Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: BMA 6 Certified

  1. #1
    Elitest Murray Owner Mos6502's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    BMA 6 Certified

    I know that the BMA was the Bicycle Manufacturers Association of America - but I have no idea what is supposed to be "certified" by /6. Does anybody know the specifics? Or what manufacturers were part of the BMA? (it seems like most were, excepting Schwinn).

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,287
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    BMA/6 certified was a marketing ploy, Schwinn had no reason to align itself with that as it would have put them on the same tier, Schwinn was above. It had to do with minimum performance of the brakes and things like "toe clip" overlap and CPSC mandated stuff.

  3. #3
    jwa
    jwa is offline
    moron
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IIRC, the BMA/6 "certification" evolved from a Consumer Products Safety Commission's 1970s attempt to try to protect children from Dangerous Things. I think the thought was, if bicycles for kids are made less dangerous - i.e., less prone to component failure - kids will suffer fewer injuries. So the CPSC took standards from the Bicycle Manufacturer's Association re: frame & component stress testing etc, & awarded "certification" for "children's" bikes of such quality. Schwinn & other manufacturers of "adult" bikes weren't a concern for the CPSC at the time.

    Biggest thing I remember (as a teen, when this BMA/6 certification first appeared in '72 or '73) was all the stupid reflectors that began sprouting on the newly "certified" bikes. I think, if memory serves, that the BMA/6 standard called for simply reflectors rather than headlights or taillights - lights were probably more effective for safety, but not necessary because kids obviously wouldn't be riding bikes at night anyhow!

  4. #4
    Senior Member sykerocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Montpelier, VA
    My Bikes
    The keepers: 1960 Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, 1968 Ranger, 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Tourist, 1973 Lambert, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport, 2 - 1988 Rossins
    Posts
    3,809
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I worked at the bike shop, BMA/6 was synonomous for "crappy POS bicycle". There was a reason that Schwinn wouldn't lower themselves to attaching that sticker - their good reputation.

    Syke
    Deranged Few M/C

  5. #5
    Senior Member sykerocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Montpelier, VA
    My Bikes
    The keepers: 1960 Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, 1968 Ranger, 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Tourist, 1973 Lambert, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport, 2 - 1988 Rossins
    Posts
    3,809
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by repechage
    BMA/6 certified was a marketing ploy, Schwinn had no reason to align itself with that as it would have put them on the same tier, Schwinn was above. It had to do with minimum performance of the brakes and things like "toe clip" overlap and CPSC mandated stuff.
    What it seemingly had nothing to do with was stuff like quality frames, well built wheels, stems that were well cast, and overall good construction. You know, the kind of stuff that a lifelong bureaucrat, with no worries of ever being fired, would never consider important. Hell, they let Murry, Huffy and Iverson decide the safety standards!

    Syke
    Deranged Few M/C

  6. #6
    Elitest Murray Owner Mos6502's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had read somewhere that Schwinn wasn't part of the BMA because the association required silly things, such as shipping bicycles with the front wheel in place - which Schwinn properly assumed as being stupid. I think that was written in a popular mechanics article from the 70s, or a book published by popular mechanics, I just wanted to know if there were any other manufacturers who decided not to join.

    So I'm going to assume that there was never a BMA 5 or BMA 7 rating? (does the number signify anything?) Does anybody know about when they stopped putting the BMA 6 sticker on everything?

    Thanks for the answers.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,287
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would you want to trust a discount store stock clerk to put in a front wheel? I guess I should strike that today, as Toys-R-Us and Waldosmart seem to.

    BMA/6 was just a Marketing name, went away when the cost of the stickers was beyond their proven value.

  8. #8
    Avenir Equipped BlankCrows's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    My Bikes
    Chesini X-Uno, etc.....
    Posts
    1,149
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got an old beast with one of those stickers. It mentions standards tested by an independent laboratory. Perhaps that lab was actually a auto wrecker's yard with one of those big car crushers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •