Measuring Force Applied to Bicycle
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Measuring Force Applied to Bicycle
Hi all,
I am currently researching into different ways to measure the calories burned by a cyclist during a ride. Looking at the ride specifically (i.e. not taking into account factors such as age, lean body mass etc.), I have considered calories as energy and consequently the energy expended by the rider would be based on the force the rider applies during the ride multiplyed by the speed at which they are cycling at. In regards to different ways of measuring the force expended by the rider, one way that I have found would be to use a strain gauge on either side of the pedal. Does anyone have any suggestions as to where on the bicycle the best place would be to measure the force applied by the rider, and also other ways of determining the force applied by the rider? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.
I am currently researching into different ways to measure the calories burned by a cyclist during a ride. Looking at the ride specifically (i.e. not taking into account factors such as age, lean body mass etc.), I have considered calories as energy and consequently the energy expended by the rider would be based on the force the rider applies during the ride multiplyed by the speed at which they are cycling at. In regards to different ways of measuring the force expended by the rider, one way that I have found would be to use a strain gauge on either side of the pedal. Does anyone have any suggestions as to where on the bicycle the best place would be to measure the force applied by the rider, and also other ways of determining the force applied by the rider? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.
#2
Listen to me
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Texas
Posts: 2,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
F=ma.
Weigh the bike and rider.
Measure distance and acceleration with a cycle computer.
Calculate force.
Simple
Weigh the bike and rider.
Measure distance and acceleration with a cycle computer.
Calculate force.
Simple
#3
Chronic Tai Shan
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118
Bikes: Pake Single Speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by powers2b
F=ma.
Weigh the bike and rider.
Measure distance and acceleration with a cycle computer.
Calculate force.
Simple
Weigh the bike and rider.
Measure distance and acceleration with a cycle computer.
Calculate force.
Simple
Maybe 3-D accelerometers on the pedals or shoes. That would give you the actual acceleration of the pedal itself, then the mass of the rider, assuming all his/her weight is on one pedal at a time (completely out of the saddle and really pumping) would give the Force applied.
The maximum force should be applied during the downward motion, moving CCW from 9:00 to 6:00. I would use your vertical acceleration at 9:00 as a in F=ma.
Last edited by ofofhy; 01-26-05 at 02:35 PM.
#4
Chronic Tai Shan
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118
Bikes: Pake Single Speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by powers2b
Yes, it does.
It takes into acount all friction losses including wind resistance.
Not all engineering problems require engineering tools.
It takes into acount all friction losses including wind resistance.
Not all engineering problems require engineering tools.
#5
Listen to me
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Texas
Posts: 2,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The forces of friction and wind resistance can be calculated when the rider stops pedaling. By measuring the deceleration you get the force (mass is constant).
Not all engineering problems require engineering tools.
Not all engineering problems require engineering tools.
#6
Chronic Tai Shan
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118
Bikes: Pake Single Speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The cycle computer: engineering tool? Or is it a bikng tool?
The school probably has a few accelerometers around (assuming that this question is related to a university class - students seem to come here with those at the beginning of semesters) versus buying a cyclocomputer.
Drivetrain friction is not accounted for by measuring decelleration after pedalling stops.
The school probably has a few accelerometers around (assuming that this question is related to a university class - students seem to come here with those at the beginning of semesters) versus buying a cyclocomputer.
Drivetrain friction is not accounted for by measuring decelleration after pedalling stops.
Last edited by ofofhy; 01-26-05 at 03:05 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,521
Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
This has already been done. It is a special rear hub with a strain guage between the cassette and the hub that measures the torque being applied to the rear wheel. The power is torque multiplied by rotational speed. There was a thread on this or the road forum recently titled "What is this" (the rear hub on a used bike he had bought).
#8
Listen to me
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Texas
Posts: 2,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ofofhy
Drivetrain friction is not accounted for by measuring decelleration after pedalling stops.
#9
Chronic Tai Shan
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118
Bikes: Pake Single Speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by powers2b
Assumed negligable.
https://www.sdearthtimes.com/et1199/et1199s13.html
Last edited by ofofhy; 01-26-05 at 03:25 PM.
#10
Retrogrouch in Training
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
Posts: 5,484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There's also a system that measures based on deformation in the cranks.
You should check out the book Bicycling Science as it goes into the question of human power generation and output in considerable depth, including the various many ways this is measured.
You should check out the book Bicycling Science as it goes into the question of human power generation and output in considerable depth, including the various many ways this is measured.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You would need a force gage like the rear hub idea or strain gages on the pedals. Even with this, all you would get is the energy needed to propel the bike and rider. It doesn't factor in the inefficiency of the human engine to give total calories expended. Lots of energy goes into biomechanic inefficiencies, keeping cool or warm ........... that would not be accounted for.
#12
Get the stick.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,543
Bikes: 12 Y.O. Litespeed MTB, IRO Jamie Roy fixie, Custom Habanero Ti 'Cross, No name SS MTB, Old school lugged steel track bike (soon)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You guys are talking about mechanical work done, not nessasarily the energy consumed. Naturally this is relevant, but it doesn't tell the whole story. For example, push as hard as you can against a rigid wall. You will quickly tire. From the vantage point of your muscles, you are doing aerobic and anerobic work, but external to your body, no work is done. This is becuase in this instance, the efficiency is zero. Difficult to estimate the actual caloric expenditure of cycling, unless you can estimate, or better still, measure efficiency. Just something to consider. I will be interested to see what you decide to do.
#13
Senior Member
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darkmother
You guys are talking about mechanical work done, not nessasarily the energy consumed. Naturally this is relevant, but it doesn't tell the whole story. For example, push as hard as you can against a rigid wall. You will quickly tire. From the vantage point of your muscles, you are doing aerobic and anerobic work, but external to your body, no work is done. This is becuase in this instance, the efficiency is zero. Difficult to estimate the actual caloric expenditure of cycling, unless you can estimate, or better still, measure efficiency. Just something to consider. I will be interested to see what you decide to do.
#15
Retrogrouch in Training
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
Posts: 5,484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by darkmother
You guys are talking about mechanical work done, not nessasarily the energy consumed. Naturally this is relevant, but it doesn't tell the whole story. For example, push as hard as you can against a rigid wall. You will quickly tire. From the vantage point of your muscles, you are doing aerobic and anerobic work, but external to your body, no work is done. This is becuase in this instance, the efficiency is zero. Difficult to estimate the actual caloric expenditure of cycling, unless you can estimate, or better still, measure efficiency. Just something to consider. I will be interested to see what you decide to do.
#16
Aluminium Crusader :-)
Originally Posted by ivan_yulaev
https://www.analyticcycling.com/ForcesPower_Page.html
There's also this one, but I don't think it's as elaborate