Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Switching from AL to CF fork on a 2007 Scott S60 Speedster

    All,

    I understand my frame set/bike isn't a top of the line model, I don't care, I want to upgrade the fork to CF. However, all the CF forks I have found will not necessarily look right with the frame. Basically the top of the fork legs would not match with the bottom of the head tube. Size wise, it's not a problem and functionally it would be fine, but my little of OCD would feel stupid and I couldn't go through with it.

    I have been trying to find a Scott CF fork that would work, but haven't been able to. Any help in the BF universe?

    Added a couple of pics so you see what I mean.





    Damian
    Last edited by damian.garcia83; 07-20-14 at 10:32 AM.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ttt

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,512
    Mentioned
    69 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    You have a nice fork matched cosmetically to the bike, which suits your OCD. What benefit do you hope to gain with the "upgrade"?

    Even if you could find a CF fork with a crown of a similar type (not common in modern CF fork construction), it would be a B quality fork, since all modern A-level CF forks are of a unicrown construction with the steerer built in. Also, unless you paint it, you can't match the overall cosmetic.

    Even though I'm not OCD about bikes, I'd leave well enough and keep the original fork until a crash eliminates the option.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    River City, OR
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You didn't mention what your budget is. Perhaps you're looking at some of the lower end forks, which most likely won't match the headtube diameters with integrated headsets. There's quite a few out there which do match. Look at 3T- Control Tech- Enve- Ritchey- Whisky, etc. Expect to be in the $4-600 range. These are all top quality forks.

    In your case there is probably a big benefit in moving to carbon. You are going to shave off over a pound, and I'd be surprised if the ride quality didn't (change for the better.) In every case I've seen there's been a significant improvement. You don't want to stray too far from the existing rake of your current fork. Up to 5mm less won't hurt. More? NO. Check what you've got.

    Next? Light wheelset.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
    Even though I'm not OCD about bikes, I'd leave well enough and keep the original fork until a crash eliminates the option.
    I'm tired of getting my teeth shaken and I have ridden a carbon fork/aluminum framed bike back to back with mine and it was a very different experience on the same piece of road. While I may follow this, that experience is what has driven me to want to change to/upgrade to a CF fork.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by reddog3 View Post
    You didn't mention what your budget is. Perhaps you're looking at some of the lower end forks, which most likely won't match the headtube diameters with integrated headsets. There's quite a few out there which do match. Look at 3T- Control Tech- Enve- Ritchey- Whisky, etc. Expect to be in the $4-600 range. These are all top quality forks.

    In your case there is probably a big benefit in moving to carbon. You are going to shave off over a pound, and I'd be surprised if the ride quality didn't (change for the better.) In every case I've seen there's been a significant improvement. You don't want to stray too far from the existing rake of your current fork. Up to 5mm less won't hurt. More? NO. Check what you've got.

    Next? Light wheelset.
    Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. I guess next I will have to figure out actual dimensions that match well. It would be even better if I can find a matte black fork with yellow accents.

    How could I determine rake on my current set up? I've tried googling that year speedster and am coming up empty. I wouldn't mind the steering getting a hair lazier, but not too much.

    Not really too worried about budget since I have an emotional tie to this bike.

    I have Mavic Cosmos on there right now that are serving me well. Granted I know they are not lightweights, but they have been tough as hell thus far.

    Damian
    Last edited by damian.garcia83; 07-23-14 at 02:40 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,512
    Mentioned
    69 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by damian.garcia83 View Post
    I'm tired of getting my teeth shaken and I have ridden a carbon fork/aluminum framed bike back to back with mine and it was a very different experience on the same piece of road. While I may follow this, that experience is what has driven me to want to change to/upgrade to a CF fork.
    Then you've made a decision. Find the best match, and live with the cosmetic issues, if any.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  8. #8
    AAZ
    AAZ is offline
    Senior Member AAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    143
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I see that the 2007 Scott Speedster S30 CD looks black.
    Maybe Scott still keeps some around?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    River City, OR
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by damian.garcia83 View Post
    Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. I guess next I will have to figure out actual dimensions that match well. It would be even better if I can find a matte black fork with yellow accents.

    How could I determine rake on my current set up? I've tried googling that year speedster and am coming up empty. I wouldn't mind the steering getting a hair lazier, but not too much.

    Not really too worried about budget since I have an emotional tie to this bike.

    I have Mavic Cosmos on there right now that are serving me well. Granted I know they are not lightweights, but they have been tough as hell thus far.

    Damian
    I looked at the Scott site and they still list a Speedster, and given their MO I doubt the specs have changed. They don't show the fork rake (offset) or the trail numbers. Given the frame size we know the head tube angle. If they listed the trail number, figuring the fork offset is easy.

    To explain how to measure it in text (for me at least) can be confusing. Search for "measuring rake bicycles" and there will be some illustrations pointing you in the right direction. Don't let the reference to motorcycles (and you'll see some) throw you off. Their "rake" angle is a completely different thing. Hope this might help.

    OTOH- most "spirited" road bike forks have a rake (offset) of 42-45mm. It's dependent on other angles as well, but that's generally the range, and most aftermarket for will be in this range. The thing to consider- if you want a "lazier" feel, go with a fork with less rake, which results in more trail. Without delving further into your current bike's specs, I think any of the 42-43mm rake forks would do fine. All these higher end forks are road forks, so there is really no need to concern yourself with axle to crown height.

    FWIW- the ENVE forks (and that's good as it gets) have optional graphics colors. Yellow on black? No problem.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •