Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-14, 04:26 PM   #1
digger531
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Bikes: Soma Double Cross DC, Salsa Vaya, Redline D440, '87 Schwinn Super Sport
Posts: 592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Drive side spokes

Why not use thicker spokes on the drive side?

If I am ordering two different length spokes for the back already and building the wheel myself. Is there a downside to this? I have heard people say its unnecessary and i would have to agree that it is most likely overkill but considering there would be no extra expense, should make the build easier, and result in a stronger wheel....

Why not?
digger531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 04:36 PM   #2
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 19,767
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 477 Post(s)
what did you have in mind ?
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 04:42 PM   #3
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 29,690
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger531 View Post
Why not use thicker spokes on the drive side?
No reason. I and many experienced wheel builders do exactly that as a way to compensate for the difference in tension.

(though I like to look at the bright side and think of in terms of using lighter spokes on the NDS)
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 04:54 PM   #4
digger531
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Bikes: Soma Double Cross DC, Salsa Vaya, Redline D440, '87 Schwinn Super Sport
Posts: 592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2.0x1.5 NDS and 2.0x1.8 DS or 2.0x1.8 NDS and 2.0 DS??????
digger531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 04:57 PM   #5
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 29,690
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger531 View Post
2.0x1.5 NDS and 2.0x1.8 DS or 2.0x1.8 NDS and 2.0 DS??????
Either is reasonable, but if you're going to make these types of decisions, you should have the basis set in your head first.

I prefer to use DB spokes all the way around, so I'd lean to the first option, but my actual choice always depends on the specifics of the wheel, ie. rim, rider weight, putpose, etc.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 05:33 PM   #6
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Posts: 20,277
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
My belief is that thinnner spokes have value for balancing tensile stress, but not thicker spokes. Here is the simplified answer: If you start with heavy gauge spokes for some reason, you will get better wheel durability by going thinner on the NDS. But if you are already using light gauge spokes all around, there is no advantage except a little stiffness gain to using thicker spokes on the DS. Different gauge spokes on the two sides does not balance spoke tension. It balances the tensile stress which is different. Lighter gauge = higher tensile stress. Higher stress is better because it leades to more spoke stretch. That is better because it protects the spokes from going slack when the rim is compressed. So lighter spokes are always better. That is what I mean when I say it makes sense to go lighter on the NDS if you insist on heavier everywhere else. But it doesn't make sense to go heavier on the DS for any reason except a little stiffness.
__________________
Robert

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAJ View Post
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 05:49 PM   #7
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 29,690
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker View Post
My belief is that thinnner spokes have value for balancing tensile stress, but not thicker spokes. Here is the simplified answer: If you start with heavy gauge spokes for some reason, you will get better wheel durability by going thinner on the NDS. But if you are already using light gauge spokes all around, there is no advantage except a little stiffness gain to using thicker spokes on the DS. ....
This is a case of raising the bridge or lowering the water. It's simply a question of outlook. Since the wheel has no way of knowing where you started, either action is functionally identical.

I agree with the res (unquoted) of the post. Using lighter spokes increases the elongation at the same tension, increasing the working distance in the spokes elastic range as the rim flexes inward.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 06:57 PM   #8
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger531 View Post
2.0x1.5 NDS and 2.0x1.8 DS or 2.0x1.8 NDS and 2.0 DS??????
What rim, what hub, how many spokes, what do you weigh, what size tire, what type of road conditions.....
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 07:10 PM   #9
Soil_Sampler
A little North of Hell
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 4,807
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
mixed spokes

http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...2#post16468332
Soil_Sampler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 07:34 PM   #10
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Posts: 20,277
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
This is a case of raising the bridge or lowering the water. It's simply a question of outlook. Since the wheel has no way of knowing where you started, either action is functionally identical.

I agree with the res (unquoted) of the post. Using lighter spokes increases the elongation at the same tension, increasing the working distance in the spokes elastic range as the rim flexes inward.
Yes the actions are functionally identical. It's the thought process that is different. If you have some reason to insist on heavy DS spokes, then I would encourage you to make a better wheel by lightening up AT LEAST the NDS spokes. But if the wheel is already planned to be light spokes all around, I wouldn't bother to make the DS spokes heavier. It serves no purpose IMO. Hard to explain, but it boils down to this: I recommend Revolution, Laser or CX-Ray spokes exclusively. You can't build a more durable wheel. You want a little stiffer wheel, use a few more spokes. But I wouldn't use heavier spokes.
__________________
Robert

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAJ View Post
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 08:11 PM   #11
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker View Post
Yes the actions are functionally identical. It's the thought process that is different. If you have some reason to insist on heavy DS spokes, then I would encourage you to make a better wheel by lightening up AT LEAST the NDS spokes. But if the wheel is already planned to be light spokes all around, I wouldn't bother to make the DS spokes heavier. It serves no purpose IMO. Hard to explain, but it boils down to this: I recommend Revolution, Laser or CX-Ray spokes exclusively. You can't build a more durable wheel. You want a little stiffer wheel, use a few more spokes. But I wouldn't use heavier spokes.
You just "think" the thought process is different.
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 08:29 PM   #12
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Posts: 20,277
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
You just "think" the thought process is different.
I tawt I taw a putty tat.
__________________
Robert

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAJ View Post
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-14, 09:08 PM   #13
davidad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,863
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
I built up a rear for my Heron with 15 gauge double butted spokes and it does fine. There is very little difference in the ultimate tensile strength of the two sizes. What makes for a strong wheel is the right number of spokes for the weight of the vehicle and proper tension.
davidad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-14, 07:57 AM   #14
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Posts: 20,277
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Here is what I just posted on the other current spoke choice thread. IMO it is what choosing spoke gauge is all about:

The correct choice of spokes is very simple. Spokes do not routinely break in the center, only at the J bend and near the threads. There is plenty of tensile strength in even 1.5 mm spoke sections to accommodate very heavy riders. Even the lightest SS spokes available these days have the same gauge J bends and thread areas as the heaviest, so have the same inherent resistance to breakage at those points. There is no strength-based rationale for using any spoke heavier than 2.0/1.5/2.0. Because the lighter spoke stretches more at any tension than a heavier spoke, it has more "return travel" before going slack when the rim is rhythmically compressed at every point on every revolution routinely and compressed by accidental stresses like hitting a pothole occasionally. That helps to keep the spoke from fatiguing and failing at the previously mentioned spots, the J bend and just below the threads. For the vast majority of riders the most durable and most comfortable wheels they can possibly ride will be built only with such spokes like Revoutions, Lasers, and CX-Rays.

The one reason to use heavier spokes than that is to obtain greater stiffness, which according to Rob at Psimet is not best accomplished in that way. The lighter spokes do result in some loss in wheel stiffness. Some of this lost stiffness can be regained by using more spokes rather than fewer, but probably not the entire amount. If stiffness is an issue for you that can't be resolved by more spokes and a stiffer rim, then perhaps a heavier spoke is proper for you. And in that case using the heavier spoke first only on the DS and maybe the front would be the smart plan. It is imperative to preserve the high level of stretch in the less tensioned, NDS spokes. Using heavier spokes on the NDS should be avoided if at all possible.

To give you some idea of the quantities of stretch we are talking about, a 2.0 mm diameter spoke stretches ~1.0 mm at 120 kgF, the common DS tension or 0.5 mm at 60 kgF a common NDS tension. That NDS stretch is not sufficient to protect the spoke from going slack periodically when the wheel is in use. The greatest popularity of 2.0 mm spokes was back in the day when wheels were not so heavily dished and DS and NDS tensions were commonly much closer. So the NDS stretch was closer to the 1.0 mm on the DS. That is not the case now. Revolution spokes however stretch about twice as much, so even at 60 kgF on the NDS they are stretched about 1.0 mm, plenty to protect against most instances of rim compression which could cause slackening of the spokes.

This is it in a nutshell: lightest spokes = best wheels unless desired stiffness cannot be achieved by spoke count and rim properties. If the DS and front wheel stretch is too high and the nipples bottom out before full tension is achieved, just go to a slightly shorter spoke. Don't change to a heavier spoke to moderate the stretching.
__________________
Robert

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAJ View Post
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-14, 08:02 AM   #15
Amesja
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3
Posts: 3,496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
You just "think" the thought process is different.
Yes, that post made Spock cry.
Amesja is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.