Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Short and tall?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Short and tall?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-08, 02:00 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Skåne Sweden
Posts: 17

Bikes: Van Iseghem conversion, LeJeune road 1970

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Short and tall?

For many years I’ve had bikes too big for me. This I understood when I bought a 53 cm LeJeune for my son. I kept it for myself and it’s the least bad fit I’ve had. It seems I would need a short and tall bike according to CompetitiveCyclist.com and I think they are right. The LeJeune has taken me about 2500 km the last two years and never been more comfortable riding. The only problem is that it looks ridiculous with the two fists of post sticking out of the frame. CompetitiveCyclist.com suggests a seat tube at about 57 cm and a top tube length of less than 53 cm.

I understand that it would be very difficult to find a creature like this but could someone point me to a maker that used to make short and tall bikes? Perhaps it would be possible to find a 55 cm with short top tube. I’m looking for something between 1963 and 1983 preferably Italian but any European maker would do.

These are my measurements:
Inseam: 87
Trunk: 60.4
Forearm: 33.5
Arm: 63
Thigh: 61.4
Lower Leg: 55.4
Sternal Notch: 144
Total Body Height: 176
Pavoni is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 02:17 PM
  #2  
juneeaa memba!
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: boogled up in...Idaho!
Posts: 5,632

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
well. You can get someone to build you one...probably for a considerable sum. You could also shop for an older vintage frame. It was the trend before the mid-80's to make less reach than rise. I have a few bikes that have a 57 cm seatpost and a 55 cm top tube (the Hetchins leaps immediately to mind, although it is like a 58/56...). That would be very ball park, especially when you factor in a zero-offset seatpost and a shorter stem. You may also consider a slightly shorter one, like a 56/54...then you could use a stem with a little rise to better accommodate your fit.
luker is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 02:55 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Skåne Sweden
Posts: 17

Bikes: Van Iseghem conversion, LeJeune road 1970

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I did some measurements of the bikes I have:
Danish unknown 1968 59/56
Crescent 1976 56,5/56,5
Bianchi early -80 56/56
Van Iseghem 57/56
LeJeune 1970 52,5/54
It’s interesting that almost all of them have the same top tube length. This afternoon I took a 50 km ride with the Van Iseghem and my shoulders are killing me. But 300 km last summer on the LeJeune was no problem. The LeJeune is good but it looks silly. I really need to get the top tube down to maximum 54 cm. Moving the seat forward wouldn’t help because of the increased weight on the arms and shoulders. I need 8 cm saddle setback. The only way of adjustment is stem length and it’s hard to find a nice Cinelli or 3TTT shorter than 9 cm. And shorter would also look funny.
Perhaps I should take the Bianchi to a frame builder and have it shortened. But I would really like to find a frame that fits from the beginning. Never seen a Hetchins in Sweden though.
Pavoni is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 07:53 PM
  #4  
juneeaa memba!
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: boogled up in...Idaho!
Posts: 5,632

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
yeah. as they get smaller the top tube has to stay beyond a certain length to avoid toeclip overlap. so the smaller bikes get stretched. Nowadays they are better with that, especially for WSD bikes. But in 57, 58 height, the toptube can be considerably shorter. I'll measure a few of mine and let you know which one has the shortest top tube.
luker is offline  
Old 04-13-08, 08:18 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Can we see pics of the lejeune as set-up for you? I an just curious I have 2 fists of post on my Gazelle and it doesn't look too bad, that's a traditional campagnolo post at max height.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 04-14-08, 11:03 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Skåne Sweden
Posts: 17

Bikes: Van Iseghem conversion, LeJeune road 1970

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry about the bad picture https://vitaby.se/cykel/lejeune/ but you can see what I mean. (And, yes I know: I have to get new tape and move the levers down a bit. Haven't changed much on the bike since I bought it.)
Pavoni is offline  
Old 04-25-08, 04:48 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Skåne Sweden
Posts: 17

Bikes: Van Iseghem conversion, LeJeune road 1970

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So, anyone have some measurements that could help me find a nice short and tall frame.

I'm also thinking about getting a shorter stem for the Bianchi. A 3TTT 7 - 8 cm would maybe work but it seems almost impossible if I don't want to pay a fortune. Any advice?
Pavoni is offline  
Old 04-25-08, 04:54 PM
  #8  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times in 837 Posts
Look for an early 1970s Nishiki -- mine had a very short top tube.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 04-26-08, 01:50 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
PBR Streetgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SF
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Pavoni
So, anyone have some measurements that could help me find a nice short and tall frame.

I'm also thinking about getting a shorter stem for the Bianchi. A 3TTT 7 - 8 cm would maybe work but it seems almost impossible if I don't want to pay a fortune. Any advice?
Why wouldn't a 7 cm stem work on the Bianchi? What's impossible about it? Couldn't be too much money. That seems like the most practical approach and it's certainly cheaper than a custom frame (or even a used frame that works).
PBR Streetgang is offline  
Old 04-26-08, 01:54 PM
  #10  
Dolce far niente
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 14 Posts
My Merckx is pretty "square" - the top tube and seat tube are the same length.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline  
Old 04-26-08, 02:23 PM
  #11  
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 11,586

Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Surly Straggler

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 56 Posts
Might look into a Gazelle from the late 70's into the early/mid 80's. They tend to run at least 1.5cm shorter on the top tube vs seat tube.
cuda2k is offline  
Old 04-29-08, 10:12 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Skåne Sweden
Posts: 17

Bikes: Van Iseghem conversion, LeJeune road 1970

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=PBR Streetgang;6589235]Why wouldn't a 7 cm stem work on the Bianchi? What's impossible about it? Couldn't be too much money. QUOTE]


Impossible if I don't want to spend a fortune. But I decided on a Cinelli for $39 on Ebay. I'll go with the Bianchi and see if I can make it fit with the new stem. Thank's for the advices and I'll look for a Gazelle or a Nishiki
Pavoni is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.