Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Cartridge Bottom Bracket with Cotter Pin Cranks

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Cartridge Bottom Bracket with Cotter Pin Cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-09, 11:22 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15

Bikes: Cannondale RS800, Raleigh Sprite 3-speed, Batavus Champion fixed gear, Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cartridge Bottom Bracket with Cotter Pin Cranks

Hey guys,
I have what may be a dumb question so please bare with me. I am pulling some parts off of an old Lady's Robin Hood 3speed that I saved from the trash pile and putting them on a Raleigh Sprite frame of similar fate. I would like to use a modern cartridge bottom bracket because because this is going to be my commuter bike and I am a fan of the reliability. I would still like to use the original cotter pin cranks on this project because I love the look.

Is there a cartridge BB that will accept these cranks?

Thanks for the help!
WITbike is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 11:23 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Not that I know of.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 11:28 AM
  #3  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by WITbike
I would like to use a modern cartridge bottom bracket because because this is going to be my commuter bike and I am a fan of the reliability.
Someone please show me a study or provide concrete facts that proves cartridge BB's superiority over cup-and-cone.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 11:33 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15

Bikes: Cannondale RS800, Raleigh Sprite 3-speed, Batavus Champion fixed gear, Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Someone please show me a study or provide concrete facts that proves cartridge BB's superiority over cup-and-cone.

-Kurt
Who knows..I think it is just personal preference. I know that I have had trouble in the past with having to tighten my cup and cones more often than I would like. To each his own.
WITbike is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 12:14 PM
  #5  
BEHOLD! THE MANTICORE!
 
rotharpunc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 54914
Posts: 1,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I have never heard of a cottered cartridge BB. For some applications I prefer sealed just because I don't have to think about servicing it, but I would still Take a Campagnolo cup and cone over a $10 shimano cartridge any day. Perhaps you could use the cartridge BB with a crankset like this:



it is a swaaged(sp?) crankset with a steel chainring affixed to alloy arms. Its not exactly cottered, but it sort of has the same look, and will work with a cartridge BB.
rotharpunc is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 01:16 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boone NC USA
Posts: 622

Bikes: Bianchi hybrid. Dunelt 3-sp. Raleigh basket case. Wanting a Roadster.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by cudak888
Someone please show me a study or provide concrete facts that proves cartridge BB's superiority over cup-and-cone.

-Kurt
Also that it will last longer than an oil lubricated BB
graywolf is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 02:10 PM
  #7  
Gear Hub fan
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,829

Bikes: Civia Hyland Rohloff, Swobo Dixon, Colnago, Univega

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I suspect that it depends on quality. Phil Wood cartridge bottom brackets have an excelllent reputation for reliability but so do Campy cup type bottom brackets if given even close to reasonable servicing and installed with a guard. I have seen a TA which failed due to being cyclocrossed, installed w/o a guard and given inadequate service. Dirt intrusion ate the spindle.

Getting back to the OPs question the parts are different generations. Cottered cranks went out as cartridge bottom brackets were first coming in with little or no overlap that I am aware of.
__________________
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro

Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
tatfiend is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 06:36 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
krems81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 795

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Someone please show me a study or provide concrete facts that proves cartridge BB's superiority over cup-and-cone.

-Kurt
Plug and play, no worries about it coming loose. Worth the thoughtlessness in many cases. When its done, its done.
krems81 is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 06:47 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
krems81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 795

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
as for cartridge bb for cotter pin cranks. not happening. cotter pin cranks were defunct before cartridge bbs were ever developed. not even Phil makes them, and Phil is the one company willing to make bottom brackets for threadings that no longer exist. If you suggested it, they'd probably tell you you were crazy.

the reason? cottered cranks are extremely inefficient to work on, not to mention difficulty of getting the cotter pins out. The development of cotterless cranks was a huge evolution in bicycle technology. No one looked back. Not saying that they don't have a place. We're in c&v after all, and they're very beautiful. But if you're commuting and you want a cartridge bottom bracket you don't have to service too often (servicing cottered takes longer anyway), use a square taper.

Now the question is whether you can fit an english threaded bb into that raleigh frame. Guessing no. So time to get out the taps, or buy a phil cartridge with raleigh cups.

Last edited by krems81; 02-27-09 at 06:51 PM.
krems81 is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 07:06 PM
  #10  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by krems81
Plug and play, no worries about it coming loose. Worth the thoughtlessness in many cases. When its done, its done.
Funny - though I've had to service far fewer bikes with cartridges then with cup-and-cone, I've found that the majority of the cartridge-equipped bikes are in for servicing because of a shot cartridge BB.

Cup and cone + cartridge both wear down. Neither is vastly superior to another when it comes down to developing slop from wear, and you can't adjust that in a cartridge.

That said, I've yet to have a cup-and-cone BB start loosening on me provided it was not loose in the first place...

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 07:20 PM
  #11  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
I've worked on cottered-cranks. Even have an old cotter-pin press. If I found that bike, I'd be thrilled to bring it back from the grave. Heck - the Park Tool Co. still has a series of holes on their spoke-ruler & ball-bearing measuring-gauge for sizing cotter-pins.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 07:30 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
The advantage, especially when it comes to anything other than the top of the line ground race tupe cup and cone BBs, is that you only need to replace the cartridge. In the long run it is more cost effective as you never have to replace the spindle or cups unless due to abnormal damage from improper installation. That is worth something as others have mentioned... I am talking about good quality like philwood, TA, syncros etc... I have a maybe 3 or 4 suncros BB in a box all Titanium and i can just replace the bearings and have a like new BB, I picked most of them up for $10 or less. I have sold 3 or 4 too for as much as $70! I love Syncros products!
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 02-27-09, 07:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by krems81
as for cartridge bb for cotter pin cranks. not happening. cotter pin cranks were defunct before cartridge bbs were ever developed. not even Phil makes them, and Phil is the one company willing to make bottom brackets for threadings that no longer exist. If you suggested it, they'd probably tell you you were crazy.

the reason? cottered cranks are extremely inefficient to work on, not to mention difficulty of getting the cotter pins out. The development of cotterless cranks was a huge evolution in bicycle technology. No one looked back. Not saying that they don't have a place. We're in c&v after all, and they're very beautiful. But if you're commuting and you want a cartridge bottom bracket you don't have to service too often (servicing cottered takes longer anyway), use a square taper.

Now the question is whether you can fit an english threaded bb into that raleigh frame. Guessing no. So time to get out the taps, or buy a phil cartridge with raleigh cups.
I don't find it any more difficult to work on a cottered crank than a cotterless one, but I don't try to do the job with a hammer. Both jobs are simple and quick if you have the right tools.

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...=511103&page=4

My problem now is finding cups I can use to install that cottered crank in a BSC threaded shell.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 08:00 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
krems81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 795

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
I don't have a cotter pin press, and i don't know how well they work. I don't know where to buy one, but if it was the right price, I'd purchase.

That said cottered cranks aren't ideal for this fellow. He's a commuter and he wants worry free. If he uses them then he has to use the cups and axle, and when those wear down he can search ebay for another, but it would be a pain.

As for bbs, cartridges usually last at least a year or two, which is all I really expect out of them. I used to be cup and cone all the way, but cartridge is just easier if you're working on a lot of bikes, and we've all felt adjustable cup bbs jiggling at the crank for whatever reason (adjusted too loose in the first place, wore down, or loosened up along the way). Im surprised you've never had one move on you. Anyway, if you see that with a cartridge, you know it can't jiggle as far, and all it means is time for a new cartridge. I appreciate the simplicity.

Not saying I prefer them for my own bikes. They're definitely not as elegant. But I can tighten and overhaul mine myself if there's any issue. I prefer them for customer's bikes. And there's a reason why shops do too. Heck arguably the finest bb made today is cartridge, that's got to say something. It can't be ALL trend towards eliminating labor if Phil is using them too.

Cheers.

Last edited by krems81; 02-28-09 at 08:16 AM.
krems81 is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 08:27 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
The big advantage of cartridge bottom brackets for most "mechanics" is that it takes no skill whatsoever to install them.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 09:07 AM
  #16  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
The big advantage of cartridge bottom brackets for most "mechanics" is that it takes no skill whatsoever to install them.
Correct - no skill, and relatively zero practice.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 10:11 AM
  #17  
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
Originally Posted by WITbike
Is there a cartridge BB that will accept these cranks?
In the immortal words of John McEnroe: "You cannot be serious." Maybe someone can find me a bluetooth headset interface for my AT&T rotary phone, too.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 10:58 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
bigvegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Speaking strictly hypothetically here, would it be possible to use an Isis splined bottom bracket, and then use the cotter pins to lock the cranks in place against the splines?

I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
bigvegan is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 03:16 PM
  #19  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times in 836 Posts
If you can find a set, relatively rare cotterless steel cranks would would solve the problem -- they would look almost correct for the bike and would accommodate a modern cartridge BB.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 07:41 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
krems81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 795

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
The big advantage of cartridge bottom brackets for most "mechanics" is that it takes no skill whatsoever to install them.
Thats most. There are knowledgeable mechanics who like them for other reasons. Mostly because they make their job easier. You can't deny Ipass, even though the toll booth attendant worked perfectly well. Fact is ipass saves fuel and prevents congestion.

Last edited by krems81; 02-28-09 at 07:50 PM.
krems81 is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 07:49 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
krems81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 795

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by bigvegan
Speaking strictly hypothetically here, would it be possible to use an Isis splined bottom bracket, and then use the cotter pins to lock the cranks in place against the splines?

I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
Even if the crank fit perfectly onto the isis spindle, you'd have to grind flats in the isis splines for the cotter pins. This would be a delicate task, and the end result probably wouldn't be reliable. The crank probably wouldn't fit onto the isis spindle in the first place.
krems81 is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 07:50 PM
  #22  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
If you can find a set, relatively rare cotterless steel cranks would would solve the problem -- they would look almost correct for the bike and would accommodate a modern cartridge BB.
Either solution opens up a quandary of either locating a spindle made for a 71mm BB shell, or seeking an older Shimano UN-72 BB and 26TPI Phil rings.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 09:35 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 703
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigvegan
Speaking strictly hypothetically here, would it be possible to use an Isis splined bottom bracket, and then use the cotter pins to lock the cranks in place against the splines?

I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
The ISIS spindle wouldn't be long enough...
kramnnim is offline  
Old 02-28-09, 11:39 PM
  #24  
Senior Moment
 
Peter_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
A cottered bottom bracket is reliable if all is installed properly. The issue is sealing the bearings to keep out entry of grit, etc. You can put something on each side of the axle adjacent to each cup to keep out grit, etc. Some use o-rings of properly selected diameter. I use pipe cleaners sprayed with silicone spray. You would probably also cut neoprene washers too. Use your imagination and seal up that crack between the axle and cup.
Peter_B is offline  
Old 03-01-09, 01:05 AM
  #25  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,690 Times in 2,513 Posts
Cottered cranks were fine unless they weren't. There was nothing to strike fear into a bike boom mechanic's heart than the words "something's wrong with my crank" from a customer with a cottered crank.
unterhausen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.