The trouble with technology that advances too fast
#26
Senior Member
I never go out into the woods without a compass, K-Bar, water bottle, & paper map. All that other stuff could fail and, I want to make sure I can get back to civilization some day.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
142 Posts
Isn't that the truth. When we were riding around Lake Superior earlier this summer, I saw the motleyist collection of beat up touring bikes loaded with sleeping bags, cooking equipment, radios, and overstuffed panniers.
Really, most of the "touring" bikes I observed were old mtbs with garage sale Blackburns.
Let's just say I was impressed with their ingenuity.
Fast forward to the other day. I was talking to two guys with a MAP and a Bruce Gordon loaded with all the fancy new stuff. Custom racks, Swift Bags, Schmidt dyno hubs and Edelux II lights.
Incredible bikes.
I asked them where they were touring to and they said they use the bikes mainly for commuting.
I just about wet myself.
I thought they were off on a trans-continental tour.
#28
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,613
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10955 Post(s)
Liked 7,485 Times
in
4,187 Posts
[QUOTE=RobbieTunes;18133078]Once you've followed a Di2 for about 2 miles, it's just another bunch of cogs and fairly ugly cranksets.[QUOTE]
I don't understand why cranksets have turned ugly. They went from functional art to functionally fugly.
I don't understand why cranksets have turned ugly. They went from functional art to functionally fugly.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
Hah!
Isn't that the truth. When we were riding around Lake Superior earlier this summer, I saw the motleyist collection of beat up touring bikes loaded with sleeping bags, cooking equipment, radios, and overstuffed panniers.
Really, most of the "touring" bikes I observed were old mtbs with garage sale Blackburns.
Let's just say I was impressed with their ingenuity.
Fast forward to the other day. I was talking to two guys with a MAP and a Bruce Gordon loaded with all the fancy new stuff. Custom racks, Swift Bags, Schmidt dyno hubs and Edelux II lights.
Incredible bikes.
I asked them where they were touring to and they said they use the bikes mainly for commuting.
I just about wet myself.
I thought they were off on a trans-continental tour.
Isn't that the truth. When we were riding around Lake Superior earlier this summer, I saw the motleyist collection of beat up touring bikes loaded with sleeping bags, cooking equipment, radios, and overstuffed panniers.
Really, most of the "touring" bikes I observed were old mtbs with garage sale Blackburns.
Let's just say I was impressed with their ingenuity.
Fast forward to the other day. I was talking to two guys with a MAP and a Bruce Gordon loaded with all the fancy new stuff. Custom racks, Swift Bags, Schmidt dyno hubs and Edelux II lights.
Incredible bikes.
I asked them where they were touring to and they said they use the bikes mainly for commuting.
I just about wet myself.
I thought they were off on a trans-continental tour.
Fwiw, on a 150-mile group ride I did last month, the array of bicycles was pretty interesting. I was on my Lemond Buenos Aires 650B conversion with Shimergo 8-speed drivetrain. Another rider was an a new-ish Cannonade alu or CF (I couldn't tell which) bike and had all of his stuff in a backpack. Another rider was on a fixed-gear Raleigh Pro. There were several Surleys, a Boulder, and a Soma. The only thing that all shared were generator hubs and LED lamps as it was a night-time ride. On the whole, these were all experienced brevet riders. Whatever gets the job done.
#30
aka Tom Reingold
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I think just about all the new stuff is better than most of the old stuff in one way or another. I wouldn't question that. But:
1. is it worth the extra cost?
2. is it sufficiently better than the old stuff to declare the old stuff useless?
3. by gaining a new advantage, do you lose an old advantage? What is the overall balance of loss and gain?
4. how long does it take before the advance becomes obsolete?
5. does it really do what it claims?
6. what is its failure mode?
An example of #3 is the reparability of steel frames. Needing to repair or modify a frame isn't all that common, so I won't claim it's a highly valuable trait, but mixed in with the other desirable attributes of steel frames, it does have significant value.
I'm also a technologist by trade. In essence, I promote the use of computers for communication and enterprise management. I'm building more and more capable systems for people to use in their jobs. But I don't promote building a web site to announce that we're heading out for lunch today, just to make a silly example.
Another interest of mine is choral singing, usually a cappella. I go to a three-hour rehearsal once a week, and I perform in about six concerts a year. These are my hours of no tech. I use paper and pencil. I don't even use a mechanical pencil; I use the kind I have to sharpen. One day I will learn to use a scoring app, but I haven't needed to yet. I enjoy the freedom from electronics in those few hours per week.
