When C&V stops making sense - the saddle
10-19-15, 12:07 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511
Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
When C&V stops making sense - the saddle
With many things C&V we crave period correct, and the look of a horizontal top tube with a -17 drop stem. A positive rise stem uses less material and is stiffer AND lighter, but just doesn't look right. It looks like it belongs on a hybrid bike ridden by old people in their Florida retirement community. Its about form as much as function. We use road drop handlebars on most of our bikes when the vast majority of us can't actually ride in the drops for any meaningful proportion of our mileage on the frame sizes we think actually fit us. Most of us are perched up on the hoods and stay there throughout most rides. We like the way an aggressive racing geometry bike looks, even modern compact geometry bikes with aggressive saddle to bars drops, and massive saddle to drop position drops. We wouldn't even consider riding bikes in either the size we would properly fit to be able to comfortably ride in the position in the drops, or to use quill/stem risers. Most of us hate the look of head tube extensions on custom frames, even though those more properly accommodate recreational and competitive cycling fit for the 99% of us that don't have the fitness, flexibility, and form of professional CAT 1 roadies. We like what we like.
However, I'm going to suggest that we stop liking vintage saddles and the likes of Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles with specificity. Vintage and hard leather saddles look great on the bike, in fact they look ideal, not to make a bad pun. I love my Selle Anatomica saddle and copper rivets and rails. Nothing else even comes close.
However, I've ridden on plenty of saddles that cause nerve compression and just don't adequately protect the cyclist from injury. Yes, I posted INJURY. Your bike fit and saddle shouldn't injure your health or cause inflammation of the prostrate which can lead to an increased risk of prostate cancer. Your saddle shouldn't contribute to erectile dysfunction, nerve compression or unduly restrict blood flow to your bits.
We've come a long long way in the science of bringing Urologists and test data to compare and baseline saddle design. I think its long past the point where we continue to ride art saddles like Brooks and start thinking about what really is healthy for our undercarriage. Hard leather saddles stretched across steel frames ain't healthy, and that's not-debatable. The empirical measurements show that such saddles significantly decrease blood flow to the perineal region, and specifically to the penis.
I think its time to acknowledge that there really isn't any place on a bike for a C&V saddle, which is sad, but compromising our health, increasing our cancer risk, and having a less comfortable saddle because of the way it looks off the bike is just so fallacious I don't know where to start. Rule number one in the modern context of what we've learned actually empirically measuring blood flow from cyclists positioned on different saddles should be: first do no harm.
I think C&V saddles make zero sense in that enlightened context. I think Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles have to be shelved with a notion that they are neither healthy nor beneficial for the cyclist, beautiful or not.
I think the Specialized Power saddle is one of the fugliest saddles I've ever seen, but I'm considering the absurd notion of switching to them on all my bikes. I don't ride bikes to develop a large prostrate and to cause it inflammation, raising my risk for developing prostrate cancer. I don't ride bikes to increase my risk of developing sexual dysfunction. I don't ride bikes to damage my perineal nerves.
I think I'm intelligent enough to not care what something look like, ugly or not, if it prevents me from actually injuring my body in a way that other saddles just can't. Will they look good on classic and vintage bikes? Nope, and that's okay.
Specialized Power saddle review | CyclingTips
Looking over this data you'd have to be an idiot to still be riding on C&V saddles at this point:
https://www.specialized.com/OA_MEDIA/...WhitePages.pdf
Interesting backstory on the development of the saddles that minimize restricted blood flow, and how they went about actually experimenting with the different designs in a race context. One thing the piece is absolutely correct about is that Body Geometry saddles were widely panned. A lot of shops mocked the products and spread misinformation about the saddles to their customers. Which is interesting in that we'd listen to a hack making $10/hr and ignore the data coming from medical professionals and researchers, but that's cycling in a nutshell right there.
Evolution of the Specialized Romin Saddle ? Interview with Dr. Roger Minkow
Now if only Specialized would make a C&V saddle offering.
[Edit] Many posters take this discussion WAY off topic so wade through this discussion if you want to learn a lot about forum member's preferences for music, movies etc. Or to basically learn that most of them can't comprehend the literature that suggests that a cyclist can't "Feel" nerve damage happening, even on a saddle they deem comfortable. Also the medical research showing diminished perineal area blood flow used normal cycling sized cyclists NOT people my height/weight. That's lost on many responders. This discussion devolves into a "don't challenge us with anything that threatens our preconceptions." It read's like a bunch of smoker's in the 1950s in denial.
However, I'm going to suggest that we stop liking vintage saddles and the likes of Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles with specificity. Vintage and hard leather saddles look great on the bike, in fact they look ideal, not to make a bad pun. I love my Selle Anatomica saddle and copper rivets and rails. Nothing else even comes close.
However, I've ridden on plenty of saddles that cause nerve compression and just don't adequately protect the cyclist from injury. Yes, I posted INJURY. Your bike fit and saddle shouldn't injure your health or cause inflammation of the prostrate which can lead to an increased risk of prostate cancer. Your saddle shouldn't contribute to erectile dysfunction, nerve compression or unduly restrict blood flow to your bits.
We've come a long long way in the science of bringing Urologists and test data to compare and baseline saddle design. I think its long past the point where we continue to ride art saddles like Brooks and start thinking about what really is healthy for our undercarriage. Hard leather saddles stretched across steel frames ain't healthy, and that's not-debatable. The empirical measurements show that such saddles significantly decrease blood flow to the perineal region, and specifically to the penis.
I think its time to acknowledge that there really isn't any place on a bike for a C&V saddle, which is sad, but compromising our health, increasing our cancer risk, and having a less comfortable saddle because of the way it looks off the bike is just so fallacious I don't know where to start. Rule number one in the modern context of what we've learned actually empirically measuring blood flow from cyclists positioned on different saddles should be: first do no harm.
I think C&V saddles make zero sense in that enlightened context. I think Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles have to be shelved with a notion that they are neither healthy nor beneficial for the cyclist, beautiful or not.
I think the Specialized Power saddle is one of the fugliest saddles I've ever seen, but I'm considering the absurd notion of switching to them on all my bikes. I don't ride bikes to develop a large prostrate and to cause it inflammation, raising my risk for developing prostrate cancer. I don't ride bikes to increase my risk of developing sexual dysfunction. I don't ride bikes to damage my perineal nerves.
I think I'm intelligent enough to not care what something look like, ugly or not, if it prevents me from actually injuring my body in a way that other saddles just can't. Will they look good on classic and vintage bikes? Nope, and that's okay.
Specialized Power saddle review | CyclingTips
Looking over this data you'd have to be an idiot to still be riding on C&V saddles at this point:
https://www.specialized.com/OA_MEDIA/...WhitePages.pdf
Interesting backstory on the development of the saddles that minimize restricted blood flow, and how they went about actually experimenting with the different designs in a race context. One thing the piece is absolutely correct about is that Body Geometry saddles were widely panned. A lot of shops mocked the products and spread misinformation about the saddles to their customers. Which is interesting in that we'd listen to a hack making $10/hr and ignore the data coming from medical professionals and researchers, but that's cycling in a nutshell right there.
Evolution of the Specialized Romin Saddle ? Interview with Dr. Roger Minkow
Now if only Specialized would make a C&V saddle offering.
[Edit] Many posters take this discussion WAY off topic so wade through this discussion if you want to learn a lot about forum member's preferences for music, movies etc. Or to basically learn that most of them can't comprehend the literature that suggests that a cyclist can't "Feel" nerve damage happening, even on a saddle they deem comfortable. Also the medical research showing diminished perineal area blood flow used normal cycling sized cyclists NOT people my height/weight. That's lost on many responders. This discussion devolves into a "don't challenge us with anything that threatens our preconceptions." It read's like a bunch of smoker's in the 1950s in denial.
Last edited by mtnbke; 10-29-15 at 11:11 PM.
10-19-15, 12:26 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408
Bikes: I hate bikes!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times
in
233 Posts
I road 126 miles on Saturday on my B17. I did not wear padded cycling shorts. I had and have no issues. Just ask my wife. You need to ride more and post less. Troll.
10-19-15, 12:40 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 2,982
Bikes: LESS than I did a year ago!
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
With many things C&V we crave period correct, and the look of a horizontal top tube with a -17 drop stem. A positive rise stem uses less material and is stiffer AND lighter, but just doesn't look right. It looks like it belongs on a hybrid bike ridden by old people in their Florida retirement community. Its about form as much as function. We use road drop handlebars on most of our bikes when the vast majority of us can't actually ride in the drops for any meaningful proportion of our mileage on the frame sizes we think actually fit us. Most of us are perched up on the hoods and stay there throughout most rides. We like the way an aggressive racing geometry bike looks, even modern compact geometry bikes with aggressive saddle to bars drops, and massive saddle to drop position drops. We wouldn't even consider riding bikes in either the size we would properly fit to be able to comfortably ride in the position in the drops, or to use quill/stem risers. Most of us hate the look of head tube extensions on custom frames, even though those more properly accommodate recreational and competitive cycling fit for the 99% of us that don't have the fitness, flexibility, and form of professional CAT 1 roadies. We like what we like.
However, I'm going to suggest that we stop liking vintage saddles and the likes of Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles with specificity. Vintage and hard leather saddles look great on the bike, in fact they look ideal, not to make a bad pun. I love my Selle Anatomica saddle and copper rivets and rails. Nothing else even comes close.
However, I've ridden on plenty of saddles that cause nerve compression and just don't adequately protect the cyclist from injury. Yes, I posted INJURY. Your bike fit and saddle shouldn't injure your health or cause inflammation of the prostrate which can lead to an increased risk of prostate cancer. Your saddle shouldn't contribute to erectile dysfunction, nerve compression or unduly restrict blood flow to your bits.
We've come a long long way in the science of bringing Urologists and test data to compare and baseline saddle design. I think its long past the point where we continue to ride art saddles like Brooks and start thinking about what really is healthy for our undercarriage. Hard leather saddles stretched across steel frames ain't healthy, and that's not-debatable. The empirical measurements show that such saddles significantly decrease blood flow to the perineal region, and specifically to the penis.
I think its time to acknowledge that there really isn't any place on a bike for a C&V saddle, which is sad, but compromising our health, increasing our cancer risk, and having a less comfortable saddle because of the way it looks off the bike is just so fallacious I don't know where to start. Rule number one in the modern context of what we've learned actually empirically measuring blood flow from cyclists positioned on different saddles should be: first do no harm.
I think C&V saddles make zero sense in that enlightened context. I think Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles have to be shelved with a notion that they are neither healthy nor beneficial for the cyclist, beautiful or not.
I think the Specialized Power saddle is one of the fugliest saddles I've ever seen, but I'm considering the absurd notion of switching to them on all my bikes. I don't ride bikes to develop a large prostrate and to cause it inflammation, raising my risk for developing prostrate cancer. I don't ride bikes to increase my risk of developing sexual dysfunction. I don't ride bikes to damage my perineal nerves.
I think I'm intelligent enough to not care what something look like, ugly or not, if it prevents me from actually injuring my body in a way that other saddles just can't. Will they look good on classic and vintage bikes? Nope, and that's okay.
Specialized Power saddle review | CyclingTips
Looking over this data you'd have to be an idiot to still be riding on C&V saddles at this point:
https://www.specialized.com/OA_MEDIA/...WhitePages.pdf
Interesting backstory on the development of the saddles that minimize restricted blood flow, and how they went about actually experimenting with the different designs in a race context. One thing the piece is absolutely correct about is that Body Geometry saddles were widely panned. A lot of shops mocked the products and spread misinformation about the saddles to their customers. Which is interesting in that we'd listen to a hack making $10/hr and ignore the data coming from medical professionals and researchers, but that's cycling in a nutshell right there.
Evolution of the Specialized Romin Saddle ? Interview with Dr. Roger Minkow
Now if only Specialized would make a C&V saddle offering.
However, I'm going to suggest that we stop liking vintage saddles and the likes of Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles with specificity. Vintage and hard leather saddles look great on the bike, in fact they look ideal, not to make a bad pun. I love my Selle Anatomica saddle and copper rivets and rails. Nothing else even comes close.
However, I've ridden on plenty of saddles that cause nerve compression and just don't adequately protect the cyclist from injury. Yes, I posted INJURY. Your bike fit and saddle shouldn't injure your health or cause inflammation of the prostrate which can lead to an increased risk of prostate cancer. Your saddle shouldn't contribute to erectile dysfunction, nerve compression or unduly restrict blood flow to your bits.
We've come a long long way in the science of bringing Urologists and test data to compare and baseline saddle design. I think its long past the point where we continue to ride art saddles like Brooks and start thinking about what really is healthy for our undercarriage. Hard leather saddles stretched across steel frames ain't healthy, and that's not-debatable. The empirical measurements show that such saddles significantly decrease blood flow to the perineal region, and specifically to the penis.
I think its time to acknowledge that there really isn't any place on a bike for a C&V saddle, which is sad, but compromising our health, increasing our cancer risk, and having a less comfortable saddle because of the way it looks off the bike is just so fallacious I don't know where to start. Rule number one in the modern context of what we've learned actually empirically measuring blood flow from cyclists positioned on different saddles should be: first do no harm.
I think C&V saddles make zero sense in that enlightened context. I think Brooks, Ideale, and Selle Anatomica saddles have to be shelved with a notion that they are neither healthy nor beneficial for the cyclist, beautiful or not.
I think the Specialized Power saddle is one of the fugliest saddles I've ever seen, but I'm considering the absurd notion of switching to them on all my bikes. I don't ride bikes to develop a large prostrate and to cause it inflammation, raising my risk for developing prostrate cancer. I don't ride bikes to increase my risk of developing sexual dysfunction. I don't ride bikes to damage my perineal nerves.
I think I'm intelligent enough to not care what something look like, ugly or not, if it prevents me from actually injuring my body in a way that other saddles just can't. Will they look good on classic and vintage bikes? Nope, and that's okay.
Specialized Power saddle review | CyclingTips
Looking over this data you'd have to be an idiot to still be riding on C&V saddles at this point:
https://www.specialized.com/OA_MEDIA/...WhitePages.pdf
Interesting backstory on the development of the saddles that minimize restricted blood flow, and how they went about actually experimenting with the different designs in a race context. One thing the piece is absolutely correct about is that Body Geometry saddles were widely panned. A lot of shops mocked the products and spread misinformation about the saddles to their customers. Which is interesting in that we'd listen to a hack making $10/hr and ignore the data coming from medical professionals and researchers, but that's cycling in a nutshell right there.
Evolution of the Specialized Romin Saddle ? Interview with Dr. Roger Minkow
Now if only Specialized would make a C&V saddle offering.
So, it really makes me wonder...why?
10-19-15, 12:51 PM
#7
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I only rode 103 miles on Saturday, on a Swallow-type saddle that I recovered myself. Cotton trousers and cotton briefs. No issues.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
10-19-15, 12:56 PM
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,613
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10959 Post(s)
Liked 7,487 Times
in
4,188 Posts
While I don't suggest or think some forum call to shelving vintage(style) saddles is necessary, I also have 0 use for them. I haven't used a Brooks, but I also don't want to allocate $150 to test if I like it.
There are tons of modern touches that people make to their bikes- lined brake and shift housing, brifters, SPD pedals, cushioned bar tape, riser stems, threadless converter stems, etc etc etc.
You certainly enjoy painting with a broad brush by claiming 'we' like riding with quill threadless stems and 'we' enjoy ill fitting bicycles.
Modern saddles are just like all these other modern components. Bikes were meant to be used and part of that use is replacing worn components. There is no magical line where componentry became improper to use because it is too modern. That line, if it exists, is in the eye of the beholder and it should rightfully remain there. To each their own when it comes to what components to use and why.
I love a Serfas RX saddle which is cut in half lengthwise- Its really comfortable- firm but cushioned and flexible but stiff. Not sure how that all works, but it works for me. Saddles are so individual, that whatever works should be what is used.
There are tons of modern touches that people make to their bikes- lined brake and shift housing, brifters, SPD pedals, cushioned bar tape, riser stems, threadless converter stems, etc etc etc.
You certainly enjoy painting with a broad brush by claiming 'we' like riding with quill threadless stems and 'we' enjoy ill fitting bicycles.
Modern saddles are just like all these other modern components. Bikes were meant to be used and part of that use is replacing worn components. There is no magical line where componentry became improper to use because it is too modern. That line, if it exists, is in the eye of the beholder and it should rightfully remain there. To each their own when it comes to what components to use and why.
I love a Serfas RX saddle which is cut in half lengthwise- Its really comfortable- firm but cushioned and flexible but stiff. Not sure how that all works, but it works for me. Saddles are so individual, that whatever works should be what is used.
10-19-15, 01:09 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
I'm not sure if he's really trolling or just does not communicate his feeling quite right to us.
Instead of saying "stop loving" C&V saddles he mentioned, maybe mtnbke should just ask for help with suggestions for alternatives to C&V saddles that he can try out, but not try to convince everyone (in this forum, especially) to quit "loving"/using C&V saddles......
I might not feel the same impact as others from his statement about C&V saddles cause I myself had experienced problems with certain C&V saddles in the past, so I can relate, but Heck!, I'd really go berserk if someone tries to even suggest to me to stop loving bacon today!
Instead of saying "stop loving" C&V saddles he mentioned, maybe mtnbke should just ask for help with suggestions for alternatives to C&V saddles that he can try out, but not try to convince everyone (in this forum, especially) to quit "loving"/using C&V saddles......
I might not feel the same impact as others from his statement about C&V saddles cause I myself had experienced problems with certain C&V saddles in the past, so I can relate, but Heck!, I'd really go berserk if someone tries to even suggest to me to stop loving bacon today!
10-19-15, 01:10 PM
#11
Full Member
To each their own. I don't find Brooks or any similar type saddles comfortable at all. Some people do. I do agree with your sentiments on you shouldn't sacrifice comfort for looks. I had a friend who almost was going to give up on cycling because his back was bad and drops were killing him and he refused to roll with mustache bars. Eventually he gave them a try, now he doesn't shut up about them and can do a 200 mile ride and still go to Disneyland the next day.
10-19-15, 01:19 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,845
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,822 Times
in
1,541 Posts
I think the OP is completely overstating or misunderstanding the position people in this form have on saddles. Resulting in an overly broad, inaccurate statement.
There is no slavish focus on 'vintage', which in and of it self is not even a correct term.
The most common position is simple: Saddles are very personal and you need to find what works for you. YMMV
Beyond that many people ride "vintage" saddle because they work for the individual.
all of my saddles are "Vintage" a brooks b-17, a brooks swift and a sella italia turbo.
but not all brooks work for me. Professional....no go, B-17 N imperial (cutout seat) no go (pinched things it shouldn't pinch) but many other people love these.
