Vitus-- Weight question
#1
jamie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: new york, ny
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Vitus-- Weight question
Hey-
I recently found a Vitus and am in love with it (being repaired haven't rode it yet)- the only issue is that I'm not exactly 'slim' and I've heard that Vitus frames are only good for lighter riders due to a myriad of issues.
(I'm about 165 lbs).
THANKS
I recently found a Vitus and am in love with it (being repaired haven't rode it yet)- the only issue is that I'm not exactly 'slim' and I've heard that Vitus frames are only good for lighter riders due to a myriad of issues.
(I'm about 165 lbs).
THANKS
#2
NFL Owner
I'm 200+ and have had no frame integrity issues with my Vitus Futural. The only issue I've ever had has been with bottom bracket flex, but I attribute that to the 1" diameter aluminum tubes. It's not that big of a problem.
My brother also has a Vitus Futural, and he weighs between 185 & 200, and also has had no issues with his.
My brother also has a Vitus Futural, and he weighs between 185 & 200, and also has had no issues with his.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Every girl I dated who had one was right around 100#, as long as you don't do stupid stuff, jumps, cyclocross, Mt. Tam downhill runs, should be no problem.
#4
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Which tube set are you referring to? Their 980 tubeset is the lightest vintage steel stock that was commercially available (even lighter than 753). Their other sets are also light (983 also weighs less than 753, 181 weighs about the same as 531c, and 888 is comparable in weight to 501).
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Zorro, I think he is referring to the Vitus alloy frame, never seen one with 1" diameter tubes though.
980 Super Vitus is indeed light, as my 19lb. 56cm road bike attests, with a reasonable build, light wheels, Campag. black pedals but otherwise reasonable.
980 Super Vitus is indeed light, as my 19lb. 56cm road bike attests, with a reasonable build, light wheels, Campag. black pedals but otherwise reasonable.
#6
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
Zorro, I think he is referring to the Vitus alloy frame, ...
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#7
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 4,761
Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
So how does the 980 or the Futural compare with the 979 Vitus Dural tubeset?
#8
NFL Owner
The tubeset of the Futural is 1" diameter aluminum and is designated 787 (the forks are designated 707). When I worked for a shop that sold Vitus frames, the Futural frames were less expensive than the 979 frames we sold. I would think that it would therefore be somewhat heavier than a comparable sized 979 frame. The construction was a little different (semi-internal brake cable routing vs. internal brake cable routing), but surely that couldn't account for all the differences.
Not to be too picky, but steel is an alloy.
Originally Posted by repechage
Zorro, I think he is referring to the Vitus alloy frame, never seen one with 1" diameter tubes though.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by monogodo
The tubeset of the Futural is 1" diameter aluminum and is designated 787 (the forks are designated 707). When I worked for a shop that sold Vitus frames, the Futural frames were less expensive than the 979 frames we sold. I would think that it would therefore be somewhat heavier than a comparable sized 979 frame. The construction was a little different (semi-internal brake cable routing vs. internal brake cable routing), but surely that couldn't account for all the differences.
Not to be too picky, but steel is an alloy.
Not to be too picky, but steel is an alloy.
#10
NFL Owner
If said Schwinn Varsity has downtube shifter braze-ons and braze-on cable guides, yes.
#11
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 4,761
Bikes: 84 Trek 660 Suntour Superbe; 87 Giant Rincon Shimano XT; 07 Mercian Vincitore Campy Veloce
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by monogodo
The tubeset of the Futural is 1" diameter aluminum and is designated 787 (the forks are designated 707). When I worked for a shop that sold Vitus frames, the Futural frames were less expensive than the 979 frames we sold. I would think that it would therefore be somewhat heavier than a comparable sized 979 frame. The construction was a little different (semi-internal brake cable routing vs. internal brake cable routing), but surely that couldn't account for all the differences.
.
.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
At 165,I believe you're well within limitations of most bikes that have limits. Stephen Roche rode Vitus. Others too of course. The frames are heartier than one might suspect. Some vitas frames went away more due to problems with the lugs, mainly top-tube to head. They didn't fail in service as far as while ridden, the upper lug at the top tube could shatter when servicing the headset for example.Not to make you fearfull,the mech. doing the bike should succeed,not iffy in the future once he disassembles it,he and the frame are out-of-the-woods so to speak. Such problems have plagued alum.-lugged frames,still do.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by froze
Thanks for the reply; was the 979 their top of the line tube set or was there others better?
The Vitus was used by a number of Pros at the time, often with various manufacture graphics applied. The Alan frames had the same fate, but the relabeling was endorsed by the maker in that case.
I did not follow them too closely, but some of the Vitus frames had aluminum steerers, others had steel, don't know if it was size determined and or a rinning change.
#14
NFL Owner
I'm fairly certain the Futural has a steel steer tube.
My brother destroyed his ex-girlfriend's 979 when installing the headset.
I need to post some pics of the Futural.
My brother destroyed his ex-girlfriend's 979 when installing the headset.
I need to post some pics of the Futural.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by monogodo
If said Schwinn Varsity has downtube shifter braze-ons and braze-on cable guides, yes.
All the Varsity frames I have had unpainted had the cable stops spot welded in position, only brazed joint was top tube to seat tube. From the electroforged era, no comment on the later reuse of the name.
#16
jamie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: new york, ny
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you Old and New!
THANK YOU for answering my question! I really really appreciate it- or at least making me feel a little better about so unabashingly thinking this bike is HOT.
Originally Posted by old and new
At 165,I believe you're well within limitations of most bikes that have limits. Stephen Roche rode Vitus. Others too of course. The frames are heartier than one might suspect. S.
#18
Senior Member
Resurrecting this ancient thread not because I think OP still needs their question answered, but because this page appears prominently on Google when searching for answers around the max weight a 787 can take.
I just completed a 4 day bikepacking trip in heavy mud and challenging conditions. I was nervous about putting my 787 through it, but when it transpired I had to lend my gf my modern mountain bike for the trip I had no other choice.
I weigh 75kg, and my cargo for the trip (water, camping gear, clothes) weighed 25kg, making the combined load 100kg - or 220lbs in old money. The Vitus did admirably, didn't scare me at any point with flex. In fact it actually survived a very nasty crash while loaded up (crash was in no way the bike's fault) without any kind of structural damage - although to be fair it had a soft landing, in that it fell on me after I was thrown off it!
Not suggesting every existing 787 frame is as robust as my 56cm one, but thought this was useful information for anyone else googling around the subject.
Worth noting I have unusual components on my 787 - 650b wheels, Tektro long drop brakes, quill stem adapter and 46cm Ritchey Venturemax bars.
Pic for loadout
I just completed a 4 day bikepacking trip in heavy mud and challenging conditions. I was nervous about putting my 787 through it, but when it transpired I had to lend my gf my modern mountain bike for the trip I had no other choice.
I weigh 75kg, and my cargo for the trip (water, camping gear, clothes) weighed 25kg, making the combined load 100kg - or 220lbs in old money. The Vitus did admirably, didn't scare me at any point with flex. In fact it actually survived a very nasty crash while loaded up (crash was in no way the bike's fault) without any kind of structural damage - although to be fair it had a soft landing, in that it fell on me after I was thrown off it!
Not suggesting every existing 787 frame is as robust as my 56cm one, but thought this was useful information for anyone else googling around the subject.
Worth noting I have unusual components on my 787 - 650b wheels, Tektro long drop brakes, quill stem adapter and 46cm Ritchey Venturemax bars.
Pic for loadout
Likes For Funktopus: