Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   Campagnolo Triomphe ? (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/560535-campagnolo-triomphe.html)

Sixty Fiver 07-09-09 08:16 PM

Campagnolo Triomphe ?
 
Found this dusty old thing hanging in my garage and was pretty sure this was a Triomphe groupo... can anyone confirm this for me ?

http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...anchifind4.jpg

http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...anchifind5.jpg

http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...anchifind6.jpg

http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...anchifind7.jpg

http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...anchifind8.jpg

And where does this group sit in the heirarchy of Campy bits ?

Sixty Fiver 07-09-09 08:33 PM

If I am correct on anything it is only because of Cuda's excellent work on Velobase.

Tigerprawn 07-09-09 09:11 PM

Velobase was the first thing I thought of when I was going to attempt to help. Looks like you're right though...

Furthermore, why the heck was that beauty hanging in your garage collecting dust! I'd love a bike like that!

Sixty Fiver 07-09-09 09:16 PM


Originally Posted by Tigerprawn (Post 9251212)
Velobase was the first thing I thought of when I was going to attempt to help. Looks like you're right though...

Furthermore, why the heck was that beauty hanging in your garage collecting dust! I'd love a bike like that!

A bent fork and the fact it's a little large for me had something to do with it...

Tigerprawn 07-09-09 09:17 PM


Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver (Post 9251241)
A bent fork and the fact it's a little large for me had something to do with it...

Sad... Very sad... It's a beauty

cudak888 07-09-09 09:23 PM

Victory, and I can straighten that fork for you.

-Kurt

terrors 07-09-09 09:24 PM

campagnolo
 
It could be 'Victory' I can never tell the two a part. They are the lower end tho

Sixty Fiver 07-09-09 09:26 PM


Originally Posted by cudak888 (Post 9251279)
Victory, and I can straighten that fork for you.

-Kurt

What is the difference ?

cudak888 07-09-09 09:38 PM


Originally Posted by terrors (Post 9251285)
They are the lower end tho

C-Record
Super Record (out by '87)
Victory
Triomphe
990
980

Wouldn't call it lower-end, particularly when it's essentially SR with a cosmetics job and a better RD (though the calipers are two-position like Nuovo Gran Sport). Granted, it doesn't have too much snob appeal (and it is generally - and ungraciously) tacked onto frames just under the Columbus SL notch, but I wholeheartedly consider it the all-time, under-appreciated Campagnolo group of the pre-indexing era.


Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver (Post 9251295)
What is the difference ?

Slight cosmetics - namely, stamped drillium levers vs. smooth, crankarm spider end treatment, brake calipers has a small peak to its cross-section + different nuts, FD has three pivots on clamp vs. two, longer shifter levers, and - most importantly - the RD of Victory has a three-position parallelogram angle stop, which allows it to be positioned closer to the cogs. Pulley cage is also all-aluminum, and a bit nicer in styling.

-Kurt

Sixty Fiver 07-09-09 09:43 PM

Cuda - Thanks.

My Campy lore is weak.

cudak888 07-09-09 10:26 PM


Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver (Post 9251406)
Cuda - Thanks.

My Campy lore is weak.

Glad to help.

-Kurt

P.S.: The surest way to learn how to ID Campagnolo is to have far too much of it around for your own good. ;)

jebensch 07-10-09 07:49 AM

The Victory spider runs with straight edges into the chainring. The Triomphe flares out a little at the spider-ends.

cpsqlrwn 07-10-09 08:08 AM

No doubt that this is all Victory. And Victory is a reliable groupset, significantly better than Triomphe when one considers the rear derailleur performance (Triomphe RD was crap), particularly the later Victory versions. Victory gets rather low resale value, and it is easily confused with Triomphe. The brake levers are also markedly different from Triomphe and way cooler.

cudak888 07-10-09 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by cpsqlrwn (Post 9253068)
And Victory is a reliable groupset, significantly better than Triomphe when one considers the rear derailleur performance (Triomphe RD was crap), particularly the later Victory versions.

The Victory RD does give significantly better performance (though a easy cheat on a Triomphe is to file its pivot stop down), but the 1986 Victory S3 RD's had no greater benefit over the originals save for larger high/low limit screws that made adjustment easier.

-Kurt

P.S.: Forgot to mention - Victory FD's came in braze-on variants, Triomphe did not, IIRC.

23skidoo 07-10-09 10:37 AM

Well if it's too big for you and the fork is bent and you won't be needing it any more just drop me a PM. What size is it anyway?

terrors 07-10-09 03:56 PM

victory
 
any idea what model bike it is? Kinda looks like it might be a Rekord 748 or 848.

Bianchigirll 07-10-09 04:00 PM

yes just what size is it? if it is unwanted I know someone who might take the poor orphan in (wink wink)

Sixty Fiver 07-10-09 06:00 PM

The frame will be orphaned and I will take a proper measurement.

vledaD 07-11-09 02:54 PM

same groupo i have on my univega. its nice i like it. Looks very nice.

Sixty Fiver 07-11-09 02:59 PM

The frame is 56 cm dt and 56 dt... just a speck too tall for me.

I sealed the deal on my new road frame and should have that bike built up on Monday... :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.