spreading a frame from 130 mm to 135 or not?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
spreading a frame from 130 mm to 135 or not?
I have an older mtb (a 1988 specialized stumpjumper comp) that is set at 130. I am in the process of converting it to drops and I plan on using a 135 mm rear wheel. I had planned on spreading the rear drop outs to 135 but the wheel goes in fairly readily if I push apart the drop outs. I'm thinking of just calling it a day and not cold setting the rear triangle.
My question is am I missing something here? Is there a reason to do it other than facilitating wheel changes which is not a big deal for this bike.
Thanks in advance for the responses!
My question is am I missing something here? Is there a reason to do it other than facilitating wheel changes which is not a big deal for this bike.
Thanks in advance for the responses!
#2
Collector of Useless Info
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Spread it, then align the dropouts. If you're only going to use 135 OLD wheels, then it puts less stress on the axle to have parallel dropouts at the OLD of the wheel.
But 5 mm isn't that much, so I don't think you're going to die in a fiery crash due to axle breakage.
But 5 mm isn't that much, so I don't think you're going to die in a fiery crash due to axle breakage.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
#4
Really Old Senior Member
I've spaced my 86 Rockhopper rear wheel at 132-133.
I can stuff it in without undue effort.
Since I built the wheel myself, I spaced the hub first and then dished to suit.
I can stuff it in without undue effort.
Since I built the wheel myself, I spaced the hub first and then dished to suit.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times
in
741 Posts
You won't hurt the frame with the force fit and the angular error of the dropouts is very small. The only downside is a slightly tight fit when you have a road-side flat to fix.
Alternatively, since it's already 130 mm and you are converting it to a "road bike", you could reduce the hub spacing to 130 mm, shorten the axle by 5 mm and redish the rim. More work for sure but it leaves the frame untouched.
Alternatively, since it's already 130 mm and you are converting it to a "road bike", you could reduce the hub spacing to 130 mm, shorten the axle by 5 mm and redish the rim. More work for sure but it leaves the frame untouched.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,433
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
You won't hurt the frame with the force fit and the angular error of the dropouts is very small. The only downside is a slightly tight fit when you have a road-side flat to fix.
Alternatively, since it's already 130 mm and you are converting it to a "road bike", you could reduce the hub spacing to 130 mm, shorten the axle by 5 mm and redish the rim. More work for sure but it leaves the frame untouched.
Alternatively, since it's already 130 mm and you are converting it to a "road bike", you could reduce the hub spacing to 130 mm, shorten the axle by 5 mm and redish the rim. More work for sure but it leaves the frame untouched.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immunizer
Bicycle Mechanics
8
08-16-11 07:14 AM