Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-07, 12:17 PM   #1
55/Rad
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: Seven Axiom
Posts: 11,696
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Raleigh Experts

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...8699&rd=1&rd=1

'84 Racing USA with 555RSL tubing and Super Record gruppo. Looks to be in pretty good shape.

Thoughts? Too expensive?

55/Rad
__________________
55/Rad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 01:10 PM   #2
CV-6 
If I own it, I ride it
 
CV-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune, Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré, Springfield, Motobecane, John Howard
Posts: 4,226
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 55/Rad
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...8699&rd=1&rd=1

'84 Racing USA with 555RSL tubing and Super Record gruppo. Looks to be in pretty good shape.

Thoughts? Too expensive?

55/Rad
My initial reaction is overpriced. But I got to thinking you might be hard pressed to find that SR group in that condition by itself for that price. I would maybe buy it, sell the frame, and look for a Team Raleigh frame to put the SR on.

EDIT: There is not much on the net about 555RSL. Mostly people looking for info and saying they never heard of it.
__________________
Lynn Travers

Photos

Last edited by CV-6; 05-08-07 at 01:25 PM.
CV-6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 01:40 PM   #3
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Bikes: 1982 Tomassini, 1963 Peugeot PX10, and eight special issue Canadian lightweights...
Posts: 7,451
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Worth it..?

The price is certianly fair considering the grouppo and its condition. I agree, sell the frame set and install it on a better frame of your choice. Or just keep the bicycle as it is. It will never be worth less in the days to come. At least, that's what I think.
randyjawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 02:29 PM   #4
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,576
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Rad - While it's a nice bike, I doubt it will dislodge either your Trek or your Pinarello as favorites. I think the price is fair, considering the condition of everything.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 04:37 PM   #5
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,746
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
555RSL has been confirmed to be either 501 or some form (butted?) 531 - these bikes usually have some form of Reynolds stamping around the steer tube area on the fork. Lowest in the lineup of the Team frame (you could get it in 531 C and 753 in '84), but an excellent machine regardless. English, not Taiwanese, purchasable as a frameset only.

Rough finish and fit on these, as you will find on anything else that came out of Nottingham or Birmingham during the mid '70s to '80s. Price is fair, but no bargain - consider the gruppo on it. Strip the gruppo off, and you have a $200-250 eBay frame if you know how to sell it - $120 if you don't.

Take care,

-Kurt
__________________
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 06:26 PM   #6
ollo_ollo
Senior Member
 
ollo_ollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Sublimity Orygun
Bikes: Still have a few left!
Posts: 3,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
I have to agree with everyone else, price is fair. Since it has a best offer option, I would be inclined to offer less & keep shopping for a better frame. Don
ollo_ollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 07:03 PM   #7
cuda2k
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
Posts: 11,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
cudak888 is the Raleigh Expert abound and he's already weighed in. Got to say that's one clean Super Record group. Makes me want to go back over my rear derailleur with a finer tooth comb.
cuda2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 07:28 PM   #8
CV-6 
If I own it, I ride it
 
CV-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune, Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré, Springfield, Motobecane, John Howard
Posts: 4,226
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
I was eyeballing the pictures again and noticed the front caliper is nutted and the rear is recessed. Seems rather odd. Kurt's comments on the tubing were pretty much verified by another source although that source is convinced it is 531, no 501 mentioned.
__________________
Lynn Travers

Photos
CV-6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 07:38 PM   #9
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,746
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CV-6
I was eyeballing the pictures again and noticed the front caliper is nutted and the rear is recessed. Seems rather odd. Kurt's comments on the tubing were pretty much verified by another source although that source is convinced it is 531, no 501 mentioned.
I know this tubing has been confirmed as Reynolds, but I did not know that it had been definitely determined to be some form of 531. What puzzles me is what form of 531 was used under the 555RSL badging - it would have made no sense to use 531C, for 531C was already in the lineup as a more expensive tubing option for this model. Likewise, I doubt if they used 531 straight gauge, for that would make the lowest-end Team frame second to the double-butted, Japanese manufactured, 555SL-equipped Prestige, Competition, Super Course, and Grand Prix models, which were all below the Team in the '84 hiearchy, respectively.

The fork is original - why they rigged a nutted brake over the recessed hole is beyond me, although I suspect that the shop or individual that built the frame up happened to have a pair of non-matching front and rear SR calipers. Why the mounting bolt wasn't simply ground down or replaced is a mystery - one not worth solving, IMHO - anyone can swap it to recessed.

Take care,

-Kurt
__________________

Last edited by cudak888; 05-08-07 at 07:45 PM.
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-07, 08:06 PM   #10
CV-6 
If I own it, I ride it
 
CV-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardinal Country
Bikes: Lejeune, Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré, Springfield, Motobecane, John Howard
Posts: 4,226
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cudak888
I know this tubing has been confirmed as Reynolds, but I did not know that it had been definitely determined to be some form of 531.

snippage

Take care,

-Kurt

My source indicated he had one of these frames repainted and the fork was stamped Reynolds 531 and can only assume the remainder of the frame is 531. He also indicated the frames used the same serial number format as the 531 bikes. Your other comments raise some valid questions. Like why bother with another tubing designation.
__________________
Lynn Travers

Photos
CV-6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-07, 09:13 AM   #11
serotta
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NC
Bikes: Serotta, kestrel, Raleigh, Cannondale, Proflex, Santana tandem, Santana Stylus (single), Trek, Schwinn, Azuki
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rad for what it's worth, this is mine. I've had it over 20 years, paid 125 for the frame and fork, and used some spare parts stripped from an old Benotto to built it. It's 531c.

serotta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-07, 06:51 PM   #12
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,746
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serotta
Rad for what it's worth, this is mine. I've had it over 20 years, paid 125 for the frame and fork, and used some spare parts stripped from an old Benotto to built it. It's 531c.
^
An '86. Got closeups of those seatstays? They don't look like traditional Raleigh USA stays.

-Kurt
__________________
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-07, 07:36 PM   #13
55/Rad
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: Seven Axiom
Posts: 11,696
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
[QUOTE=serotta]Rad for what it's worth, this is mine. I've had it over 20 years, paid 125 for the frame and fork, and used some spare parts stripped from an old Benotto to built it. It's 531c.
Well, in the tradition of me following in your footsteps every other year - see Santana Stylus - I better go get this bike. It's local too.
__________________
55/Rad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 04:32 AM   #14
serotta
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NC
Bikes: Serotta, kestrel, Raleigh, Cannondale, Proflex, Santana tandem, Santana Stylus (single), Trek, Schwinn, Azuki
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cudak888
^
An '86. Got closeups of those seatstays? They don't look like traditional Raleigh USA stays.

-Kurt
Gimme a few hours or a day, and I'll see if my digital camera can get close up and personal with those stays.

john
serotta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 04:35 AM   #15
serotta
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NC
Bikes: Serotta, kestrel, Raleigh, Cannondale, Proflex, Santana tandem, Santana Stylus (single), Trek, Schwinn, Azuki
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
[QUOTE=55/Rad]
Quote:
Originally Posted by serotta
Rad for what it's worth, this is mine. I've had it over 20 years, paid 125 for the frame and fork, and used some spare parts stripped from an old Benotto to built it. It's 531c.
Well, in the tradition of me following in your footsteps every other year - see Santana Stylus - I better go get this bike. It's local too.
Full Retro Campy group, how can you go wrong for the money? You'll just spend it foolishly if you don't use it on a bike.
serotta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 07:12 AM   #16
satbuilder 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Bikes: 1973 Bianchi Team, 1974 Marnati Corsa, 1974 ish Motobecane CT, 1971 Mercier 300, 1977/78 Colnago Mexico, 1982 Pinarello Italia, 198? Raleigh Team 753, NOS Tesch 101, Tesch S-22, 1983 Peugeot Mixte
Posts: 788
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
I have one of those with 753 tubing. Looks pretty well made to me. Wish I had the change to pick that one up and swap parts over.
satbuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 07:17 AM   #17
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 12,482
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 382 Post(s)
This is very interesting. The circa 1984 555SL frames that I recall had Chrome Moly on the labels, implying that if it was Reynolds, then it would be 501. My logic had always steered to towards Reynolds 501, but I recall another post where an owner had found a Tange stamping, I believe on the fork steerer. Now we have evidence of 1985 555 being manganese molybdenum like 531!

As for some frames being 753 and others being 555SL, as opposed to 531, I suspect that it may be tied into the country of origin. The 753 frames probably came from England. The lower Raleigh USA frames (Prestige, Competition, Supercourse, etc.) that used 555SL were reportedly built in Japan. So maybe the team replica 555SL frames were made in Japan? Just speculation on my part.

It is also accepted fact that many of true team Racing USA frames were built by Marinoni using Columbus, even though they had Reynolds decals. Did Marinoni also do the custom, non-team frames? Yet another possibilty. Very confusing.
T-Mar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 07:21 AM   #18
satbuilder 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Bikes: 1973 Bianchi Team, 1974 Marnati Corsa, 1974 ish Motobecane CT, 1971 Mercier 300, 1977/78 Colnago Mexico, 1982 Pinarello Italia, 198? Raleigh Team 753, NOS Tesch 101, Tesch S-22, 1983 Peugeot Mixte
Posts: 788
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
My 753 frame is from Ilkeston, has stickers on the seat tube and an SB number on the BB shell.
satbuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 07:38 AM   #19
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Bikes:
Posts: 1,064
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Notice the wording in the ad link provided by Chuckk: the two tubing types referred to are "Reynolds 753" and "Raleigh 555T." For the bikes that they sourced from Japan and Taiwan and that were built with tubing produced in Asia, Raleigh USA used tubing names and decals reminiscent, shall we say, of Reynolds equivalents, hoping to borrow some of the cachet of the longtime Reynolds-Raleigh connection. Those of us selling the Raleigh USA bikes in those days had to explain to inquiring customers that Raleigh tubing is not Reynolds tubing. At least, that's what we did where I worked; there may have been dealerships where promoting the confusion was encouraged.
Trakhak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 08:26 AM   #20
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 12,482
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 382 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trakhak
Notice the wording in the ad link provided by Chuckk: the two tubing types referred to are "Reynolds 753" and "Raleigh 555T." For the bikes that they sourced from Japan and Taiwan and that were built with tubing produced in Asia, Raleigh USA used tubing names and decals reminiscent, shall we say, of Reynolds equivalents, hoping to borrow some of the cachet of the longtime Reynolds-Raleigh connection. Those of us selling the Raleigh USA bikes in those days had to explain to inquiring customers that Raleigh tubing is not Reynolds tubing. At least, that's what we did where I worked; there may have been dealerships where promoting the confusion was encouraged.
I think most us are well aware of the distinction between the tubing decals. The question is whether it is just a marketing marketing attempt to cash in a Reynold's look-alike decal or whether it is Reynolds but there was some reason why they could not the Reynolds name.

In 1982 TI-Raleigh abandoned direct involvement in the US market and licensed the name to Huffy who formed the Raleigh Cycle Company of America. Part of the agreement may have prevented the use of the Reynolds name or it may have been in conflict with agreements that Huffy had with other tubing suppliers. I am not saying that this is the case, but it happens often enough in the corporate world that it could explain Reynolds tubing being renamed Raleigh 555.

There appears to be conflicting evidence supporting both Reynolds and non-Reynolds tubing as 555. Even the labels for 555 conflict from year to year, with 1984 being chromium-molybdenum and 1985 specifying manganese-molybdenum, based on the ad. For all we know, there even the possibility that the source changed from year to year. That might explain the conflicting evidence.

Given the conflicting evidence, perhaps it wisest to err on the side of caution, like your LBS did. However, in the end, I think there is too much hype regarding the difference between tubesets, regardless of the manufacturer. Most tubesets of a particular level will be sufficiently similar that the geometry and skills of the brazer will make far more difference than the properties of the tubing.
T-Mar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 09:05 AM   #21
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,746
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Mar
This is very interesting. The circa 1984 555SL frames that I recall had Chrome Moly on the labels, implying that if it was Reynolds, then it would be 501. My logic had always steered to towards Reynolds 501, but I recall another post where an owner had found a Tange stamping, I believe on the fork steerer. Now we have evidence of 1985 555 being manganese molybdenum like 531!
You've got it confused, T-Mar. 555SL is cro-mo, used on the Taiwanese and Japanese production only, and 555RSL is manganese molybdenum, used exclusively on the Nottingham Team Pros and the Nottingham-made 1986 Prestige only (the Prestiege had been a Japanese 555SL machine in '84 and '85).

If the '85 catalogue states 555RSL and 753 as the only two options (without any mention of 531), I'd venture to say that 555RSL is, without question, 531. Is there another English manganese molybdenum tubing that exists out there? Not that I know of. Good enough for me, thank you very much!

Quote:
There appears to be conflicting evidence supporting both Reynolds and non-Reynolds tubing as 555. Even the labels for 555 conflict from year to year, with 1984 being chromium-molybdenum and 1985 specifying manganese-molybdenum, based on the ad. For all we know, there even the possibility that the source changed from year to year. That might explain the conflicting evidence.
See above. The various 555 suffixes determine whether it is Japanese cro-mo or English 531.

The real question is, what tubing is 555SL? Or for that matter, 555T (used on some of the touring machines)? And what was their "triple-butted" 575SL? Wasn't Miyata the only company to make triple-butted tubing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Mar
So maybe the team replica 555SL frames were made in Japan? Just speculation on my part.
No, they came from England, and they were 555RSL, not SL. Anything 753/555RSL came from England, 555SL is found on both Taiwanese or Japanese made GP's, SC's and Competitions (I know the '84-85 Prestige came from Japan - I do not know if any came from Taiwan), and 555T appears to have come only from Taiwan. I forgot if the 575SL machines I've seen were Japanese or Taiwanese, but I seem to remember they were from Taiwan.

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Mar
It is also accepted fact that many of true team Racing USA frames were built by Marinoni using Columbus, even though they had Reynolds decals. Did Marinoni also do the custom, non-team frames? Yet another possibilty. Very confusing.
I highly doubt it. Marinoni's framework was far superior to the traditionally sloppy Nottingham craftmanship of the Team frames sold to the public.

Take care,

-Kurt
__________________

Last edited by cudak888; 05-10-07 at 09:14 AM.
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 09:16 AM   #22
ricohman
Senior Member
 
ricohman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatchewan
Bikes:
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
A pic of my 84 Olympian's tube decal. It does not suggest Reynolds tubing is used.
ricohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 09:35 AM   #23
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,746
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
See above - that's 555SL.

-Kurt
__________________
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 09:36 AM   #24
serotta
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NC
Bikes: Serotta, kestrel, Raleigh, Cannondale, Proflex, Santana tandem, Santana Stylus (single), Trek, Schwinn, Azuki
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cuda Here's the pictures you requested, the first two are the stays on the bike picture above, the third is the stay on an older Raleigh 531c frameset that broke at the stay and was rewelded (sloppily) to use as a fixie. The older frameset appears to have the stays wrapped across the front of the seat tube.
I was wrong about the length of time I've had them. I got the oldest one in Jan of 88 as NOS from a local shop that was reducing inventory. It cracked 7 months later, and the Raleigh Rep. found as close a replacement as possible, with another NOS frame that was slightly newer. Both have Made in England decals.





serotta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-07, 10:45 AM   #25
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,576
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Serotta. Looks like your seat tube needs to be .2 or .4 mm larger.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.