Bike Forums

Bike Forums (http://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   BMX (http://www.bikeforums.net/bmx/)
-   -   Fly Bikes Brake (http://www.bikeforums.net/bmx/440905-fly-bikes-brake.html)

SpriteBMX 07-14-08 01:08 AM

Fly Bikes Brake
 
I am wondering what is so different from Fly Bikes with the Chainstay or Seatstay brakes. Do they really make a difference if you use the seatstay one for chainstays or vise-versa? My real question though is, that to the people that have the seatstay version, are the "flybikes" logo on the side upsidedown or the right way? If you don't get what I just said, please ask me to reise.

CMcMahon 07-14-08 01:40 AM

The chainstay brakes are angled for a straighter cable line, but the seatstay brakes aren't.

Street rider 07-14-08 09:04 AM

but seatstay mounts are meant for those of you out there who want to run a small gearing like 25/9, and still want to have brakes.

CMcMahon 07-14-08 11:14 AM

Do you actually know what you're talking about? The chainstay brakes work fine with 25-9 on most frames made in the past few years.

minichamp31 07-14-08 12:31 PM

Yeah, I know a kid who has chainstay Fly brakes with a 25/9 gear.

SpriteBMX 07-14-08 01:44 PM

Thx for the replys but for the seatstay, are the words on the side upsidedown? Not a big deal but I would like to know.

Street rider 07-14-08 03:21 PM

ok so some newer frames are made with shorter mounts to accomidate brakes, but thats the original reason that mounts were put on the seatstay. because the didnt make short mounts a while back. seatstay just keeps it all out of the way. like if your chain comes loose or whatever, then its not riding on the brakes.

FitRider 921 07-14-08 03:26 PM

No brakes is just so much easier.

CMcMahon 07-14-08 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Street rider (Post 7059005)
ok so some newer frames are made with shorter mounts to accomidate brakes, but thats the original reason that mounts were put on the seatstay. because the didnt make short mounts a while back. seatstay just keeps it all out of the way. like if your chain comes loose or whatever, then its not riding on the brakes.

That's funny, because I ran 25-9 on a Stricker with Fly brakes and normal chainstay mounts about, oh, four years ago. And after that, I did the exact same thing on a LAF and a Psykopath, also without shortened mounts.

FACT: You will lose this argument.

Street rider 07-14-08 04:26 PM

fine. i dont really care. i dont run brakes anyway. im with fit...wayyyyyyy easier.

minichamp31 07-14-08 08:42 PM

They look cleaner, but other than that, I'm always going to run brakes.

Street rider 07-14-08 10:09 PM

i went brakeless cause my brakes kept goin funny and it was way too much work. plus the part of the are that holds the end of the cable just broke right off.

wethepeople 07-14-08 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CMcMahon (Post 7059295)
That's funny, because I ran 25-9 on a Stricker with Fly brakes and normal chainstay mounts about, oh, four years ago. And after that, I did the exact same thing on a LAF and a Psykopath, also without shortened mounts.

FACT: You will lose this argument.

What frame are you riding now?

CMcMahon 07-14-08 11:47 PM

Nothing. I cracked the Psykopath right before I left for a six-week hiking/geology trip (which I got back from on Friday), and now I just picked up Nick Dawg's Solid AA (custom, with a Spanish BB and Fly brakes on the chainstays...) to ride for the week, since he'll be racing in Nashville. I'll probably be taking one of Joey Cobb's old, brakemountless Volume frames off him later in the week.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:08 PM.