Long reach, short drop bars
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 888
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Long reach, short drop bars
Maybe this should go in the road bike forum, but I consider it a parts issue. Is there any such thing as a modern long reach + short/any drop handlebar? Looking for something around 120mm+ in reach. Preferably with a round profile. The current trend seems to be a shorter reach and drop. Honestly I'd prefer a Nitto rb-021 or rb-018 with a bar end shifter/brake combo, but that doesn't exist either. Is the best option traditional 26mm bars with a shim or is there something else out there?
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 888
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Those look nice. The reported 395gm weight is fairly heavy for any bar, maybe more than some steel bars. Will have to compare those in size and weight to some of the ancient ones in my parts bin. I am curious about the reasoning behind the compact bar trend. A reach of 115mm isn't exactly radical. Modern 31mm bars seem to all be in the 70-90mm range, which is less than the width of my palms. Is this because of UCI regulations (no more than 5cm beyond axle), weight savings or something else?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,407
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FWIW,
I'm working with a fitter right now who 'prescribed' the shortest and shallowest bars on the market for me...based solely on my measurements etc. while in each of the three main positions. I mention this because the current "trend" might well be the industry taking a closer look at proper bike fit across the board and adapting options to fill a need. Not everyone may belong on a short and shallow bar, but it's good to have the bases covered for those who require it in order to fully utilize and properly fit their bikes.
Another thing to consider. If you design shallow bars without shortening them also, you might end up with clearance problems between the top curve (between the tops and hoods) and your wrists when riding out of the saddle in the drops. There are lots of shapes out there though, and maybe going for a cyclocross handlebar with a little bit of flare to address that problem ( https://salsacycles.com/components/cowbell_3 ). Salsa has lots of other shapes of bars as well, and you may find what you're looking for on their site.
-Jeremy
I'm working with a fitter right now who 'prescribed' the shortest and shallowest bars on the market for me...based solely on my measurements etc. while in each of the three main positions. I mention this because the current "trend" might well be the industry taking a closer look at proper bike fit across the board and adapting options to fill a need. Not everyone may belong on a short and shallow bar, but it's good to have the bases covered for those who require it in order to fully utilize and properly fit their bikes.
Another thing to consider. If you design shallow bars without shortening them also, you might end up with clearance problems between the top curve (between the tops and hoods) and your wrists when riding out of the saddle in the drops. There are lots of shapes out there though, and maybe going for a cyclocross handlebar with a little bit of flare to address that problem ( https://salsacycles.com/components/cowbell_3 ). Salsa has lots of other shapes of bars as well, and you may find what you're looking for on their site.
-Jeremy
#7
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I am curious about the reasoning behind the compact bar trend. A reach of 115mm isn't exactly radical. Modern 31mm bars seem to all be in the 70-90mm range, which is less than the width of my palms. Is this because of UCI regulations (no more than 5cm beyond axle), weight savings or something else?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 546
Bikes: 2009 Surly Cross Check Frankenbike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
On modern bikes with STI you ride on the hoods more, the ramp of the bars is not so important. In the old days you didn't ride on the hoods. Plus with the modern racing position the bars are low to begin with so a deep drop is unnecessary. If you look at old bars from the 60s, 70s or 80s the drop is huge on a lot of them.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 888
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On modern bikes with STI you ride on the hoods more, the ramp of the bars is not so important. In the old days you didn't ride on the hoods. Plus with the modern racing position the bars are low to begin with so a deep drop is unnecessary. If you look at old bars from the 60s, 70s or 80s the drop is huge on a lot of them.
I've never used the drops much on modern bars because, as tunnelrat81 mentioned above, my wrists hit the bends. And with the compact styles, the drops are often too short to get a decent grip. I ride a lot of the old bars from the 60-80s and understand the issue with the hoods and getting a flat transition. But it seems to me that at the minimum manufacturers could offer slightly longer reaches in the larger sizes. Just a few centimeters would make a huge difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
therhodeo
Road Cycling
32
08-20-15 06:52 PM
Bethany
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
4
04-12-13 01:12 PM
Wiggles_dad
Classic & Vintage
4
02-06-11 08:24 PM