Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Joining the Vintage Cult!

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Joining the Vintage Cult!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-07, 08:43 AM
  #1  
Professional Fuss-Budget
Thread Starter
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,494
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
Joining the Vintage Cult!

I picked up a vintage bike from a shop this week: Novara Strada, steel frame, downtube indexed / friction shifters, double chainring bike. I think it's 80s era, looks like it was an entry-level road bike, e.g. there are no braze-ons for racks on the seatstays. It rides very well, so I'm guessing it sat in someone's basement for a few years. My main purpose for this bike is for long distance rides (i.e. centuries, ultras), so I think the steel will work out very well.

I noticed that the gearing is kind of high: 52 -42T "Biopace" chainrings, looks like a 12-28 in the back. By my calculations, that's a gear inch range of 40" - 112". I usually run closer to 30" on the low end, but that's with a hybrid bike with very wide tires. So far I don't mind the Biopace, although obviously I haven't put many miles on it.

Also, the tires are mixed -- 700c 25 in front, 700c 28 in back.

So, here we go with the questions....

1) What are my options for lowering the gearing, if it turns out that is necessary?
2) Would replacing the Biopace chainrings require swapping out the cranks as well?
3) Is mixing the tires per this setup a good plan, bad plan, not important?
4) Will going up hills with a 40" low gear make me, like, macho?

Thanks....
B
Bacciagalupe is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 09:05 AM
  #2  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times in 837 Posts
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
1) What are my options for lowering the gearing, if it turns out that is necessary?
Check the bolt circle diameter (BCD) of your cranks. If it is a road-standard 130mm, you can drop your lowest gear by 10% simply by replacing the 42T Biopace with a round 38T ring. If it is mountain-standard 110mm, you can go even smaller -- 34T, if I recall correctly.

Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
2) Would replacing the Biopace chainrings require swapping out the cranks as well?
Generally not, unless you have a nonstandard BCD. However, I have seen Biopace only in 110mm and 130mm, so you should be fine.

Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
3) Is mixing the tires per this setup a good plan, bad plan, not important?
It's not important and makes a modicum of sense, because you put more weight over the rear. Also note that some models of 28mm tires are narrower than certain other 25mm tires.

Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
4) Will going up hills with a 40" low gear make me, like, macho?
I typically gear my bikes with seldom-used lowest gears in the mid-40s, e.g. my preferred 44 gear-inches (42/26) on the Bianchi and the UO-8, and a slightly higher 45" (38/23) on Capo #1. I get ALOT of use out of second gear, which is typically circa 49" (42/23 or 38/21), about 2% below a typical Tour de France grannie (if one can call it that!) of 50" (39/21). I expect to resort to Capo #2's lowest gear, an "I hope I can still handle this as I did 30 years ago" 48-incher (46/26), fairly often. On that bike, I am constrained by the 6-bolt 157mm BCD (44T minimum) and the original 1960 Campagnolo Gran Sport derailleur's 26T low-cog limit, and I am not even considering retaining the knee-busting stock gearing of 52-48/14-16-18-20-22 (59 to 100 gear-inches; the bike was made in Schwarzenegger country), which one of my friends still has on his.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

Last edited by John E; 04-20-07 at 09:16 AM.
John E is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 09:09 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
1) What are my options for lowering the gearing, if it turns out that is necessary?
2) Would replacing the Biopace chainrings require swapping out the cranks as well?
3) Is mixing the tires per this setup a good plan, bad plan, not important?
4) Will going up hills with a 40" low gear make me, like, macho?

Thanks....
B
1) Larger cog rear, smaller chainring front. You didn't say whether it has a freewheel or a cassette, but larger versions are available in either, up to about 32-34 teeth. If your RD accommodates the 28, it will probably handle 32, at least. Can't say whether that gets you more or less than you could get with a chainring switch, because we'd need the particulars on your cranks to know that.
2) Probably not. You don't mention what crankset it has, but if it has Biopace, it is probably a Shimano with one of their vintage standard BCDs - 110mm for mountain cranks or 130 for road. Lots of round rings available in those sizes. 110 has since become the "standard" for "compact" road setups, which gives new life to the older Shimano MTB cranks.
3) Mixing tires with slight size differences like that is no big deal. When people do it, they almost instinctively put the smaller tire on the rear, like on muscle cars. Many bike gurus, however, recommend putting the larger one on the front. What you're running is an insignificant difference, anyway. Some manufacturers "25" is larger than some others "28."
4) I have a couple of roadie buddies who would tell you without hesitation that 42x28 is already way into wimp territory. They would rather go through rounds of knee surgery than have anyone spot a 23 cog in their rear clusters.
GCRyder is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 09:21 AM
  #4  
Professional Fuss-Budget
Thread Starter
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,494
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
Sweet I didn't think the tire setup would be an issue, and it rides pretty well anyway. I assume speed-wise the difference between 28 and even 23 are not noticeable to a non-racer.

FWIW, I like to spin rapidly on hills. I'm not worried about looking like a wuss by some random cycler who's staring at my gears, I'd rather just make it up the hills.

- I'm pretty sure the cranks are 130mm. How do I verify, just by measuring?
- Any issues mixing a Biopace big ring with a round regular ring? Or should I just swap both at once.
- I can't tell if it's a freewheel or cassette.
- What's the max jump on the front -- 14 teeth, correct? I.e. if I tried to go for a 50/32 compact, I'd need to swap out to a 110 crank.
Bacciagalupe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.