Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    question to peugeot-philes on frame variations

    as a confirmed franco-phobe, it pains me to say that i currently have THREE french bikes in the house these days.
    as some of you already know, I recently acquired a very clean, very original little peugeot UO9 from a fellow CV'er for general kickin' 'round town.

    Decalling, headbadge,componentry, etc and what's left of the btm bkt serial number all clearly indicate it to be a UO-9 of what looks to be 1980 or 81 vintage, but with one major glaring difference-

    The frame's lugwork/construction is unlike any pictures of the peugeot UO series that I've found in the various online peugeot websites and catalogues.

    The headtube lugs are of a different, more sculpted design and the seatcluster is of "lugless" construction, rather than a simple plain lug.
    the bike is clearly marked as made in france. size is a 19"(50cm). everything else seems to match the us catalogues for either 1980 or 81.


    http://mysite.verizon.net/imagelib/s...v7n7&title=UO9

    http://mysite.verizon.net/imagelib/s...o09e&title=UO9


    so what's the story? why is this one different?

    tia.
    best,
    k







    Last edited by caterham; 03-12-08 at 01:33 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    bump

    *bump*


    okie.....


    where's all those bright, good-looking C-V pugheads when you need them?

    i'm going out for a spin and i expect to find a half-dozen or so scholarly historical treatises on peugeot UO series product development when i get back.

    well,... actually a french bicycle joke or limmerick in poor taste would do.
    "there was a young cyclist named dolores..."

    thanks.

    best,
    k
    Last edited by caterham; 03-13-08 at 01:52 AM.

  3. #3
    stringbreaker stringbreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa. State
    My Bikes
    specialized crossroads hybrid 2006 Raleigh Cadent 2 1971 Schwinn Varsity, 1972 Schwinn Continental, 1977 Schwinn Volare (frame)
    Posts
    4,443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I changed my mind I want it back
    (Life is too short to play crappy guitars) 2006 Raleigh Cadent 3.0, 1977 Schwinn Volare, 2010 Windsor tourist. ( I didn't fall , I attacked the floor)

  4. #4
    Senior Member cyclotoine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    YT
    Posts
    7,602
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Small frame size required different angles?
    1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear

  5. #5
    Senior Member miamijim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    11,840
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Here's my guess....

    In the early 80's Peugeot began the transition away from fully lugged frames to lugless or internaly and externaly brazed frames. Because the head tube joints are a very high stress area I'd venture and guess Peugeot didnt want to take any chances with joint failure in the head tube area.

    A few other ideas...

    1. Your blue bike is a very small frame based on the proximity of the lugs to one another. There is a chance Peugeots brazing equiptment couldnt braze two lugless joints so close together.

    2. Larger Peugeot frames were often lugged while smaller frames were brazed (P8's were lugless P9's were lugged-same bike) lending truth to the idea that they felt lugless joints were lacking some strength/stiffness.
    WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 2005 Pinarello Dogma; 1991 Paramount PDG 70 Mtb; 1976? AD Vent Noir; 1989 LeMond Maillot Juane F&F; 1993? Basso GAP F&F; 1989 Terry Symmetry; 2003 Trek 4700 Mtb; 1983 Vitus 979

  6. #6
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,920
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For the UO-x series, what was the last year for the familiar "Thunderbird" or "Aztec" lugs of the early and mid 1970s?
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  7. #7
    Senior Member miamijim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    11,840
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by John E View Post
    For the UO-x series, what was the last year for the familiar "Thunderbird" or "Aztec" lugs of the early and mid 1970s?
    1978...possibly later.
    WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 2005 Pinarello Dogma; 1991 Paramount PDG 70 Mtb; 1976? AD Vent Noir; 1989 LeMond Maillot Juane F&F; 1993? Basso GAP F&F; 1989 Terry Symmetry; 2003 Trek 4700 Mtb; 1983 Vitus 979

  8. #8
    Broom Wagon Fodder reverborama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    Fuji Supreme; Fuji Royale; Schwinn Varsity; Nishiki International; Schwinn Premis, Falcon Merckx
    Posts
    1,168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've owned two Peugeots - Both U0-10's. The first was a 1980 or so with non aztec lugs. The current is a 77 with the aztec lugs. That's about all I know, though.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks guys. interesting replies.

    CT:>>>Small frame size required different angles?<<<

    perhaps and certainly would be logical but i've seen earlier uo8's with full brazed lugwork in the 19" size. I'd also expect a lug style more cosmetically similar to the regular size runs for product continuity or at least backtracking to their earlier lug , tho economics & availability might have been the principal deciders. that also wouldn't fully explain the lugless seatcluster treatment.



    MJ:>>>In the early 80's Peugeot began the transition away from fully lugged frames to lugless or internaly and externaly brazed frames. Because the head tube joints are a very high stress area I'd venture and guess Peugeot didnt want to take any chances with joint failure in the head tube area.<<<

    I'd first thought that my bike might have been a lug to lugless transition model but product catalogues show that peugeot continued to use a full lugged treatment on the UO8, UO9 and UO10 for several years after mine was built, right up until the model was phased out.If indeed it was a phasing-in of lugless construction, I'd expect it to appear more commonly on UO's with each new model year rather than as a stand-alone oddity smack in the middle of the product's run.


    MJ:>>>Your blue bike is a very small frame based on the proximity of the lugs to one another. There is a chance Peugeots brazing equiptment couldnt braze two lugless joints so close together.<<<

    that's a very intriguing and attractive rationale for the use of a different lug design. by itself, it wouldn't account for the lugless seatcluster on my bike but taken as just one of several manufacturing factors of the small sized bikes(or all of these suggestions combined ), production tooling limitations would present a viable explanation.

    Have you ever seen this headlug design on any other peugeot model before? I certainly didn't recognise it.
    Would you know if peugeot used outside subcontractors or split production between different divisions/facilities within the recreational bike lines?

    thanks again for all your insights.
    best,
    k
    Last edited by caterham; 03-13-08 at 02:01 AM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member miamijim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    11,840
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Caterham:

    Your bike could be a transition to lugless construction versus away from lugged....

    The seat lug joints could be close enough together for their lugless brazing equiptment...

    I think it was strength issue. P8's were build as a lugless model except for the largest size which was build with lugs and relabled as a P9.
    WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 2005 Pinarello Dogma; 1991 Paramount PDG 70 Mtb; 1976? AD Vent Noir; 1989 LeMond Maillot Juane F&F; 1993? Basso GAP F&F; 1989 Terry Symmetry; 2003 Trek 4700 Mtb; 1983 Vitus 979

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by miamijim View Post
    Your bike could be a transition to lugless construction versus away from lugged....
    The seat lug joints could be close enough together for their lugless brazing equiptment...
    I think it was strength issue. P8's were build as a lugless model except for the largest size which was build with lugs and relabled as a P9.
    hi mj,

    imo, there's no question of peugeot's interest in lugless construction.
    I'd also expect conservatism in lugless 's introduction to the line, for reliabilty's sake and also to test for market acceptance.
    If it were simply a strength issue, I would have expected that after my 19" was produced in 1980, that the following year ,a lugless seatcluster would have appeared on the 21" frames, and so on.

    Instead, mine seems to be an isolated example right in the middle of the revised UO-8/9/10 production span.
    the lugless seatcluster apparently doesn't appear on the UO series again but rather, the lugless p8 is introduced as a completley separate & distinct model several years after mine.
    Based on the progression of the technique's useage thru the peugeot line-up, it would seem that there may have been a problem of acceptance , moreso than simply an issue of reliability-ie- that there was resistance to 'meddling' with the bread-n-butter UO models.

    best,
    k

  12. #12
    Senior Member miamijim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    11,840
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Whats the stamped serail number? Its either on the BB or right rear drop out with the format Y123 45678
    WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 2005 Pinarello Dogma; 1991 Paramount PDG 70 Mtb; 1976? AD Vent Noir; 1989 LeMond Maillot Juane F&F; 1993? Basso GAP F&F; 1989 Terry Symmetry; 2003 Trek 4700 Mtb; 1983 Vitus 979

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hi mj,

    the stamped serial # is:

    Y0 7 06789

    best,
    k
    Last edited by caterham; 03-13-08 at 11:44 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member miamijim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    11,840
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by caterham View Post
    hi mj,

    the stamped serial # is:

    Y0 7 06178

    best,
    k
    I wanted to confirm its an '80. In regards to the strtength issue and your larger 19" being lugless. Assuming your 19" is a newer model Peugeot could have phased in lugless construction with the headtube being converted last as the headtube just are critical from a safety perspective.

    I do agree that they probably had concurrent luggless/lugged models to ease the consumers mindset....but then again maybe they had alot of lugs lying around.
    WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 2005 Pinarello Dogma; 1991 Paramount PDG 70 Mtb; 1976? AD Vent Noir; 1989 LeMond Maillot Juane F&F; 1993? Basso GAP F&F; 1989 Terry Symmetry; 2003 Trek 4700 Mtb; 1983 Vitus 979

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •