Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Ultegra Front Deraileur Chainring Size Compatability

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Ultegra Front Deraileur Chainring Size Compatability

Old 05-21-14, 11:00 PM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Ultegra Front Deraileur Chainring Size Compatability

I recently swapped my 52/42/30 Campy chainrings for to TA 46/40/30 chainrings to test out a crossover gearing setup. My front Deraileur is an Ultegra triple. I can't seem to shift into the largest chainring because the front Deraileur is sitting too high for the 46t ring. But if I lower it, then it won't clear the middle ring. Are front deraileurs designed for a specific size of chainrings? Are my chainring sizes not compatible? Help!
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 04:59 AM
  #2  
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times in 1,198 Posts
Yes, they are. I use an Ultegra triple for a 50/34/24 combination but use friction for shifting the chainrings. STI's were too fiddly, wouldn;t do the job consistently.
Shimano makes several cross FD's that would work.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is online now  
Old 05-22-14, 05:25 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
dsbrantjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times in 723 Posts
Front derailleurs are sized both for the large chainring but also by the teeth difference between the large and middle rings. If the difference is not enough you will run into your situation, where the derailleur will need to be set too high for the large ring to avoid hitting the middle one. The curve of the derailleur cage may also not be ideal for the large ring. You may find that shifting to/from the large ring is not ideal but usable. Or failing that a different derailleur may be required.
dsbrantjr is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 06:22 AM
  #4  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggles_dad
I recently swapped my 52/42/30 Campy chainrings for to TA 46/40/30 chainrings to test out a crossover gearing setup. My front Deraileur is an Ultegra triple. I can't seem to shift into the largest chainring because the front Deraileur is sitting too high for the 46t ring. But if I lower it, then it won't clear the middle ring. Are front deraileurs designed for a specific size of chainrings? Are my chainring sizes not compatible? Help!
While front derailers are sized for a range of outer chainring diameters, the range is very broad. I've used Ultegra for 52/40/30 and 50/39/24 triples and have used Tiagra for 50/39/28 and 46/34/20 without issues. They all shift just fine.

Shimano's tech bulletin on the Ultegra 6703 derailer says that the minimum difference between the outer and middle ring is 13 teeth which puts your combination well within the range. Something else must be off for the derailer to hit the middle ring. The alignment may be off.

On a side note, I've never found STI to be that fiddly to set up and use. The Tiagra front derailer is actually a better derailer for triples than the Ultegra, however. It's easier to set up, is more forgiving, and can be used over a wider gear range than its more expensive brothers.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 06:27 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,434 Times in 2,812 Posts
I tried an Ultegra triple FD with a 22/32/48 and it was an utter failure.
The arc of the cage was too large for the 48, putting the tail of the cage too far from the chainring.
I replaced it with an IRD Alpina FD which worked like a charm.
Since then I've seen a lot of recommendations for the Tiagra FD for such applications.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 08:37 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Modern front derailleurs aren't designed for half-step gearing as the inner cage plate is too deep to clear a middle chainring nearly the same size as the outer unless the derailleur is mounted way too high.

Half-step was more common when 5 and 6-speed freewheels were the norm as it filled in the big gearing gaps between the cogs. With newer 8, 9, 10 and even 11-speed cassettes, the need for half-step pretty much went away and current front derailleurs won't work with it.
HillRider is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 08:39 AM
  #7  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by cyccommute
While front derailers are sized for a range of outer chainring diameters, the range is very broad. I've used Ultegra for 52/40/30 and 50/39/24 triples and have used Tiagra for 50/39/28 and 46/34/20 without issues. They all shift just fine.

Shimano's tech bulletin on the Ultegra 6703 derailer says that the minimum difference between the outer and middle ring is 13 teeth which puts your combination well within the range. Something else must be off for the derailer to hit the middle ring. The alignment may be off.

On a side note, I've never found STI to be that fiddly to set up and use. The Tiagra front derailer is actually a better derailer for triples than the Ultegra, however. It's easier to set up, is more forgiving, and can be used over a wider gear range than its more expensive brothers.
My difference between outer and middle are only 6 teeth with the new 46/40/30 setup.
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 08:40 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
dsbrantjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319

Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times in 723 Posts
"Ultegra 6703 derailer says that the minimum difference between the outer and middle ring is 13 teeth"

And the difference between 46 and 40 is 6 teeth, which is less than the specified minimum; this is why the cage is hitting the middle ring.
dsbrantjr is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 08:42 AM
  #9  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I just read an article by Jan Heine that describes front derailleurs and chainring sizing. Trouble with STI Triples | Off The Beaten Path I think I'm going to get the Shimano CX70 or another cross FD.
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 08:57 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggles_dad
I just read an article by Jan Heine that describes front derailleurs and chainring sizing. Trouble with STI Triples | Off The Beaten Path I think I'm going to get the Shimano CX70 or another cross FD.
Keep in mind Heine is selling cranks so his analysis can be a bit self-promoting. Also, he never mentions the difficulty of finding a front derailleur capable of shifting the half-step gearing he advocates.

Yes Shimano sells 50/39/30 triples but the current 105 triple (FC-5700) has a 74 mm bolt circle for the granny so you can fit as small as a 24T granny ring in place of the 30. That will give a plenty low gear for almost any rider if combined with a wide enough range cassette.
HillRider is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 09:13 AM
  #11  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by HillRider
Keep in mind Heine is selling cranks so his analysis can be a bit self-promoting. Also, he never mentions the difficulty of finding a front derailleur capable of shifting the half-step gearing he advocates.

Yes Shimano sells 50/39/30 triples but the current 105 triple (FC-5700) has a 74 mm bolt circle for the granny so you can fit as small as a 24T granny ring in place of the 30. That will give a plenty low gear for almost any rider if combined with a wide enough range cassette.
I'm not going for lower gearing but to optimize my gearing for a better shift pattern and better chain line. I'm trying to achieve a 46/40/30 or 46/40/26 gearing so that I can have true crossover gearing for my outer and middle rings. This would allow me to avoid double shifting since I like to use down tube shifters. Do you think an Ultegra 6800 double front derailleur would be compatible with this gearing?
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 10:14 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggles_dad
I'm not going for lower gearing but to optimize my gearing for a better shift pattern and better chain line. I'm trying to achieve a 46/40/30 or 46/40/26 gearing so that I can have true crossover gearing for my outer and middle rings. This would allow me to avoid double shifting since I like to use down tube shifters. Do you think an Ultegra 6800 double front derailleur would be compatible with this gearing?
No, it wouldn't work any better. You have the same problem that the inner cage plate won't clear the middle chainring unless it's installed too high. These derailleurs are designed for at least 10 tooth differences (52/42) in the chainrings and often 11T (50/39) or 14T (53/39) or more.
HillRider is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 10:30 AM
  #13  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by HillRider
No, it wouldn't work any better. You have the same problem that the inner cage plate won't clear the middle chainring unless it's installed too high. These derailleurs are designed for at least 10 tooth differences (52/42) in the chainrings and often 11T (50/39) or 14T (53/39) or more.
So the Shimano CX70 it is? Is a cyclocross front derailleur that is designed for a small tooth difference work with a larger tooth difference for the inner chainring?
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 10:42 AM
  #14  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by dsbrantjr
"Ultegra 6703 derailer says that the minimum difference between the outer and middle ring is 13 teeth"

