Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member riomx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    199? Red Peugeot Triathlon
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Trek 600 or Schwinn Super Sport

    I posted the other day about possibly buying a Trek 600 bike going for $125 with a mix of Ofmega and Shimano 600 components for my wife posted on Craigslist. I thought it may be long gone, since I didn't hear from the owner in three days. However, I just got an e-mail from him today, saying he's gonna show it to the first person who sets up a time.

    Today though, I found what i believe to be a 1984 Schwinn Super Sport with Cyclone II components going for $180 that's closer to home. The Trek is about 120 miles away, while the Schwinn is within 3 miles

    Anyway, the motivating factor here is weight. Should I go with the Trek 600 since it's made of Reynolds 531, or are the mid-80s Super Sports comparably light?

    Thanks,

    - joe
    49cm 198? Dark Blue Fuji Royale II (For Sale)
    56cm 198? Pearl White Peugeot UO9 (For Sale)
    48cm 1985 Trek 660 (For Sale)
    51cm 198? Dark Blue Peugeot Iseran
    52cm 1987 Violet Nishiki Olympic 12
    53cm 199? Diamondback Centurion Master TG
    52cm 199? Red Peugeot Triathlon

  2. #2
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,197
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by riomx View Post
    I posted the other day about possibly buying a Trek 600 bike going for $125 with a mix of Ofmega and Shimano 600 components for my wife posted on Craigslist. I thought it may be long gone, since I didn't hear from the owner in three days. However, I just got an e-mail from him today, saying he's gonna show it to the first person who sets up a time.

    Today though, I found what i believe to be a 1984 Schwinn Super Sport with Cyclone II components going for $180 that's closer to home. The Trek is about 120 miles away, while the Schwinn is within 3 miles

    Anyway, the motivating factor here is weight. Should I go with the Trek 600 since it's made of Reynolds 531, or are the mid-80s Super Sports comparably light?

    Thanks,

    - joe
    There were Trek 600s over several years, and I think some were fully db 531, some were tubes only, and some were 531 tubes with some other cromolly for the forks and stays. I have a very similar '84 610 and a fully db '82 (I think) 600. The fully db is a LOT lighter. I'd find it hard to believe a SS is as light a frame.

    The 600 I have is a fairly flexy bike, but I kinda like that.

  3. #3
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The weight for a 1984 Super Sport (23" or 58.4cm c-t frame) is 24 pounds. This is for a ready-to-ride bike with pedals.

    1984 Schwinn road bike specs
    - Stan

  4. #4
    Old Fogy
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Murray, Utah
    Posts
    1,224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've owned both. They are both nice bikes, but the Trek is slightly lighter, and just feels "livelier" to me. My Trek, which I still own and ride regularly, is equipped with Campy components and Brooks saddle. That may be part of the reason I prefer it.
    The guy who bought the Super Sport has it stripped and is threatening to make a single speed out of it. I would not have sold it to him if I had thought he would ruin it that way.

  5. #5
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    18,869
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Trek is a much better bike. I am surprised it is still around.

  6. #6
    Senior Member riomx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    199? Red Peugeot Triathlon
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As always, thanks guys. I can always count on a quick response here on the C&V forums.

    I've carried and ridden (briefly) Trek bikes with 531 frames and they are beautiful. To me, they felt weightless compared to my cheaper bikes.

    I just weighed my Triathlon, which has a Reynolds 501 frame. It came in at about 24-25 pounds (I weighed myself and then picked up the bike while on the scale ). So, if the Super Sport is around the same weight, I think that will suffice.

    I'm supposed to check it out tonight if I hear back from the guy. If it's a decent bike, I may just bring it home and save myself the trouble of driving out to East Colorado. If it's a pig though, I'll wait for the Trek.
    49cm 198? Dark Blue Fuji Royale II (For Sale)
    56cm 198? Pearl White Peugeot UO9 (For Sale)
    48cm 1985 Trek 660 (For Sale)
    51cm 198? Dark Blue Peugeot Iseran
    52cm 1987 Violet Nishiki Olympic 12
    53cm 199? Diamondback Centurion Master TG
    52cm 199? Red Peugeot Triathlon

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,016
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My super sport sustained the impact of a car which knocked me out for a brief moment in time. The frame suffers a slight buckle but the frame is rideable. It does need a new fork.

    I'll be painting it before winter. I hope it rides okay after the crash. The Tenax Schwinns are pretty freaking awsome.

  8. #8
    Senior Member riomx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    199? Red Peugeot Triathlon
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just went to see the Super Sport, and in the words of Bill O'Reilly, F***ING THING SUCKS!!!

    It was in awful shape. Horribly weatherbeaten - everything on it was cracked and rusted. Poor thing struggled to shift altogether.

    I just e-mailed the guy with the Trek. Hopefully he still has it. I've told him I'm ready to buy tomorrow.

    The saga continues!
    49cm 198? Dark Blue Fuji Royale II (For Sale)
    56cm 198? Pearl White Peugeot UO9 (For Sale)
    48cm 1985 Trek 660 (For Sale)
    51cm 198? Dark Blue Peugeot Iseran
    52cm 1987 Violet Nishiki Olympic 12
    53cm 199? Diamondback Centurion Master TG
    52cm 199? Red Peugeot Triathlon

  9. #9
    Big Doofus mstrpete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Cascadia
    My Bikes
    Trek 830 MTB, Fuji S10-S
    Posts
    1,009
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shame on the yutz who let that SS get trashed. Good luck on scoring the 600.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    146
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think trek 600s were 531 all around, not frame only. Could be wrong.

  11. #11
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by canonizer View Post
    I think trek 600s were 531 all around, not frame only. Could be wrong.
    From the '85 Trek catalog:

    Trek 600 - Trek's top-of-the-line Sport Performance machine.

    Frame: Main tubes: Reynolds 531CS, double-butted.

    Fork: Reynolds 531CS w/Aero Crown

    Stays: Reynolds 531CS
    - Stan

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    146
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yay for my memory! (I also own a trek 600 that's way too big for me. I ride it when the miyata's got a flat or nasty out. 27" wheels do serve a decent purpose)

  13. #13
    slow as I ever was Ex Pres's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    an imposter living in the 35223
    Posts
    5,777
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
    From the '85 Trek catalog:

    Trek 600 - Trek's top-of-the-line Sport Performance machine.

    Frame: Main tubes: Reynolds 531CS, double-butted.

    Fork: Reynolds 531CS w/Aero Crown

    Stays: Reynolds 531CS
    That's a trick decal, 531cs (club sport) meant 531 butted main tubes, but with forks and stays of special cro-moly tubing.
    72 special CNC ______ 72 Frejus (ala Legnano) _73 Holdsworth Record
    80 Ranson__________ 80 unknown French____ 83 Trek 600 (620 styled)
    85 Gianni Motta_____ 90 Miele Gara ________ 02 Casati Dardo #1
    02 Casati Dardo #2 __ 03 Casati Dardo ______ 08 BF IRO (fixed/SS)
    09 Dogma FPX magn_ 10 Vassago Fisticuff (IGH)

    For Sale: _________ 78 Raleigh Professional __ 82 Peugeot PXN10
    85 Trek 560_______ 88 Guerciotti GLX

  14. #14
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Barker View Post
    That's a trick decal, 531cs (club sport) meant 531 butted main tubes, but with forks and stays of special cro-moly tubing.
    That's misleading if not downright dishonest.

    By saying the fork and stays are "531CS", and with Reynolds 531 widely advertised as a Manganese-Molybdenum alloy, it sure smells like misrepresentation.

    From vintage-trek.com:

    "Reynolds 531CS (Club Sport) frame tubing is first used by Trek. According to Terry at Reynolds-Cycle.com: '531CS was a special set, supplied mainly to Trek. The main triangle was butted 531 and the rear stays were CrMo (501).' The fork was taper gauge CrMo (501). (Info. provided by Dickey Greer.)"
    - Stan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •