Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Hoopy Frood gamecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3fx, Peugeot PX-10, Fuji Roubaix Pro ('04), Cannondale R600, Triumph Roadsters, Raleigh 20, Univega Nuovo Sport, Schwinn Sierra, Bianchi Osprey, Peugeot NS-22, Batavus Champion, Haro Pulse.
    Posts
    457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    height estimate plz? [pics]

    I've been chewing my fingernails on this one, as the seller is of the uneducated, unmotivated variety.

    Can anyone eyeball the size of this frame for me?



  2. #2
    Buh'wah?! Amani576's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    My Bikes
    1972 Raleigh Twenty, mid-80's Trek
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It looks like a collegiate like mine, so.. 56-58cm.
    Hope that helps.
    -Gene-

    Edit: Although, after looking at it again, it doesn't have one piece cranks, so, I imagine it's a raleigh sports. But, irregardless, it still looks about that size.

  3. #3
    Senior Member fender1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Berwyn PA
    My Bikes
    I hate bikes!
    Posts
    4,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My guess, 57cm seat tube.

  4. #4
    Hoopy Frood gamecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3fx, Peugeot PX-10, Fuji Roubaix Pro ('04), Cannondale R600, Triumph Roadsters, Raleigh 20, Univega Nuovo Sport, Schwinn Sierra, Bianchi Osprey, Peugeot NS-22, Batavus Champion, Haro Pulse.
    Posts
    457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hrrrm. This would fit more like an MTB than a road bike, right? Might be just a bit much. Shame.

    And it's a Triumph (although quite possibly from after Triumph was acquired by Raleigh.)
    I have a 'thing' for Triumph.

    Thanks!

  5. #5
    Buh'wah?! Amani576's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    My Bikes
    1972 Raleigh Twenty, mid-80's Trek
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, a much more upright position that a MTB. Although, some people prefer the bars being close on these, some don't. It'll be a much more relaxed, less speed oriented ride than a road bike, but, smoother and more efficient than a MTB.
    -Gene-

  6. #6
    Senior Member afilado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chattanooga
    My Bikes
    '93 Bridgestone RB-1, '91 Specialized Allez Epic, '85 Raleigh Team Pro, '78 Andre Bertin, early '90s F. Moser Leader AX , '85 Centurion Equipe, '98 Litespeed Tuscany, '89 Klein Quantum, '80 Nishiki Superbe, '83 Peckham, '84 Fuji Opus III
    Posts
    1,172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    58/59 cm....

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    7,549
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Given the size of that head tube, I'd say it's a 25" frame. That's hard to find in a 3-speed.

    Neal

    Edit: Okay, I now agree that it's 23" after looking at pics of 23" frame 3-speeds I've owned.
    Last edited by nlerner; 11-12-08 at 07:23 PM.

  8. #8
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,729
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    23", center to top. Guaranteed.

    The only other size Raleigh (I realize this is a secondary-brand variant) made the Sports in was 21" center-to-top. There might have been a 25" exception somewhere along the line, but this isn't it - I'm 100% sure of that.

    -Kurt

  9. #9
    Senior Member King of Kadence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    sf
    Posts
    539
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like he said, 23"

  10. #10
    Hoopy Frood gamecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3fx, Peugeot PX-10, Fuji Roubaix Pro ('04), Cannondale R600, Triumph Roadsters, Raleigh 20, Univega Nuovo Sport, Schwinn Sierra, Bianchi Osprey, Peugeot NS-22, Batavus Champion, Haro Pulse.
    Posts
    457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good to know!

    /files it away

    Much appreciated.

  11. #11
    Hoopy Frood gamecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3fx, Peugeot PX-10, Fuji Roubaix Pro ('04), Cannondale R600, Triumph Roadsters, Raleigh 20, Univega Nuovo Sport, Schwinn Sierra, Bianchi Osprey, Peugeot NS-22, Batavus Champion, Haro Pulse.
    Posts
    457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just to clarify, considering this:

    Yeah, a much more upright position that a MTB. Although, some people prefer the bars being close on these, some don't. It'll be a much more relaxed, less speed oriented ride than a road bike, but, smoother and more efficient than a MTB.
    Does that suggest I can go a little bigger than I would with a MTB frame, or should go a little smaller? I have a 23" Schwinn Sierra, and it's a little on the bigger side for me. On the other hand, I have the ~58cm Peugeot PX-10 I'm fixing up which seems about right (maybe a tiny bit big, but not really noticeable.)

    Here are my WS measurements:

    WS Recommended Sizes -- Road

    Frame Size center-to-center:54 cm
    Frame Size center-to-top:6 cm
    Overall Reach: 65.72 cm
    Saddle Height: 74.01 cm
    Handlebar Width: 46 cm

    WS Recommended Sizes -- Mountain
    Frame Size center-to-center: 17 in
    Frame Size center-to-top: 18 in
    Overall Reach: 65.72 cm
    Saddle Height: 74.01 cm
    Handlebar Width: 46 cm
    These seem like under-estimates to me. Especially on the MTB side.
    Am I missing somthing?

    Your Measurements
    Height: 71.00 in
    Sternum Notch: 58.10 in
    Inseam Length: 33.00 in
    Arm Length: 23.50 in
    Shoulder Width: 18.50 in
    Flexiblity: 6
    Weight: 178.00 lbs
    Foot Size: 12.00 USMens
    I know there's no way of really knowing how well a bike will fit until you can try it out, but what do people think? Would I be reasonably comfortable on this 23" or should I be holding out for the smaller 21" frame?
    Last edited by gamecat; 11-13-08 at 08:03 AM.

  12. #12
    rhm
    rhm is offline
    multimodal commuter rhm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NJ, NYC, LI
    My Bikes
    1945? Fothergill, 1948 Raleigh Record Ace, 1954 Drysdale, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1972 Fuji Finest, 1983 Trek 720, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
    Posts
    11,909
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gamecat View Post
    And it's a Triumph (although quite possibly from after Triumph was acquired by Raleigh.)
    I have a 'thing' for Triumph.
    I had a '69 (Raleigh) Triumph, and it was a little different: the gear cable went down the downtube all the way to the chain stay. The one in your photo seems to have a fulcrum on the top tube and presumably a wheel at the top of the seat tube; this means better shifting than the one I had. Whether this means yours is earlier I can only speculate, but I would speculate: yes, it is.

  13. #13
    Buh'wah?! Amani576's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    My Bikes
    1972 Raleigh Twenty, mid-80's Trek
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whether you go bigger or smaller on that is all a matter of preference. Some like being a bit more leaned over so that they can still go a little faster, while some want smaller so that they can have the handlebars higher and closer to them. If you can go try it out I'd suggest doing that to see if you like the position it has.
    -Gene-

  14. #14
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    14,452
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by afilado View Post
    58/59 cm....
    +1, and maybe even 60.
    Not a 56, I ride those.
    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻
    You will not believe how fast I used to be...

    1979 Centurion Semi Pro
    1982 Lotus Classique
    1985 Cinelli Equipe Centurion
    1985 Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso)
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1995 Trek OCLV 5500
    1997 Kestrel 200SCi
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2004 Quintana Roo Kilo
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2013 Eddy Merckx EMX-3

  15. #15
    No lugs? No hugs. Exit.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    My Bikes
    '85 Miyata 310, '06 GT Performer
    Posts
    1,115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    looks a little bigger than my 56cm.
    1997 Vitali track, 1986 Cilo Swiss road, 2006 KHS Flite 100, 2009 top-secret track bike.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •