Aluminum 1" fork
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aluminum 1" fork
https://www.ebay.com/itm/380536488419...84.m1438.l2649
Above link got me researching al forks. Then the Rinard data appears to show this flavor of fork as being pretty flexible.. flex measured in mm's.
Brand, Model Lateral Longitudinal Total Weight
Schwinn Paramount (1) 3.81 3.30 7.11 n/a
Merckx sloping crown 3.81 3.30 7.11 777
Colnago, straight blades 3.81 3.56 7.36 730
Kestrel EMS Composite (2) 5.33 3.56 8.89 526
Tange Silhouette, CrMo 5.33 3.81 9.14 590
Kinesis Easton aluminum 5.59 4.06 9.65 507
Dimension Carbon (3) 5.33 4.32 9.65 482
Time Carbon (2) 4.83 4.32 9.14 525
Look Carbon (4) 6.60 4.32 10.92 447
Fuji Titanium 4.75 4.37 9.12 n/a
SR Prism (2) 5.08 4.57 9.65 546
Trek OCLV 5.08 4.83 9.91 508
'Carbon love' as I term it.. blows off the bottom line. Carbon when it fails.. fails instantly... your toast. Easiest choice for my application is the Nashbar 220mm steer 1" threaded. Can't find anyone dissing it for breakage.. they could have a good lawyer.. who knows. Great value IMO.. but riding carbon would haunt me. Understand well.. I am not flaming anyone's choice of carbon.. just for me it's a non starter.
So.. the request of real world input from anyone riding this flavor of aluminum fork.. in the low 500 gram area for wt. Again 1" threaded. Problem appears to be finding one to buy and try.
I would be.. very interested in something steel.. at the 600 gr area. Some references around appear to say some of the older model bikes had decent wt steel forks. [?].
Above link got me researching al forks. Then the Rinard data appears to show this flavor of fork as being pretty flexible.. flex measured in mm's.
Brand, Model Lateral Longitudinal Total Weight
Schwinn Paramount (1) 3.81 3.30 7.11 n/a
Merckx sloping crown 3.81 3.30 7.11 777
Colnago, straight blades 3.81 3.56 7.36 730
Kestrel EMS Composite (2) 5.33 3.56 8.89 526
Tange Silhouette, CrMo 5.33 3.81 9.14 590
Kinesis Easton aluminum 5.59 4.06 9.65 507
Dimension Carbon (3) 5.33 4.32 9.65 482
Time Carbon (2) 4.83 4.32 9.14 525
Look Carbon (4) 6.60 4.32 10.92 447
Fuji Titanium 4.75 4.37 9.12 n/a
SR Prism (2) 5.08 4.57 9.65 546
Trek OCLV 5.08 4.83 9.91 508
'Carbon love' as I term it.. blows off the bottom line. Carbon when it fails.. fails instantly... your toast. Easiest choice for my application is the Nashbar 220mm steer 1" threaded. Can't find anyone dissing it for breakage.. they could have a good lawyer.. who knows. Great value IMO.. but riding carbon would haunt me. Understand well.. I am not flaming anyone's choice of carbon.. just for me it's a non starter.
So.. the request of real world input from anyone riding this flavor of aluminum fork.. in the low 500 gram area for wt. Again 1" threaded. Problem appears to be finding one to buy and try.
I would be.. very interested in something steel.. at the 600 gr area. Some references around appear to say some of the older model bikes had decent wt steel forks. [?].
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
In 1996 I built up a Litespeed Catalyst using an SR aluminum blade and crown, steel steerer threaded fork and rode it for 30,000 miles. I presume it was pretty much identical to the Kinesis in your chart. It worked well enough and the flex wasn't an issue I could see. However, I got a bit concerned about it's integrity after all those miles. Aluminum has no "fatigue threshold" and it WILL fail after enough time and stress cycles no matter how low the stress. And, when aluminum does fail, it's pretty sudden so it "haunted" me too.