I have two bikes with brifters. I like brifters. I'm fine with riding old shifting systems, too. The longer the ride, the more I want more gears and easy shifting.
I've tried carbon fiber bikes. They ride great. One day, I might own one, but they are expensive, and they are even expensiver than they appear, because their expected lifespan is a lot shorter than that of steel bikes.
I tried a relative's Di2 shifting. It worked like a champ on one ride I took, which was about 15 miles. The actual advantage seemed quite small, since I don't find repair and maintenance of cables to be burdensome. I expect its failure modes to be more annoying than those of cable systems. Given this disadvantage and the tiny advantage it offers, I don't crave electronic shifting at all.
1. is it worth the extra cost?
2. is it sufficiently better than the old stuff to declare the old stuff useless?
3. by gaining a new advantage, do you lose an old advantage? What is the overall balance of loss and gain?
4. how long does it take before the advance becomes obsolete?
5. does it really do what it claims?
6. what is its failure mode?
An example of #3 is the reparability of steel frames. Needing to repair or modify a frame isn't all that common, so I won't claim it's a highly valuable trait, but mixed in with the other desirable attributes of steel frames, it does have significant value.
I'm also a technologist by trade. In essence, I promote the use of computers for communication and enterprise management. I'm building more and more capable systems for people to use in their jobs. But I don't promote building a web site to announce that we're heading out for lunch today, just to make a silly example.
Another interest of mine is choral singing, usually a cappella. I go to a three-hour rehearsal once a week, and I perform in about six concerts a year. These are my hours of no tech. I use paper and pencil. I don't even use a mechanical pencil; I use the kind I have to sharpen. One day I will learn to use a scoring app, but I haven't needed to yet. I enjoy the freedom from electronics in those few hours per week.
I have two bikes with brifters. I like brifters. I'm fine with riding old shifting systems, too. The longer the ride, the more I want more gears and easy shifting.
I've tried carbon fiber bikes. They ride great. One day, I might own one, but they are expensive, and they are even expensiver than they appear, because their expected lifespan is a lot shorter than that of steel bikes.
I tried a relative's Di2 shifting. It worked like a champ on one ride I took, which was about 15 miles. The actual advantage seemed quite small, since I don't find repair and maintenance of cables to be burdensome. I expect its failure modes to be more annoying than those of cable systems. Given this disadvantage and the tiny advantage it offers, I don't crave electronic shifting at all.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#31
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
I found it to be another us vs. them click-bait rubbish. Can't blame the author because the only thing that sells these days is confrontation. I am terribly sick of us vs them. There is no them, it's just us.
But other than the writing style, the author seems unable to separate need and want. I don't need a cambio corsa equipped bike. I don't need a Vittoria Margherita equipped bike. I don't need an EPS equipped bike. But I certainly can want one. And I certainly won't apologize for wanting one. I don't need to "make do" with anything if I choose not to. I'm no communist.
His best line was "TDF tech probably plateaued at least 5 years ago." An opinion just as valid as mine that TDF tech probably plateaued at least 110 years ago with the advent of the flip-flop hub.
But other than the writing style, the author seems unable to separate need and want. I don't need a cambio corsa equipped bike. I don't need a Vittoria Margherita equipped bike. I don't need an EPS equipped bike. But I certainly can want one. And I certainly won't apologize for wanting one. I don't need to "make do" with anything if I choose not to. I'm no communist.
His best line was "TDF tech probably plateaued at least 5 years ago." An opinion just as valid as mine that TDF tech probably plateaued at least 110 years ago with the advent of the flip-flop hub.
I'd be happy to stick electronic shifting on my Rivendell if it didn't cost so much more money than the great functioning Ultegra 6800 group that is on there. I could be happy with friction bar ends too.
#32
Aspiring curmudgeon
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
13 Posts
Electronic shifting is just something I don't see an advantage in. Any shifter is basically a remote control for the derailleur. Why do I need it to be wireless if the two are always a fixed distance away from each other?
That said, I've never used it. Maybe it performs better, I can't say. It doesn't seem suited to my purposes, so I'll refrain from judgment.
That said, I've never used it. Maybe it performs better, I can't say. It doesn't seem suited to my purposes, so I'll refrain from judgment.
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
#33
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
I've noticed electronic shifting does perform better in certain situations...
One, when climbing a hill under power you can shift up or down through the cassette without it getting all hinkey.
Two, when sprinting hard you can continue to shift to get to higher and higher gears.
None of this is really all that important to me. I'm cool with cabled shifting...but I will say the new Ultegra stuff shifts better than my older 6500 stuff.
Can't beat downtube friction or even barend for simplicity though.
One, when climbing a hill under power you can shift up or down through the cassette without it getting all hinkey.
Two, when sprinting hard you can continue to shift to get to higher and higher gears.
None of this is really all that important to me. I'm cool with cabled shifting...but I will say the new Ultegra stuff shifts better than my older 6500 stuff.
Can't beat downtube friction or even barend for simplicity though.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 191
Bikes: 1974 Raleigh Super Tourer, 1974 Ralegh Gran Sport, 1985 Schwinn Peloton, 1986 Schwinn World Sport, 1987 Panasonic DX-4000
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Another interest of mine is choral singing, usually a cappella. I go to a three-hour rehearsal once a week, and I perform in about six concerts a year. These are my hours of no tech. I use paper and pencil. I don't even use a mechanical pencil; I use the kind I have to sharpen. One day I will learn to use a scoring app, but I haven't needed to yet. I enjoy the freedom from electronics in those few hours per week.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 57
Bikes: 2008 Ironhorse MKIII, 1985 Trek 410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mostly good. The problem with people who are critical of new gear and are still using 9speed is just that. They are criticizing from the outside. As someone who rides and works on new bike I have to say I love the constant advances in technology and yes you can feel it, especially with sport riding and especially on mountain bikes. I did got from 26" to 29" and it is a world of difference, then back to 27.5" and now back to 29". tire size and choice makes a huge difference, fat bikes are way cool. + size tires are rad and may take over. You have to ride it to know. I have used 3x9, 3x10, 2x10, 1x10 and now 1x11. 1x systems are awesome. The chainring life is just fine and it is fewer parts to maintain and replace. Front derailleur systems on mountain bikes are sort of clunky with rear suspension. The sport is way better off for having 1x systems and clutch derailleurs. They are awesome. Dropper post also are an amazing advancement for mountain biking. The difference in speed and fun is instant and you never want to go back..
the best part of the article is the link the the cycle systems academy podcast. You just opened a huge door for me. I have a lot of listening to do. Fun!
the best part of the article is the link the the cycle systems academy podcast. You just opened a huge door for me. I have a lot of listening to do. Fun!
On the other hand, I feel the move from 26" wheels was just a marketing ploy. I like the immediate, flickable nature of the 26" wheel. I like technical riding; I like riding over obstacles, while feeling what I am doing. I think 29" wheels feel like riding around on a tank. And I feel that 27.5" wheels were an attempt to rectify the sluggishness of the 29", but still allowed manufacturers to be able to sell the 'next thing' to the masses. I don't know why I feel so strongly about this, but I hate hearing people say that 27.5" wheels roll over things so much better, or that they smooth this or that out. That's not why I love MTB. I *want* to be challenged.
All that said, I love 27.5 and 29" wheels. They made a LOT of very expensive, very strong 26" wheelsets available nearly for the price of dirt.
Last edited by jcoll003; 09-05-15 at 12:05 AM.
#36
Cousinmosquito
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Bikes: Drop-barred Karate Monkey (10 spd), Singular Kite(9spd), Santa Cruz Tallboy(10spd), Santa Cruz Superlight(9spd), Litespeed Ocooee(9spd), Carbon road bike(9spd), Carbon Giant XTC(10spd), Bianchi D2 Chrono TT bike(9spd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hey guys, its really cool to see you critiqueing my blog post from (Jeff's Bike Blog) but bear in mind, its just a blog. Just another opinion : ) I am a fan of technology, but not when usability is sacrificed, or as someone else said, the pros don't outweigh the cons. Keep up the debate! The guy talking about having 1x9, and how it made him stronger, implies hes having to work harder, so he presulmabley has less of a usable range of gears. Thats cool if you are still young : ) Like riding a singlespeed eh! You have to attack everything. I don't follow XC racing much anymore, I still do it but not as much as I used to. I watched the last world cup on the net last night. Man, gone are the days when people winched there way about the course, now its just attack attack attack. Does anyone have a view on whether this came about because of limited gear range or is it just a change in racing style? My guess is that some of these courses don't have a great amount of elevation anyway ? Its certainly exciting to watch. A shame its not all televised. A kiwi came 1st in U23 last night !
