Slicks On A MTB
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Slicks On A MTB
I'm thinking of buying slicks for my MTB, but I cannot seem to find the price anywhere. Can anyone give me an estimate of the price per each wheel? My MTB is a 29er.
Thanks!
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
Where have you looked? Any bikeshop or on-line dealer has them but maybe not listed as 29" tires. Are you aware that "29" " MTB wheels are identical in size to 700c road wheels and take the same tires? Since 29" rims tend to be wider than road rims, you will probably do better to use moderately wide road tires, say 700-28 and above.
#4
Really Old Senior Member
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times
in
1,407 Posts
The 29" mtb size is just a different name for 700c tires. Since only the mtb community calls them 29", you might be more likely to find what you're looking for as a wide 700c road tire, such as a 700x42c or the like.
BTW- as someone riding slicks for commuting, I remind you that their performance in mud, or loose sand is worse than terrible. They're also pretty bad in gravel or lightly sand covered roads. So if you're using these tires of road or mixed on/off road use, consider tires with either a center ridge, or a smooth center, with tread to either side. Either of these will give you good performance on pavement, with the tread providing traction and bite on soft surfaces. That's what I use on the commuter in the winter, when it's mostly pavement, but I might run in to some snow.
BTW- as someone riding slicks for commuting, I remind you that their performance in mud, or loose sand is worse than terrible. They're also pretty bad in gravel or lightly sand covered roads. So if you're using these tires of road or mixed on/off road use, consider tires with either a center ridge, or a smooth center, with tread to either side. Either of these will give you good performance on pavement, with the tread providing traction and bite on soft surfaces. That's what I use on the commuter in the winter, when it's mostly pavement, but I might run in to some snow.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
"The 29" mtb size is just a different name for 700c tires."
Confusingly, "700c" tires have a rim diameter of 622mm. The tires you have will be marked "622-XX" or "XX-622" or the like. The XX, say 42, for example, is the nominal width in millimeters. You should roughly match this width with your new tires although tires of different design or manufacturer will vary slightly in actual width.
Confusingly, "700c" tires have a rim diameter of 622mm. The tires you have will be marked "622-XX" or "XX-622" or the like. The XX, say 42, for example, is the nominal width in millimeters. You should roughly match this width with your new tires although tires of different design or manufacturer will vary slightly in actual width.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
This isn't that critical as bike rims are pretty tolerant of tire width. I installed 26x1.25" (32 mm) slicks on an old MTB that came stock with 26x2.125" (54mm) knobbies and it worked fine.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
My suggestion as to roughly matching the tire width was for avoiding clearance issues rather than for rim width compatibility. Of course going narrower as opposed to wider does not have this risk.
#10
S'Cruzer
I would NOT even consider using any tire narrower than the rim's outer width, and thats quite narrow.
due to the nature of mountain bike steering geometry, when I've put very narrow/light tires on them, I've found the handling got pretty squirrely, so I prboably wouldn't go much under a 700x40 tire on a 29er mountain bike.
that said, there's lots of nice 40mm slicks and semi-slicks. look for tires that are relatively light compared with most in the same size, and that have a high thread count (this tends to go hand in hand). these tires will have a more supple sidewall, and will give a nicer ride with lower rolling resistance.
also note that the thinner the tire, the more PSI of air pressure you need for the same weight load.
due to the nature of mountain bike steering geometry, when I've put very narrow/light tires on them, I've found the handling got pretty squirrely, so I prboably wouldn't go much under a 700x40 tire on a 29er mountain bike.
that said, there's lots of nice 40mm slicks and semi-slicks. look for tires that are relatively light compared with most in the same size, and that have a high thread count (this tends to go hand in hand). these tires will have a more supple sidewall, and will give a nicer ride with lower rolling resistance.
also note that the thinner the tire, the more PSI of air pressure you need for the same weight load.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times
in
1,407 Posts
Normally, I'd be with you on this, but the OP described this as a 29r, ir sold as a mtn bike. In that case, odds favor plenty or room for a pretty fat tire.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
I would NOT even consider using any tire narrower than the rim's outer width, and thats quite narrow.
due to the nature of mountain bike steering geometry, when I've put very narrow/light tires on them, I've found the handling got pretty squirrely, so I prboably wouldn't go much under a 700x40 tire on a 29er mountain bike.
due to the nature of mountain bike steering geometry, when I've put very narrow/light tires on them, I've found the handling got pretty squirrely, so I prboably wouldn't go much under a 700x40 tire on a 29er mountain bike.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times
in
1,407 Posts
The MTB I installed the 1.25" slicks on was a rigid fork hardtail and was used as strictly a road bike after that. The handling was fine even down a local 40 mph hill. These tires were somewhat wider than the rims (25 mm ID?) and I wouldn't, for example, recommend 700-23 tires on a 29er rim and i don't know how narrow tires would affect a full suspension bike.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 03-17-13 at 08:49 PM.
#16
S'Cruzer
One thing people forget is that when you use a narrower tire you also reduce the radius. That drops the axle and reduces trail, changing the steering geometry. It's not a factor on road bikes since the range of sizes is narrow. But taking an inch off the radius of the wheel on a mtn bike that was designed around a 2" wide tire is quite a bit. Combine that with a suspension fork that's sagged a bit, and the trail can get pretty skimpy. If it gets small enough the handling can get squirrelly.
there IS another effect, the smaller diameter/circumference wheel gives you effectively lower gear ratios across the board, by a few percent.
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hi,
One option is to mix tyres, a good rolling slicker tyre on
the back and a tyre with a bit more tread on the front.
No suspension MTB - fit lower pressure wider tyres.
Suspension MTB - tyre width matters less I believe.
rgds, sreten.
One option is to mix tyres, a good rolling slicker tyre on
the back and a tyre with a bit more tread on the front.
No suspension MTB - fit lower pressure wider tyres.
Suspension MTB - tyre width matters less I believe.
rgds, sreten.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kenyan_boy
Recreational & Family
7
10-21-10 03:12 PM