Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Disraeli Gears Charles Wahl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Riding: 1960s Falcon commuter; Queued: 1977 Bob Jackson, 1983 Serotta Club Special, 1984 Motobécane Team Champion, 1983 Guerciotti SLX, 1974 Harding (like Holdsworth Pro), 1974 Peugeot PX10LE, 1970s Jeunet Franche-Comté, 1974 Raleigh International
    Posts
    3,009
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Note on Tange Infinity tubing

    While browsing The Paterek Manual, a book about framebuilding, I ran across this note, in a "supplement" at the rear (page 342):

    "Pg. 2-64
    Tube sets; Tange has recently introduced the Infinity series of
    tubing. This is a seamed tubing that has tapered walls rather than butted
    walls. During coldworking, the seams nearly disappear from sight and the
    tube takes on almost the same strength properties as seamless tubing. Send
    to Shimano for more information. The Infinity name comes from the concept
    that the tubes do not have a starting or stopping point for the butt. In
    effect, they are infinitely butted."

    This book is not dated, but it looks like it was self-published, in the early 80s. I don't have a paper copy, just the scanned version that is available at http://icelord.net/bike/

    What's interesting, apart from the technical claim made, is that this seems to be a "late-breaking news" addition to the basic text, which includes a chart with Tange tubing on the referenced page. That chart includes Prestige, along with Nos. 1 through 5. So, if all this can be believed, Infinity was not a precursor of Prestige, but was introduced later. The note in the supplement before this one advises of another tubing newly available from Tange: "900."

  2. #2
    juneeaa memba!
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    boogled up in...Idaho!
    My Bikes
    Crap. The box is not big enough...
    Posts
    5,611
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    there is infinite change in between a nickel and a dime, too.

  3. #3
    juneeaa memba!
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    boogled up in...Idaho!
    My Bikes
    Crap. The box is not big enough...
    Posts
    5,611
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ah, that sounded too harsh. I was just commenting on the marketing types stretching the concept to its limits. As I remember, Prestige was first, and Infinity was later. I could see the seam, though.

  4. #4
    Unique Vintage Steel cuda2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Allen, TX
    My Bikes
    Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
    Posts
    11,486
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Infinity came no later than 84 as my Centurion is built with it. Certainly heavier than my 531 or Columbus SL bikes though it is a comfortable ride. And got to admit the Brooks B17 and high flange hubs have a bit to do with the weight as well. Will probably be taking that bike out this weekend.

  5. #5
    Disraeli Gears Charles Wahl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Riding: 1960s Falcon commuter; Queued: 1977 Bob Jackson, 1983 Serotta Club Special, 1984 Motobécane Team Champion, 1983 Guerciotti SLX, 1974 Harding (like Holdsworth Pro), 1974 Peugeot PX10LE, 1970s Jeunet Franche-Comté, 1974 Raleigh International
    Posts
    3,009
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh, I can see the seam too, in the seat tube of my Nishiki frame. But, at a slightly larger size than my 531C Raleigh, the Nishiki is only about 50 grams heavier. The frame is heavier, but the fork is lighter than those on the Raleigh.

  6. #6
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, West of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I hope this question is not considered a thread hijack, that's not my intention.
    Where does Tange 900 (double butted) fit into this picture, my guess is one step lower than Infinity. Is that correct?
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  7. #7
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,000
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Wahl View Post
    Oh, I can see the seam too, in the seat tube of my Nishiki frame. But, at a slightly larger size than my 531C Raleigh, the Nishiki is only about 50 grams heavier. The frame is heavier, but the fork is lighter than those on the Raleigh.
    Is 50 g significant in trying to judge whether the tubeset was the driving factor? What is the typical sample to sample weight variation between sequential production units of such frames?

    Road Fan

  8. #8
    Senior Member Bikedued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,955
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Shogun touring bike is infinity tubing, and doesn't feel all that light to me? It rides like a Lincoln though,
    so I'm not complaining. I could barely see a seam when I had it stripped down for paint.,,,,BD
    "Whale. Oil. Beef. Hooked!" The Rumjacks

  9. #9
    Disraeli Gears Charles Wahl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Riding: 1960s Falcon commuter; Queued: 1977 Bob Jackson, 1983 Serotta Club Special, 1984 Motobécane Team Champion, 1983 Guerciotti SLX, 1974 Harding (like Holdsworth Pro), 1974 Peugeot PX10LE, 1970s Jeunet Franche-Comté, 1974 Raleigh International
    Posts
    3,009
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Road Fan View Post
    Is 50 g significant in trying to judge whether the tubeset was the driving factor? What is the typical sample to sample weight variation between sequential production units of such frames?
    I double-checked, and the difference is actually 75 g, not 50. To be more accurate, the Nishiki frame weighs 160 g more than the Raleigh, while its fork is about 85 g lighter. My point was simply that the Infinity tubing is probably not that much heavier than the Reynolds 531C. And I have no idea how any sort of as-built weight variation information could be compiled at this date: the bikes we have available as a sample are different models, from different years, constructed in different sizes. Too many variables!
    Last edited by Charles Wahl; 03-01-08 at 06:47 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,000
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Wahl View Post
    I double-checked, and the difference is actually 75 g, not 50. My point was simply that the Infinity tubing is probably not that much heavier than the Reynolds 531C. And I have no idea how any sort of statistical variation information could be compiled at this date: the bikes we have available as a sample are different models, from different years, constructed in different sizes. Too many variables!

    Yeah, Charles, we'd need a lot of access to a bike frame factory's production records, or enough experience with designing and building frames to have the craft knowledge. I was hoping such a unique person would chime in. My question was definitely to the community rather than to you!

    Just to know what the variation is requires lots of data.

    Road Fan

  11. #11
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, West of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by A.Winthrop View Post
    In a post elsewhere, T-Mar suggests that although Tange 900,
    developed for use with mass production of frames, had the
    reputation of being lower-end tubing, it was essentially the
    same as Tange #2. I don't know the source for his information
    but he's usually right on these things. You could run a
    search for Tang 900 on this forum to find T-Mar's original
    post.
    Thanks A.Winthrop, much appreciated.
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's another almost-threadjack:
    If Tange 900 was equivalent (more or less) to Tange 2, does that mean that Tange 1000 was equivalent (more or less) to Tange 1?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •