Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

bike size vs inseam

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

bike size vs inseam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-07, 11:50 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bike size vs inseam

This topic has been brought up sporadically on thread but I was just wondering, what size of bike do you typically ride, and what is your inseam? It appears some people like a lot of room for error, and others like a snug fit. Personally I have a 34" inseam, and like bikes in the 56-58 cm range.
blue 414 is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 11:57 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
I have a 32 inch inseam and like bikes between 58cm & 62cm.
fender1 is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:05 PM
  #3  
Lanky Lass
 
East Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Take a deep breath, and ask--What would Sheldon do?
Posts: 21,434

Bikes: Nishiki Nut! International, Pro, Olympic 12, Sport mixte, and others too numerous to mention.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I think it's a 28 inch inseam, 49cm is the maximum size I can safely ride.

East Hill
__________________
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
East Hill is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:06 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by fender1
I have a 32 inch inseam and like bikes between 58cm & 62cm.
That's a huge range!

I know this topic is endless..

I have am ~36.5" cycling inseam (though I wear 32-34" leg jeans)... I like 62cm c-c.... anything smaller the the drop to the handlebars starts to become to large and I start to feel cramped in the cockpit. I am about 6'3.5" to be precise. I have had my left leg SHORTENED by 2cm to more closely match the right. And I like 175-180mm cranks. 58-59cm top tubes and 115-130mm stems depending on application. standover on my 62cm frames ranges from around 33.5-almost 35".
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:07 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Depends on what you consider your inseam. I used to believe mine was 32, it's not. When I finally measured it correctly, I determined it's 33.25,give or take a few millimeters. For years I rode a 21"(53cm) which was what was available. 23" (28cm) was a little too high, felt too big underneath me but rideable. Since most bikes the past twenty years come in 56cm along with others of course, it suits me,55 as well. Seems like many guys that are way taller ride 56, 54 even,seems small. At 5"10" ,my inseam is relatively short I think so do data bases. I don't fender 1, either you like a big frame or your inseam is actually longer, if you're over 5'11" I'd bet longer.
old and new is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:11 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by East Hill
I think it's a 28 inch inseam, 49cm is the maximum size I can safely ride.

East Hill
I've done similar calculations for some female clients of mine, the frame size you've ascertained does ,in fact, seem correct young lady, going by concensus that is. Too small of frame renders one less efficient.
old and new is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:38 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
RK1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by old and new
Depends on what you consider your inseam. I used to believe mine was 32, it's not. When I finally measured it correctly, I determined it's 33.25,give or take a few millimeters. For years I rode a 21"(53cm) which was what was available. 23" (28cm) was a little too high, felt too big underneath me but rideable. Since most bikes the past twenty years come in 56cm along with others of course, it suits me,55 as well. Seems like many guys that are way taller ride 56, 54 even,seems small. At 5"10" ,my inseam is relatively short I think so do data bases. I don't fender 1, either you like a big frame or your inseam is actually longer, if you're over 5'11" I'd bet longer.
I am 6' with a 33" inseam and I use a 55cm top tube (56cm ST) bike w/ a 12cm, 90 degree stem. I also use a 175mm crank.
RK1963 is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:46 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,153
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3806 Post(s)
Liked 6,675 Times in 2,607 Posts
My pubic bone height is 35" (I wear 32" inseam pants), and ride/own bikes that are 56cm to 60cm, measured center of crank to top of seat tube. My preference is for the larger end of that range. For years I rode a 57cm bike, but once I bumped up to 59/60cm, I found true comfort.

Neal
nlerner is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:47 PM
  #9  
car dodger
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Posts: 3,439
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 61 Posts
funny how inches and cm's get incorperated into the same terms regarding cycling..." 33" inseam and I use a 55cm top tube ", or "stem is 1 1/8" steer tube diameter w/ 110 cm length", or " 1" quill stem, 25.4mm clamp"...
norskagent is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:48 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
RK1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
My pubic bone height is 35" (I wear 32" inseam pants), and ride/own bikes that are 56cm to 60cm, measured center of crank to top of seat tube. My preference is for the larger end of that range. For years I rode a 57cm bike, but once I bumped up to 59/60cm, I found true comfort.

Neal
I know what you mean. I also have a 24" trek (61cm?) and find it very comfortable. However, I prefer the 56cm when sprinting.
RK1963 is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 12:52 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
My pubic bone height is 35" (I wear 32" inseam pants), and ride/own bikes that are 56cm to 60cm, measured center of crank to top of seat tube. My preference is for the larger end of that range. For years I rode a 57cm bike, but once I bumped up to 59/60cm, I found true comfort.

Neal
+1 on that!
fender1 is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 01:05 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
all sound really on the same page concerning this question. It's just that inseam (pant) get confused by some with anatomic inseam (PBH). The subject does come-up quite often. It took me twenty years to get a grip on it. Fortunately for many newer riders,it's made more clear, due to all of you of course.
old and new is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 01:07 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i guess i will clarify my measurements. I wear a 32 pant inseam, actual height is 34 inches
blue 414 is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 01:29 PM
  #14  
tuz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto/Montréal
Posts: 1,209

Bikes: Eight homemade, three very dusty

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
I have 32" pant inseam, and ride a 55cm c-c (square) bike. I'm 5'10".
I prefer a short stem (80mm) to ride upright on the bar tops. I guess I have a short torso... On a 56cm top tube + 90mm stem I fell steched a bit.
tuz is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 01:32 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Mhendricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, ca.
Posts: 1,326

Bikes: 2006 Orbea Volata, 84 Trek 760, 83 Trek 720,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a 33" inseam and ride 60cm frames and use 175mm cranks.
__________________
They call me "Mr. Mixte"
Mhendricks is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 01:35 PM
  #16  
Your mom
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
31" inseam, 52 cm. modern geometry, 54 - 56 traditional.
tellyho is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 02:17 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
My PBH is ~31.75 inches. I'm 5'10''. I ride a 54 cm c-c, w/170 cranks. Short legs, long torso.
Old Fat Guy is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 04:36 PM
  #18  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times in 836 Posts
I wear a 30" trouser inseam and 55cm C-T is my size in a traditional road bike frame. My saddle height looks right to me, although I expose too little seatpost by some modern standards and too much by some earlier standards.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 05:22 PM
  #19  
Dolce far niente
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 14 Posts
I'v got a 30" pants inseam, and like 56/57cm bikes. Long torso, Barney Rubble legs.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 05:33 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I don't know my "cycling" inseam, but I wear 30" pants. Thinking about the way I've set up my bikes, I think that if I had a custom bike built for me it would be 53cm ST c-c and 55 TT c-c.
caloso is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 05:40 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
30" pants inseam. Prefer a 32.5" standover height (max). Top tube 56 or 57cm (c-c).

Short legs, long arms.
McDave is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 06:10 PM
  #22  
Muscle bike design spec
 
robtown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 3,688

Bikes: 70 Atala Record Proffesional, 00 Lemond, 08 Kestrel Evoke, 96 Colnago Master Olympic, 01 Colnago Ovalmaster, 76 Raleigh Gran Sport, 03 Fuji World, 86 Paramount, 90 Miyata CF, 09 Ritchey Breakaway CX, Bianchi Trofeo, 12 OutRiderUSA HyperLite

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fender1
I have a 32 inch inseam and like bikes between 58cm & 62cm.
Ditto
__________________
Korval is Ships
See my Hyperlite 411 it's the photo model on OutRiderUSA web page
robtown is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 10:12 PM
  #23  
California über Alles!!
 
Radfahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 139

Bikes: Steve Rex City Bike, Steve Rex Road Bike, Giant Rincon Grocery-Getter, Raleigh Superbe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'5" with a 36" inseam, and I ride 63 to 65cm bikes...
Radfahrer is offline  
Old 06-12-07, 10:22 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Bikedued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,963
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 60 Posts
Funny, I can comfortably ride about 62-64cm. My comfortable standover is about 32-33 inches depending on the shoes I'm wearing. I'm 6' 1" and find myself more comfortable on larger frames than should fit me. A frame can feel just about right in leg length, but I very often find the top tube too short. A real shame, since the Prelude I just finished is one of them. I like to stretch out a bit on top, and it absolutely drives me nuts when the bars feel too close. I guess I have normal legs but a long torso? Probably the same reason I cannot keep a shirt tucked in, lol.,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.

Last edited by Bikedued; 06-12-07 at 10:27 PM.
Bikedued is offline  
Old 06-13-07, 12:08 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 414 Times in 125 Posts
6', 34" inseam (87cm), PBH 88.5 cm, like big bikes...63 x 59cm...25", '71 Paramount...perfection!!.
Bogester is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.