Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 65
  1. #1
    Senior Member triplebutted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Lemond, Gios, Fuji, Trek, too many to write
    Posts
    1,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    When did centerpulls give way to sidepulls?

    I was looking at all those Merkx photos and noticed the 1966 racing bike had centerpulls. But the Coppi video link and 50's bikes with sidepulls.

    Anyone have a pseudo-historical remembrance of when these sidepulls got more popular than centerpulls?

  2. #2
    Senior Member triplebutted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Lemond, Gios, Fuji, Trek, too many to write
    Posts
    1,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ohhhh, title is wrong, should be centerpulls give way to sidepulls!

  3. #3
    can't member Noah Scape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Iowa City
    Posts
    1,682
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the 60s were the heyday for centerpulls in the racing world. The French continued to use them in racing well into the 70s.

  4. #4
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good side-pulls - which used to be considered inferior to center-pulls - came back by about 1980. Campy was the rage, and many manufacturers started making them. For better, or worse. Then mtn. bikes came in, and the new rage was cantilevers.
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  5. #5
    Senior Member cyclotoine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    YT
    Posts
    7,577
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by triplebutted View Post
    Ohhhh, title is wrong, should be centerpulls give way to sidepulls!
    I think the original question is valid, sidepulls were the originals which eventually gave way to centerpulls. EVeryone copied the MAFAC design, even universal introduced a centerpull in the 1960s (but maintained a sidepull model also, the universal extra).. in anycase, by the early 1970s centerpulls were a thing of the past on race bikes but continued to appear on entry level and lower end bicycles into the 1980s... one place centerpulls should ALWAYS be used is mixtes. They were made for sidepulls, anything else just looks wrong.
    1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear

  6. #6
    Senior Member triplebutted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Lemond, Gios, Fuji, Trek, too many to write
    Posts
    1,854
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclotoine View Post
    I think the original question is valid, sidepulls were the originals which eventually gave way to centerpulls. EVeryone copied the MAFAC design, even universal introduced a centerpull in the 1960s (but maintained a sidepull model also, the universal extra).. in anycase, by the early 1970s centerpulls were a thing of the past on race bikes but continued to appear on entry level and lower end bicycles into the 1980s... one place centerpulls should ALWAYS be used is mixtes. They were made for sidepulls, anything else just looks wrong.
    Ohhh, good piece of history. I always thought the geneology was Center's-->sidepulls--to whatever I remember from 1982...

    I'm digging those bikes with mafacs on them. I need to start thinking of a project that will have good racing style centerpulls....

  7. #7
    BEHOLD! THE MANTICORE! rotharpunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    54914
    Posts
    1,798
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    someone please explain to me the performance differences of centerpull vs. sidepull(single and dual pivot) performance wise if assuming similar levels of quality

  8. #8
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,731
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclotoine View Post
    one place centerpulls should ALWAYS be used is mixtes.
    Provided that centerpull caliper is mounted on the intermediary center stays. Anything else is a disaster.

    -Kurt

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    My Bikes
    Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
    Posts
    5,775
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd guess center and sidepulls ran concurrent in the 50s; centerpulls popular in the 60s until about 1970, when Campagnolo brought out their sidepulls. From what I saw in the 70s, the racing crowd preferred sidepulls, the Weinmann 500s were pretty good if your frame was tight enough to run them, and if you couldn't afford Campagnolo you'd go with Universal. Though with many of the frames of the day, you were stuck with centerpulls due to the generous clearances.

    People say centerpulls have a greater mechanical advantage; I've always preferred sidepulls myself, but it may just be looks and simplicity. Any brake will more or less stop you: some take more planning that others!

  10. #10
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,501
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the move to centerpulls had been made before my time. By the time I started paying attention to brakes in the early '70s, you had cheap bikes with sidepulls, middle to high end with centerpulls, and Campy Record.

    My first decent bike came with racks and it had cantilevers. Cantilevers were mostly used on cyclocross and tandems, with the occasional touring bike thrown in.

  11. #11
    BEHOLD! THE MANTICORE! rotharpunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    54914
    Posts
    1,798
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer the look of centerpulls, and they seem to offer more clearance than anything save for cantilevers. how do centerpulls compare to modern dual pivot sidepulls?

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lancaster County, PA
    My Bikes
    '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As cyclotoine posts, Mafac introduced their centerpull brake at a time everyone else had sidepulls. The Mafacs were very popular - so much so, that everyone else (which at the time was primarily Universal and GB) scrambled to catch up, leading to the Universal 61 and GB Coureur, and centerpulls dominated the 60's. You can pretty much document the swing back to sidepulls, which was fairly sudden in the pro ranks, by looking at pictures of Eddy Merckx in 1968. At the Tour of Flanders, his bike had Universal sidepulls. At the Giro, his bike had sidepulls. By 1969 at the latest, virtually everyone using Campagnolo components had the new sidepulls, and again, other manufacturers scrambled to catch up. The exception was of course the teams riding French components, primarily Peugeot, which retained the Mafac sidepulls (often with braze-on mountings).

  13. #13
    Crawlin' up, flyin' down bikingshearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
    My Bikes
    1967 Paramount, 1982-ish Ron Cooper,1986 De Rosa Professional, 1978 Eisentraut "A," 1961 BianchiCompetizione, 1994 Trek 520, 199? Burley Bossa Nova
    Posts
    3,037
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My guess - and it's a guess - is that the swings back and forth were due to basic R&D. Various companies made brakes, and each tried to make them better than the other guy's.

    The good old fashioned Mafac Racer was pretty much state-of-the-art by the end of the 1950's. It stopped better than other brakes. It also did not hurt that, because it was French, it was on the French bikes ridden by Frenchmen Louison Bobet and Jacques Anquetil, who won 8 Tours de France between them in the mid-50's to mid-60's.

    By the end of the 60's, Campy had figured out how to make sidepulls that were lighter and worked roughly as well as Mafacs. They also had a finish that Mafac, Universal, and the others, could not touch. (Of course, you paid for it, too.) Mafac countered with the Pro, which was essentially a shaved-down version of the Racer. It survioved in the pro peloton until at least 1977, when Bernard Thevenet won his second Tour using the latest and greatest version of them.

    There is one other matter - the quick-release mechaism. The Mafac "quick release" was to unhook one end of the yolk cable. What happens if you forget to undo the quick release with a Mafac? It ain't pretty. Until recent iterations of Campy brakes (which require a brake kever with a built-in quick release), quality sidepulls had some sort of cam device on the calipers themselves. If you forgot to reset it, it just meant that you pulled your levers further to make the brakes work. Much safer. Weinmann and others got around this by having the quick release mechanism built into the cable housing stop above the brake, but that always looked kind of . . . . funky.

    Then someone figured out the whole "double pivot" sidepull design, with increased stopping power, sidepull looks, and only a slight weight penalty over singel-pivot sidepulls.

    All of this strikes me as the kind of incremental change that is pretty standard in most products. Somebody builds a mouse trap, the next guy looks to build a better one. "Better" can be matter of looks, weight, function, convenience, or combination of them. In the not-too-distant future, someone will come up with the next "latest and greatest" for brakes. Who knows, it might even be centerpulls.
    "I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney

  14. #14
    Seņor Member USAZorro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    My Bikes
    1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1994 Trek 830 MTB, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead, Unicycle
    Posts
    13,034
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wait? You guys use sidepulls?


    I still prefer center pulls.
    The search for inner peace continues...

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    My Bikes
    Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
    Posts
    5,775
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think its the Mafac riders who are crashing and going off the cliff here:


  16. #16
    Senior Member Grand Bois's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pinole, CA, USA
    Posts
    15,231
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bikingshearer

    Did you mean Mafac Competition rather than Pro?

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cudak888 View Post
    Provided that centerpull caliper is mounted on the intermediary center stays. Anything else is a disaster.

    -Kurt
    Agreed. My Gitane tandem is like a mixte for the stoker, but the canti studs are on the seat-stays rather than the mid-stays, forcing an utterly ridiculous pulley system. I guess this was done for the sake of heel clearance, but it seems much more complex than it needs to be.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the pre WWII era almost all racing bicycles used side pulls. Mafac started to popularize their various versions of center pulls in the 50's. I am an expert on this having spent far too many years of my youth studying the pictures of my cycling heroes. Sometime around 1966 ( I am no historical expert with dates) Campy introduced their sidepull brakes, which were quite nice at the time. The Campy's were so nice that Mafac had to upgrade their center pulls just to get twerps like me to buy them. VERY few of these upgraded Mafac center pulls made it to the states. Most stateside Mafac brakes were the cheesy "RACER" models. Most everybody started lusting after Campy side pulls after Gimondi and Merckx dominated the Tour De France with them. By the mid 70's even Thevenet was sporting Campy side pulls in an otherwise French gruppo.

  19. #19
    The Improbable Bulk Little Darwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre, PA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    7,295
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the move back to side pulls probably was facilitated by the move to tighter clearances allowing for the short reach brakes so that the lack of efficiency wasn't so drastic. The the reduced weight possible did make them preferable. Plus the lack of a need for a cable stop on the headset and seat post clamp...

    The dual pivot design obviously helped braking efficiency too.

    The latest Campagnolo brakes have gone back to single pivot for the rear brake where efficiency isn't as critical to save a few grams.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hull, QC
    Posts
    661
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What about dual-pivots historically?

    I have an old Raleigh (early 1970s), that has a pair of Altenburger Syncro (or somesuch) brakes, and they look at first glance like sidepull, but have pivot points similar to the center pull brakes.

    And MAN do they ever work well.

  21. #21
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,731
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dokydoky View Post
    Agreed. My Gitane tandem is like a mixte for the stoker, but the canti studs are on the seat-stays rather than the mid-stays, forcing an utterly ridiculous pulley system. I guess this was done for the sake of heel clearance, but it seems much more complex than it needs to be.
    Pulley system? You should be lucky that you have a pulley system and not a cable stop hanging off the seatpost binder.

    -Kurt

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,289
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panthers007 View Post
    Good side-pulls - which used to be considered inferior to center-pulls - came back by about 1980. Campy was the rage, and many manufacturers started making them. For better, or worse. Then mtn. bikes came in, and the new rage was cantilevers.
    Side pull brakes among racers and wannabe's started taking over with the intro of the Campagnolo Record sidepull, 1968 for the pro's. Then by 1970, the masses wanted them, at about $60.+ a pair. Outrageous at the time.

    In the 60's Mafac center pulls were probably the best choice.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Wilmette, IL
    Posts
    4,350
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The introduction of the Campy sidepulls changed everything. It was the first really quality brakes produced. They had much nicer levers, and the braking action was superbe. You could actually control your braking and even the pads were of superior grade. And they were very expensive at the time they were introduced.

    At the first Boul. Mich. Bike Rally, one of the all time great races sponsered by Raleigh in Chicago, a set of Campy brakes was a lap prime in the Intermediate race!!!!

  24. #24
    Senior Member ga_mueller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    1978 Nishiki Superbe, 1982 Miyata Team, 1987 Miyata 912, 1987 Davidson Challenge, 1993 Bridgestone RB1-7
    Posts
    325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have centerpulls on my '82 Team Miyata... ahead or behind of their time??

  25. #25
    Senior Member sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NorCal - bay area
    My Bikes
    giant, trek, peugeots, friday
    Posts
    1,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rotharpunc View Post
    someone please explain to me the performance differences of centerpull vs. sidepull(single and dual pivot) performance wise if assuming similar levels of quality
    Just got a '75 peugeot mixte (fairly low-end mix of components I think) with Mafac "Racer" centerpulls. Oh man, what a revelation! You can fit them with long canti-lever pads, and they have some stopping power. They are way better than even the 105 sidepulls on my mid-80's Trek, which I always thought were pretty good. And anything less than 105 sidepulls, like old Dia-compe, are junk and should be disgarded, imho. I even removed some weak mid-80s Campi Gran Sport sidepulls from my Italian bike.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •