Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Blue Light Special kmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bay Area, Sunny Cali
    My Bikes
    '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    1986 Centurion Dave Scott Ironman Geometry

    Hi all,

    I'm having trouble finding geometry specs on any of the Centurion Ironman bikes. I'm riding a 1986 Centurion Dave Scott Ironman right now (not the Expert or Master). I can't really tell the differences from my Schwinn Prologue frame, which has 74.5 ST and 73 HT angles (both frames are 56cm) qualitatively, but I would guess that the Centurion has a more relaxed seat tube angle. Here's a link to some pictures and specs for reference:

    Centurion DS Ironman pic gallery

    FYI, the serial # is KG511572.

    I'm going to take all those "vintage parts" off the Centurion and swap them with the "race parts" on my Schwinn since the frame is damaged and I want something reliable to train on. (Alas, the Schwinn will be confined to campus bike duties...)

    I may try to get one of those angle measuring ruler things and just measure manually...

    EDIT: I guess there was not an actual question (with a "?") when I wrote this, but here it is: What is the geometry of this Centurion frame?
    Last edited by kmart; 10-09-08 at 01:32 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    racer x flies across cobblestones with a grimace of determination, three feet of seatpost, bars level with ankles, carbon fiber frame with Kryptonite lugs and a millimeter clearance between the fork and the 700x21c tires. This gives everyone a *****

  2. #2
    Blue Light Special kmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bay Area, Sunny Cali
    My Bikes
    '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nobody knows....?
    :'(
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    racer x flies across cobblestones with a grimace of determination, three feet of seatpost, bars level with ankles, carbon fiber frame with Kryptonite lugs and a millimeter clearance between the fork and the 700x21c tires. This gives everyone a *****

  3. #3
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, West of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,885
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know the answer, but your going to put Shimano 600 on a campus bike???
    Please buy a REALLY good lock.
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  4. #4
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,245
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    for some reason, 6400 600 doesn't sell for much.

    but use a bigger protractor, since we know that the top tube is pretty much parallel to the ground.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  5. #5
    slow as I ever was Ex Pres's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    an imposter living in the 35223
    Posts
    5,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I believe 73 and 73

    edit: well, the '84 TA's were, according to AWs scan. I just assumed Centurion changed the name but not the geometry.
    Last edited by Ex Pres; 10-10-08 at 08:03 AM.
    72 special CNC ___________ 72 Frejus (ala Legnano) __73 Holdsworth Record
    78 Raleigh Professional_____ 80 Ranson_____________ 80 unknown French (SS)
    82 Peugeot PXN10_________83 Trek 620 (nee 600)____ 85 Gianni Motta
    85 Trek 560______________88 Guerciotti GLX
    90 Miele Gara_____________02 Casati Dardo (g/blue)__02 Casati Dardo (y/blk)
    03 Casati Dardo___________08 BF IRO (fixed)________10 Vassago Fisticuff (IGH)

  6. #6
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,042
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just by eye, I guess that Scott is pretty steep. I'd believe your numbers, between 74 and 75 for the front and rear. To get a real good measurement you need the actual bike, a good instrument, and a steady hand.

    with my riding buds, I compare frame angles by parking the two bikes close together and eyeballing the tubes. You can't see actual angle of course, but i feel you can definitely see when two tubes are not parallel, such as caused by a difference in seat tube angle.

    I think if they look the same side by side, then they are practically the same, barring measurment with a really good angle measuring guage.

  7. #7
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,017
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I happen to have the geometry specs somewhere, from Bicycle Guide magazine. I will look.
    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻
    Perhaps you didn't really hear what you thought I said...

    1979 Centurion Semi Pro
    1982 Lotus Classique
    1986 De Rosa Professional SLX
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso)
    1988 Miele
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2011 Eddy Merckx EMX3
    2014 Wraith Hustle

  8. #8
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,017
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    this? Per Bicycle Guide, the frame specs only changed in 1989, but the test bike they got didn't have the changes.
    I've ridden the Comp TA, the '86 Ironman, '88 Master, '89 Expert and Master, and the '88 Carbon. I have the fit the same, they ride about the same, other than component differences.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻
    Perhaps you didn't really hear what you thought I said...

    1979 Centurion Semi Pro
    1982 Lotus Classique
    1986 De Rosa Professional SLX
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso)
    1988 Miele
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2011 Eddy Merckx EMX3
    2014 Wraith Hustle

  9. #9
    Blue Light Special kmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bay Area, Sunny Cali
    My Bikes
    '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
    Posts
    1,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    73ST, 74.5 HT...interesting. I have noticed it steers a little quicker but I get a little less power than my Schwinn (74.5ST, 73HT). Thanks for posting that, robbie.
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    racer x flies across cobblestones with a grimace of determination, three feet of seatpost, bars level with ankles, carbon fiber frame with Kryptonite lugs and a millimeter clearance between the fork and the 700x21c tires. This gives everyone a *****

  10. #10
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,042
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    steering quickness will be based on the combination of head angle and fork offset, using the formula for trail, not just on head tube. It's also affected by wheelbase and handlebar extension plus stem extension, so I don't think you can just isolate head angle.

    it's hard to assess and hard to predict - same for the sense of power.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been trying to get a handle () on this for a while - trail is the key number in determining quickness.

    I've found this to be a pretty good explaination:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorcycle_dynamics

    An interesting thing is that you can have a slow handling (ie a stable bike) with a steep head angle if it has more trail, due to low fork offset, than a bike with a shallow head angle which has less trail. The shallow head angle bike will have more fork offset, making it look like some sort of soft riding touring bike, yet it will have quick steering. Basically, looks can be deceiving.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    9,997
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    This is really interesting. A circa circa 1985/1986 Centurion Ironman with a 1987 Kawamura serial number and a 1988 600 Ultegra group!

    As for angles, these will change depending the year and size of the frame. For instance, the 1987 specs claim 74 degree parallel angles, but this is for a 58cm frame. A 56cm was 74 head and 73.5 seat. Typically, the head angle will stay the same for a particular year, but seat angles will get shallower as frames get smaller.

    If you really want to know the angles, the only way to be sure is to measure them. I suggest you dig out your protractor, some boxboard, a ruler and a hobby knife. Cut several pieces of pie in 1/2 degree increments for 71-75 degrees and take a bite out of the apex, to clear the lugs. Make sure you mark the templates with the angles before you cut them out.

    As previously stated, there's more to steering quickness than just head angle.

  13. #13
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,017
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    All these numbers....

    I can only say from experience, my steel Ironman bikes ride pretty much the same.

    The '88 Carbon is a different animal altogether, running Campy wheels that make a difference, too.

    I find no difference between a 58cm Comp TA and a 58cm '86 Ironman as far as riding, but the Comp TA has a better chain and is smoother somewhow.

    I put a CF fork on my '89 Expert, and it's a whole different bike.

    Aesthetics aside, I like an Ironman with a CF fork for a good combination of ride/handling, differing wheel sets notwithstanding, guys.

    There, I've used a couple of big words, and thanks for the info on this thread. I had no clue but this is really interesting.
    Last edited by RobbieTunes; 10-10-08 at 05:40 PM.
    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻
    Perhaps you didn't really hear what you thought I said...

    1979 Centurion Semi Pro
    1982 Lotus Classique
    1986 De Rosa Professional SLX
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso)
    1988 Miele
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2011 Eddy Merckx EMX3
    2014 Wraith Hustle

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •