Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Ron Wood is cool.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Midwest
    My Bikes
    1980 Peugeot PKN10, '82 PSV10, '88PH10 and a 2002 LeMond Alp d'Huez.
    Posts
    114
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Long wheelbase bike

    I recently bought an early 80s Motobecane Mirage. After taking it for a 10 mile ride tonight, I was very impressed with the ride and handling. I've never ridden a bike that handles like the Moto- it is so willing to change direction yet extremely stable. It is the complete opposite of the Giant OCR3 i just sold. Looking at the bike i notice that it has a much longer wheelbase than my Peugeot PKN10 or my LeMond by a bit more than 3 inches. The chainstays are noticeably longer on the Moto. How and why is it that longer wheelbase improves handlling?

  2. #2
    Senior Member wahoonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    On the road-USA
    My Bikes
    Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
    Posts
    15,854
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Check the trail on the fork, it really can make or break a bike IMHO. Most of the newer bikes appear to have straighter forks with less trail. I much prefer the older more relaxed geometry that was prevalent in the mid 70's sport bikes. I have had a couple of long haul tour bikes that rode like a train on rails, they weren't quick handleing but very comfortable for long all day riding. Too many of today's bikes are aimed at the Lance wannabees and the tri riders which is a whole different style and type of riding. You can have a long wheel base with a fairly short trail, head tube and seat tube angle also play a part in it. Relaxed angles slow the steering a bit but give increased overal comfort.

    Aaron
    Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

    ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

    "Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
    RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
    _Nicodemus

    "Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred
    Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
    _krazygluon

  3. #3
    Ron Wood is cool.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Midwest
    My Bikes
    1980 Peugeot PKN10, '82 PSV10, '88PH10 and a 2002 LeMond Alp d'Huez.
    Posts
    114
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The angle of the headtube on my moto is more relaxed than the peugeot but the amount of trail in both forks is about the same.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    10,761
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Ocana 1973 View Post
    The angle of the headtube on my moto is more relaxed than the peugeot but the amount of trail in both forks is about the same.
    Do you mean to say that then amount of rake (aka offset) of the two forks is about the same?

    BTW, trail is a pretty sensitive function. "about the same" might still represent a significant difference.

    Road Fan

  5. #5
    Ron Wood is cool.
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Midwest
    My Bikes
    1980 Peugeot PKN10, '82 PSV10, '88PH10 and a 2002 LeMond Alp d'Huez.
    Posts
    114
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use the term "trail" reluctantly. What i'm really referring to is the amount of castor angle in the fork.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Wilmette, IL
    Posts
    4,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, long wheelbase bikes ride nice. I recently switched from my racing bike with a sub 40' wheelbase to a hybrid that is 42 1/2' long. What a nice ride. My hands and wrists dont hurt, my butt doesnt hurt, no more jolts from bad roads. I think most people would benefit from longer wheelbase bikes. They would enjoy riding more with less aches and pains. But fashion drives everything including bikes. Look at the fixed gear craze and people riding track bikes on city streets. Give me a bike with long wheelbase, plenty of fork rake and clearence for fenders. And I'm plenty happy with 10 gears too.

  7. #7
    Old Skeptic stronglight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    My Bikes
    19 road bikes & 1 Track bike
    Posts
    1,044
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A great number of things can effect the handling and the ride of a bike. Even the seat tube angle can determine how much of a riders weight is ultimately distributed to the front of the bike and onto the fork, as can the chain stay length. And the head tube angle can also come into play along with the actual rake of the fork itself. Fascinating to consider all the variables, and see how they effect each of my own bikes.

    I too much prefer what is basically the more relaxed geometry of a classic "touring" bike. The extreme end of relaxed geometry might be the British Roadster style bikes with frame tube angles at perhaps 63-68 degrees.

    I haven't yet aged (perhaps I should say "matured") to where I can appreciate the extremely layed back angles of a Roadster bike, designed entirely for the very upright seated position of course, but plenty of time to further temper my tastes and needs in the future. One must admit that people riding old Raleigh roadsters always seem to be very comfortable and contented. There must be much to like about that ride... and the less hurried riding pace too, I suppose. Those bikes also do handle with superb stability.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,834
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IMO we're still suffering the lingering effects of the "crit bike craze" of the late 80s. (I had one made in '87 or '88 and spent a season trying to convince myself it didn't suck). Lots of folks just don't think a bike looks racy unless it has a tiny little bend in the fork blades and a rear wheel brushing the seat tube. By '89 or '90 I had frames made with the "stage race" geometry that LeMond had sort-of popularized. It was a tad harder to muscle those bikes through a fast "S" turn in a criterium, but they were otherwise much, much better than the typical race frames of the day, IMO.

    Today, long after the racing career ended, I find that my favorite bikes come with a 73 or 74 degree head angle and about 60 mm of rake, for a trail somewhere in the neigborhood of 40 mm. This results in what I consider perfect handling, although I ride 27 mm tires at a minimum and am told that trail that low results in instability with typical <25 mm tires. I haven't tried it so don't know, but I do know that I don't especially care for the 60+ mm of trail typical on a modern "performance" bicycle, regardless of tires.
    Last edited by Six jours; 10-25-07 at 09:39 AM.

  9. #9
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,356
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I concur with the general sentiments of this thread. For clarification, fork trail is specifically defined as the distance along the ground between the front tire's contact point and a straight line projection through the center of the steerer tube. This is a function of head tube angle, fork length, and fork rake. Fork rake is the forward displacement of the front axle resulting from curvature of the fork blades.

    My Bianchi and my (now my son's) Peugeot PKN-10, both ca. 1980 models, are about as short, upright, and stiff geometries as I care to ride. For a long ride with a few bumps, it is hard to beat the old relaxed geometry framesets, either touring bikes of the 1970s or long distance road racing bikes of the 1960s.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •