Broken rear derailliur
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Russellville, Ar
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Broken rear derailliur
I bought a 2014 Specialized Crosstown Sport in July 2 of this year. I have put 360 miles on it. Yesterday I was riding up a hill that I've ridden up pretty much daily and heard a pop and the pedals stuck. I looked down and the rear derailleur had snapped in two and part of it was wedged in the spokes. I noticed that the rear wheel is now out of round. I walked it home and this morning I took it back to the LBS from whom I bought it. I was told that I would have to pay for the parts and repairs, that it wasn't covered under warranty. I was told that it couldn't just break like that and that I had to have broken it by changing gears under too much load or else I had done somethiing to cause the damage. I argued that it had never been wrecked , dropped or otherwise abused, but they refused to budge. They roughly figured $100 to replace and tune the derailleur and fix the wheel. I guess my question is, should this not be coverable under warranty? This seems to be total BS as far as I concerned.
Last edited by gpo1956; 10-08-14 at 05:36 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Warranty issue = manufacturing defect. The question is: "what defect are you alleging?"
It sounds to me like you somehow shifted your derailleur into the spokes. I'm wondering how that might have happened and why it didn't happen earlier.
It sounds to me like you somehow shifted your derailleur into the spokes. I'm wondering how that might have happened and why it didn't happen earlier.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Odds are the derailleur shifted into the spokes, then broke. Not a warranty issue from a part failing.
However, you might be able to push the issue that the LBS didn't assemble the bike correctly, allowing the derailleur to shift into the spokes.
Most shops have a 'free' 230 day tune up/adjustment period.
Did your shop & did you bring it in for one?
However, you might be able to push the issue that the LBS didn't assemble the bike correctly, allowing the derailleur to shift into the spokes.
Most shops have a 'free' 230 day tune up/adjustment period.
Did your shop & did you bring it in for one?
#5
Lost at sea...
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 935
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount (match), Trek 520, random bits and pieces...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Not sure what to say. Sucks. Wish we had a time machine to go back and do an inspection to see what happened before it happened... then I'd have an opinion.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I saw this happen to a bike with a tight link in the chain. The chain was clean and dry with no lubricant, and that was the cause of the tight link. When the tight link hit the rear derailleur it could not run through so the derailleur was twisted right off the bike. The dropout plate was also twisted and pulled out of the chainstay. The Trek factory fixed it for $300 plus shipping.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,663
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5766 Post(s)
Liked 2,538 Times
in
1,404 Posts
The fact that you were in low gear poits to a specific possibility. Not an absolute face, but a realistic possibility.
Odds are that the low gear limit was off a bit allowing the RD to move in too far toward the wheel. This could cause the cage to snag a spoke, or the chain to overshift and pull the RD in with it. So, it's the getting caught by the wheel that destroyed the RD, not the other way around.
As to why a limit might be off, the most common reason is the hanger getting bent in if the bike is dropped on it's right side.
As I said, this only describes what "could" happen, not necessarily what did.
IMO, the shop might be right saying it's not warranty, but they might not be. When I was in retail we settled these types of situations by giving the customer of the doubt, but insisted they hear why it might not be warranty. In grayer cases we'd split the difference and offer a deeply discounted repair.
We also kept a jar where we collected donations for a local church that had a bike program their impoverished members. If we went the extra mile to do free work that should have been charged, we'd ask that they donate whatever they thought was appropriate. Often times folks would gladly donate the entire sum that we waived.
Talk to the shop, and see if you can work out a middle ground gray area settlement both of you can live with.
Odds are that the low gear limit was off a bit allowing the RD to move in too far toward the wheel. This could cause the cage to snag a spoke, or the chain to overshift and pull the RD in with it. So, it's the getting caught by the wheel that destroyed the RD, not the other way around.
As to why a limit might be off, the most common reason is the hanger getting bent in if the bike is dropped on it's right side.
As I said, this only describes what "could" happen, not necessarily what did.
IMO, the shop might be right saying it's not warranty, but they might not be. When I was in retail we settled these types of situations by giving the customer of the doubt, but insisted they hear why it might not be warranty. In grayer cases we'd split the difference and offer a deeply discounted repair.
We also kept a jar where we collected donations for a local church that had a bike program their impoverished members. If we went the extra mile to do free work that should have been charged, we'd ask that they donate whatever they thought was appropriate. Often times folks would gladly donate the entire sum that we waived.
Talk to the shop, and see if you can work out a middle ground gray area settlement both of you can live with.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Look 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
While I agree the RD may not have been adjusted properly, I'm not sure how it could hit the spokes with the spoke protector (dork disk) in place. I'd return it to the bike shop and expect them to correct the problem -- at no charge.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Look 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I saw this happen to a bike with a tight link in the chain. The chain was clean and dry with no lubricant, and that was the cause of the tight link. When the tight link hit the rear derailleur it could not run through so the derailleur was twisted right off the bike. The dropout plate was also twisted and pulled out of the chainstay. The Trek factory fixed it for $300 plus shipping.
#11
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
I see this happen all the time. The bike owner lays the bike down on its right side and bends the derailleur hanger. Or it gets slapped by a self-closing door. It happens without the owner noticing it at all!
Then the bike rides fine, with the owner not knowing it, but actually, the bike is in a lower gear than it should be because of the misalignment. It shifts through some but not all of the gears.
Then the owner shifts down, and the derailleur goes into the spokes. The owner does not correlate the shifting action with the hanger bending, and he has no reason to, because he doesn't know about the bending.
Running the derailleur into the spokes ruins the derailleur and often damages the wheel.
As I said, I've seen this happen a lot, and the owner is not at all conscious of playing a part in the cause.
Then the bike rides fine, with the owner not knowing it, but actually, the bike is in a lower gear than it should be because of the misalignment. It shifts through some but not all of the gears.
Then the owner shifts down, and the derailleur goes into the spokes. The owner does not correlate the shifting action with the hanger bending, and he has no reason to, because he doesn't know about the bending.
Running the derailleur into the spokes ruins the derailleur and often damages the wheel.
As I said, I've seen this happen a lot, and the owner is not at all conscious of playing a part in the cause.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#12
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Personally I would send an e-mail off to the Mfg of the bike and report the LBS. Apparently they are too damned lazy to write up the warrenty to the mfg.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
Happened to me laying the bike down on its left side! What I didn't know until later was that some guy had stumbled and accidentally stepped on my RD while the bike was lying there.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
I see this happen all the time. The bike owner lays the bike down on its right side and bends the derailleur hanger. Or it gets slapped by a self-closing door. It happens without the owner noticing it at all!
Then the bike rides fine, with the owner not knowing it, but actually, the bike is in a lower gear than it should be because of the misalignment. It shifts through some but not all of the gears.
Then the owner shifts down, and the derailleur goes into the spokes. The owner does not correlate the shifting action with the hanger bending, and he has no reason to, because he doesn't know about the bending.
Running the derailleur into the spokes ruins the derailleur and often damages the wheel.
As I said, I've seen this happen a lot, and the owner is not at all conscious of playing a part in the cause.
Then the bike rides fine, with the owner not knowing it, but actually, the bike is in a lower gear than it should be because of the misalignment. It shifts through some but not all of the gears.
Then the owner shifts down, and the derailleur goes into the spokes. The owner does not correlate the shifting action with the hanger bending, and he has no reason to, because he doesn't know about the bending.
Running the derailleur into the spokes ruins the derailleur and often damages the wheel.
As I said, I've seen this happen a lot, and the owner is not at all conscious of playing a part in the cause.
But it's easy enough to tell if the hangers bent or if they didn't adjust the lower stop correctly. Either the hanger alignment tool is going to show it is straight or not straight. But I don't know if I would trust them at this point.
Lean your bike against a WALL.
Lay your bike on its left side.
Fork mount roof rack.
These are the 3 ways to prevent bending your hanger.
Last edited by andr0id; 10-09-14 at 09:21 AM.
#15
Seńor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
If the derailleur went into the spokes there are two possible causes:
Misadjusted limit screws, which is the fault of the shop who assembled the bike, no the manufacturer who sold the partially assembled bike to them, or the bike took a blow to the side which bent the hanger, which is the fault of the owner, even if the initial damage or impact was too minor to notice.
Either way, the manufacturer has no responsibility for this, so claiming the lbs is 'lazy' for not 'writing up the warrenty [sic]' is ridiculous. Especially because with most manufacturers, there is nothing to 'write up' for warranty service - generally, the shop calls the manufacturer or distributor, and gets an RMA number and sends the part back with the RMA number attached.
#16
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
You forgot the icon and "just kidding" comment at the end.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#17
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
. I was told that I would have to pay for the parts and repairs, that it wasn't covered under warranty. I was told that it couldn't just break like that and that I had to have broken it by changing gears under too much load or else I had done somethiing to cause the damage. I argued that it had never been wrecked , dropped or otherwise abused, but they refused to budge. They roughly figured $100 to replace and tune the derailleur and fix the wheel. I guess my question is, should this not be coverable under warranty? This seems to be total BS as far as I concerned.
But if you had been using the lowest (easiest) gear previously, and then 1 day it caused this problem, then something happened to the bike since you have been using it.
If this was the first time you used the lowest (easiest gear), then it's theoretically possible that it was mis-adjusted, and did not become apparent until now. Or it was fine, and got banged or such as others have already explained.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Last edited by Homebrew01; 10-09-14 at 10:32 AM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,663
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5766 Post(s)
Liked 2,538 Times
in
1,404 Posts
This is a situation that screams for some sort of compromise. There's no way of knowing if the RD was misadjusted by th dealer, or the hanger bend by owner misuse, or even if the hanger or RD were defective as supplied by the manufacturer.
So folks could argue about black and white claims or accept that this is a murky gray area and seek a compromise.
If I were called to mediate, I'd suggest that the dealer provide the labor free, and the customer pay something for the parts (heavily discounted from retail or at cost). Or if the manufacturer can pony up the parts free (most would), the dealer works free, and the customer now with nothing left to pay, make a donation to an agreed upon charity to cover the chance that he was responsible.
The main point is that since nobody can be shown to be totally responsible, nobody should eat the loss solo.
So folks could argue about black and white claims or accept that this is a murky gray area and seek a compromise.
If I were called to mediate, I'd suggest that the dealer provide the labor free, and the customer pay something for the parts (heavily discounted from retail or at cost). Or if the manufacturer can pony up the parts free (most would), the dealer works free, and the customer now with nothing left to pay, make a donation to an agreed upon charity to cover the chance that he was responsible.
The main point is that since nobody can be shown to be totally responsible, nobody should eat the loss solo.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#19
Banned
This was a Wall-Mart Schwinn? a guess based on the really cheap parts pick for the crank-set in the offered picture.
That is between them and you .. but thanks for venting ..
I walked it home and this morning I took it back to the LBS from whom I bought it.
That is between them and you .. but thanks for venting ..
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Russellville, Ar
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just got the call from the store. $88 to fix. Obvious to them that it was my fault and nothing they would do. I've ridden this bike almost daily since 7/2 and never had any problems with it until Tuesday. The black plastic part of the derailleur snapped cleanly in half and the part with the cog was jammed into the spokes. I fell off to the right side when it stopped. I picked it up and it rolled backwards slightly and the cog piece fell off and dropped to the chain as in the picture. It rode in the back of my truck yesterday morning while I made my way to North Little Rock. I drove through 1"+ per hour rain storm and the bike was soaked when I got in. Mechanic looked at it this afternoon and said there was rust on it where it had been dinged. Said it couldn't have happened Tuesday even after being in the back of my truck for 4 hours. This was just too orchestrated from the begining. They were not in the least acurious about the details of what happened or how. It was just immediately decided that it was my fault. I KNOW the history of the bike, they weren't in the least interested. Extremely angry, but have learned my lesson.
#21
Banned
Perhaps the replacement RD will be selected from further up the Food Chain , so the piece that was plastic that broke, the next one won't be plastic.
YGWYPF.
YGWYPF.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Yes, it looks like it was a inexpensive bike, regardless of where it was purchased. And, regardless of where it came from, the Owner is going to feel pain when his/her relatively new toy/vehicle got broke.
While I have never owned or worked in a bike shop, I do have over 40 years experience working in retail stores, and on my own bikes. I have never had a failure like that, or seen one in person, although I have seen photos before. I understand that this type of failure is usually caused by a mis-adjusted rear derailleur OR a bent rear derailleur or derailleur hanger. But I can also see this type of failure being caused by failure of the plastic derailleur body.