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I think the point that it's still a bunch of gears on a bike is on par. If you take a top road bicycle from 1980 vs 2015, visually they will be night & day different. The complexity of the bicycle has increased. The speed? Very little. However, that very little bit came from mountains of change. Advancements have made for some great improvements. Most of which the average cyclist will gain no benefit. A whole lot of perceived benefit but, none actually. The consumer wants the the latest, greatest, coolest looking thing on the market.
#39
Cousinmosquito
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Bikes: Drop-barred Karate Monkey (10 spd), Singular Kite(9spd), Santa Cruz Tallboy(10spd), Santa Cruz Superlight(9spd), Litespeed Ocooee(9spd), Carbon road bike(9spd), Carbon Giant XTC(10spd), Bianchi D2 Chrono TT bike(9spd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think just about all the new stuff is better than most of the old stuff in one way or another. I wouldn't question that. But:
1. is it worth the extra cost?
2. is it sufficiently better than the old stuff to declare the old stuff useless?
3. by gaining a new advantage, do you lose an old advantage? What is the overall balance of loss and gain?
4. how long does it take before the advance becomes obsolete?
5. does it really do what it claims?
6. what is its failure mode?
An example of #3 is the reparability of steel frames. Needing to repair or modify a frame isn't all that common, so I won't claim it's a highly valuable trait, but mixed in with the other desirable attributes of steel frames, it does have significant value.
I'm also a technologist by trade. In essence, I promote the use of computers for communication and enterprise management. I'm building more and more capable systems for people to use in their jobs. But I don't promote building a web site to announce that we're heading out for lunch today, just to make a silly example.
Another interest of mine is choral singing, usually a cappella. I go to a three-hour rehearsal once a week, and I perform in about six concerts a year. These are my hours of no tech. I use paper and pencil. I don't even use a mechanical pencil; I use the kind I have to sharpen. One day I will learn to use a scoring app, but I haven't needed to yet. I enjoy the freedom from electronics in those few hours per week.
I have two bikes with brifters. I like brifters. I'm fine with riding old shifting systems, too. The longer the ride, the more I want more gears and easy shifting.
I've tried carbon fiber bikes. They ride great. One day, I might own one, but they are expensive, and they are even expensiver than they appear, because their expected lifespan is a lot shorter than that of steel bikes.
I tried a relative's Di2 shifting. It worked like a champ on one ride I took, which was about 15 miles. The actual advantage seemed quite small, since I don't find repair and maintenance of cables to be burdensome. I expect its failure modes to be more annoying than those of cable systems. Given this disadvantage and the tiny advantage it offers, I don't crave electronic shifting at all.
1. is it worth the extra cost?
2. is it sufficiently better than the old stuff to declare the old stuff useless?
3. by gaining a new advantage, do you lose an old advantage? What is the overall balance of loss and gain?
4. how long does it take before the advance becomes obsolete?
5. does it really do what it claims?
6. what is its failure mode?
An example of #3 is the reparability of steel frames. Needing to repair or modify a frame isn't all that common, so I won't claim it's a highly valuable trait, but mixed in with the other desirable attributes of steel frames, it does have significant value.
I'm also a technologist by trade. In essence, I promote the use of computers for communication and enterprise management. I'm building more and more capable systems for people to use in their jobs. But I don't promote building a web site to announce that we're heading out for lunch today, just to make a silly example.
Another interest of mine is choral singing, usually a cappella. I go to a three-hour rehearsal once a week, and I perform in about six concerts a year. These are my hours of no tech. I use paper and pencil. I don't even use a mechanical pencil; I use the kind I have to sharpen. One day I will learn to use a scoring app, but I haven't needed to yet. I enjoy the freedom from electronics in those few hours per week.
I have two bikes with brifters. I like brifters. I'm fine with riding old shifting systems, too. The longer the ride, the more I want more gears and easy shifting.
I've tried carbon fiber bikes. They ride great. One day, I might own one, but they are expensive, and they are even expensiver than they appear, because their expected lifespan is a lot shorter than that of steel bikes.
I tried a relative's Di2 shifting. It worked like a champ on one ride I took, which was about 15 miles. The actual advantage seemed quite small, since I don't find repair and maintenance of cables to be burdensome. I expect its failure modes to be more annoying than those of cable systems. Given this disadvantage and the tiny advantage it offers, I don't crave electronic shifting at all.
I found this to be an interesting read. Possibly best posted somewhere else tho ?
New research unlocks secrets of steel tubing - Cycling Weekly
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,054
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,802 Times
in
1,408 Posts
1. is it worth the extra cost?
2. is it sufficiently better than the old stuff to declare the old stuff useless?
