Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-01-07, 02:58 PM   #1
braingel
one word, not two
Thread Starter
 
braingel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: se portland
Bikes:
Posts: 825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
any info on bridgestone 200?

were the 200,300,etc models on par with rb-2, rb-3,etc, or are they much lower quality? there's a 200 up on my CL right now (http://portland.craigslist.org/mlt/bik/268426342.html) that i'm thinking about, but it doesn't seem like the seller knows anything about it, and it's far enough from my house that i don't feel like riding up there just to be dissappointed...it's got stem shifters and double brake levers, so i'm guessing it's not really that high quality, but hopefully someone can tell me otherwise. if it's worth it i'll go check it out, and i'm sure i can get the price significantly lowered.
braingel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-07, 04:16 PM   #2
HillRider 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
Posts: 28,776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
In 1985 I bought a Bridgestone 400, which at the time was the bottom of their "good bike" line. It had butted Cr-Mo main tubes and Hi-ten (i.e. plain carbon steel.) stays and fork blades. It had an SR alloy crank, Sun Tour ARX derailleurs and clamp-on Sun Tour dt shifters. It cost me $250 brand new.

The 300 and 200 were well below it in both frame quality and components. I still have the '85 catalog spec pages and the 200 from that year is listed as having a straight gauge Hi-ten frame and fork and pretty low line components including a steel seatpost. As you noted it came with stem shifters and brake extension levers.

It certainly isn't one of the "collectable grade" Bridgestones and I would pay very little for it. BTW, the MSRP in 1985 was $179.95.
HillRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-07, 05:59 PM   #3
GCRyder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Bikes:
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think they used the "Hundreds" names for years and years before switching to the "RB/MB/CB" nomenclature. I bought a Bridgestone new in 1974 (paid $92 at the LBS), and I'm pretty sure it was a "100" model. IIRC, you had to go a few models up the line just to get a chromoly seat tube. I think the "100" meant 100% cast iron. I commuted on it for several years - got my cardio workout riding it, and my weight workout lifting it up and down stairs from my apartment.

The bike in the CL listing has the same stem-mount shifters, flat-crown fork, chain ring guard, brake levers and suicide levers that I recall, but mine had centerpull brakes and did not have QR wheels. You might note that their "entry level racer" in 1985 was the "600" model: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/bridgest...one6001985.pdf Even it was a 24-pounder, according to the article.
GCRyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-07, 06:16 PM   #4
braingel
one word, not two
Thread Starter
 
braingel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: se portland
Bikes:
Posts: 825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was under the impression that all of the Bridgestone models ran the other way in quality, ie. 100 is good and 600 not so much. At any rate, it sounds like maybe I should just let it find a different home.
braingel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-07, 12:33 AM   #5
silversmith
Yet another vegan biker
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Trapped behind the corn curtain
Bikes: Sakae Prism, Vintage Fuji bike(S), too many bikes, one from scratch bike.
Posts: 965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
I was under the impression that all of the Bridgestone models ran the other way in quality, ie. 100 is good and 600 not so much.
It does go that way in later years. I have an XO5 but would love to have an XO1
silversmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-16, 06:45 PM   #6
velojym
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Bikes:
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I picked up a 200 frame for a song, a few years ago, and built up a beater "ramprat" to ride at the airport. I'll admit not much of it's original anymore, but it's great fun to be-bop around the airport and downtown.



I slapped on 700c hoops with Panaracer Pasela TG tires, longer reach brakes to fit, a new handlebar setup, and some LX mech parts from a $20 thrift shop Giant, a tensioner and spacers to remove most of the cassette gears. It'll probably spend some time clamped into a stationary trainer this winter.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ramprat.jpg (98.5 KB, 18 views)

Last edited by velojym; 01-22-16 at 06:48 PM.
velojym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-16, 07:54 PM   #7
plonz 
Senior Member
 
plonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 2011 Specializd Tarmac, 1985 Specialized Expedition, 1985 Bridgestone 400, 1985 Peugeot PSN 10, 1984 Raleigh Competition, 1981 Colnago Super
Posts: 985
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
The Bridgestone 400 is definitely a step up from the 100/200/300.

These Bridgestones compare pretty well to the Schwinns of the same era with the 400 matching up with the chromo LeTour and the 200 more closely matching the World. The latter being a 28lb sidewalk bomber.

I own a 400 and it rides nice but is noticeably slower and heavier than say, my Schwinn Tempo. I wouldn't want to try anything else lower in the line up, that's for sure.
plonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 PM.