Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

List of low-normal/rapid rise rear derailleurs?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

List of low-normal/rapid rise rear derailleurs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-14, 09:05 AM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
List of low-normal/rapid rise rear derailleurs?

Is there a list of all the models that had such reverse action, preferably with short cage? I'm looking for one to use as a ghetto IGH chain tensioner and don't know which models to look for. I figure low normal would be best for a tensioner because then I could just pull it outward with my hand to make wheel removal easier.
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 09:40 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
demoncyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Medway, MA
Posts: 2,727

Bikes: 2011 Lynskey Sportive, 1988 Cannondale SM400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You would pull towards the rear to remove the wheel, not outwards. So, it makes no difference if it is high normal or low normal- you will be locking the derailleur in place with the set screws either way.
demoncyclist is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 09:54 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
Originally Posted by demoncyclist
You would pull towards the rear to remove the wheel, not outwards. So, it makes no difference if it is high normal or low normal- you will be locking the derailleur in place with the set screws either way.
+1,pulling the derailleur outwards would result in damaging the derailleur. You can use any short cage rear derailleur as a chain tensioner, and it doesn't have to be a particularly good one. Look for an older derailleur designed for 5 or 6 speed freewheels. If your IGH requires a 1/8" chain you will require as wide a cage as possible, most Rapid rise rear derailleurs probably have cages that are too narrow for a wide chain
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 10:39 AM
  #4  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by demoncyclist
You would pull towards the rear to remove the wheel, not outwards. So, it makes no difference if it is high normal or low normal- you will be locking the derailleur in place with the set screws either way.
A chain tensioner should have the cage at near maximum extension, which means it would be extremely difficult to pull the parallelogram to the rear. With low normal, I could pull the parallelogram to the outside to allow me to release the chain, then I could pull the derailleur to clear everything.

Originally Posted by alcjphil
+1,pulling the derailleur outwards would result in damaging the derailleur.
That's why I'm asking for a low normal. Spring tension would push it toward the hub, stopped only by the low limit screw. All I'd need to do is disengage the chain from the pulleys then I would be able to pull it outward because there's nothing fighting me except the spring. You're thinking of standard high normal derailleurs where spring tension would push it outward from the hub, so the high limit screw would be used to hold it in the right position.
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 02:01 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
A derailleur is not a chain tensioner and you wouldn't have the cage at near maximum extension if you were using one. You would size the chain long enough so that you could pull the derailleur back to allow the wheel to drop out, not so that the derailleur cage was at full extension
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 02:08 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Cross Creek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 346

Bikes: 2013 Rivendell Sam, 1996 Bianchi Milano, 1994 Trek 820

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Wouldn't it be easier, more effective, and probably cheaper to simply use a chain tensioner than to try to find an unusual deraileur for the job?
Cross Creek is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 02:15 PM
  #7  
Mechanic/Tourist
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,522

Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 486 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rapid rise derailleurs tend to be more expensive, but just for the sake of argument let's say you need to find models. Why not just Google rapid ride derailleur??
cny-bikeman is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 02:48 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
A simple chain tensioner is a very different animal than a derailleur. Most of them only have a single jockey wheel so they look very different in use than a derailleur. If you are looking for the cheapest solution, a proper chain tensioner will probably cost the least amount of money and do the best job
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 02:53 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
A Fools Errand I'd say, I think even Shimano Gave up making them... it was another expensive thing they did , then quit.

Just Buy a chain tensioner .. Rohloff**, Shimano Alfine and Pauls 'melvin' are all 2 pulley types ..

the Limit screws on even cheap High normal RD's can be screwed in far enough to move the cage over the Cog.
if needed put a longer screw in.. low normal you would do the same , you are just resisting the return spring pressure
instead of pulling it with the cable,.

the spring in between the 2 pulleys wraps up the excess chain slack.


** I own one of these the chainline is a shim washer stack to place the pulleys (made by Tacx) under the Cog.

Last edited by fietsbob; 10-18-14 at 10:58 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 03:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
Originally Posted by streetstomper
I'm looking for one to use as a ghetto IGH chain tensioner
If I were going to kludge something together, I would use something that I already had in my spare parts bin. If I had to go and look to buy something, I would buy the proper component, especially since a chain tensioner is a much simpler and cheaper part to buy
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 04:06 PM
  #11  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
All of you saying "buy a tensioner, it's cheaper," seem to miss the point that the cheap single pulley tensioners don't work well. I've read plenty of reviews about them including on MTBR and here and a huge percentage are negative, including for the famous Surly Singleator. The dual pulley ones like the Paul Melvin are damned expensive, far more expensive than a used derailleur on eBay. The Melvin starts at $65 plus shipping, more than twice what a good used derailleur costs. I don't even want to think about what the Rohloff costs. The Alfine is designed for Shimano's own chainline, although you can use a few washers to shim it outward up to a point. Also, the dual pulley ones are essentially fixed position with non-adjustable angle stops. You can't push them to the side or swivel them back to remove the wheel. With many models, the only option is to unbolt the tensioner from the frame before trying to remove the wheel. And the dual pulley tensioners tend to have small cog limits, usually around 18T maximum. Many people who actually have used tensioners say the best solution is an old derailleur rather than a purpose-built tensioner.

I really don't understand why it's so hard to just answer a question rather than trying to tell me I'm stupid. If you know which derailleurs are low normal, I'd be happy to hear it. If all you're going to say is "Google it," then just go find another topic.

Last edited by streetstomper; 10-17-14 at 04:15 PM.
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 06:18 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times in 229 Posts
Here you go:

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...%20derailleurs

Last edited by dwmckee; 10-17-14 at 06:33 PM.
dwmckee is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 06:56 PM
  #13  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
So much for the assumption that bikeforum members are helpful.
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 08:12 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
Originally Posted by streetstomper
All I'd need to do is disengage the chain from the pulleys then I would be able to pull it outward because there's nothing fighting me except the spring. You're thinking of standard high normal derailleurs where spring tension would push it outward from the hub, so the high limit screw would be used to hold it in the right position.
On most derailleurs the chain is contained by the cage, you cannot disengage it from the pulleys without taking the cage apart. That is why you need enough chain to be able to swing the derailleur back so that the wheel can drop down. Your idea of swinging the derailleur out of the way will not work
People are trying to help you by giving the best suggestions they can
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 09:15 PM
  #15  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
You're assuming I would thread the chain between the pulleys. What makes you think I wouldn't just cut off the bent tab and route the chain beneath both pulleys. I don't see you addressing any of the shortcomings I already noted three posts above.

It's a safe guess that you have no experience at all with tensioners.
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 09:21 PM
  #16  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,846

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12777 Post(s)
Liked 7,694 Times in 4,083 Posts
I've seen LX, XT and XTR, I think. I bet there was a Deore, too.

Sorry, don't remember part numbers. I don't think I've seen any short cage, but mid cages, yes.

I'm not sure how that helps you though. Just a list of most of the Shimano RDs from 5 years ago
LesterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 10-17-14, 09:29 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times in 229 Posts
Originally Posted by streetstomper
So much for the assumption that bikeforum members are helpful.
You asked for a list of rapid rise derailleurs and I gave you a link to several model numbers that are rapid rise (and without any commentary). Isn't that precisely what you asked for? If you do not have time to look at the links I sent, here are the model numbers listed:

Shimano XT M770, 771, 772, 761

Good luck.
dwmckee is offline  
Old 10-17-14, 10:32 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
Originally Posted by streetstomper
You're assuming I would thread the chain between the pulleys. What makes you think I wouldn't just cut off the bent tab and route the chain beneath both pulleys. I don't see you addressing any of the shortcomings I already noted three posts above.