I have seen plenty of cases where the Customer is not always Right, but the store bends to the wishes of the Customer in order to make the Customer happy. Since the bike was near new, it should have had a warranty on it. The Manufacturer should replace the broken/failed part/s for free and get them back so they can study the failed part/s. The shop paid for it's service when they sold the bike and the continued patronage of the Customer is how the shop gets paid for the labor to repair the damage.
I don't see how it is the Customer's fault that the part/s failed, and the Customer should not unfairly bear the cost of this particular repair. In the absence of evidence of fault, the Customer should be given the benefit of doubt. The shop should not make a profit on the misfortune of it's Customer (when it's not the Customer's fault), nor should eat the cost of the replacement part/s. I don't like inexpensive/poor quality parts, regardless of the price. I go out of my way to point out the ways that inferiority/cheap parts are not the way to go, when quality parts are available for the same or little more money. Maybe the shop can talk the Owner into an upgrade to an all metal derailleur (Customer pays the price different in cost) since it needs to be replaced anyway., and the shop provide the labor free of charge.
To the Owner: I hope you learned your lesson. A less expensive, higher quality used bike for less money is always a better bet then a new shiny inexpensive bike from a store. No matter where you buy a bike, new or used, when you wheel it out from the Seller's place, know that you are on your own. The warranty, if any is only going to do you any good if a major part like the frame turns out to be bad during the warranty period. For everything else, it's going to be on you, so learn to wrench on your own bike.
While I have never owned or worked in a bike shop, I do have over 40 years experience working in retail stores, and on my own bikes. I have never had a failure like that, or seen one in person, although I have seen photos before. I understand that this type of failure is usually caused by a mis-adjusted rear derailleur OR a bent rear derailleur or derailleur hanger. But I can also see this type of failure being caused by failure of the plastic derailleur body.
I have seen plenty of cases where the Customer is not always Right, but the store bends to the wishes of the Customer in order to make the Customer happy. Since the bike was near new, it should have had a warranty on it. The Manufacturer should replace the broken/failed part/s for free and get them back so they can study the failed part/s. The shop paid for it's service when they sold the bike and the continued patronage of the Customer is how the shop gets paid for the labor to repair the damage.
I don't see how it is the Customer's fault that the part/s failed, and the Customer should not unfairly bear the cost of this particular repair. In the absence of evidence of fault, the Customer should be given the benefit of doubt. The shop should not make a profit on the misfortune of it's Customer (when it's not the Customer's fault), nor should eat the cost of the replacement part/s. I don't like inexpensive/poor quality parts, regardless of the price. I go out of my way to point out the ways that inferiority/cheap parts are not the way to go, when quality parts are available for the same or little more money. Maybe the shop can talk the Owner into an upgrade to an all metal derailleur (Customer pays the price different in cost) since it needs to be replaced anyway., and the shop provide the labor free of charge.
To the Owner: I hope you learned your lesson. A less expensive, higher quality used bike for less money is always a better bet then a new shiny inexpensive bike from a store. No matter where you buy a bike, new or used, when you wheel it out from the Seller's place, know that you are on your own. The warranty, if any is only going to do you any good if a major part like the frame turns out to be bad during the warranty period. For everything else, it's going to be on you, so learn to wrench on your own bike.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,663
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5766 Post(s)
Liked 2,538 Times
in
1,404 Posts
OR
If the RD and frame show no evidence to support the idea that it's your fault, ie. scratches on the bottom RD body to support the notion of a bent hanger, you can take this to small claims court. If it's under a warranty that includes parts and labor, the burden will be on the dealer to explain how this is your fault, not a defect. The odds greatly favor you here. BTW- spend the extra dough to sue and serve both the dealer and maker. Given the stakes they'd probably try to settle this before a hearing rather than take their chances with a small town judge.
BTW- there's an excellent chance that it's your fault, but the dealer should be able to show you how, and not just say you shifted wrong, which is nonsense.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Russellville, Ar
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd be glad to email the pictures to any of you more experienced members. They were taken immediately after getting home. I can't find any rust as they noted, although I might not be looking in the right areas.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't see how rust on the bike could cause the derailleur body to break without warning, unless the chain was/is badly rusted and stiff as a result. Sounds to me like the shop was fishing for a reason to weasel out of the warranty.