Crazy to try racing this? Or worthwhile ...
#26
gridlock junky
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 201
Bikes: 1944 JC Higgens Cruiser, 1988 Univega Aero Speed, 1993 GT Ricochet, 2005 Electra Cruiser, 2006 Cervelo Dual, 2007 IRO Mark V
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
do it, with style.
#27
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
There are few things in life more satisfying than running a nitwit - who is dressed-up like an insect - into the weeds on his $8,000.00 carboniferous toy while on a nice, vintage steel-framed bicycle.
#28
Senior Member
After riding with groups for a while in 1999 I decided to try my hand at a cat 5 race, the bike
I used was a old 1975 mid range race bike, it only had 2x5 with friction shifters.
The crit was flat and only had four corners, I kept in my 52 and only used the 16 and 14.
For this type of course the bike did not hold me back, I was near my physical limit the whole race.
When you first start racing, in my opinion the bike makes very little difference, you quickly discover if
you have the motor or not.
I used was a old 1975 mid range race bike, it only had 2x5 with friction shifters.
The crit was flat and only had four corners, I kept in my 52 and only used the 16 and 14.
For this type of course the bike did not hold me back, I was near my physical limit the whole race.
When you first start racing, in my opinion the bike makes very little difference, you quickly discover if
you have the motor or not.
#29
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
dubesor, that bike has a style all it's own and is much more comfortable to ride then the swanky new Aluminium and Carbon bikes. I found this quate on a poster in a bike shop I used to work in. the pic was a peleton heading down the road with a lone stragler about 2ft behind. on the bottom was this "the joy is not in winning but in having the courage to join the race" nice bike ride and enjoy.
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Its all about the motor. Throw some realy good Michelins on there with lightweight inner tubes and you'll be good to go. Check your hub adjustments (a touch of play when fully clamped down then tighten a smidge).
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Posts: 159
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes You Can
On a steel bike, given the right course, you'll be faster. Sounds silly ? Advantage of "carbon" is low weight, and, mainly due to rear triangle geometry, "responsiveness", the ability to brutally accelerate. On long climbs the carbon is an advantage, in "shorttrack" crit stuff, it's good too. Indexed shifting allows you to use the bike like a racing car, moving through the gears. Non-indexed, you need a different pedalling technique, not a constant cadence and always equal application of power.
With steel you are going to be a load faster down hill. Overtake, or take a breather. If the terrain is suited to keeping up momentum, you'll go down in history as the guy who made the world realize carbon is a marketting fad. Most people are riding carbon wunderbikes because the magazines and the sales bumph tells them they have to. Those bikes have their uses, but they aren't best suited for all races.
With steel you are going to be a load faster down hill. Overtake, or take a breather. If the terrain is suited to keeping up momentum, you'll go down in history as the guy who made the world realize carbon is a marketting fad. Most people are riding carbon wunderbikes because the magazines and the sales bumph tells them they have to. Those bikes have their uses, but they aren't best suited for all races.
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
So you're saying a course with a more down-sloping grade is an advantage for older bikes?
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would go for it. Only advice I have is to change the
stem and the handlebars. You wouldn't want to snap
either one of them in a full blown sprint.
Aluminum DOES fatigue... Better too be safe than sorry.
Shortcut.
stem and the handlebars. You wouldn't want to snap
either one of them in a full blown sprint.
Aluminum DOES fatigue... Better too be safe than sorry.
Shortcut.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Here's me trying to catch my breath on the downslope.
#38
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Why would a steel bike have an advantage going downhill?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
It doesn't. What would be an advantage is aero rims with first class hubs and good descending skills.
#40
Building a better Strida
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: toronto, canada
Posts: 1,106
Bikes: bianchi brava 1988. fuji track 2007, 2006 Bianchi Pista, 1987 Miele and a strida knock off
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I think you should go ahead on that bike, but keep in mind:
1. does the race have a lot of hills?
2. is it really technical or just a sunday/sat morning ride?
if its a ride with a few rolling hills, then you should do just fine, given that bike is ~5lbs over what most carbon bikes are, it doesn't really matter THAT much unless you are going to be doing a lot of climbing.
if the race is a technical corner crazy crit, then i'd still go on that bike, but make sure you are fully re-acquainted with its handling and knowing what gear to be in, etc.
tires sound fine, and wheels should be fine too.
you WILL feel a difference with more modern wheels, fewer spoke count, lighter materials, but watch the gearing.
my bianchi feels far more alive with its 12-21 8-speed cassette, than it did with the 13-25...6-speed.
1. does the race have a lot of hills?
2. is it really technical or just a sunday/sat morning ride?
if its a ride with a few rolling hills, then you should do just fine, given that bike is ~5lbs over what most carbon bikes are, it doesn't really matter THAT much unless you are going to be doing a lot of climbing.
if the race is a technical corner crazy crit, then i'd still go on that bike, but make sure you are fully re-acquainted with its handling and knowing what gear to be in, etc.
tires sound fine, and wheels should be fine too.
you WILL feel a difference with more modern wheels, fewer spoke count, lighter materials, but watch the gearing.
my bianchi feels far more alive with its 12-21 8-speed cassette, than it did with the 13-25...6-speed.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Posts: 159
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's quite right. Weight is an advantage downhill. Extreme example is tandem. The cx of one rider and the weight of two. Ever tried to keep up with a freewheeling tandem on a downhill ? You kept up ? It was a daydream. The heavier weight is faster downhill. On moderate uphills which don't require getting out of the saddle, a steel bike will keep up momentum beter than a carbon bike. The pedalling technique required for getting the most out of this is different. Pedalling cadence has risen a load in recent years. Suited to carbon lightweights and indexed shifting. The indexing allows you to shift seamlessly and keep up the cadence. Without indexing (steel), the modulation should come more from your legs, not the drivetrain being used like a gearbox (CF). Even ultralite wheelweight at circumference (rim and tire) isn't always best. There is thing called momentum, and if you look at some of the track record attempts over long distances, you'll see guys now trying (Japan) really heavy rims.
Anyway, give it a try. Be nice to know how it goes
Anyway, give it a try. Be nice to know how it goes
#43
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
I have to add my "go for it," and can attest to excellent results on an identical (size, color, etc) bike upgraded to STI shifting and with the OEM wheels modified to accept an 8-sp freehub and cassette.
Properly lubed, hubs packed well, and fit right, I had no problem finding my bike split to be in the top 10, against many younger "motors" and almost all younger bikes. Top 2 bikes splits were a steel framed Brew and a 1993 Paramount, so go figure.
I promply bought another frame, same size, in black, and upgraded it heavily, got it under 20 lbs, and cut 3:45 off of that 15mile time, no aeros, either. The weight wasn't much of a factor, but shifting smarter and keeping revs up made the difference.
If there are not a lot of hills, and you keep up your momentum, that bike will race just fine.
Oh, and that purple bike? Sold to a guy with a $4000 Scott. He says "once you get it up to speed, it stays there." He's learned from his Ironman what his plastic fantastic (and it is really nice) bike can't teach: how to ride fast. Get it going, then keep it going, and on the downhills, a little weight and properly packed hubs will give you 3 lengths.
Properly lubed, hubs packed well, and fit right, I had no problem finding my bike split to be in the top 10, against many younger "motors" and almost all younger bikes. Top 2 bikes splits were a steel framed Brew and a 1993 Paramount, so go figure.
I promply bought another frame, same size, in black, and upgraded it heavily, got it under 20 lbs, and cut 3:45 off of that 15mile time, no aeros, either. The weight wasn't much of a factor, but shifting smarter and keeping revs up made the difference.
If there are not a lot of hills, and you keep up your momentum, that bike will race just fine.
Oh, and that purple bike? Sold to a guy with a $4000 Scott. He says "once you get it up to speed, it stays there." He's learned from his Ironman what his plastic fantastic (and it is really nice) bike can't teach: how to ride fast. Get it going, then keep it going, and on the downhills, a little weight and properly packed hubs will give you 3 lengths.
#44
K2ProFlex baby!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: My response would have been something along the lines of: "Does your bike have computer controlled suspension? Then shut your piehole, this baby is from the future!"
Posts: 6,133
Bikes: to many to list
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times
in
31 Posts
__________________
You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve
You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve
#45
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
batman_3000, heavier things go faster downhill only when the air resistance is the same. Actually, it's the air drag/weight ratio that makes the difference. The weight of a carbon bike with rider is about the same weight as a steel bike plus rider. The difference isn't likely to be significant since the air resistance is the same.
A feather lands more slowly than a pebble only because of its air resistance, not its weight. If there were no air, they would fall at exactly the same rate.
A feather lands more slowly than a pebble only because of its air resistance, not its weight. If there were no air, they would fall at exactly the same rate.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Posts: 159
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Exactly
You have it in a nutshell:
If there are not a lot of hills, and you keep up your momentum, that bike will race just fine.
Oh, and that purple bike? Sold to a guy with a $4000 Scott. He says "once you get it up to speed, it stays there." He's learned from his Ironman what his plastic fantastic (and it is really nice) bike can't teach: how to ride fast. Get it going, then keep it going, and on the downhills, a little weight and properly packed hubs will give you 3 lengths.
Oh, and that purple bike? Sold to a guy with a $4000 Scott. He says "once you get it up to speed, it stays there." He's learned from his Ironman what his plastic fantastic (and it is really nice) bike can't teach: how to ride fast. Get it going, then keep it going, and on the downhills, a little weight and properly packed hubs will give you 3 lengths.
#49
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
weight is not really a problem on hills below a certain grade. And even then, I'm not sure how much difference a few pounds really makes. I know there is a psychological difference, the physics just doesn't seem to be there to support a significant performance difference.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Go for it
While I can't say that I have actually competed on an older steel bike, I am a construction superintendent that has spent the biggest part of 10 years living in motel rooms. The bike I travel with is an ancient Univega Viva Sport, and I always try to find group rides wherever I am.
Invariably, I ask a LBS where the rides are, and I show up with my ratty old travel bike. I am 47, and it is absolutely amazing how many rides I have ridden alone, because most of those riders out there with their $3000 bikes are not into it mentally or physically, and drop on the first hill or headwind. (Houston has some hellacious headwinds, and I'm not even going to mention Wyoming)
It is sort of fun to have everyone looking down their nose at you at the start, when you know you are going to outride 70 percent of them regardless of age or equipment.
Invariably, I ask a LBS where the rides are, and I show up with my ratty old travel bike. I am 47, and it is absolutely amazing how many rides I have ridden alone, because most of those riders out there with their $3000 bikes are not into it mentally or physically, and drop on the first hill or headwind. (Houston has some hellacious headwinds, and I'm not even going to mention Wyoming)
It is sort of fun to have everyone looking down their nose at you at the start, when you know you are going to outride 70 percent of them regardless of age or equipment.