I replaced it with a Kestrel EMS Pro steel steerer threaded carbon fork that was more than equally satisfactory, and carbon has no finite fatique limit. It may fail suddenly but that's not a certainty the way it is with aluminum. The EMS is still in service 45,000 miles later showing no signs of any problems.
i have two newer bikes with 1-1/8" all-carbon Easton EC SLX90 forks and they seem to be a long term investment. They have 22,000 and 25,000 miles on them and i'm not worried about them at all.
I replaced it with a Kestrel EMS Pro steel steerer threaded carbon fork that was more than equally satisfactory, and carbon has no finite fatique limit. It may fail suddenly but that's not a certainty the way it is with aluminum. The EMS is still in service 45,000 miles later showing no signs of any problems.
i have two newer bikes with 1-1/8" all-carbon Easton EC SLX90 forks and they seem to be a long term investment. They have 22,000 and 25,000 miles on them and i'm not worried about them at all.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank You HillRider for the in-depth response.
Went and read up on aluminum fatigue. In the end.. appears to me al when it fails that takes literally billions of cycles.. and gives advance warning of the breakage... ie, cracks and resulting bend of the weak area. [?] At least that is what I came away with sifting the data. Correct me if I am wrong.
Carbon breaks like an icicle... from what I can find.
Comparing apples to apples comes to mind. Who's flavor of al alloy.. who's carbon weaves and to what specs for either. QC largely isn't in this day and age. Coat of nice paint.. some internet blah.. and out the door. Let the lawyers deal with the mess later if need be.
Went and read up on aluminum fatigue. In the end.. appears to me al when it fails that takes literally billions of cycles.. and gives advance warning of the breakage... ie, cracks and resulting bend of the weak area. [?] At least that is what I came away with sifting the data. Correct me if I am wrong.
Carbon breaks like an icicle... from what I can find.
Comparing apples to apples comes to mind. Who's flavor of al alloy.. who's carbon weaves and to what specs for either. QC largely isn't in this day and age. Coat of nice paint.. some internet blah.. and out the door. Let the lawyers deal with the mess later if need be.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,370
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times
in
1,677 Posts
Trek's catalogs somewhere around 1990 or so included a graph showing numbers of stress cycles to failure from testing their steel, aluminum, and carbon frames. Good, better, best, respectively. The German bike magazine Tour has repeatedly subjected frames from various manufacturers to stress cycle testing and got essentially the same results.
Kinesis aluminum fork on my mid-'90s Schwinn Peloton (bought new, ridden for tens of thousands of miles), other aluminum forks on a Specialized Langster and a Felt TK2, carbon fork on a 2005 Motobecane Le Champion, steel forks on lots of high-end steel racing bikes since I started racing in 1965. They all feel the same to me. I don't worry about longevity with any of them.
Kinesis aluminum fork on my mid-'90s Schwinn Peloton (bought new, ridden for tens of thousands of miles), other aluminum forks on a Specialized Langster and a Felt TK2, carbon fork on a 2005 Motobecane Le Champion, steel forks on lots of high-end steel racing bikes since I started racing in 1965. They all feel the same to me. I don't worry about longevity with any of them.
#5
Banned
Had 2 AlAn 'supers', in the 80's 1 road, 1 cross... cross fork was excessively set in motion,
by putting the brakes on.. ( like an inch, at the tips ) ..
aluminum steerer, crown, blades and tips..,
only the bosses that were on the blades for the cantilever brakes, were steel ..
Road fork, with brake bolted thru the fork crown was better, mounting for the brake
tothe crown, and the cable directly effecting the brake,
rather than pulling from the top, to the brake on the flexible fork blades..
by putting the brakes on.. ( like an inch, at the tips ) ..
aluminum steerer, crown, blades and tips..,
only the bosses that were on the blades for the cantilever brakes, were steel ..
Road fork, with brake bolted thru the fork crown was better, mounting for the brake
tothe crown, and the cable directly effecting the brake,
rather than pulling from the top, to the brake on the flexible fork blades..
