Need help with seat post
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Need help with seat post
Hi all. Recently purchased a used 2008 Specialized Expedition Sport. The seat post was just a few inches too short for me, so I bought this guy to replace it. The specs on the bike page say its a 27.2 mm seat post so it was an easy choice when I was deciding what size I wanted. However, when I got the seat post today it didn't fit! Then I learned that the size of the seat post is on the seat post. Apparently its 30.9 mm. I think luck might be on my side though because its a little too small, rather than a little too big. Should I just get a new post (I don't see many options at that size and would rather not return it to Amazon) or should I just get a shim? I am not quite sure how they work. Do I need to get one that goes exactly from 27.2 to 30.9 or is it more like a range of widths? For example, if I got one that was for 27.2 to 31.6, would the shim work for any value in there? Or are is it an exact thing so that the shim can be fully inserted into the post hole?
Thanks for the help!!
Thanks for the help!!
#2
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
856 Posts
I think I have seen a two-piece shim used that can take up a variable amount of slack.
I haven't messed with them though.
Now in this case, it's obviously the new post that is 27.2, and yes there are sized shims for that common adaptation and this is preferable to a multi-fit shim which may be improper for modern or high-end frames made from better materials.
I haven't messed with them though.
Now in this case, it's obviously the new post that is 27.2, and yes there are sized shims for that common adaptation and this is preferable to a multi-fit shim which may be improper for modern or high-end frames made from better materials.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,658
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5764 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,404 Posts
Shimming is fine as long s the shim is 3" long. However 30.9 is common readily size, and in your shoes I'd go for the right post over a shim. See if you can return your post, or put it up on ebay.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#5
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
856 Posts
Yeah, come to think of it, I needed a rare-sized (25.6mm) seatpost with a zero-offset, micro-adjustable head.
I thought "Good luck finding that, it's an Austrian vintage bike size.", but a quick Googling session immediately produced a fine specimen, for only $20 (shipped) thru Amazon. Delivery was about 4 days.
A shim might cost half that much, but the correct-size post might ship out immediately with the wrong post collecting the charge-card credit later?
This silver, 2-bolt post was very light even at about 18" long! I cut 90 grams of length out of it:
I thought "Good luck finding that, it's an Austrian vintage bike size.", but a quick Googling session immediately produced a fine specimen, for only $20 (shipped) thru Amazon. Delivery was about 4 days.
A shim might cost half that much, but the correct-size post might ship out immediately with the wrong post collecting the charge-card credit later?
This silver, 2-bolt post was very light even at about 18" long! I cut 90 grams of length out of it:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
#7
Retro Grouch
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
A quick check shows a shim is about 2x the price of your seatpost. Returning an item to Amazon is a snap (especially if it's a "Prime," which pays for the return shipping), then buy a seatpost that fits.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NW UK
Posts: 418
Bikes: 1992 Marin Eldridge Grade, 2007 Kona PHD and 199? Trek 1000 (current build project)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
30.9 millimetres = 1.21653543 inches
You know, I understand the imperial/metric situation, but how on Earth did we end up with the situation where there are just so many different seat-post sizes?
Or is that just a 'metricated' version of 1.2" in this particular case?
Surely tube manufacturers like Reynolds et al, if they have been making tube-sets specifically for bicycles for years, would have benefited from using just a few standard, more rounded sizes than the plethora that exist now?
Edit: Doh. I found out, and it's pretty obvious now I think about it - it's all because the seatpost has to fit down the *inside* diameter of the seat tube, which can vary because of the different buttings etc. used over the years as tubing has evolved.
You know, I understand the imperial/metric situation, but how on Earth did we end up with the situation where there are just so many different seat-post sizes?
Or is that just a 'metricated' version of 1.2" in this particular case?
Surely tube manufacturers like Reynolds et al, if they have been making tube-sets specifically for bicycles for years, would have benefited from using just a few standard, more rounded sizes than the plethora that exist now?
Edit: Doh. I found out, and it's pretty obvious now I think about it - it's all because the seatpost has to fit down the *inside* diameter of the seat tube, which can vary because of the different buttings etc. used over the years as tubing has evolved.
Last edited by Continuity; 04-06-13 at 04:43 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NW UK
Posts: 418
Bikes: 1992 Marin Eldridge Grade, 2007 Kona PHD and 199? Trek 1000 (current build project)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts