Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member SingeDebile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    why the 2 tooth difference in TA chainrings?

    Ive noticed this on alot of TA chainring setups there will be two nearly identical large chainrings with only a 2 tooth difference, then there is the third granny gear. Now I understand the idea behind the granny gear... but whats the point in having two nearly identical large chainrings? Wouldnt it make more sense to have a mid sized chain ring? Ive always thought of the big one being for "super speed" and downhill... the middle for all around, and the small for climbing.
    bike bike
    ,/(looking for high end steel frames in the larger then life sizes of 68-70cm)
    69cm Romic 'Sport Tourer/Porteur'

  2. #2
    Stop reading my posts! unworthy1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    8,386
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think you're talking about half-step gearing, and the triple option: half-step plus granny. It's not always just a 2t difference between the chainrings, that depends on what you run in the rear. Rather than my trying to explain it, just do a search for those 2 subject lines in something like Sheldon's site.
    Cyclocross cranksets also usually have a close jump between the 2 rings...

  3. #3
    Senior Member Grand Bois's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pinole, CA, USA
    Posts
    15,505
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Wilmette, IL
    Posts
    4,545
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Back in the 70's the Junior race catagory had a 93 inch gear restriction. I ran a setup of 49/52 chainrings and a 15-24 5 speed cog. Gave me a nice range of gears. And with the chainrings that close in size the front derailleur shifts between them very easily, not that big jump/drop of the chain. And when running through your gears you use the front derailleur as often as the rear.

  5. #5
    Senior Member SingeDebile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by big chainring View Post
    Back in the 70's the Junior race catagory had a 93 inch gear restriction. I ran a setup of 49/52 chainrings and a 15-24 5 speed cog. Gave me a nice range of gears. And with the chainrings that close in size the front derailleur shifts between them very easily, not that big jump/drop of the chain. And when running through your gears you use the front derailleur as often as the rear.
    I like what you said at the end there, that seems very interesting. I definitely tend to stay in one gear up front and shift the back.... but this makes alot of sense! and I can see myself liking it. Thanks!
    bike bike
    ,/(looking for high end steel frames in the larger then life sizes of 68-70cm)
    69cm Romic 'Sport Tourer/Porteur'

  6. #6
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,267
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I strongly favor a 3-tooth drop between the two (outer) chainrings, because this works so well ratiometrically with a 2-tooth progression back. One of the all-time classic combinations is:
    49-46 / 14-16-18-20-23 -- plug that into an Excel and you will see why I like it so well. I took the concept a step further in the mid 1970s with my third-step gearing: 49-46-43 / 13-16-19-23-26, which provides a beautiful set of 14 ratios if one avoids large-large cross-chaining.

    In the 1970s I geared my Nishiki with a 50-47 / 14-16-18-20-23 half-step, which I could change in 5 minutes to a 50-42 / 14-16-18-20-23 1.5-step for rides in the hills.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •