Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Bicycle misnomenclature

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Bicycle misnomenclature

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-15, 07:10 AM
  #76  
aka Tom Reingold
Thread Starter
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times in 1,430 Posts
Peddle is just a misspelling of pedal. Never heard pendle.

Block was somewhat common in the 70's, short for gear block, i.e. freewheel. A straight block was one where each sprocket size was one tooth off its adjacent sprocket.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 07:19 AM
  #77  
Cisalpinist
 
Italuminium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557

Bikes: blue ones.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Peddle is just a misspelling of pedal. Never heard pendle.
It's common in Dutch to write "pendalen" instead of "pedalen", but I've seen "pendles" once or twice here. Bugs the living daylights out of me.
Italuminium is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 12:07 PM
  #78  
Bikes are okay, I guess.
 
thumpism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938

Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times in 1,557 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Peddle is just a misspelling of pedal. Never heard pendle.
Not a misspelling, but a different word. To peddle is to sell. You might encounter bike shops named Bike Peddler as a play on words for Pedaler (as a rep I had dealers who used both of those names), one who sells bikes as well as pedals them.
thumpism is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 04:20 PM
  #79  
Senior Member
 
YouthxCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 191

Bikes: 1974 Raleigh Super Tourer, 1974 Ralegh Gran Sport, 1985 Schwinn Peloton, 1986 Schwinn World Sport, 1987 Panasonic DX-4000

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Related to an earlier post, why do we call bikes "10 speed" or "12 speed" or what have you based on the the freewheel? Once you get rid of two of the cross-chain gears, your'e already down to 8 usable gears on a 5-speed freewheel, and it's probably more like 6 safely.
YouthxCrew is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 06:48 PM
  #80  
Junior Member
 
Don Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 196
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Thank you. I'm quite proud of that coinage.

The stupidest coinage in bikedom is groupset. ~~CRINGE~~ Don't group and set mean the same thing?! It sounds so thoughtless. How did this word get its start?
I downloaded a browser word-replacement extension a while back specifically to change that word to "gruppo" when i came across it. It's improved my quality of life, I'm sure.
Don Marco is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 06:53 PM
  #81  
What??? Only 2 wheels?
 
jimmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434

Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10

Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times in 232 Posts
What's the point of using a consistent grupposet anyway?
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
jimmuller is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 07:20 PM
  #82  
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times in 856 Posts
Originally Posted by jimmuller
What's the point of using a consistent grupposet anyway?
Nowadays, everything. There's the cable pull ratio between levers and shifters and levers and brakes, and there's sprocket-spacing differences that must be respected both front and rear. There can even be chainring size steps that have to conform to the particular front derailer.

Manufacturers have shown only slight and intermittent preference for making their gruppo parts compatible with any other maker's parts, and often take measures to assure otherwise.
dddd is offline  
Old 04-19-15, 08:34 PM
  #83  
What??? Only 2 wheels?
 
jimmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434

Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10

Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times in 232 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd
What's the point of using a consistent grupposet anyway?
Nowadays, everything...
Ah, I'm afraid you took my question literally. It wasn't meant to be. Perhaps I should have asked about using a coordinated consistent grupposet collection superset gruppo.

The original point was about a gruppo set. Seems rather redundant to me it seems redundant. I didn't do nuthin' but extend the concept.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
jimmuller is offline  
Old 04-20-15, 01:52 AM
  #84  
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,181

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times in 856 Posts
Yeah, that's funny. I find that redundant non-words like groupset are sometimes used when introducing unfamiliar subjects to newbies, maybe to help them grasp a concept. But then these new words don't go away and are repeated.
dddd is offline  
Old 04-20-15, 04:50 AM
  #85  
Junior Member
 
Don Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 196
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Don Marco is offline  
Old 04-20-15, 07:23 AM
  #86  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by jimmuller
I've heard a lot of people refer to the "front forks". I wonder if they every think there might be rear forks.

Of course toe clips are really cages, and pedal/shoe combinations with integrated clips are called clipless.

And wonder of wonder, the bicycle manufacturing industry went over to using English measurements (mostly) instead of metric.
They did so as the French stayed true to metric... No one wanted to copy them.
repechage is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 09:03 AM
  #87  
aka Tom Reingold
Thread Starter
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times in 1,430 Posts
Bump. What's your favorite bike misnomenclature?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 09:57 AM
  #88  
Senior Member
 
ApolloSoyuz1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NW Ohio flatlander
Posts: 236

Bikes: Cannondale SR400 (3.0). Phat t00bs!

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by thumpism
Figure 8 (pronounced "fig-YATE") = rear derailleur.
Sponges = Grab On foam grips.
Speed handles = safety levers.
Flettahs = reflectors.
Stretchers = bungee cords.
I gotta admit: this struck me as "Pittsburgh-ese"
ApolloSoyuz1975 is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 10:11 AM
  #89  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
https://www.google.com/search?q=defi...hrome&ie=UTF-8

verb: rake; 3rd person present: rakes; past tense: raked; past participle: raked; gerund or present participle: raking
1.
set (something, especially a stage or the floor of an auditorium) at a sloping angle.
(of a ship's mast or funnel) incline from the perpendicular toward the stern.
(of a ship's bow or stern) project at its upper part beyond the keel.

noun
noun: rake; plural noun: rakes
1.
the angle at which a thing slopes.
2.
the angle of the edge or face of a cutting tool.
So, "rake" is an angle. On bicycles, when we say "rake" we really mean "offset."
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 10:20 AM
  #90  
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,376 Times in 891 Posts
thinktubes is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 10:45 AM
  #91  
52psi
 
Fahrenheit531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,014

Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 801 Times in 390 Posts
^^ I suspect someone spent some quality time with their bottom bracket and seat post during construction of that diagram.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Fahrenheit531 is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 11:05 AM
  #92  
Heck on Wheels
 
SloButWide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: USA Midwest
Posts: 1,055

Bikes: In Signature

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Derailleur, or even Sheldon Brown's "de-railler" makes no sense. There is no rail, but there are cogs.
Clearly, the solution is to rename the Derailleur the "chain mover thingy". Some bikes have a front chain mover thingy and a back chain mover thingy. But wait, you object, "Doesn't the crank move the chain also? Isn't it a chain mover thingy?" No, No! It's a chain goer around thingy! Clearly, it makes the chain go around.

If you think this is ridiculous, you've never listened to people explain their problem to a bike mechanic.
__________________
"I had a great ride this morning, except for that part about winding up at work."

Bikes so far: 2011 Felt Z85, 80's Raleigh Sovereign (USA), 91 Bianchi Peregrine, 91 Austro-Daimler Pathfinder, 90's Trek 730 Multitrack, STOLEN: 80 Schwinn Voyageur (Japan)

SloButWide is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 11:19 AM
  #93  
Heck on Wheels
 
SloButWide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: USA Midwest
Posts: 1,055

Bikes: In Signature

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Thank you. I'm quite proud of that coinage.

The stupidest coinage in bikedom is groupset. ~~CRINGE~~ Don't group and set mean the same thing?! It sounds so thoughtless. How did this word get its start?
A close second has to be colorway. If the word snuck out of the fashion industry, shouldn't it have a classy Italian or French equivalent?
__________________
"I had a great ride this morning, except for that part about winding up at work."

Bikes so far: 2011 Felt Z85, 80's Raleigh Sovereign (USA), 91 Bianchi Peregrine, 91 Austro-Daimler Pathfinder, 90's Trek 730 Multitrack, STOLEN: 80 Schwinn Voyageur (Japan)

SloButWide is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 11:35 AM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
agmetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,541

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by thinktubes
I love "hyperdrive core"....might start using that
agmetal is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 01:19 PM
  #95  
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,844

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2296 Post(s)
Liked 2,046 Times in 1,253 Posts
Crank set vs chain set. Crank sets have no rings unless you are Sheldon. Also wondering which includes the bottom bracket?
clubman is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 01:30 PM
  #96  
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,595

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 720 Times in 395 Posts
"Natural" languages aren't completely logic. Artificial ones are, but they haven't had much success.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 02:01 PM
  #97  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by clubman
Crank set vs chain set. Crank sets have no rings unless you are Sheldon. Also wondering which includes the bottom bracket?

Wikipedia disagrees and so do I:


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




A Shimano Deore right crankset, showing crank arm, spider, three chainrings and chainring guard



Belt-drive crankset on a Trek District



A chainring that incorporates the manufacturer's brand name


The crankset (in the US) or chainset (in the UK), is the component of a bicycle drivetrain that converts the reciprocating motion of the rider's legs into rotational motion used to drive the chain or belt, which in turn drives the rear wheel. It consists of one or more sprockets, also called chainrings[1][2][3] or chainwheels[3] attached to the cranks, arms,[4] or crankarms[5] to which the pedals attach. It is connected to the rider by the pedals, to the bicycle frame by the bottom bracket, and to the rear sprocket, cassette or freewheel via the chain.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 03:27 PM
  #98  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,777

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3582 Post(s)
Liked 3,394 Times in 1,928 Posts
Originally Posted by Sir_Name
Saddle vs seat. I like Sheldon's distinction between the two:

[I]"You'll notice that I do call them "saddles," not "seats." There is a reason for this. A "seat" is something you sit on, and is designed to bear essentially your entire weight. […] A saddle is intended to carry some, but not all of your weight."
I prefer "a seat is something you sit on; a saddle is something you ride on."
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 05:05 PM
  #99  
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,844

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2296 Post(s)
Liked 2,046 Times in 1,253 Posts
Originally Posted by Grand Bois
Wikipedia disagrees and so do I:
I don't make any claim to knowing what is correct. I do remember that one of them should include or used to include the spindle and cups. I think it was an English idiosyncrasy that's gone away.
clubman is offline  
Old 04-27-17, 05:09 PM
  #100  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by SloButWide
A close second has to be colorway. If the word snuck out of the fashion industry, shouldn't it have a classy Italian or French equivalent?
The only way I can avoid saying something vulgar and insulting to the user of the term colorway is to justify stifling my anger and dismay by thinking that colorway refers to the overall color design including stripes, highlights, logos, etc. Then I can live with it. Just as I can live with "seat" and "clip in pedals". The alternative would be something like "color treatment" or such, like "window treatment" or "wall treatment". Which is worse?

I can't find such justification for those who either use the word groupset, or non-Italians who use gruppo.

Something I can totally get is the term used by the uncool, "clip in pedals" because about the absolute dumbest custom is calling modern pedals "clipless". Clips - and distinguishing pedals by the lack of them - is referring to such an arcane term and completely out of the realm of understanding of anyone born after, say, 1965, even enthusiastic and knowledgeable cyclists. And there's no need for them to know or have known about clips.

Clip in pedals is such a better term. Or as some call them, my preferred, automatic pedals or step in pedals, like ski bindings were known when we went from heel straps and toe levers that you had to push down engage the binding.

Thank goodness we don't refer to modern landline phones as "crankless phones".

Last edited by Camilo; 04-27-17 at 05:14 PM.
Camilo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.