Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    zungguzungguguzungguzeng Catnap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Williamsburg, Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    Zunow, Bridgestone, Mercier, Centurion, Surly, Cannondale
    Posts
    1,116
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Schwinn Paramount Sprint



    this is a 56cm Schwinn Paramount Sprint frame & fork i recently acquired. There's very little information on this model of Paramount online, so I was hoping someone could help shed some light on its value.

    I has been re-painted red, although not the best job. Under the red there seems to be a beige / yellow color. Chrome is in great condition with no pitting or rust. There's no dents in the frame and only a few scratches. I can provide a lot more photos but I wanted to wait to see what angles / areas would be most helpful.

    BB / headset / shifters are Campy Record, but I'm primarily interested in the value of the frame itself and not those parts.
    Quote Originally Posted by indiglow View Post
    Drunken attempts and subsequent faliures at tarckstanding in front of cops is majestic failz.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lancaster County, PA
    My Bikes
    '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Those generally have a lot of value, but that one's been messed with and would take a fair investment to set right. In particular, it has a number of added braze-ons (top tube cable guides, shifters, front derailleur) that would need to be removed. That reduces its value considerably.

  3. #3
    zungguzungguguzungguzeng Catnap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Williamsburg, Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    Zunow, Bridgestone, Mercier, Centurion, Surly, Cannondale
    Posts
    1,116
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Picchio Special View Post
    Those generally have a lot of value, but that one's been messed with and would take a fair investment to set right. In particular, it has a number of added braze-ons (top tube cable guides, shifters, front derailleur) that would need to be removed. That reduces its value considerably.
    so these bikes originally used a clamp-on FD and shifters? is the cable-guide braze-on located on the drive-side chainstay also not original?
    Quote Originally Posted by indiglow View Post
    Drunken attempts and subsequent faliures at tarckstanding in front of cops is majestic failz.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,720
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Catnap View Post
    so these bikes originally used a clamp-on FD and shifters? is the cable-guide braze-on located on the drive-side chainstay also not original?
    Yes and Correct. For "value' to the period correct police, all that would have to go. from a practical stance a case can be made for the braze ons as they are. The front derailleur braze on probably would improve shifting, the curved seat tube placed the standard Campagnolo cage at a divergent angle. I would assemble the drive train and review.

    So, it depends on what you want to do with it. I would be tempted to ride it as is for a while.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Malden, MA.
    My Bikes
    1994 Schwinn Passage, 2010 Masi
    Posts
    269
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That was called the "short couple" frame style. One other Schwinn had the option. Was only sold for 2 years in the 70's as I recall. Scooper might know more. Chris

  6. #6
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    2007 Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks, Chris.

    The short coupled, or "Sprint style" frame was a Paramount option in 1975, 1976, 1977, and 1978. The other Schwinn model with a similar bent seat tube was the electroforged Sprint. The frame style was developed for hill climbing. The P10-9 would have had top tube "cable stop" braze-ons for the rear brake cable as shown below, while the P13-9 would have used Campagnolo bolt-on steel top tube cable clamps for the rear brake cable.

    If you check the serial number on the left (non-drive-side) rear dropout, the first character is a letter representing the month followed by two digits representing the year. A= January, M=December (I is skipped because of possible confusion with 1). For example, M75132 would have been the 132nd Paramount frame scheduled for December, 1975 production.



    Last edited by Scooper; 02-24-11 at 11:06 AM.
    - Stan

  7. #7
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    2007 Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It occurred to me that this 1976 Paramount order form may be helpful, too.

    Notice that the P14, P10 and the P13 (and T22 tandem) were the only Paramount models available with the Sprint style frame. Also, note that the Sprint style P13 and P10 were supplied with a Huret front derailleur rather than Campy (note is at lower right on form).

    - Stan

  8. #8
    Senior Member tugrul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Portsmouth, NH
    Posts
    2,437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One just cropped up on eBay: SCHWINN PRO RACING PARAMOUNT “short couple” F&F 4sale, opening bid of $499.


    Why does this one have such a large gap?

    Looking for Quick release for a BR-6208 Cotter pin press

  9. #9
    Keeper of the SLDB BobHufford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    My Bikes
    '75 Schwinn Paramount P-10, '86 Ritchey Commando, '87 Schwinn Cimarron, '91 Trek 990, '87 Schwinn High Sierra, '73 Schwinn Super Sport, '4? Schwinn New World, '76 Swing Bike.
    Posts
    1,629
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    700c wheels instead of 27"?

    Bob

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lancaster County, PA
    My Bikes
    '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BobHufford View Post
    700c wheels instead of 27"?

    Bob
    Makes sense - the under-TT braze-on guides point toward a touring model that would originally have had 27" wheels.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Minnesota- the frozen tundra
    My Bikes
    1977 Raleigh Super Grand Prix, 1976 Gitane Tour de France
    Posts
    1,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    These guys might be able to help http://www.schwinnbikes.com/schwinn-life/forums/

    I believe that style frame with the bent seat tube was 1974-1975 only. that is a fantastic looking frame.

    I had one with the electroforged frame last summer, I think I sold it too cheap as I've never seen another one.

    My name is Steve and I don't have a bent fork anymore :)

    1979 Raleigh Competition G.S.- mine
    197? Raleigh Super Grand Prix- mine
    1979 Raleigh Super Grand Prix- mine
    1970? Bottecchia- wifes
    1980s Vitus 979- sons
    1974 Viscount Aerospace sons
    1972 Peugeot AO8- sons
    1990s Schwinn hybrid- daughters

  12. #12
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,729
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tugrul View Post
    Why does this one have such a large gap?

    A. It's a P10 w/700C tubulars. By comparison, the OP's bike - a P13 - would look far different with the very same set of wheels.

    B. Rear wheel is shoved all the way back in the drops. Take my word for it - I took that photo.

    It may look original, but I'm pretty sure it has Flying "C" Cinelli bars. Case in point, the chrome Paramount shown in that same photo set looks as if it's from the early 1970's - even though it's a 1960's P13 with a Nuovo group tacked on it.

    -Kurt

    P.S.: I dare say the OP's frame should bring around $500-600.
    Last edited by cudak888; 02-25-11 at 08:21 AM.

  13. #13
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    2007 Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FORDSVTPARTS View Post
    I believe that style frame with the bent seat tube was 1974-1975 only.
    There's no mention of the Sprint-style Paramount frame in the 1974 catalog, but it is advertised as available in the 1975, 1976, 1977, and 1978 catalogs.
    - Stan

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Minnesota- the frozen tundra
    My Bikes
    1977 Raleigh Super Grand Prix, 1976 Gitane Tour de France
    Posts
    1,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
    There's no mention of the Sprint-style Paramount frame in the 1974 catalog, but it is advertised as available in the 1975, 1976, 1977, and 1978 catalogs.
    I'd be curious to know if the later Sprint Paramounts had the kicked forward seat tube though, I know the Sprint name continued but the frame style (at least in Electroforged) was only a two year design and I may have been off a year.
    My name is Steve and I don't have a bent fork anymore :)

    1979 Raleigh Competition G.S.- mine
    197? Raleigh Super Grand Prix- mine
    1979 Raleigh Super Grand Prix- mine
    1970? Bottecchia- wifes
    1980s Vitus 979- sons
    1974 Viscount Aerospace sons
    1972 Peugeot AO8- sons
    1990s Schwinn hybrid- daughters

  15. #15
    Keeper of the SLDB BobHufford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    My Bikes
    '75 Schwinn Paramount P-10, '86 Ritchey Commando, '87 Schwinn Cimarron, '91 Trek 990, '87 Schwinn High Sierra, '73 Schwinn Super Sport, '4? Schwinn New World, '76 Swing Bike.
    Posts
    1,629
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, all the Sprint Paramounts had the curved seat tube.

    The '70s EF Sprint was in the catalog for '74 and '75, but there are a few '76s out there (some with different colors and decals).

