Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Rant ..... about classic bikes, and the way they sometimes look

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Rant ..... about classic bikes, and the way they sometimes look

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-09, 05:22 PM
  #1  
presto, pronto, prego!
Thread Starter
 
s70rguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hua Hin Thailand
Posts: 547

Bikes: Dave Lloyd custom, Brands SLX, Visser Vainqueur, XACD ti custom, Hewitt Scandium, Presto 1972, and more ...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 5 Posts
Rant ..... about classic bikes, and the way they sometimes look

Well, thats probably not the most informative title ever, but anyway, here goes.

For years now, I've been looking with great interest at all the classic bikes shown here, and have enjoyed the different ways people enjoy building them up and riding them. its been an education too, and will be.

But one thing irritates me no end. And thats the way many use stem length and saddle position to make a bike fit thats obviously not the right size. And, go on to enjoy AND describe the ride! How is that possible???

What am I referring to? Extra short or extra long stems for a too long or too short toptube. Saddle pushed forward on post for a toptube thats too long. Seatpost out too much, or shoved in too far. Etc., etc.

Now for one thing, the attraction of a classic steel bike for me is not only the fact that it is lugged steel, but foremost that hard to grasp combination of craftsmanship (even in mass produced frames like f.i. Miyata; read Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance and you know what I mean) and elegance that combines into something that just wants to be ridden, and ridden the right way. I can look at classic bikes for hours at end (figuratively speaking) and admire all angles, details, colours and imagine it being raced, thrown into corners, sprinted, going down a mountain at speed ..
For me its all about harmony .. if the man on the bike is in sync with the bike, even visually, everything will work together perfectly. I think. Of course this rules out your belly rubbing the toptube ...

So here are my rules ...

Centerline of seatpost should go through center of saddle (if not, the seattube angle is not right for you, or rather your femur length).
Saddle should be higher than stem, for a 58 c-t frame about 10 cms. Rule of thumb: headtube length should be about the same as seatpost extension.
Stem length should be proportionate to all this, for esthetics sake.

And not just esthetics; for me its essential that my hands rest more or less straight above the front hub. Its all about the feel of the bike. Not the same for everyone I grant you that. But a racing lightweight should have that racing feel right? If only to appreciate what the bike was build for.

Pay respect to the bike is what I say, and if inevitable, suffer for it ...

Flame away ...

Last edited by s70rguy; 10-05-09 at 05:39 PM.
s70rguy is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:27 PM
  #2  
guy on a bike
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: AUSTIN TEXAS!!!
Posts: 499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
*sigh*


quit being a control freak, Uncle Adolf, just let the kids do their thing
JJPistols is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:33 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
www.rivbike.com Maybe you collaborated with him. In case you've never read it.
He's not the only one that agrees with you either.
old and new is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:34 PM
  #4  
big ring
 
MIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 5,838
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by s70rguy
Rule of thumb: headtube length should be about the same as seatpost extension.
Maybe on a compact frame. That's not even possible (nor desirable) on most classic bikes as the post is <20cm long and require at least 1/3 of that to be inserted into the seat tube. Ever hear of "fist full of seatpost?"
MIN is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:38 PM
  #5  
presto, pronto, prego!
Thread Starter
 
s70rguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hua Hin Thailand
Posts: 547

Bikes: Dave Lloyd custom, Brands SLX, Visser Vainqueur, XACD ti custom, Hewitt Scandium, Presto 1972, and more ...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MIN
Maybe on a compact frame. That's not even possible (nor desirable) on most classic bikes as the post is <20cm long and require at least 1/3 of that to be inserted into the seat tube. Ever hear of "fist full of seatpost?"
You're right; what I meant to say was the length up to the saddle top. Its the visual thing I'm talking about.
s70rguy is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:44 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
divineAndbright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quite a few members in this forum are up there in age and find being flexible ain't quite as easy anymore so they may ride with their stem way up there to be more upright. while I agree it isnt very pleasing to look at but at least they are still actually riding.

Then there are the people who are riding bikes that don't quite fit em right, either they don't know or their bike is all they could find atm so they do what they can to make it work, for now (hopefully!).

