Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-09, 08:05 AM   #1
bassogap
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia Beach
Bikes: 2005 Cannondale R5000 1986 Basso Gap(Super Record) 1986 Schwinn Voyager SP 1975 Schwinn Paramount Track Bike 1974 Raleigh RRA
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Masi 3V

I realize that by now, they themselves have come to be considered classics. But after seeing one when they first came out,i was astonished how unattractive these "plug-in" lugged bikes could replace the Gran Criterium. I know on a technical level it is a better frame, but it utterly lacks the beauty of the traditional frames. They also appear much easier to construct, so i was suprised to note the 3V frames wern't less expensive than the Gran
criteriums.


Consequently, the 3V has never truly impressed me,and I don't think I'd go out of my way to get one....
bassogap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 10:45 AM   #2
dudeona3V
Senior Member
 
dudeona3V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SRQ
Bikes: '69 Raleigh DL-1, '72 Paramount, '75 Eisentraut, '80 A-D Vent Noir II, '82 A-D Inter 10, '83 Motobecane Grand Touring, '83 Stumpjumper, '84 Masi GC, '87 Recherche, '87 Tesch 101, '88 Tesch S-22, '88 Davidson...
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's a different kind of beauty perhaps. I sold my '71 GC to buy a 3V in the late 80s because a.) at the time, I didn't have the level of appreciation for a vintage true Italian bike that I have now; and b.) the 3V just rides so much better, particularly up a hill which was and still is where I ride most. Yes, I do now I regret having sold the Milano GC (it's since been replaced by a Carlsbad, but it's not the same). At the same time, I've developed a downright fondness for the look of the 3V. The OS tubing and industrial lugwork complement the bike's overall aggressive nature and twenty years later, it still looks contemporary. That being said, it's true beauty will always be in the way it rides, but perhaps that too is in the eye of the beholder.
dudeona3V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 11:07 AM   #3
Picchio Special
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Posts: 5,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Technically, the 3V didn't "replace" the Gran Criterium. It was the Prestige that replaced the GC quite a while before the 3V was developed, though a few bikes labeled GC continued to be made in Italy. The 3V and Prestige then coexisted in the Masi lineup in the 80's, as far as I know. (In the US, the story was a little different, but the 3V was definitely an Italian product first.)
I can understand feelings about the 3V and it's construction, but I do think the early Italian 3V's made from exotic Excell French tubing are plenty cool in their own right. Makes sense that the 3V cost more, IMO, because you were getting something on the cutting-edge in terms of both technology and performance. And I'm not sure they were really that much easier to construct than the Prestiges, either.
Picchio Special is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-09, 05:01 PM   #4
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 10,954
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Picchio Special View Post
... And I'm not sure they were really that much easier to construct than the Prestiges, either.
I think they were easier to build, but the tooling cost and the inventory cost of those parts and tubing probably ate into the profit margins. Much more cash had to be tied up sitting on the shelf rather than just ordering smaller amounts as was typical for a small builder at the time.

Then there was the marketing, if its "top of the line" it should cost more.
repechage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.