Cartridge Bottom Bracket with Cotter Pin Cranks
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
Bikes: Cannondale RS800, Raleigh Sprite 3-speed, Batavus Champion fixed gear, Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cartridge Bottom Bracket with Cotter Pin Cranks
Hey guys,
I have what may be a dumb question so please bare with me. I am pulling some parts off of an old Lady's Robin Hood 3speed that I saved from the trash pile and putting them on a Raleigh Sprite frame of similar fate. I would like to use a modern cartridge bottom bracket because because this is going to be my commuter bike and I am a fan of the reliability. I would still like to use the original cotter pin cranks on this project because I love the look.
Is there a cartridge BB that will accept these cranks?
Thanks for the help!
I have what may be a dumb question so please bare with me. I am pulling some parts off of an old Lady's Robin Hood 3speed that I saved from the trash pile and putting them on a Raleigh Sprite frame of similar fate. I would like to use a modern cartridge bottom bracket because because this is going to be my commuter bike and I am a fan of the reliability. I would still like to use the original cotter pin cranks on this project because I love the look.
Is there a cartridge BB that will accept these cranks?
Thanks for the help!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
14 Posts
Not that I know of.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
#3
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times
in
2,092 Posts
-Kurt
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 15
Bikes: Cannondale RS800, Raleigh Sprite 3-speed, Batavus Champion fixed gear, Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Who knows..I think it is just personal preference. I know that I have had trouble in the past with having to tighten my cup and cones more often than I would like. To each his own.
#5
BEHOLD! THE MANTICORE!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 54914
Posts: 1,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have never heard of a cottered cartridge BB. For some applications I prefer sealed just because I don't have to think about servicing it, but I would still Take a Campagnolo cup and cone over a $10 shimano cartridge any day. Perhaps you could use the cartridge BB with a crankset like this:
it is a swaaged(sp?) crankset with a steel chainring affixed to alloy arms. Its not exactly cottered, but it sort of has the same look, and will work with a cartridge BB.
it is a swaaged(sp?) crankset with a steel chainring affixed to alloy arms. Its not exactly cottered, but it sort of has the same look, and will work with a cartridge BB.
#7
Gear Hub fan
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,829
Bikes: Civia Hyland Rohloff, Swobo Dixon, Colnago, Univega
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I suspect that it depends on quality. Phil Wood cartridge bottom brackets have an excelllent reputation for reliability but so do Campy cup type bottom brackets if given even close to reasonable servicing and installed with a guard. I have seen a TA which failed due to being cyclocrossed, installed w/o a guard and given inadequate service. Dirt intrusion ate the spindle.
Getting back to the OPs question the parts are different generations. Cottered cranks went out as cartridge bottom brackets were first coming in with little or no overlap that I am aware of.
Getting back to the OPs question the parts are different generations. Cottered cranks went out as cartridge bottom brackets were first coming in with little or no overlap that I am aware of.
__________________
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro
Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro
Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
#8
Senior Member
#9
Senior Member
as for cartridge bb for cotter pin cranks. not happening. cotter pin cranks were defunct before cartridge bbs were ever developed. not even Phil makes them, and Phil is the one company willing to make bottom brackets for threadings that no longer exist. If you suggested it, they'd probably tell you you were crazy.
the reason? cottered cranks are extremely inefficient to work on, not to mention difficulty of getting the cotter pins out. The development of cotterless cranks was a huge evolution in bicycle technology. No one looked back. Not saying that they don't have a place. We're in c&v after all, and they're very beautiful. But if you're commuting and you want a cartridge bottom bracket you don't have to service too often (servicing cottered takes longer anyway), use a square taper.
Now the question is whether you can fit an english threaded bb into that raleigh frame. Guessing no. So time to get out the taps, or buy a phil cartridge with raleigh cups.
the reason? cottered cranks are extremely inefficient to work on, not to mention difficulty of getting the cotter pins out. The development of cotterless cranks was a huge evolution in bicycle technology. No one looked back. Not saying that they don't have a place. We're in c&v after all, and they're very beautiful. But if you're commuting and you want a cartridge bottom bracket you don't have to service too often (servicing cottered takes longer anyway), use a square taper.
Now the question is whether you can fit an english threaded bb into that raleigh frame. Guessing no. So time to get out the taps, or buy a phil cartridge with raleigh cups.
Last edited by krems81; 02-27-09 at 06:51 PM.
#10
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Cup and cone + cartridge both wear down. Neither is vastly superior to another when it comes down to developing slop from wear, and you can't adjust that in a cartridge.
That said, I've yet to have a cup-and-cone BB start loosening on me provided it was not loose in the first place...
-Kurt
#11
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
I've worked on cottered-cranks. Even have an old cotter-pin press. If I found that bike, I'd be thrilled to bring it back from the grave. Heck - the Park Tool Co. still has a series of holes on their spoke-ruler & ball-bearing measuring-gauge for sizing cotter-pins.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
14 Posts
The advantage, especially when it comes to anything other than the top of the line ground race tupe cup and cone BBs, is that you only need to replace the cartridge. In the long run it is more cost effective as you never have to replace the spindle or cups unless due to abnormal damage from improper installation. That is worth something as others have mentioned... I am talking about good quality like philwood, TA, syncros etc... I have a maybe 3 or 4 suncros BB in a box all Titanium and i can just replace the bearings and have a like new BB, I picked most of them up for $10 or less. I have sold 3 or 4 too for as much as $70! I love Syncros products!
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
25 Posts
as for cartridge bb for cotter pin cranks. not happening. cotter pin cranks were defunct before cartridge bbs were ever developed. not even Phil makes them, and Phil is the one company willing to make bottom brackets for threadings that no longer exist. If you suggested it, they'd probably tell you you were crazy.
the reason? cottered cranks are extremely inefficient to work on, not to mention difficulty of getting the cotter pins out. The development of cotterless cranks was a huge evolution in bicycle technology. No one looked back. Not saying that they don't have a place. We're in c&v after all, and they're very beautiful. But if you're commuting and you want a cartridge bottom bracket you don't have to service too often (servicing cottered takes longer anyway), use a square taper.
Now the question is whether you can fit an english threaded bb into that raleigh frame. Guessing no. So time to get out the taps, or buy a phil cartridge with raleigh cups.
the reason? cottered cranks are extremely inefficient to work on, not to mention difficulty of getting the cotter pins out. The development of cotterless cranks was a huge evolution in bicycle technology. No one looked back. Not saying that they don't have a place. We're in c&v after all, and they're very beautiful. But if you're commuting and you want a cartridge bottom bracket you don't have to service too often (servicing cottered takes longer anyway), use a square taper.
Now the question is whether you can fit an english threaded bb into that raleigh frame. Guessing no. So time to get out the taps, or buy a phil cartridge with raleigh cups.
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...=511103&page=4
My problem now is finding cups I can use to install that cottered crank in a BSC threaded shell.
#14
Senior Member
I don't have a cotter pin press, and i don't know how well they work. I don't know where to buy one, but if it was the right price, I'd purchase.
That said cottered cranks aren't ideal for this fellow. He's a commuter and he wants worry free. If he uses them then he has to use the cups and axle, and when those wear down he can search ebay for another, but it would be a pain.
As for bbs, cartridges usually last at least a year or two, which is all I really expect out of them. I used to be cup and cone all the way, but cartridge is just easier if you're working on a lot of bikes, and we've all felt adjustable cup bbs jiggling at the crank for whatever reason (adjusted too loose in the first place, wore down, or loosened up along the way). Im surprised you've never had one move on you. Anyway, if you see that with a cartridge, you know it can't jiggle as far, and all it means is time for a new cartridge. I appreciate the simplicity.
Not saying I prefer them for my own bikes. They're definitely not as elegant. But I can tighten and overhaul mine myself if there's any issue. I prefer them for customer's bikes. And there's a reason why shops do too. Heck arguably the finest bb made today is cartridge, that's got to say something. It can't be ALL trend towards eliminating labor if Phil is using them too.
Cheers.
That said cottered cranks aren't ideal for this fellow. He's a commuter and he wants worry free. If he uses them then he has to use the cups and axle, and when those wear down he can search ebay for another, but it would be a pain.
As for bbs, cartridges usually last at least a year or two, which is all I really expect out of them. I used to be cup and cone all the way, but cartridge is just easier if you're working on a lot of bikes, and we've all felt adjustable cup bbs jiggling at the crank for whatever reason (adjusted too loose in the first place, wore down, or loosened up along the way). Im surprised you've never had one move on you. Anyway, if you see that with a cartridge, you know it can't jiggle as far, and all it means is time for a new cartridge. I appreciate the simplicity.
Not saying I prefer them for my own bikes. They're definitely not as elegant. But I can tighten and overhaul mine myself if there's any issue. I prefer them for customer's bikes. And there's a reason why shops do too. Heck arguably the finest bb made today is cartridge, that's got to say something. It can't be ALL trend towards eliminating labor if Phil is using them too.
Cheers.
Last edited by krems81; 02-28-09 at 08:16 AM.
#16
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times
in
2,092 Posts
#17
Disraeli Gears
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Speaking strictly hypothetically here, would it be possible to use an Isis splined bottom bracket, and then use the cotter pins to lock the cranks in place against the splines?
I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
#19
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
If you can find a set, relatively rare cotterless steel cranks would would solve the problem -- they would look almost correct for the bike and would accommodate a modern cartridge BB.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#20
Senior Member
Thats most. There are knowledgeable mechanics who like them for other reasons. Mostly because they make their job easier. You can't deny Ipass, even though the toll booth attendant worked perfectly well. Fact is ipass saves fuel and prevents congestion.
Last edited by krems81; 02-28-09 at 07:50 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Speaking strictly hypothetically here, would it be possible to use an Isis splined bottom bracket, and then use the cotter pins to lock the cranks in place against the splines?
I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
#22
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,512
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times
in
2,092 Posts
-Kurt
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 703
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Speaking strictly hypothetically here, would it be possible to use an Isis splined bottom bracket, and then use the cotter pins to lock the cranks in place against the splines?
I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
I know it would be about the single ugliest solution possible to a more or less non-existent problem, but would it work, or would it just be a disaster engineering wise?
#24
Senior Moment
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
A cottered bottom bracket is reliable if all is installed properly. The issue is sealing the bearings to keep out entry of grit, etc. You can put something on each side of the axle adjacent to each cup to keep out grit, etc. Some use o-rings of properly selected diameter. I use pipe cleaners sprayed with silicone spray. You would probably also cut neoprene washers too. Use your imagination and seal up that crack between the axle and cup.
#25
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,690 Times
in
2,513 Posts
Cottered cranks were fine unless they weren't. There was nothing to strike fear into a bike boom mechanic's heart than the words "something's wrong with my crank" from a customer with a cottered crank.