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-01-13 at 11:45 AM.
#6
Senior Member
SG, Regardless of material most forks are going to outlive the cyclist barring an abnormal event. I've had all three listed materials on essentially the same frame (Cannondale road) and feedback was similar, as was comfort.
Brad
Brad
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
That's been my experience too. I've had aluminum, steel and carbon forks on similar road bikes and they are pretty much interchangable to me. You want a better ride, fit bigger, lower pressure tires.
As to Trek's and Tour's fatigue rating, I presume the aluminum frames they tested are quite "overbuilt" if they outlasted a steel frame.
As to Trek's and Tour's fatigue rating, I presume the aluminum frames they tested are quite "overbuilt" if they outlasted a steel frame.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have done essentially that HillRider.. larger tires. Same frame in MTB form with lower pressure 1.5" tires.. was faster than I anticipated also... the al fork not seeming to give as hard a feedback on the 'tar cracks' as my steel frame & forked winter bike.
Last edited by SortaGrey; 01-01-13 at 12:39 PM.
#9
Banned
Rigidity is how Aluminum frames survive, flexing can result in cracks.
AlAn's were famous for cracked lugs.. Italy was too far away for repairs.
AlAn's were famous for cracked lugs.. Italy was too far away for repairs.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Constant tinkerer
Regarding your light steel fork question, my Eddy Merckx has a 1" threaded fork out of Reynolds 653. It weighs 650g. Just one data point but maybe useful.
Strangely the lightest fork was on an old Cannondale R900. Aluminum fork with an oversized 1 1/4" steerer tube. 460g. I'm sure there are carbon forks that are lighter, but I've never owned one yet.
+1
If you're really that worried (and you shouldn't be) your options are steel and Ti. I've had bikes with steel, aluminum, and carbon forks. They all rode similarly. Tire width and pressure has a much bigger effect on comfort than frame material. So I wouldn't worry about that either.
Buy whichever material you want. Personally I would buy based on weight and price. Can I suggest threadless though? It really is a better, stiffer system.
Strangely the lightest fork was on an old Cannondale R900. Aluminum fork with an oversized 1 1/4" steerer tube. 460g. I'm sure there are carbon forks that are lighter, but I've never owned one yet.
If you're really that worried (and you shouldn't be) your options are steel and Ti. I've had bikes with steel, aluminum, and carbon forks. They all rode similarly. Tire width and pressure has a much bigger effect on comfort than frame material. So I wouldn't worry about that either.
Buy whichever material you want. Personally I would buy based on weight and price. Can I suggest threadless though? It really is a better, stiffer system.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,471
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 960 Post(s)
Liked 1,626 Times
in
1,044 Posts
I am an older rider now and more concerned with safety for that unpredictable time that I put excessive stress on a fork (running off the road) - So I am staying with steel - But all have to admit - That really is a nice looking fork...
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lacks the vertical adjustability I want to trial.. more stiffness seems to me also is anti-ride quality. [?]. And I have the components to burn now in 1".
That is indeed a lite fork at 470's range too. Thanks for that steel reference too.
I wonder if anyone knows what the al fork on the 90/early 90's Cannondale weighed? Mine came with the steel one.. around 740 grs in 63cm frame. Higher cost models came with al the catalogs stated.
Last edited by SortaGrey; 01-01-13 at 01:02 PM.
#14
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,814
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12757 Post(s)
Liked 7,672 Times
in
4,070 Posts
Threadless has vertical adjustability (long as you don't mind the big knob when it's low).
Invest in a couple of cheap threadless stems of varying rises and you can even have adjustability without the knob when it's low.
Invest in a couple of cheap threadless stems of varying rises and you can even have adjustability without the knob when it's low.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rather than another edit: per 'worry' about forks going south. Not really the issue.. worry.
Granted very few of any flavor is going to fail. Yet.. I remember well the 'hole I had to take on last spring as "she/it" came flying over the rise in the road.. more into my lane than "hers/it's". I mean it hit hard... I actually stopped and looked things over.. also thinking "she/it" might have see me stop and come back.. to get some edification of driving........