In many many cases brooks work for people and that is why the get recommended. But they also get recommended with the caveat of fine tuning needed, have to match shape to bottom and have to match saddle to position on the bike (degrees of uprightness)
All of this is about function and comfort and little is about vintage
There is no slavish focus on 'vintage', which in and of it self is not even a correct term.
The most common position is simple: Saddles are very personal and you need to find what works for you. YMMV
Beyond that many people ride "vintage" saddle because they work for the individual.
all of my saddles are "Vintage" a brooks b-17, a brooks swift and a sella italia turbo.
but not all brooks work for me. Professional....no go, B-17 N imperial (cutout seat) no go (pinched things it shouldn't pinch) but many other people love these.
In many many cases brooks work for people and that is why the get recommended. But they also get recommended with the caveat of fine tuning needed, have to match shape to bottom and have to match saddle to position on the bike (degrees of uprightness)
All of this is about function and comfort and little is about vintage
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
10-19-15, 01:23 PM
#13
Abuse Magnet
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,869
Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times
in
88 Posts
After getting my first Brooks, I won't get anything else. It was a real eye-opener for me.
10-19-15, 01:27 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,536
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 1,291 Times
in
487 Posts
The OP contains an excess of opinion based upon a completely false premise. I have tried many saddles in the search for comfort (or at least less pain). I finally arrived at the Brooks B-17 Imperial, which is the most comfortable saddle I've ever ridden. I was quite surprised that it was actually comfortable straight out of the box, before any break in period had elapsed. The bonus is that it also looks good!
Note that in contrast, the Brooks Pro that came on my old Raleigh International was never comfortable for me, so I got rid of it. Not all suspended leather saddles are comfortable, neither are they all uncomfortable.
Also, the OP sure makes a lot of false generalizations about things like stem height, riding in the drops, etc. For example: "Most of us are perched up on the hoods and stay there throughout most rides." I'm an old guy and I ride in the drops frequently. It makes a huge difference when riding long distances at speed or into a headwind. The only concession I've had to make to age has been raising the bars so that the tops are even with the saddle.
Note that in contrast, the Brooks Pro that came on my old Raleigh International was never comfortable for me, so I got rid of it. Not all suspended leather saddles are comfortable, neither are they all uncomfortable.
Also, the OP sure makes a lot of false generalizations about things like stem height, riding in the drops, etc. For example: "Most of us are perched up on the hoods and stay there throughout most rides." I'm an old guy and I ride in the drops frequently. It makes a huge difference when riding long distances at speed or into a headwind. The only concession I've had to make to age has been raising the bars so that the tops are even with the saddle.
Last edited by davester; 10-19-15 at 01:58 PM.
10-19-15, 02:31 PM
#15
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 423 Times
in
282 Posts
Its just silly. "When _____ stops making sense - _______"
Really? Leading into the topic of cancer?
To make the connection of ones bike saddle leading into cancer is beyond me. Whats next?
I swim regularly and countless laps in a pool full of chemicals. And just like millions of other swimmers who've been doing it for years with a very healthy outlook. Are you going to tell me pool chem's are going to get me? Same with cycling. By doing so, most are in a healthier state of mind and body. I'll gladly take these risk.
Really? Leading into the topic of cancer?
To make the connection of ones bike saddle leading into cancer is beyond me. Whats next?
I swim regularly and countless laps in a pool full of chemicals. And just like millions of other swimmers who've been doing it for years with a very healthy outlook. Are you going to tell me pool chem's are going to get me? Same with cycling. By doing so, most are in a healthier state of mind and body. I'll gladly take these risk.
10-19-15, 04:20 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,120
Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 77 Times
in
40 Posts
I read this thread with a little surprise, and a healthy dose of skepticism. I've ridden upon many, many, MANY saddles. A whole bunch of them simply aren't for me. I need to be comfortable when I ride. And of course everyone knows the old adage: YMMV. So, when I say that a Brooks Pro fits me very well (it does), and a Brooks B17 does not (it definitely does not), there's plenty of us on here the opposite proves true. I've got a brother-in-law who very comfortably rides very upright on one of Brooks' "big butt" saddles - I've tried, and I feel like I get lost on it. Personally, I really like the Cambium C17, but others have had different experiences than me. But that's just Brooks. One of my ride buddies loves his Anatomica but it left me feeling kind of "meh." I love the Regal too, which, like most Brooks, is still made and sold.
I find it a little weird that the only two C&V posts I've read recently where I felt like one of the posters had incongruously found himself in the wrong place were both written by the OP: here and over in the thread about updating a bike. Both posts were fairly tough bashes on two of the most storied of bicycle components - Brooks and 531 steel.
I'm not a doctor (just married to one), but I thought the connections to cancer and impotence and bicycle saddles had largely been disproven. Adequate fit - something that many of us on these forums seem to know quite a lot about - has been shown to alleviate most concerns "down there." Or at least that's what I've been led to believe. If I'm wrong about this - and gosh knows that wouldn't be the first time - someone please set me straight.
I find it a little weird that the only two C&V posts I've read recently where I felt like one of the posters had incongruously found himself in the wrong place were both written by the OP: here and over in the thread about updating a bike. Both posts were fairly tough bashes on two of the most storied of bicycle components - Brooks and 531 steel.
I'm not a doctor (just married to one), but I thought the connections to cancer and impotence and bicycle saddles had largely been disproven. Adequate fit - something that many of us on these forums seem to know quite a lot about - has been shown to alleviate most concerns "down there." Or at least that's what I've been led to believe. If I'm wrong about this - and gosh knows that wouldn't be the first time - someone please set me straight.
10-19-15, 04:28 PM
#17
Senior Member
I've ridden the same Brooks B-17-clone Fujita Belt saddle that came on my S-10S for well over 45,000 miles. I never had padded cycling shorts in all that time. Now I do - but only wear them if riding more than 50 miles (approx three hours) at a time. For my 10 or 12 mile one-way commute - nope.
Oh, don't get me wrong, it originally took several hundred miles spread over a few weeks for the saddle and my butt to come to a mutual understanding. It also takes a week or so every Spring. After that, it really doesn't bother me.
Now I'm faced with the task of replacing the cheap SSO (SEAT-shaped objects) on my latest acquisitions. Since my butt is already broken in to my Fuji's hard leather saddle, I suppose it only makes sense to get the same style for the other two so they fit/feel similar.
Oh, don't get me wrong, it originally took several hundred miles spread over a few weeks for the saddle and my butt to come to a mutual understanding. It also takes a week or so every Spring. After that, it really doesn't bother me.
Now I'm faced with the task of replacing the cheap SSO (SEAT-shaped objects) on my latest acquisitions. Since my butt is already broken in to my Fuji's hard leather saddle, I suppose it only makes sense to get the same style for the other two so they fit/feel similar.
10-19-15, 04:36 PM
#18
Senior Member
Strange thread. My most comfortable saddle is a 50 year old unpadded plastic saddle - more comfortable by far than any modern saddle I've tried, so I'm going to call nonsense on this one. If a saddle was doing you "harm" you would experience symptoms like numbness and discomfort. Also a saddle that works for me might be torture for someone else, modern or vintage.
Also, for the record I do have a slavish devotion to vintage.
Also, for the record I do have a slavish devotion to vintage.
Last edited by devinfan; 10-19-15 at 04:43 PM.
10-19-15, 04:41 PM
#19
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
We're all gonna DIE! 
However I doubt my Brooks saddle is going to be the cause of it. Brooks saddles are one of the few that I can get on, brand new out of the box and they only get more comfortable the more I ride them. I think I have 7 at the moment. No they aren't for everybody. Ride what works for you.
Aaron
However I doubt my Brooks saddle is going to be the cause of it.
Brooks saddles are one of the few that I can get on, brand new out of the box and they only get more comfortable the more I ride them. I think I have 7 at the moment. No they aren't for everybody. Ride what works for you.Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
10-19-15, 04:48 PM
#20
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Ooooo, another mtnbke post. Nothing like a long winded spiel crapping all over C&V enthusiasts' tastes, questioning their intelligence while framing it as "I'm just here to help."
I'm relatively new here and I already have this guy figured out. I am though shocked, SHOCKED there wasn't more mention of aluminum in that. I think he might have rushed it.
I'm relatively new here and I already have this guy figured out. I am though shocked, SHOCKED there wasn't more mention of aluminum in that. I think he might have rushed it.
10-19-15, 04:52 PM
#21
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Ooooo, another mtnbke post. Nothing like a long winded spiel crapping all over C&V enthusiasts' tastes, questioning their intelligence while framing it as "I'm just here to help."
I'm relatively new here and I already have this guy figured out. I am though shocked, SHOCKED there wasn't more mention of aluminum in that. I think he might have rushed it.
I'm relatively new here and I already have this guy figured out. I am though shocked, SHOCKED there wasn't more mention of aluminum in that. I think he might have rushed it.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
10-19-15, 04:56 PM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,780
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1677 Post(s)
Liked 3,096 Times
in
913 Posts
OP is also a sucker for slick advertising. Be wary of data presented by someone trying to sell you something.
I have a Specialized Toupe saddle which I like a lot because it's comfy, not because I'm worried about my junk falling off. In general I'm not a fan of vintage saddles because I don't like the look of many of them, but I do like my Turbo saddle and it looks good on my Merckx (IMO). Also if it was 100% about perfect comfort, we'd all be cruising on recumbents.
I have a Specialized Toupe saddle which I like a lot because it's comfy, not because I'm worried about my junk falling off. In general I'm not a fan of vintage saddles because I don't like the look of many of them, but I do like my Turbo saddle and it looks good on my Merckx (IMO). Also if it was 100% about perfect comfort, we'd all be cruising on recumbents.
10-19-15, 05:07 PM
#23
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,635
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4679 Post(s)
Liked 5,797 Times
in
2,282 Posts
I wonder what he said this time to rile everyone up? All I see is this.
Hey, I think I finally finally have a use for this guy!
Hey, I think I finally finally have a use for this guy!
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
10-19-15, 05:12 PM
#24
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
I was a Brooks B17 fan for over a decade and always assumed it was the most comfortable saddle ever made. Of course I didn't have the money and patience to experiment with other saddles then.
But back in '07, I decided to see what the ergonomics revolution had produced and tried one of those Specialized saddles with the fart-chute in the middle.
Specialized (very wisely) had a saddle exchange program, so you could exchange your saddle width and model until you found the apple of your @$$'s eye. I tried 11 different saddles before going back to the Avatar (which was sadly discontinued in 2009.)
I recently rode on my old Brooks around the parking lot and it feels like @$$hell to me now by comparison.
Not joining the OP's (bigoted IMO) observation, just pointing out that what works for you may not work for everyone, but don't be bashful about trying new saddles. Even with my beloved '09 Avatar, I still can still get buttsore after a spirited century, but not nearly as badly as I used to with that Brooks.
But back in '07, I decided to see what the ergonomics revolution had produced and tried one of those Specialized saddles with the fart-chute in the middle.
Specialized (very wisely) had a saddle exchange program, so you could exchange your saddle width and model until you found the apple of your @$$'s eye. I tried 11 different saddles before going back to the Avatar (which was sadly discontinued in 2009.)
I recently rode on my old Brooks around the parking lot and it feels like @$$hell to me now by comparison.
Not joining the OP's (bigoted IMO) observation, just pointing out that what works for you may not work for everyone, but don't be bashful about trying new saddles. Even with my beloved '09 Avatar, I still can still get buttsore after a spirited century, but not nearly as badly as I used to with that Brooks.
