'77 Raleigh Sport build quality question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,977
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
'77 Raleigh Sport build quality question
I was looking at a 77 Raleigh Sports for my wife that the LBS had sitting out front.
It was very similar if not identical to this bike:
https://cgi.ebay.com/Raleigh-ladies-c...QQcmdZViewItem
I rode it and the build quality & workmanship seemed much poorer than my '62 Sports. It rode like a cheap bike.
Was this my imagination or did the build quality & materials of later day Raleigh Sports' become worse?
It was very similar if not identical to this bike:
https://cgi.ebay.com/Raleigh-ladies-c...QQcmdZViewItem
I rode it and the build quality & workmanship seemed much poorer than my '62 Sports. It rode like a cheap bike.
Was this my imagination or did the build quality & materials of later day Raleigh Sports' become worse?
#2
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,921
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,087 Times
in
637 Posts
Not your imagination. The bike boom was one factor. People wanted 10-speeds in the mid-late 70's so who knows who was building 3-speed models then. I'm pretty sure the emphasis had shifter significantly from "quality" to "volume" by then also. I have a 1974 Raleigh Superbe, and even though it is a solid and sturdy bike, the build quality when it comes to the little details is shamefully poor.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#3
OldBikeGuide.com
Certainly a difference in quality in the later 3-speeds.
Have a look at this 1976 Sports.
We never see problems like that on the earlier cycles.
Have a look at this 1976 Sports.
We never see problems like that on the earlier cycles.