Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Newbie Calisun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Upgrading Older Touring Bike

    I have an older Lotus 3000R touring bike, I love this bike, but the problem I have is the it only has dual crank, 170mm , 52 and 42. So I am dying when I climb hills.
    So I am thinking of upgrading to triple crank, but I found two that I am thinking of getting.
    First one is 170mm, 52 , 42 and 30
    Second one is 175mm, 53 , 40 and 30
    I am not sure which one is a better choice. I would like to get some advice on pros and cons of the cranks I have described.
    Thanks

  2. #2
    Listen to me powers2b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lexus Texas
    Posts
    2,791
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is a great gear calculator on Sheldon Brown's website.
    What you have on the rear is just as important as what's up front.
    Enjoy

  3. #3
    Senior Curmudgeon FarHorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Directly above the center of the earth
    My Bikes
    Kona Unit single-speed Frankenbike
    Posts
    3,492
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Assuming your rear derailleur will handle it, I'd just switch to larger cogwheels at the rear. It should be cheaper than replacing your crankset. You might also consider just switching out your 42 tooth front chainring to a smaller one if the spider on your current cranks will handle it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,420
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The choice between 170 and 175 depends maily on your leg length. If you are above abouy 6' tall, then 175 may better suited to your legs.
    Work out the highest gear you currently need (in gear inches). There is no need to go higher. I have used a 30/40/50 and a 28/38/48. There are a few times I have wanted lower gears but I have never needed higher. Exactly what gearing you need depends on your strength, the terrain and your load.

  5. #5
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,261
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Michael has the right idea. 48 or 50 teeth should be PLENTY for your largest chainring. You do not even have to go to a triple, since a double with a 110mm BCD can accommodate a combination such as 48-34, which should work well in your application, with your existing derailleurs and perhaps even your bottom bracket.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  6. #6
    Year-round cyclist
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Montréal (Québec)
    Posts
    3,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the 110/74 mm pattern, you could get a Sugino crankset. There is a basic modelthat comes for $70-80 (CDN) and that already has 46-36-26 rings. For the same price or a few dollars more you could ask the shop to replace the 26 with a 24.
    Michel Gagnon
    Montréal (Québec, Canada)

  7. #7
    Tiocfáidh ár Lá jfmckenna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    The edge of b#
    My Bikes
    A whole bunch-a bikes.
    Posts
    5,414
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    if your going to do loaded touring imo you need the triple. If not I would not worry about it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •