Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New West / Vancouver
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help request: should I buy this?

    At the risk of sounding totally unschooled, I'm hoping people can weigh in on this bike:

    http://vancouver.craigslist.org/bik/362512740.html

    I've just started commuting about 25-40km per day, and my little cruiser can't really handle it. I'm looking for an older 10-18 speed, something that doesn't require any different shoes or clothing and that I can lock up outside all day and not worry about. But it would also be great if it had some speed and could stand the bumps and knocks of a 25km to-work bike route.

    Thoughts? Any ideas about the kind of thing I could look out for?
    Oh yeah, I don't want to spend more than $300 Canadian, so second-hand is it.

    thanks!

  2. #2
    Senior Member ga_mueller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    1978 Nishiki Superbe, 1982 Miyata Team, 1987 Miyata 912, 1987 Davidson Challenge, 1993 Bridgestone RB1-7
    Posts
    325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The front and rear der's are Suntour Blue Line, which first came out in 1981. Looks more like an early-80's bike.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New West / Vancouver
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's good to know .. do you think the price is too high?
    He's asking $225 CDN

  4. #4
    Senior Member amnomad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like a nice bike to me, maybe a little too nice for a commuter to lock up all day. I think I would offer the seller $150 since it will need about $75 for tires, tubes, brake hoods, and bar tape. Probably already gone though.....

  5. #5
    Senior Member divineAndbright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    ontario
    Posts
    2,238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It appears to be a half decent ride, alloy parts and forged drop outs, and the chrome stays are always pretty. If the frame is your size I think it would make a worthy commuter. Is the price too high? Well I would think so where I live, but you're in Vancouver it would appear so that would probably drive the price up considerably (especially if you're in the city). You can probably talk him down to $200 if you go and have a look at it.

  6. #6
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    2007 Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The seller is pretty clear about the size, but in the photo it looks bigger than 58cm to me. Maybe an illusion.
    - Stan

  7. #7
    crotchety young dude el twe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    SF, CA
    My Bikes
    IRO Angus; Casati Gold Line; Redline 925; '72 Schwinn Olympic Paramount
    Posts
    4,818
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, there's no way that's a 58.
    Quote Originally Posted by CardiacKid View Post
    I explained that he could never pay me enough cash for the amount of work I had put into that bike and the only way to compensate me for it was to ride the hell out of it.
    IRO Angus Casati Gold Line

  8. #8
    Stop reading my posts! unworthy1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    8,205
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, looks bigger than 58 to me, but might be an illusion due to camera angle...bring a tape measure. Seems like one of the nicer Apollos, almost but not quite as nice as the one in this thread:
    Nice old higher-end Apollo ID please T-Mar/Cyclotoine/others...
    I think $200 would be a good price...good luck!

  9. #9
    can't member Noah Scape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Iowa City
    Posts
    1,682
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree that it is bigger than 58. Looks to be a 63-64cm to me. How tall are you?

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New West / Vancouver
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, you're all right, the bike was WAY bigger than a 58cm. I measured from the middle of the cogset to the top, and it was around 62! It was painful to stand over.

    Too bad, because it was beautiful and barely ridden.

    thanks for weighing in everyone.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New West / Vancouver
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's my next idea, pics are here:

    http://vancouver.craigslist.org/bik/364412599.html

    Here's what he wrote:


    A classic lugged cro-mo steel 12-speed road bike. In excellent working condition and hasn't see much use over the years.

    - Sugino Cranks
    - Shimano Alloy brakes
    - Shimano Derailleurs
    - 27" Alloy Araya Wheels (Like New)
    - Brand new tires
    - Tange 500 Double-butted tubing frame
    - 23" seat tube from middle of bottom bracket to the top

    This bike is tuned up and the wheels have be regreased. Read to take to the road. Also suitable for converting to a fixed/single speed.


    The parts look decent, but what do you know about the Shogun? I've never heard of it. He wants $160 ...

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can do better if you are patient

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,283
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper
    The seller is pretty clear about the size, but in the photo it looks bigger than 58cm to me. Maybe an illusion.
    There's no way that bike is a 58cm/23 inch. More like 60-62cm, from that photo.

    And then I read this:

    Quote Originally Posted by Helter
    Yeah, you're all right, the bike was WAY bigger than a 58cm. I measured from the middle of the cogset to the top, and it was around 62! It was painful to stand over.

  14. #14
    Lanky Lass East Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Take a deep breath, and ask--What would Sheldon do?
    My Bikes
    Nishiki Nut! International, Pro, Olympic 12, Sport mixte, and others too numerous to mention.
    Posts
    21,575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helter
    Yeah, you're all right, the bike was WAY bigger than a 58cm. I measured from the middle of the cogset to the top, and it was around 62! It was painful to stand over.

    Too bad, because it was beautiful and barely ridden.

    thanks for weighing in everyone.
    That was a whoppin' big bike.

    But we are here to help you find a great bike, and at a reasonable price .

    East Hill
    ___________________________________________________
    TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...

  15. #15
    Senior Member Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kansas City
    My Bikes
    2006 Soma Smoothie, Some Schwinn Mountain bike that on loan to my dad, 2000 Raleigh R700 competion frame that i need to get rid of
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I hate to nit pick but the seller states in his heading that 58cm is the top tube. He says nothing about the seat tube being 58cm but is a litttle vague in the description. My comprehension skills are high but my speiling skills suck.

  16. #16
    Lanky Lass East Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Take a deep breath, and ask--What would Sheldon do?
    My Bikes
    Nishiki Nut! International, Pro, Olympic 12, Sport mixte, and others too numerous to mention.
    Posts
    21,575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex
    I hate to nit pick but the seller states in his heading that 58cm is the top tube. He says nothing about the seat tube being 58cm but is a litttle vague in the description. My comprehension skills are high but my speiling skills suck.
    The seller said it was a 23 inch frame, which translates to most of us as a 58cm bike. A bit vague in the description, but that's how most of us would interpret it. The seller knows enough to mention Sun Tour components, knows how to describe the size of the chainrings, and calls the set in the rear a 'cluster'. All of this suggests that the seller should know how bikes are measured...

    East Hill
    ___________________________________________________
    TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...

  17. #17
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    2007 Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex
    I hate to nit pick but the seller states in his heading that 58cm is the top tube. He says nothing about the seat tube being 58cm but is a litttle vague in the description. My comprehension skills are high but my speiling skills suck.
    You're absolutely right; I missed that in the heading and thought he was talking about the seat tube length, since that's the way most frames are measured.
    - Stan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •