Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

building new wheels, question about spoke tension

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

building new wheels, question about spoke tension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-14, 06:37 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 358

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
building new wheels, question about spoke tension

first question:
I bought some 32 hole Mavic CXP33 rims and DT 15/14 spokes to go on my old 130mm rear hub. I've been doing some searching for recommended spoke tension. I found some information where Mavic recommends 90-110kgf. I found other information recommending 110kgf front and up to maybe 180kgf for the drive side of the rear. When I tighten my rear wheel to about 110kgf on the drive side with rim centered the spokes on the left side seem fairly loose. If I was building these wheels without a tension gauge I would certainly tighten them a lot more. On a rear wheel should I go ahead and tighten the drive side a little bit more?

second question:
What is the downside to not building a rear wheel perfectly centered? If I center the rim then the non-drive side spokes will be a lot less tight than the drive side spokes. It seems that it would be acceptable to fudge a little bit on the centering in order to better balance the spoke tensions. Does this cause a problem? Does it cause the bike to track very slightly off if the rear rim is not centered between the dropouts?
bjtesch is offline  
Old 08-07-14, 06:46 PM
  #2  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,872

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
Typically, on a rear, your NDS tension will be 50-70% of DS, depending on the difference between the offsets of the hub flanges.
That's just the nature of the beast.
It seems most of us shoot for about 110kgf on the DS, but will increase it some to try to get at least 65kgf on the NDS.

180 kgf is TOO MUCH!
Bill Kapaun is online now  
Old 08-07-14, 07:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 358

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
180 kgf is TOO MUCH!
(Now that I have the fancy gauge, I need to build up enough courage to check the last set of wheels that I built, over 20 years ago.)
bjtesch is offline  
Old 08-08-14, 06:07 PM
  #4  
Not quite there yet
 
Matariki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Monkey Bottom, NC
Posts: 999

Bikes: A bunch of old steel bikes + an ICE trike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bjtesch
(Now that I have the fancy gauge, I need to build up enough courage to check the last set of wheels that I built, over 20 years ago.)
If those wheels are still functional, you may be pleasantly surprised at how close you came by feel.
Matariki is offline  
Old 08-09-14, 10:10 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Yes, the DS rear tension should be about 110 kgF or how much more it takes to get at least about 65 kgF on the NDS. Everything within reason, however. When I build wheels with nearly even tension on the NDS and DS because I am using twice as many spokes on the DS as the NDS (due to an extremely big flange offset difference), I like to have 120 on the DS and whatever comes out on the NDS. Normally I will find the NDS to be about 100.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 08-09-14, 10:20 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 358

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I finished the new wheels today. I'm using a Park tension gauge to measure the tension and I was able to set the front wheels at 100-110 kg. The rear wheels I got to almost 90 kg NDS and about 130 kg DS. My dish is about 2-3mm off of center.

Now that I have the gauge, I checked my old wheels just for grins. I have one set of wheels that I built over 25 years ago and have ridden a lot since then- Wolber TX rims and 2.0mm spokes. The fronts are 76-107 kg. The rears are 62-85 kg NDS and 107-137 kg DS. The spokes are fairly uniform, with just a few off more than the rest one way or another. Even though the spoke tensions are all fairly good and I have not had any problems with these wheels, I think the rear needs a bit of touchup on its truing. I don't recall that I've done that before.

My other set of wheels came on a used bike that I bought 23 years ago. I have ridden these wheels a lot and not had any problems with them, I don't recall that I have ever done any truing on them. The spoke tensions on these are not as uniform as the ones that I built. The maximum tensions of the front wheel were 68 kg, with a lot of the tensions much less and a couple almost zero. The rear wheel tensions are at 137-179 kg DS and 56-107 kg NDS. I'm surprised that the DS tensions are so high, and that the front wheels have performed well with such erratic spoke tensions.
bjtesch is offline  
Old 08-09-14, 10:49 PM
  #7  
Wheel Builder
 
Dream Cyclery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
FYI, Parktool Tension Meter is not very accurate when you measure higher tension. Not too bad on lower tension, but still not consistent enough for a great wheel build. When you use the TM-1, try to measure the same spoke multiple times to get reasonably accurate reading.
Dream Cyclery is offline  
Old 08-09-14, 11:16 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 358

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dream Cyclery
FYI, Parktool Tension Meter is not very accurate when you measure higher tension. Not too bad on lower tension, but still not consistent enough for a great wheel build. When you use the TM-1, try to measure the same spoke multiple times to get reasonably accurate reading.
I understand what you mean because as a structural engineer I understand the concept behind the function of the tool, but it is the best that I have available to me. Even in my profession measuring bolt tension is a very crude practice. The wheels that I built 25 years ago were the second set of wheels I ever built, and built without any tool for measuring tension. I found it interesting that they were tensioned fairly evenly, were in a reasonable ballpark for actual tnesion numbers, and have been ridden quite a bit for 25 years.
bjtesch is offline  
Old 08-10-14, 10:19 AM
  #9  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,872

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
Originally Posted by bjtesch
I finished the new wheels today. I'm using a Park tension gauge to measure the tension and I was able to set the front wheels at 100-110 kg. The rear wheels I got to almost 90 kg NDS and about 130 kg DS. My dish is about 2-3mm off of center.

Now that I have the gauge, I checked my old wheels just for grins. I have one set of wheels that I built over 25 years ago and have ridden a lot since then- Wolber TX rims and 2.0mm spokes. The fronts are 76-107 kg. The rears are 62-85 kg NDS and 107-137 kg DS. The spokes are fairly uniform, with just a few off more than the rest one way or another. Even though the spoke tensions are all fairly good and I have not had any problems with these wheels, I think the rear needs a bit of touchup on its truing. I don't recall that I've done that before.

My other set of wheels came on a used bike that I bought 23 years ago. I have ridden these wheels a lot and not had any problems with them, I don't recall that I have ever done any truing on them. The spoke tensions on these are not as uniform as the ones that I built. The maximum tensions of the front wheel were 68 kg, with a lot of the tensions much less and a couple almost zero. The rear wheel tensions are at 137-179 kg DS and 56-107 kg NDS. I'm surprised that the DS tensions are so high, and that the front wheels have performed well with such erratic spoke tensions.
I'll venture the rim is too close to the NDS side with 90kgf NDS. Back it off some.
IF you had been using your tension meter, you would have seen it was getting too high for proper dish.

One trick I use for old wheels to VISUALIZE tension variance-
I got a bunch of small color coded alligator clips from Radio Shack.
I go around the wheel with the tension meter to get an idea of the average tension per side.
I then go around it again and put a RED clip on the high readings and a green clip on the low.
Basically 1 clip per tension division on the meter. IF it's more than 5 divisions, I add a yellow clip as a +5.
If a wheel is WAY OFF, I'll us a different "scale" where a clip may be worth 2 or 3 divisions.

Once installed, you can visualize things pretty well to see if you have adjacent high & low spokes that can be equalized without affecting dish etc. (or not)
Depending on how far off the tensions were, I repeat as necessary.
It's pretty slow on a bad wheel, but it works for me.
Bill Kapaun is online now  
Old 08-10-14, 11:33 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
180 kgf! I don't think I could ever get even close to that. I'd think the nipples would round out first.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atlantis
Bicycle Mechanics
7
04-04-15 12:42 PM
southpawboston
Bicycle Mechanics
4
05-31-13 08:23 PM
AS Collie
Bicycle Mechanics
15
02-14-13 09:41 AM
Aaron_F
General Cycling Discussion
3
04-02-12 02:08 PM
dennyd
Bicycle Mechanics
8
06-15-10 09:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.