3. by gaining a new advantage, do you lose an old advantage? What is the overall balance of loss and gain?
4. how long does it take before the advance becomes obsolete?
5. does it really do what it claims?
6. what is its failure mode?
2. is it sufficiently better than the old stuff to declare the old stuff useless?
3. by gaining a new advantage, do you lose an old advantage? What is the overall balance of loss and gain?
4. how long does it take before the advance becomes obsolete?
5. does it really do what it claims?
6. what is its failure mode?
2. Anyone who calls old stuff useless is an a-hole. Just like anyone who calls new stuff worthless is the same a-hole on the other side of the card. By this definition, my cambio corsa is useless. But as a matter of fact, I do use it. And I enjoy using it. Hardly useless.
3. Why is it necessary to have a gain? Unless of course using this bike puts food on your table. For someone who races a bike for a living, I can see a need for a gain. Everyone else, any "gain" is merely a want, most definitely not a need. Are you going to tell me what I want? I don't think so.
4. I have no idea why this is relevant. So what if it is obsolete? You mean the company that made the technology in the first place doesn't support it and the availability of replacements gets more difficult over time? Ummm, what about C&V you don't understand?
5. While I am a serious stickler for having evidence to support a claim (go ahead, ask me about the bs of stiffer frame = improved performance), again, these bikes are a luxury. Claims are marketing puffery. The only relevant claims are the drivetrain makes the bike go forward, the handlebars steer the bike and the brakes stop the bike. Pretty easy to validate with any bike.
6. Again, how is this relevant? A steel, aluminum, or carbon frame will fail in different manners. But they all fail as a consequence of being pushed beyond their limits. The crash causes the failure, the failure does not cause the crash. Or if my cable breaks on my derailleur or the battery dies on my servo, I can't shift either way. Why is one "worse" than the other? No cables to break or batteries to die on a cambio corsa. Is that your go to shifting system?
I am not saying you aren't free to want things the way you want things. But when people start listing criteria for what's "best", like the author of the blog, it gets my hackles up. I don't like being told what my desires should be. They are my desires, just as valid or invalid as yours. What is worse is when the author of the blog makes it an us versus them piece of tripe.
#41
Cousinmosquito
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Bikes: Drop-barred Karate Monkey (10 spd), Singular Kite(9spd), Santa Cruz Tallboy(10spd), Santa Cruz Superlight(9spd), Litespeed Ocooee(9spd), Carbon road bike(9spd), Carbon Giant XTC(10spd), Bianchi D2 Chrono TT bike(9spd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1.
<snip></snip>
6. Again, how is this relevant? A steel, aluminum, or carbon frame will fail in different manners. But they all fail as a consequence of being pushed beyond their limits. The crash causes the failure, the failure does not cause the crash. Or if my cable breaks on my derailleur or the battery dies on my servo, I can't shift either way. Why is one "worse" than the other? No cables to break or batteries to die on a cambio corsa. Is that your go to shifting system?
.
<snip></snip>
6. Again, how is this relevant? A steel, aluminum, or carbon frame will fail in different manners. But they all fail as a consequence of being pushed beyond their limits. The crash causes the failure, the failure does not cause the crash. Or if my cable breaks on my derailleur or the battery dies on my servo, I can't shift either way. Why is one "worse" than the other? No cables to break or batteries to die on a cambio corsa. Is that your go to shifting system?
.
#42
Cousinmosquito
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Bikes: Drop-barred Karate Monkey (10 spd), Singular Kite(9spd), Santa Cruz Tallboy(10spd), Santa Cruz Superlight(9spd), Litespeed Ocooee(9spd), Carbon road bike(9spd), Carbon Giant XTC(10spd), Bianchi D2 Chrono TT bike(9spd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
wiggle.com | Shimano Dura Ace 9000 11 Speed Bar End Shifters | Gear Levers And Shifters Road
Edit. Sorry, mis-read your post. They are TT shifters grafted into a DT environment. There is more detail on them in the link to his bike on CX Magazine where most of the info came from.
https://www.cxmagazine.com/winning-gr...ns-breadwinner
Last edited by cousinmosquito; 09-05-15 at 05:39 PM.
#43
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
This is a Stronglight Impact E
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#44
Cousinmosquito
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Bikes: Drop-barred Karate Monkey (10 spd), Singular Kite(9spd), Santa Cruz Tallboy(10spd), Santa Cruz Superlight(9spd), Litespeed Ocooee(9spd), Carbon road bike(9spd), Carbon Giant XTC(10spd), Bianchi D2 Chrono TT bike(9spd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hear you on that. For some reason, the modern shimano cranks seem divorced from their origins, as a component by itself, they work, but not when installed on a bicycle. They look like a kitchen appliance, something you would use to dice your veggies IMHO. Taste is personal though.
#45
spondylitis.org
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Posts: 1,003
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times
in
63 Posts
Wow, someone else lived through the mountain biking "let's change everything for no reason" era.
:-p
:-p
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 765
Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Nothing ever changes
This thread is amusing, but the conversation hasn't changed in over 100 years. Back then they were scoffing over all the attempts to develop a practical gear changing system, reliable tires and effective brakes. Real men didn't need such things. The French started the technical trials that advanced bicycles from hunks of metal to bikes that would feel totally modern today, which then deteriorated into a dangerous weight saving competition.
Innovation is good, and time is the test. And yes, we often forget some great things. There was the story of the contemporary pro racer who rode a 70s era TDF bike, and loved the smooth ride, and had no trouble hanging with the contemporary bikes. Or the guy who took a ride with friction shifters and declared "Wow, this is smooth! When will these be coming out?"
For myself, I try to choose what I think are the best available technologies, of any era. But I just love my contemporary and ordinary Trek 29r MTB hardtail (all metal). Far better than my old cutting edge full suspension 26".
Here is a pretty contemporary crank; the TA Carmina:
Innovation is good, and time is the test. And yes, we often forget some great things. There was the story of the contemporary pro racer who rode a 70s era TDF bike, and loved the smooth ride, and had no trouble hanging with the contemporary bikes. Or the guy who took a ride with friction shifters and declared "Wow, this is smooth! When will these be coming out?"
For myself, I try to choose what I think are the best available technologies, of any era. But I just love my contemporary and ordinary Trek 29r MTB hardtail (all metal). Far better than my old cutting edge full suspension 26".
Here is a pretty contemporary crank; the TA Carmina:
#47
Cousinmosquito
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Bikes: Drop-barred Karate Monkey (10 spd), Singular Kite(9spd), Santa Cruz Tallboy(10spd), Santa Cruz Superlight(9spd), Litespeed Ocooee(9spd), Carbon road bike(9spd), Carbon Giant XTC(10spd), Bianchi D2 Chrono TT bike(9spd)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This thread is amusing, but the conversation hasn't changed in over 100 years. Back then they were scoffing over all the attempts to develop a practical gear changing system, reliable tires and effective brakes. Real men didn't need such things. The French started the technical trials that advanced bicycles from hunks of metal to bikes that would feel totally modern today, which then deteriorated into a dangerous weight saving competition.
Innovation is good, and time is the test. And yes, we often forget some great things. There was the story of the contemporary pro racer who rode a 70s era TDF bike, and loved the smooth ride, and had no trouble hanging with the contemporary bikes. Or the guy who took a ride with friction shifters and declared "Wow, this is smooth! When will these be coming out?"
For myself, I try to choose what I think are the best available technologies, of any era. But I just love my contemporary and ordinary Trek 29r MTB hardtail (all metal). Far better than my old cutting edge full suspension 26".
Here is a pretty contemporary crank; the TA Carmina:
Innovation is good, and time is the test. And yes, we often forget some great things. There was the story of the contemporary pro racer who rode a 70s era TDF bike, and loved the smooth ride, and had no trouble hanging with the contemporary bikes. Or the guy who took a ride with friction shifters and declared "Wow, this is smooth! When will these be coming out?"
For myself, I try to choose what I think are the best available technologies, of any era. But I just love my contemporary and ordinary Trek 29r MTB hardtail (all metal). Far better than my old cutting edge full suspension 26".
Here is a pretty contemporary crank; the TA Carmina:
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,046
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn World Sport. 1994 Diamond Back Response Elite MTB. 1964 Schwinn Typhoon. 1974 Bridgestone Sprinter, 2015 Scott Sub 10 Citybike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1688 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times
in
37 Posts
Since I don't have the cash for a new bike, I'm blissfully unaware of the glorious benefits of he latest bike technology.
And honestly, I don't really care.
And honestly, I don't really care.
#49
aka Tom Reingold
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
@iab, I feel exactly as you do. Worth and gain are in the eyes of the beholder. I'm not here to say which technology is best for anyone, and I certainly can't claim to know what's best for everyone. I'm trying to lay down a set of criteria for each individual for use to his/her own best use.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#50
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
Oh yeah...I kinda dig the new shimano Dura Ace crank....and don't mind the Ultegra too.