    The '80s Sprint was a low-end model with a diamond frame.

    Bob

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lancaster County, PA
    My Bikes
    '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BobHufford View Post
    Yes, all the Sprint Paramounts had the curved seat tube.

    The '70s EF Sprint was in the catalog for '74 and '75, but there are a few '76s out there (some with different colors and decals).

    The '80s Sprint was a low-end model with a diamond frame.

    Bob
    +1
    Good to keep in mind that we're really talking about two completely different animals, produced in different ways, and in different parts of the Schwinn factory (assuming that the Sprint Paramount wasn't in fact made in Wisconsin) by a whole different team of people. The EF Sprint was produced using mass production methods, and had a two-year catalog run, with some spillover into '76. The Sprint Paramount was basically a special order job, produced in very small numbers. Not surprising the two models wouldn't track identically in terms of chronology and duration. The two models have almost nothing in common aside from the curved seat tube.

  17. #17
    zungguzungguguzungguzeng Catnap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Williamsburg, Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    Zunow, Bridgestone, Mercier, Centurion, Surly, Cannondale
    Posts
    1,116
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
    Thanks, Chris.

    If you check the serial number on the left (non-drive-side) rear dropout, the first character is a letter representing the month followed by two digits representing the year. A= January, M=December (I is skipped because of possible confusion with 1). For example, M75132 would have been the 132nd Paramount frame scheduled for December, 1975 production.

    serial on mine is E7582... so it was the 82nd frame made in May of 1975?
    Quote Originally Posted by indiglow View Post
    Drunken attempts and subsequent faliures at tarckstanding in front of cops is majestic failz.

  18. #18
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    2007 Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Catnap View Post
    serial on mine is E7582... so it was the 82nd frame made in May of 1975?
    Correct!
    - Stan

  19. #19
    zungguzungguguzungguzeng Catnap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Williamsburg, Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    Zunow, Bridgestone, Mercier, Centurion, Surly, Cannondale
    Posts
    1,116
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so Kurt says he thinks it's worth $500-600. any other opinions? anything I can do to improve the value? i have the original decals and owner's manual, by the way.

    also, there's a hole, threaded for a screw, in the bottom of the BB shell. i assume that's for a plastic cable guide? or was there a specific / proprietary guide made by Schwinn for these bikes?
    Quote Originally Posted by indiglow View Post
    Drunken attempts and subsequent faliures at tarckstanding in front of cops is majestic failz.

  20. #20
    Newbie Jnolan2026's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Curve Tube Superior proto type 1974

    I have a 1974 Superior bent tube bike. photo link http://velospace.org/node/44866 It has been restored to new condition wih a professional restoration. look close, it is not a paramount or a sprint, It is a proto type one off Superor built in Chicago. It has the 74 sr numbers and it is the same as my 76 production Superior, with the exception of a short coupled frame. I know this is an old thread, but I think I would be interested in that frame if it is still avaliable, I dont think it would take much to restore it to original, the braze ons Make it look like an old bike but offers the ablity to install modern parts.. Chemical strip, new chrome, paint, Decals and align the frame, and it would be like new. It would be a fun bike to ride.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    839
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That is an awesome bike! Just a few minor points though. Frames made in '74 would have been originally built as Sports Tourers, many unsold Sports Tourer frames were later converted to Superiors by Schwinn (that is, any with serial numbers dating prior to '76). If you were building to '76 Superior specs note that a '76 Superior would have had a Schwinn GT-300 rear derailleur, the SunTour VTG-Luxe was used in '77 and '78. The front derailleur on a '76 Superior would have been either a Schwinn Approved GT-260 (early) or GT-280 (late). I can't tell what is on there now but the freewheel should be a Schwinn Approved Model F3.

    Did this bike come with a headbadge, and if so do you believe it is original to the bike? I ask because in that case if it was ever built up by Schwinn as a Superior it should have a 4-digit stamp indicating the day of assembly. In any case it is definitely a non-production bike and very interesting!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •