Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-09-07, 11:05 AM   #1
ticwanos
Ol' Paint
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Garland, Texas and Tahlequah, OK
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Grand Prix,'71 Schwinn Super Sport, '73 Schwinn Paramount, '83 Schwinn Super Sport, '84(?) Univega Gran Sprint, '89 Schwinn Waterford Paramount
Posts: 393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Georgena Terry Gambit

I was hoping there would be a petite lady on the forum who has had experience riding this unique Women's Specific Design and could share their impressions. I just picked this little beauty up at a garage sale (yes, I know she has seen better days, but so have I), and have been wondering if the design truly is better for a short woman's anatomy or if it is just hype. Of course, I have both a wife and daughter who are about 5'2" and I am hoping this bike will be just the thing for one or the other. It came equipped with Shimano Light action derailleurs, Sakai SA crankset, Diamcomp brakes and levers, Araya rims and petite Hsinglung (?) handlebars. I'm fairly knowledgeable about Suntour bits, but don't know the Shimano timeline and rankings. Does anyone have an idea 'bout how to date this? Thanks.


__________________
"In my cathedral,
colored glass holds no candle to
sunlight through trees."
-- Leon Briggs
ticwanos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-07, 11:14 AM   #2
East Hill
Lanky Lass
 
East Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Take a deep breath, and ask--What would Sheldon do?
Bikes: Nishiki Nut! International, Pro, Olympic 12, Sport mixte, and others too numerous to mention.
Posts: 21,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I have not ridden this particular bike, but I have a lot of experience riding what are essentially knock offs (my Nishiki Prestige and the Centurion Dave Scott Ironman Expert).

My impression of both my bikes with the smaller front wheels is that they are a bit twitchy compared to my other bikes, but I easily adjusted within a few hours of riding.

They seem to be very light bikes, very fast. I would guess that your wife and daughter would LOVE this bike, based on my experience. Of course, they'd have to ride it for themselves . It's a nice, nice bike. When I first started looking at older bikes I was actually hoping I would run across something like a Terry bike.

I'm guessing 1987 by the colour scheme. Terry is still in business, and may be able to help you date the bike if supplied with the serial number. In fact, when I sent an e-mail to the Terry website, Ms Terry herself answered it !

East Hill
__________________
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
East Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-07, 12:32 PM   #3
ollo_ollo
Senior Member
 
ollo_ollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Sublimity Orygun
Bikes: Still have a few left!
Posts: 3,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
I had a Terry Solstice given to me. I kept it for a while as 2 of my grand daughters are Chinese & quite petite. Terry bikes really do fit small women well, and mine also appeared to have smaller brake levers that were compatible with small hands. We moved recently and I sold the Terry along with many other bikes to make our move easier. You should have no trouble selling the bike if your wife & daughter don't like the fit.
ollo_ollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-07, 06:36 PM   #4
East Hill
Lanky Lass
 
East Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Take a deep breath, and ask--What would Sheldon do?
Bikes: Nishiki Nut! International, Pro, Olympic 12, Sport mixte, and others too numerous to mention.
Posts: 21,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Ah yes, I forgot to mention that not only are the brake levers smaller, but the handlebars are quite narrow. I'll have to go measure the width, but they are definitely narrow.

East Hill
__________________
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
East Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-07, 09:21 PM   #5
buddyp
Senior Member
 
buddyp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: washington dc
Bikes: derosa, bianchi, fuji, panasonic, jamis
Posts: 311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Its not possible to build a bike smaller than a certain size without compromising up the geometry. At the time the big/small wheel concept was popular the rationale was that using a 700c rear wheel allowed you to use normal cogs and chainwheels and have standard gear ratios, which you couldn't do with 2 24" wheels. IIRC 650c wheels didn't exist yet and small cogs weren't available yet, though the would be soon.

The first big/small I ever saw was built by Bill Boston. I dunno if the idea was original to him or he copied someone else. Terry was the first to market a line of bikes specifically for women and she used the big/small wheel design on her smaller sizes.

My ex-wife had a custom 700c/24" bike. It worked well for her.
buddyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 PM.