BMA 6 Certified
#1
Elitest Murray Owner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657
Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
BMA 6 Certified
I know that the BMA was the Bicycle Manufacturers Association of America - but I have no idea what is supposed to be "certified" by /6. Does anybody know the specifics? Or what manufacturers were part of the BMA? (it seems like most were, excepting Schwinn).
Thanks.
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
BMA/6 certified was a marketing ploy, Schwinn had no reason to align itself with that as it would have put them on the same tier, Schwinn was above. It had to do with minimum performance of the brakes and things like "toe clip" overlap and CPSC mandated stuff.
#3
moron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
IIRC, the BMA/6 "certification" evolved from a Consumer Products Safety Commission's 1970s attempt to try to protect children from Dangerous Things. I think the thought was, if bicycles for kids are made less dangerous - i.e., less prone to component failure - kids will suffer fewer injuries. So the CPSC took standards from the Bicycle Manufacturer's Association re: frame & component stress testing etc, & awarded "certification" for "children's" bikes of such quality. Schwinn & other manufacturers of "adult" bikes weren't a concern for the CPSC at the time.
Biggest thing I remember (as a teen, when this BMA/6 certification first appeared in '72 or '73) was all the stupid reflectors that began sprouting on the newly "certified" bikes. I think, if memory serves, that the BMA/6 standard called for simply reflectors rather than headlights or taillights - lights were probably more effective for safety, but not necessary because kids obviously wouldn't be riding bikes at night anyhow!
Biggest thing I remember (as a teen, when this BMA/6 certification first appeared in '72 or '73) was all the stupid reflectors that began sprouting on the newly "certified" bikes. I think, if memory serves, that the BMA/6 standard called for simply reflectors rather than headlights or taillights - lights were probably more effective for safety, but not necessary because kids obviously wouldn't be riding bikes at night anyhow!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 4,420
Bikes: The keepers: 1958 Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, 1968 Ranger, 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Tourist, 3 - 1986 Rossins, and a '77 PX-10 frame in process.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
129 Posts
When I worked at the bike shop, BMA/6 was synonomous for "crappy POS bicycle". There was a reason that Schwinn wouldn't lower themselves to attaching that sticker - their good reputation.
Syke
Deranged Few M/C
Syke
Deranged Few M/C
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 4,420
Bikes: The keepers: 1958 Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, 1968 Ranger, 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Tourist, 3 - 1986 Rossins, and a '77 PX-10 frame in process.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
129 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
BMA/6 certified was a marketing ploy, Schwinn had no reason to align itself with that as it would have put them on the same tier, Schwinn was above. It had to do with minimum performance of the brakes and things like "toe clip" overlap and CPSC mandated stuff.
Syke
Deranged Few M/C
#6
Elitest Murray Owner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657
Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I had read somewhere that Schwinn wasn't part of the BMA because the association required silly things, such as shipping bicycles with the front wheel in place - which Schwinn properly assumed as being stupid. I think that was written in a popular mechanics article from the 70s, or a book published by popular mechanics, I just wanted to know if there were any other manufacturers who decided not to join.
So I'm going to assume that there was never a BMA 5 or BMA 7 rating? (does the number signify anything?) Does anybody know about when they stopped putting the BMA 6 sticker on everything?
Thanks for the answers.
So I'm going to assume that there was never a BMA 5 or BMA 7 rating? (does the number signify anything?) Does anybody know about when they stopped putting the BMA 6 sticker on everything?
Thanks for the answers.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Would you want to trust a discount store stock clerk to put in a front wheel? I guess I should strike that today, as Toys-R-Us and Waldosmart seem to.
BMA/6 was just a Marketing name, went away when the cost of the stickers was beyond their proven value.
BMA/6 was just a Marketing name, went away when the cost of the stickers was beyond their proven value.
#8
Avenir Equipped
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,146
Bikes: Chesini X-Uno, etc.....
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got an old beast with one of those stickers. It mentions standards tested by an independent laboratory. Perhaps that lab was actually a auto wrecker's yard with one of those big car crushers.