It's a safe guess that you have no experience at all with tensioners.
I have been working on and building bikes for over 40 years. You guess wrong. If you route the chain below both pulleys you won't get sufficient chain engagement or tension
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 07:53 AM
  #19  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Whoa, no way! You're telling me that putting the chain below the tension pulley wouldn't engage enough teeth or give enough tension? You mean just like the single pulley tensioners you keep trying to push as the ideal solution?
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 08:07 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
Originally Posted by streetstomper
Whoa, no way! You're telling me that putting the chain below the tension pulley wouldn't engage enough teeth or give enough tension? You mean just like the single pulley tensioners you keep trying to push as the ideal solution?
Not pushing the single pulley tensioners necessarily, but they would work far better than the way you propose using a derailleur, Putting any amount of tension on the chain with the chain below both pulleys would force the upper pulley into the cog and grind it away. You have to thread the chain through the cage if you want a derailleur to work as a tensioner which is the way that the 2 pulley tensioners happen to work. If you have to thread the chain through the cage, then you are just as far ahead using any derailleur
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 10:35 AM
  #21  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
streetstomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Open Road
Posts: 281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by alcjphil
Not pushing the single pulley tensioners necessarily, but they would work far better than the way you propose using a derailleur,
There you go with single pulley tensioners work fine again. Read on:
https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...y-awesome.html

Plenty more comments like that. And your 40 years of working on bikes doesn't impress me since you didn't understand how a low normal derailleur works.
streetstomper is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 10:44 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,930
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1819 Post(s)
Liked 1,695 Times in 976 Posts
Originally Posted by streetstomper
There you go with single pulley tensioners work fine again. Read on:
https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...y-awesome.html

Plenty more comments like that. And your 40 years of working on bikes doesn't impress me since you didn't understand how a low normal derailleur works.
I didn't say that a single cog chain tensioner is the best solution, all I said was that it would work better than the way you want to use a derailleur. I understand perfectly well how a low normal rear derailleur works, I have worked on dozens of bikes that have them. I have tried to point out the flaws in your plan,and have tried to be polite, you have not. My last post in this thread, you can do what you want

Last edited by alcjphil; 10-18-14 at 10:55 AM.
alcjphil is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 11:09 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
repeat Rohloff, chain tensioner, Definitely not cheap @ $85. Universal Cycles -- Rohloff Twin Pulley Chain Tensioners

I own one of these, the chainline is a shim washer stack to place the pulleys (made by Tacx) under the Cog.

nor, for $6 less, is the USA made one from Paul Comp
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopping/product_details.php?id=336&category=2622

though this one at $26 is getting down there in cost Universal Cycles -- Q2 Chain Tension Master


I'm looking for one to use as a ghetto IGH chain tensioner and don't know which models to look for. I figure low normal would be best for a tensioner because then I could just pull it outward with my hand to make wheel removal easier.
by the way .. you remove the wheel by pulling the Whole derailleur Back. its been like that way before you were Born.

just dont cut the chain too Short.

Last edited by fietsbob; 10-18-14 at 02:34 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 12:19 PM
  #24  
New Orleans
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,794
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
This xt 760 in short form-would work just fine
and Rapid rise derailleurs are out of favor
So they would be cheap-maybe $20 -and that might include shipping
Nothing wrong with your idea
if you use a rear derailleur you have the option-eventually- of switching back to a geared bike
single speed bikes-are somewhat limited-but each to his own

Yeah they should be cheap
and the POS nashbar single speed chain tensioner I bought-years ago-was a POC
Of course for $1o(on sale) what about what I should have expected

Luck
Charlie
PS This RR will actually shift up into that 41 cog-in the BIG OR MIDDLE FRONT RING- hard to believe but it does
PPS- WOW- you folks are in high form today-you make ME look good natured
Usually just LC vs FRAP brings out this sort of venom
or maybe some Quirky French bike VS any other bike in the world!!(ok I kinda like french stuff-but I hate their quirky threading bass ACKWARDS PEDALS- funny sized stems-seat posts)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
P1010253.JPG (70.1 KB, 21 views)
phoebeisis is offline  
Old 10-18-14, 12:21 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
dwmckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468

Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times in 229 Posts
It looks like we have provided all of the help that we can possibly provide to you. Good luck!
dwmckee is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.