And the difference between 46 and 40 is 6 teeth, which is less than the specified minimum; this is why the cage is hitting the middle ring.
D'oh! I read 46 and 40 and thought 46/30. I will say, however that the difference my 50/39/28 falls outside the range as well without any issues.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 10:48 AM
  #15  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggles_dad
I just read an article by Jan Heine that describes front derailleurs and chainring sizing. Trouble with STI Triples | Off The Beaten Path I think I'm going to get the Shimano CX70 or another cross FD.
Many things that Jan Heine writes should be taken with a grain of salt. All of my road derailers are set up with STI and they shift very well indeed...including the 46/34/20. There is no need to go to a friction system or barend shifter. The CX70 is a double front derailer. The Tiagra is a triple.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 05:17 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
If you can find an Ultegra 6503 FD it might work because it's built for a 10 tooth difference between the big and middle rings and a 12 tooth difference between the small and middle rings.
My experience with TA rings is that it may be difficult to get the chain to drop over the teeth due to the thickness of the teeth at the tips. If you have this problem filing the backside of the teeth can help a lot.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 09:52 PM
  #17  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I currently have a Shimano 6503 FD. Actually, as of today it is working but not 100%. I have the derailleur set so close to the middle ring that the teeth on the middle ring barely touch (by a hair) the back plate of the front Deraileur when it is in some positions. I have TA chainrings. I was thinking that a double front Der would work because the only difference between a double and triple is that the back plate of a triple extends lower. I think the Shimano 6800 would work as well as a CX Deraileur.

Read this: https://velo-orange.blogspot.com/2011...leurs.html?m=1

Last edited by Wiggles_dad; 05-22-14 at 09:54 PM. Reason: forgot link
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 05-23-14, 07:18 AM
  #18  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggles_dad
I currently have a Shimano 6503 FD. Actually, as of today it is working but not 100%. I have the derailleur set so close to the middle ring that the teeth on the middle ring barely touch (by a hair) the back plate of the front Deraileur when it is in some positions. I have TA chainrings. I was thinking that a double front Der would work because the only difference between a double and triple is that the back plate of a triple extends lower. I think the Shimano 6800 would work as well as a CX Deraileur.
I suspect that you will just be trading one problem for another one. The problem with the Ultegra triple (FD6503) is that the distance between the inner plate and the outer plate is fairly narrow. It is further narrowed by indentations put in both plates to stiffen the derailer. The narrow gap causes other problems but in your case, the deeper stiffener pressed into the inner plate leaves you with less space to nestle up to the middle ring.

This is a problem with all of the more expensive Shimano front derailers...mountain and road. The more expensive the front derailer the harder they are to set up properly. The inexpensive front derailers...Tiagra and Sora, for example...have a wider gap between the plates and the stiffing indents are shallower. They are more forgiving in gear combinations and, in your case, would allow you to run the derailer closer to the middle ring.

Going to a double front derailer may cause issues with lifting the chain off the inner ring. You'll have to overshift the derailer to force the chain to the inner ring. Overshifting isn't something that STI likes to do nor is it that easy to make it do it. The likely result will be that you'll shift towards the middle ring but the chain will move to the outer and you'll have to shift it back. Doable but futzy.

The good news is that the Tiagra is cheap...$15 to $30...so if it doesn't work, you aren't out much money. Ultegra isn't nearly as cheap to experiment with.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 06-15-14, 08:40 AM
  #19  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Wiggles_dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 228

Bikes: '8x Casati Monza, Gunnar Sport, Surly Karate Monkey, Obed Boundary

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Just an update on my experiments with a new front derailleur and my current 46/40/30 triple setup. I replaced my Ultegra 6503 triple front derailleur with a Shimano CX70 cyclocross derailleur. I want to remind everyone that I use a down tube friction setup for the front shifting.

So far, the CX70 works better than the Ultegra derailleur that i replaced it with. The next thing that I will experiment with is expanding the range of chainrings with this new derailleur. It is only rated to handle a max range of 16t, but I want to see if I can push it to 20t. It looks like there is room in the derailleur cage to handle a bigger range. I will probably go 46/40/26 or 48/40/28.
Wiggles_dad is offline  
Old 06-15-14, 09:14 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,847

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 421 Posts
Alpina-D Front Derailleurs
trailangel is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ModeratedUser
Touring
30
02-23-15 04:46 PM
thill454
Bicycle Mechanics
2
09-01-14 12:01 PM
Jed19
Bicycle Mechanics
10
02-14-14 01:54 PM
chrisrook
Road Cycling
6
06-25-13 11:09 AM
steve53mg
Bicycle Mechanics
1
12-19-11 08:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.