Front derailleur woes...
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Front derailleur woes...
Hello bike forum readers,
I have been fixing up a 1992 (ish) Peugeot Evasion. The crankset was replaced, and now the front derailleur won't shift out far enough to accommodate the largest chainring. Does this automatically mean I need to replace it as well? It should fit...the BB is square tapered- I removed the new crankset to compare the diameter of spindle entry to the old one. Same. I tried playing with the derailleur's angles and height to see if I could get more play, I am only 2 mm short I would say, but no good.
Anyone have any ideas? Suggestions? I have attached some pictures that might not be very helpful, but I could get more specific info if needed!
Thank you
I have been fixing up a 1992 (ish) Peugeot Evasion. The crankset was replaced, and now the front derailleur won't shift out far enough to accommodate the largest chainring. Does this automatically mean I need to replace it as well? It should fit...the BB is square tapered- I removed the new crankset to compare the diameter of spindle entry to the old one. Same. I tried playing with the derailleur's angles and height to see if I could get more play, I am only 2 mm short I would say, but no good.
Anyone have any ideas? Suggestions? I have attached some pictures that might not be very helpful, but I could get more specific info if needed!
Thank you
#2
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times
in
2,365 Posts
Hello bike forum readers,
I have been fixing up a 1992 (ish) Peugeot Evasion. The crankset was replaced, and now the front derailleur won't shift out far enough to accommodate the largest chainring. Does this automatically mean I need to replace it as well? It should fit...the BB is square tapered- I removed the new crankset to compare the diameter of spindle entry to the old one. Same. I tried playing with the derailleur's angles and height to see if I could get more play, I am only 2 mm short I would say, but no good.
Anyone have any ideas? Suggestions? I have attached some pictures that might not be very helpful, but I could get more specific info if needed!
Thank you
I have been fixing up a 1992 (ish) Peugeot Evasion. The crankset was replaced, and now the front derailleur won't shift out far enough to accommodate the largest chainring. Does this automatically mean I need to replace it as well? It should fit...the BB is square tapered- I removed the new crankset to compare the diameter of spindle entry to the old one. Same. I tried playing with the derailleur's angles and height to see if I could get more play, I am only 2 mm short I would say, but no good.
Anyone have any ideas? Suggestions? I have attached some pictures that might not be very helpful, but I could get more specific info if needed!
Thank you
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@cyccommute, thank you for the quick response!
Yikes. Okay so what I'm looking at is not the fr. derailleur, but instead taking apart the BB (new cups, original spindle) and replacing it with a square tapered spindle that is shorter based on my chain line calculation?
Yikes. Okay so what I'm looking at is not the fr. derailleur, but instead taking apart the BB (new cups, original spindle) and replacing it with a square tapered spindle that is shorter based on my chain line calculation?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Obvious question; have you adjusted the front derailleur's high limit screw further out?
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@HillRider, haha sometimes those are the winning questions...
But unfortunately (well fortunately for my problem solving) yes I did...and was still 2 mm short.
But unfortunately (well fortunately for my problem solving) yes I did...and was still 2 mm short.
#6
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times
in
2,365 Posts
That's in the range of how much shorter the spindle will have to be (probably more in the 5mm range). It's kind of a pain to shorten up the spindle that little but it won't work otherwise.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5786 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Put a ruler on the downtube and across to the tips of the middle chainring. The distance from the center of the tube to the ring should be 45mm or so. No great pecision is needed, eyeball is good enough, but this will tell you the target range for shortening the spindle.
Looking at the distance from the cranks to the frame, I'd say that 5mm or more is about right, but the measurement will be your best guide.
Looking at the distance from the cranks to the frame, I'd say that 5mm or more is about right, but the measurement will be your best guide.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Put a ruler on the downtube and across to the tips of the middle chainring. The distance from the center of the tube to the ring should be 45mm or so. No great pecision is needed, eyeball is good enough, but this will tell you the target range for shortening the spindle.
Looking at the distance from the cranks to the frame, I'd say that 5mm or more is about right, but the measurement will be your best guide.
Looking at the distance from the cranks to the frame, I'd say that 5mm or more is about right, but the measurement will be your best guide.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#10
Really Old Senior Member
Many spindles have on offset, where one end is longer.
You MIGHT be able to swap the spindle end for end, although that will move the NDS pedal out more.
Is there a "code" on the spindle such as 3-S, 3P etc.
There's a chart here that shows the offsets. Scroll down a bit-
Sheldon Brown's Bottom Bracket Size Database
Which kind of begs the question-
IF you serviced your BB, did you accidentally put the spindle in the wrong way?
You MIGHT be able to swap the spindle end for end, although that will move the NDS pedal out more.
Is there a "code" on the spindle such as 3-S, 3P etc.
There's a chart here that shows the offsets. Scroll down a bit-
Sheldon Brown's Bottom Bracket Size Database
Which kind of begs the question-
IF you serviced your BB, did you accidentally put the spindle in the wrong way?
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 03-24-15 at 12:21 PM.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@Al1943 yes sir!
@Bill Kapaun If only it were that simple it is in correctly. However if I swap them, what is the risk or downside to having the NDS stick out more? I will have to take it apart tonight to check to see if there is a code on it...
Facts:
- Chain rings are too far out
To be done:
- "Educated Eyeball" the distance from the centre of the down tube to the middle chainring. The difference between the result and the required 45 mm is the amount of shortening the spindle needs.
- Remove the crankset and the BB to replace the spindle with the new shorter one, or if the offset allows it, reverse the direction.
Keeping my fingers crossed!
@Bill Kapaun If only it were that simple it is in correctly. However if I swap them, what is the risk or downside to having the NDS stick out more? I will have to take it apart tonight to check to see if there is a code on it...
Facts:
- Chain rings are too far out
To be done:
- "Educated Eyeball" the distance from the centre of the down tube to the middle chainring. The difference between the result and the required 45 mm is the amount of shortening the spindle needs.
- Remove the crankset and the BB to replace the spindle with the new shorter one, or if the offset allows it, reverse the direction.
Keeping my fingers crossed!
#12
Really Old Senior Member
The NDS pedal would stick out Xmm (amount of offset) more than it does now.
IF you are fortunate and it's only 3-4mm, you probably wouldn't notice it, if you're a mere mortal.
IF you are fortunate and it's only 3-4mm, you probably wouldn't notice it, if you're a mere mortal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgrantca
Classic & Vintage
0
05-21-14 12:12 PM
cadiremar
Bicycle Mechanics
16
06-11-13 09:31 AM