Im pretty big on the looks and set up too, but not downright snobby, the current road racing trend has racers riding bikes that look too small for them comparing to the "vintage era" and they kinda look like a sail on a sailboat because of it, yeck. A lot of them are racing with like 10 inch saddle to bar drop, I find it looks hideous, I like my bars just a few inches below my saddle.
divineAndbright is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:49 PM
  #7  
Freewheel Medic
 
pastorbobnlnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,881

Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1452 Post(s)
Liked 2,186 Times in 961 Posts
Originally Posted by s70rguy
Centerline of seatpost should go through center of saddle (if not, the seattube angle is not right for you, or rather your femur length). Saddle should be higher than stem, for a 58 c-t frame about 10 cms. Rule of thumb: headtube length should be about the same as seatpost extension.
Stem length should be proportionate to all this, for esthetics sake.
So you are saying the heck with setting a bike for your particular comfort and body shape, and instead go with this very specific formula you've determined works well for you?

If this were the case, then stems and seatposts could not be raised or lowered. Saddles could not be slid forward or aft, or tipped up or down. If this were the case then different sized stems would not be available, different width bars would be impossible to find, and crank arm lengths would all be the same.

I'm sorry, but I respectfully disagree. I like my saddles about the same height as the stem.



Of course I'll never race. But even Eddie Merkx's saddle doesn't appear to be 4 inches above his stem.

__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!

Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com





pastorbobnlnh is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:57 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
divineAndbright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
His drop was quite considerable at the time, only he and a few other riders rode with that much drop, I wouldnt be surprised if it was 6-8 inches.
divineAndbright is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 05:59 PM
  #9  
Riding like its 1990
 
thenomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: IE, SoCal
Posts: 3,785
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks for letting us in on your personal pet peeves. Not sure what I can do with your "rules" other than go on to the next thread.

People's flexibility changes over time so bike fit changes over time.
These are vintage machines not made any longer, so you often have to make due with the gem you find even if it's 2 cm too large or small.
If we were all taking glamor shots for an art cover maybe we'd look for the "golden measurments" for aesthetics, but on this forum I know these bikes are ridden, often hard. So it's even better to me to see a bike molded to the rider for best fit and utility. That's even more character and personality as you can sometimes "see the rider". Some have long arms, some long legs, some long torsos.


If you just want to hang a bike up on the wall then go for looks, if you want to ride the snot out of it then you may find beauty in the imperfections. Like a great vintage racecar.
thenomad is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 06:07 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,744

Bikes: Miele Azsora, Kuwahara Cascade

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
That works if all you're going to do is take pictures of your bikes.
jtgotsjets is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 06:11 PM
  #11  
Cascadian Nationalist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 413
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
There is a reason that so many stem searches end in the Nitto Technomic...
Ashen is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 06:12 PM
  #12  
Dropped
 
JunkYardBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwestern NJ
Posts: 6,080
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
I think he's got a legitimate point that's a bit obfuscated in his original post: a frame may ride differently with a different setup (his example of bars over the front hub). Therefore, objectivity is lost when reviews are given about a certain frame. Unfortunately, as we know, there isn't a standard setup, so there will never be an objective review about ride quality here.

I'm still trying to figure out fit issues, but this 62cm frame is my most comfortable ride presently. I do wonder sometimes how a 'properly' sized frame of the same make/model would ride, but then I can't really handle more than 1-2" of drop (and I'm not all that old), so I'd have to go with a higher stem, which would just throw the aesthetics off again!



At least I have a Rolls on there now
JunkYardBike is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 06:17 PM
  #13  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times in 2,090 Posts
Comfort over looks, and if you like both comfort + looks, don't collect anything that isn't your size.

That's all.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 06:19 PM
  #14  
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,760

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 13 Posts
To the OP: Why is it important to you that other people's bikes fit your asthetic?
bbattle is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 06:26 PM
  #15  
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,760

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 13 Posts
Interesting information about old bikes and their geometry: https://davesbikeblog.squarespace.com/
bbattle is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:02 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
oldbobcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,390

Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 513 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times in 335 Posts
So what's the problem?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
red bike003_edited.jpg (80.1 KB, 94 views)
oldbobcat is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:14 PM
  #17  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times in 2,090 Posts
Originally Posted by oldbobcat
So what's the problem?
Yes - what is the problem?





-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:24 PM
  #18  
Vello Kombi, baby
 
Poguemahone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Je suis ici
Posts: 5,188

Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Some of us just have odd body shapes. I'm just under six foot two, but I have the wingspan of someone six-foot six, and the way most frame builders measure it,my inseam is thirty seven inches . I take a big frame with a long stem... most of the time. I tend to set up my city riders with shorter stems, for a slightly more upright position.

I'm a sucker for aesthetics, but fit trumps all, sorry.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"

Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
Poguemahone is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:30 PM
  #19  
Rustbelt Rider
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 177 Posts
Yeah, the OP will also find a wide range of rules for aesthetics too. Some think the drops should run parallel to the fork crown... others say the top tube.

Ask anyone what the proper setup for a QR skewer is and you will even find a wide range there.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:35 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,995 Posts
For one thing, we are basically buying used bikes, unless you were lucky enough to buy one to be built for you back in the day. So, there are compromises, waiting for the perfect bike will keep your stable small.

There is a range of bikes that I can fit well, not a big range but enough. Not every one is the same size, nor do they need to be. In addition, I don't set up every bike the same way, especially in regard to seat to bar distance and relative height between the seat and bars. The reason for this is as one ages as I am forced to admit, some days you wake up less flexible, yesterday's position is not good today. The cluster of positions is not that far apart, and having more than one bike to select from makes cycling more enjoyable, better to ride than than not.

I do see often seat angles where I know- a severe downward angle lets say, is hiding a problem, and causing others, the rider will constantly be pushing himself back up the seat, knowingly or not, using more muscles than needed, where he should find a more comfortable saddle to begin with or look at his saddle height and or set back to see why he needs the tilt to be comfortable, but the other variables are just that, adjustments. Way back there were guys in the bike club that I was a member of who swore that the tilt was just going to have to stay there, with enough tweaking, the got more comfortable and performed better, increased comfort gets one farther.
repechage is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:41 PM
  #21  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,790

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12740 Post(s)
Liked 7,652 Times in 4,058 Posts
Originally Posted by mkeller234
Some think the drops should run parallel to the fork crown... others say the top tube.
I like curvy drops pointed at the rear axle, but kinky drops with the ends about parallel with the top tube - I guess they're not C&V yet, though.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:41 PM
  #22  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
Originally Posted by s70rguy
Well, thats probably not the most informative title ever, but anyway, here goes.

But one thing irritates me no end. And thats the way many use stem length and saddle position to make a bike fit thats obviously not the right size. And, go on to enjoy AND describe the ride! How is that possible??? Kind of like the Nike ad. We just do it.

For me its all about harmony .. if the man on the bike is in sync with the bike, even visually, everything will work together perfectly. I think. Of course this rules out your belly rubbing the toptube ... If you really want balance, then you may have to rule out frames smaller than 54cm (look too cramped) and taller than 58cm (look too stretched)

So here are my rules ...

Centerline of seatpost should go through center of saddle (if not, the seattube angle is not right for you, or rather your femur length). Zero-setback post, Setback post, or how much setback?

Stem length should be proportionate to all this, for esthetics sake. See my comment on frame size..

But a racing lightweight should have that racing feel right? What if it does, but doesn't look right?

Flame away ...
Wouldn't think of it. I read your post with interest. You are invited to the Halloween 100-miler in Durham, NC, because with a couple of beers afterward, we could talk a long time. Interesting conversation doesn't always have to make sense to everyone involved....

Last edited by RobbieTunes; 10-06-09 at 05:30 PM.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:44 PM
  #23  
Vello Kombi, baby
 
Poguemahone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Je suis ici
Posts: 5,188

Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by mkeller234
Ask anyone what the proper setup for a QR skewer is and you will even find a wide range there.
There's one guy on a ride I go on who insists that the QR levers be on the same side of the bike on both front and back wheel. I always have the front one opposite the back, and it drives him absolutely bonkers.
Now I think I do it just to irritate him.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"

Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
Poguemahone is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:46 PM
  #24  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
Originally Posted by mkeller234
Yeah, the OP will also find a wide range of rules for aesthetics too. Some think the drops should run parallel to the fork crown... others say the top tube.

Ask anyone what the proper setup for a QR skewer is and you will even find a wide range there.
I think the drops should "come up" to meet your hands in a natural position as you lean forward on the saddle, preferably before your nose hits the stem. I used to run the top of my drop in line with the stem, until I decided I preferred riding without numb hands....

Ah, the QR skewer argument...the Ben Hur, the Trailing Teardrop, the Aroused, the Droopy....
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 10-05-09, 07:47 PM
  #25  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
Originally Posted by Poguemahone
There's one guy on a ride I go on who insists that the QR levers be on the same side of the bike on both front and back wheel. I always have the front one opposite the back, and it drives him absolutely bonkers.
Now I think I do it just to irritate him.
You are a cruel, cruel dude. I'll bet you don't center your tire label on the stem, on the drive side, either, do you?

Anarchist.
RobbieTunes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.