Spokes break due to previous events.. mostly.. memories if you will. All of the bike is essentially that same.. but going head first into the rd from the icicle break is what I'm trying to avoid.
Granted very few of any flavor is going to fail. Yet.. I remember well the 'hole I had to take on last spring as "she/it" came flying over the rise in the road.. more into my lane than "hers/it's". I mean it hit hard... I actually stopped and looked things over.. also thinking "she/it" might have see me stop and come back.. to get some edification of driving........
Spokes break due to previous events.. mostly.. memories if you will. All of the bike is essentially that same.. but going head first into the rd from the icicle break is what I'm trying to avoid.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I found a reference searching this morning.. the link: https://www.vintage-trek.com/images/t...mFacts1987.pdf
Strangely the lightest fork was on an old Cannondale R900. Aluminum fork with an oversized 1 1/4" steerer tube. 460g. I'm sure there are carbon forks that are lighter, but I've never owned one yet.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
'Reference' only in the sense of it being data about that subject. Almost all "reference" shades bias.. as I'm certain that trek brochure does.
HRider.. if I may ask... what weight range are you?
I'm 238 ish btw. But I am on 24H rims.. albeit 26".. that rear triplet lacing.
HRider.. if I may ask... what weight range are you?
I'm 238 ish btw. But I am on 24H rims.. albeit 26".. that rear triplet lacing.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
'Reference' only in the sense of it being data about that subject. Almost all "reference" shades bias.. as I'm certain that trek brochure does.
HRider.. if I may ask... what weight range are you?
I'm 238 ish btw. But I am on 24H rims.. albeit 26".. that rear triplet lacing.
HRider.. if I may ask... what weight range are you?
I'm 238 ish btw. But I am on 24H rims.. albeit 26".. that rear triplet lacing.
#19
Senior Member
https://www.ebay.com/itm/380536488419...84.m1438.l2649
So.. the request of real world input from anyone riding this flavor of aluminum fork.. in the low 500 gram area for wt. Again 1" threaded. Problem appears to be finding one to buy and try.
So.. the request of real world input from anyone riding this flavor of aluminum fork.. in the low 500 gram area for wt. Again 1" threaded. Problem appears to be finding one to buy and try.
If you find these forks with long enough steerers, then you can cut the top threaded portion off, and use them in the superior threadless configuration. You'll need the top headset parts to match.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
yes, i have real world experience with this fork, albeit a 650c version. about 30-35 thousand miles and 18 years worth. absolutely no issues with it. recently had the top half painted and the bottom half polished to match the chrome job on the rear triangle of the frame.
i didn't realize that they were so light!
i didn't realize that they were so light!
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Got to thinking.. (dangerous I know).. but why not? Granted eliminating anything showing abuse.. etc. But another way of looking.. anything little used at least passed the initial go around. Interested to hear reasons for not... yes a fork is pretty critical to safety I well understand. Yet an al forks isn't going to icicle [?].
I hear the reassurances per carbon forks from your experienced responses. Admit to wanting to try one... granted many other things/variables can put one nose down likely more often than a fork. Would have to be the Nashbar.. not thinking this build will stay around for yrs. But who knows.. riding it might chg that.
I hear the reassurances per carbon forks from your experienced responses. Admit to wanting to try one... granted many other things/variables can put one nose down likely more often than a fork. Would have to be the Nashbar.. not thinking this build will stay around for yrs. But who knows.. riding it might chg that.
Last edited by SortaGrey; 01-04-13 at 01:15 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Got to thinking.. (dangerous I know).. but why not? Granted eliminating anything showing abuse.. etc. But another way of looking.. anything little used at least passed the initial go around. Interested to hear reasons for not... yes a fork is pretty critical to safety I well understand. Yet an al forks isn't going to icicle [?].
Brad
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bioluminescence
Road Cycling
25
05-25-11 11:17 AM