Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-29-13, 09:50 PM   #3276
Bikedued
Senior Member
 
Bikedued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 10,839
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Is that a Takagi with Biopace rings? Cool! Love the chrome!,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
Bikedued is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 02:22 PM   #3277
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CodenameHardHat View Post
96? Ritchey Softail. Orginaly came with the first generation Rock Shox Judy SL. Blew it up, and put the stock fork back on. Full XTR.





lovely bike indeed, I dreamed back in the days to own one but never had the means to afford one.
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 04:05 PM   #3278
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by retrobikeguy View Post
Ok, trimble inverse 4 finished for now, few changes to happen yet but its built and rideable now

Certainly noticeable, bit of a mix of old and not so old but I really wanted to be able to ride this with comfort and reliability.





also upgraded the black kestrel - tange switchblades hung up and now its fitted with some RS-1 forks

two very nice and superb bikes
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 04:06 PM   #3279
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dookie View Post
see http://www.retrobike.co.uk for lots more.

my (silver-brazed in japan) paramount:

lovely purple paramount
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 04:08 PM   #3280
blilrat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RTP Area, NC
Bikes: Somebody stole them all... I walk now.
Posts: 401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why are you digging up these ancient posts? these were posted 6 years ago
blilrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 04:16 PM   #3281
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by plodderslusk View Post
Tried to post this two other places with zero response so maybe this is the right place.
Fleamarkt season is on here in Norway and todays catch is this, an 89-90 Merida Aluminum MTB. It was decked out out with fenders, kickstand, lights and a dynamo but I wanted to see how it performed as intended so I "cleaned " it up, put on some weird VP pedals and my old Brooks and took it for spin. Had no idea bonded aluminium could feel so harsh! Biopace HP was much better thanfirst generation BP and the bike was nice on fireroads. Paid 50 $ so no real catch perhaps but the wheelset alone is worth it to me. Early XT is pretty nice stuff !




You have a Merida Al Bon from 1990-1991 which has the pre sti shimano stuff. It is a very good and very sure ride.
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 04:17 PM   #3282
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blilrat View Post
Why are you digging up these ancient posts? these were posted 6 years ago
I appreciate older mountain bikes.
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 07:13 PM   #3283
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blilrat View Post
Why are you digging up these ancient posts? these were posted 6 years ago
don't you mean vintage posts?
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 07:37 PM   #3284
Roger M
Senior Member
 
Roger M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Snohomish, WA.
Bikes:
Posts: 1,931
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
This is the only bike(in my possession) that I've owned since new. I bought it in 1994. It is a Mongoose Amplifier(re-labeled AMP Research B2 or B3). Except for tires and brake pads, this how I had it built up originally. Might be a stretch for vintage, but it is pushing twenty years almost.

I need to ride it more

Roger M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 07:56 PM   #3285
northbend 
Senior Member
 
northbend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Bend, Washington State
Bikes: 1937 Hobbs; 1977 Bruce Gordon; Merckx MX Leader (Campy 10); Schwinn Paramount (Fixed gear); Fat City Yo Eddy (MTB), Alex Singer (allrounder)
Posts: 1,566
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Roger, now that is a really cool bike. I would call that one a classic.
northbend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 09:23 PM   #3286
Aemmer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the trail
Bikes:
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Easter morning ride on one of my current projects. late 70's BMX cruiser converted to MTB back in the day:



In 1979 if you couldn't afford or find one of those new fangled MTB's but wanted something more than a pre war Schwinn, you did this. Champion double down tube Cruiser converted to MTB BITD.
Aemmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 09:37 PM   #3287
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Grabbed this 1994 (1995?) Diamondback Apex today off CL for cheap.. components are ok, nothing too exciting (Deore LX) but the frame is True Temper TT Lite, which is rebranded custom butted True Temper OXII! First time i've owned a bike with suspension (Judy RockShox).. I don't know how to tell if the fork is blown out though.. it's squishy when i lift the front end and i think i would like it firmer (or totally rigid!) Bike looks like it's gotten heavy use, drivetrain is worn out -- gears were slipping all over the place on the test ride, even lose the chain off the big ring.. in my head I'm like, well this will make it easier to get the seller to come down on their price!

It weighs 25.8 lbs "as found"... which is slightly lighter than the carbon and aluminum composite frame i picked up earlier this week for a lot more $. The tires on this bike are smaller and probably lighter, but still, you'd think crabon would be significantly lighter

Seller's pic



Bringing her home like a boss with my 1986 Diamondback Apex.. 10 years of Diamondback tech! In those ten years, the frame has gotten lighter and is now True Temper instead of Tange, and shimano has introduced indexing and hyperglide shifting, but the Apex is no longer speced with top of the line components and runs Deore LX instead of Deore XT





For a few years in the mid 90s, Diamondback speced the Apex with the same frame as the steel Axis but the component level was much lower.. in 1996 they kept the high end frame but dropped down the components to STX level, and in 97 i think the Apex no longer came with the TT Lite but was back down to the more common True Temper AVR.

Last edited by frantik; 03-31-13 at 11:43 PM.
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 11:03 PM   #3288
Shp4man
Senior Member
 
Shp4man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Bikes: 1988 Peugeot PY-10P Frankenbike, 1994 Diamond Back Response Elite MTB. 1964 Schwinn Typhoon. 1977 Peugeot PRN10E, 2003 Performance M-201 MTB dirt rider. 1974 Bridgestone Sprinter, 2015 Scott Sub 10 Citybike.
Posts: 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Found a 1994 Diamondback Response Elite on CL for $50, I just spent another $50 and about 16 hours of work making it a rider. Like this one^^^^.




It's a fast bike, it weighs about 25 with the oil suspension fork, which soaked up a rough railroad track crossing like a champ today. It's double butted True Temper chromoly steel. I painted the fork a matching color to the frame, (Duplicolor car paint).
I'm really liking this one as a rider!

Last edited by Shp4man; 03-31-13 at 11:22 PM.
Shp4man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-13, 11:20 PM   #3289
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
^ nice.. i suspect we've got identical frames.. i picked mine up for $55
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 12:44 AM   #3290
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shp4man View Post
Found a 1994 Diamondback Response Elite on CL for $50, I just spent another $50 and about 16 hours of work making it a rider. Like this one^^^^.




It's a fast bike, it weighs about 25 with the oil suspension fork, which soaked up a rough railroad track crossing like a champ today. It's double butted True Temper chromoly steel. I painted the fork a matching color to the frame, (Duplicolor car paint).
I'm really liking this one as a rider!
Very nice diamondback and true temper tubing is very good
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 12:48 AM   #3291
georges1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by frantik View Post
Grabbed this 1994 (1995?) Diamondback Apex today off CL for cheap.. components are ok, nothing too exciting (Deore LX) but the frame is True Temper TT Lite, which is rebranded custom butted True Temper OXII! First time i've owned a bike with suspension (Judy RockShox).. I don't know how to tell if the fork is blown out though.. it's squishy when i lift the front end and i think i would like it firmer (or totally rigid!) Bike looks like it's gotten heavy use, drivetrain is worn out -- gears were slipping all over the place on the test ride, even lose the chain off the big ring.. in my head I'm like, well this will make it easier to get the seller to come down on their price!

It weighs 25.8 lbs "as found"... which is slightly lighter than the carbon and aluminum composite frame i picked up earlier this week for a lot more $. The tires on this bike are smaller and probably lighter, but still, you'd think crabon would be significantly lighter

Seller's pic



Bringing her home like a boss with my 1986 Diamondback Apex.. 10 years of Diamondback tech! In those ten years, the frame has gotten lighter and is now True Temper instead of Tange, and shimano has introduced indexing and hyperglide shifting, but the Apex is no longer speced with top of the line components and runs Deore LX instead of Deore XT





For a few years in the mid 90s, Diamondback speced the Apex with the same frame as the steel Axis but the component level was much lower.. in 1996 they kept the high end frame but dropped down the components to STX level, and in 97 i think the Apex no longer came with the TT Lite but was back down to the more common True Temper AVR.
True Temper OXII is a high end steel and it gives the frame some real nervosity, lightness and comfort. OXII was comparable to the Columbus Genius atb and Dedda DR Zero steel Frame. Good catchYou can make your bike lighter by probaby equiping it with some older crossmax tubless wheels, xty 10 speed group and a carbon fork

Last edited by georges1; 04-01-13 at 01:03 AM.
georges1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 07:03 AM   #3292
4funbikes 
Senior Member
 
4funbikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southeastern,VA
Bikes:
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That Champion squareback is the bee's knees!
4funbikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 07:22 AM   #3293
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aemmer View Post
Easter morning ride on one of my current projects. late 70's BMX cruiser converted to MTB back in the day:



In 1979 if you couldn't afford or find one of those new fangled MTB's but wanted something more than a pre war Schwinn, you did this. Champion double down tube Cruiser converted to MTB BITD.
whoa sweet
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 08:08 AM   #3294
andyfloyd
80's bikes FTW
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 388
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by frantik View Post
My trek is a composite frame made with aluminum and carbon, and the carbon is just round tubes, shaped just like your typical steel tubes. Full carbon frames can be designed in custom shapes to have stiffness in some directions and flex in others. the Aluminum stays probably contribute a fair amount to how much of the road feel is transferred to one's butt

I haven't ridden this bike a ton so it's hard to give it a complete review, but it definitely feels different from steel and doesn't seem to soak up the bumps quite the same way. I will have to wait and see how it rides once i get the fit dialed in and set up the cockpit. Strangely, even though the distance from the saddle to the bars is longer than on some of my other bikes, it feels too small still.

I'd really like to get this thing down around 24 lbs or less.. I was surprised when it came in at 26lbs. No sense giving up the ride of steel if it's not significantly lighter imo...
I agree if all things are equal in terms of weight and you have steel, aluminum, and carbon which bike would you prefer? Its gotta be steel because of its ability to make the ride more comfortable due to its inherent abilty to "soak" up some of the bumps.
andyfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 08:10 AM   #3295
andyfloyd
80's bikes FTW
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 388
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by frantik View Post
Grabbed this 1994 (1995?) Diamondback Apex today off CL for cheap.. components are ok, nothing too exciting (Deore LX) but the frame is True Temper TT Lite, which is rebranded custom butted True Temper OXII! First time i've owned a bike with suspension (Judy RockShox).. I don't know how to tell if the fork is blown out though.. it's squishy when i lift the front end and i think i would like it firmer (or totally rigid!) Bike looks like it's gotten heavy use, drivetrain is worn out -- gears were slipping all over the place on the test ride, even lose the chain off the big ring.. in my head I'm like, well this will make it easier to get the seller to come down on their price!

It weighs 25.8 lbs "as found"... which is slightly lighter than the carbon and aluminum composite frame i picked up earlier this week for a lot more $. The tires on this bike are smaller and probably lighter, but still, you'd think crabon would be significantly lighter

Seller's pic



Bringing her home like a boss with my 1986 Diamondback Apex.. 10 years of Diamondback tech! In those ten years, the frame has gotten lighter and is now True Temper instead of Tange, and shimano has introduced indexing and hyperglide shifting, but the Apex is no longer speced with top of the line components and runs Deore LX instead of Deore XT





For a few years in the mid 90s, Diamondback speced the Apex with the same frame as the steel Axis but the component level was much lower.. in 1996 they kept the high end frame but dropped down the components to STX level, and in 97 i think the Apex no longer came with the TT Lite but was back down to the more common True Temper AVR.
Looks like you got a nice rider right there, now you have your steel bike that will be sub 25lbs. The weight makes all the difference trust me.
andyfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 10:37 AM   #3296
Amesja
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3
Posts: 3,496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyfloyd View Post
I agree if all things are equal in terms of weight and you have steel, aluminum, and carbon which bike would you prefer? Its gotta be steel because of its ability to make the ride more comfortable due to its inherent abilty to "soak" up some of the bumps.
Crabon soaks up bumps even better than steel.

In fact, as it ages and the miles add up it soaks them up better and better and better...
Amesja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 10:57 AM   #3297
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyfloyd View Post
I agree if all things are equal in terms of weight and you have steel, aluminum, and carbon which bike would you prefer? Its gotta be steel because of its ability to make the ride more comfortable due to its inherent abilty to "soak" up some of the bumps.
I would probably say steel but I haven't really spent much time on the trek. There may be other advantages I haven't discovered, and I'm going in with some prejudices already, but I'm trying to keep an open mind.

I do have to admit the fact that the steel diamondback I just picked up is slighter lighter than the carbon/alu trek does kind of annoy me... I'm hoping the frame has some advantage over a similarly weighted steel frame.. besides looking really cool that is
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 11:21 AM   #3298
sauze
Senior Member
 
sauze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Bikes:
Posts: 934
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hey vintage MTB'ers , this is probably more of a light trail / gravel grinder type bike but I was just wondering if anyone knew anything about the 26ers offered by Maruishi ?

I'm looking at picking up this bike (mostly for components / wheels for another build) but would probably 're build' it for my dad as just a mess around / do anything bike.

Not a great pic , but the only one I've got at the moment. Specs?


Last edited by sauze; 04-01-13 at 11:40 AM.
sauze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 11:39 AM   #3299
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
hard to tell but it looks like it might be a Deerhead FD on there? Early mtb with a nice lugged frame.. probably the lightest you would see around this time is something like Tange MTB double butted tubes but it may be even heavier

if the price is right i'd grab it, if anything for the parts like you say, but the paint looks nice and the geometry would lend itself to a nice utility bike/hauler
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-13, 09:05 PM   #3300
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,973
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I just took the Trek 8300 out for another test ride and I have to say that it rides like a champ.. I didn't really notice any significant transfer of road feel, or at least not anything that was unacceptable. It does feel stiff, but it also has a "bouncy" feel. The main things that came to mind are "light, agile and precise". I just need to get some road slicks on there to really tell how fast it is.

I was feeling a bit of buyers remorse especially after picking up the similarly weighted steel Diamondback for so much less money, but I'm feeling a lot more pleased
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.