Steel Paramount to go with my Ti Paramount
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 62
Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Paramount Ti, 1994 LeMond/Bilatto, 1985 Colnago Super
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Steel Paramount to go with my Ti Paramount
Okay, so I've become a fan of the Paramount series since getting my Ti Paramount in the Spring of this year. So I wanted to try out a 50, 52 or 53cm steel Paramount, either of Match or Waterford build. Of course, I don't see many out there, so I was wondering...
If Waterford built the Paramount back in the day, could they build another steel frame today with the same specs -- i.e. tubing, angles, etc., as when they built the Paramount? I imagine the frame would be something close to a Waterford R22. The R33 looks too thick in the tube sections, IMO, to replicate the Waterford steel Paramounts.
Also, I prefer lugged, which I don't know if the Waterford Paramount was. I do know the Match-built Paramount was lugged, but little else.
Thanks for all the help.
If Waterford built the Paramount back in the day, could they build another steel frame today with the same specs -- i.e. tubing, angles, etc., as when they built the Paramount? I imagine the frame would be something close to a Waterford R22. The R33 looks too thick in the tube sections, IMO, to replicate the Waterford steel Paramounts.
Also, I prefer lugged, which I don't know if the Waterford Paramount was. I do know the Match-built Paramount was lugged, but little else.
Thanks for all the help.
#2
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3090 Post(s)
Liked 6,593 Times
in
3,781 Posts
Waterford Precision Cycles
816 W. Bakke Ave.
Waterford, WI 53185
Phone: 262-534-4190
Fax: 262-534-4194
If they quote you a price, don't faint.
__________________
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 62
Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Paramount Ti, 1994 LeMond/Bilatto, 1985 Colnago Super
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, yes. I do like that red Paramount, but wasn't that produced as a very limited supply, and at $7K or some gawdawfully high price? Not that it's not worth it, mind you, if you have the bucks.
#5
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531
Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Well you probably aren't gonna make it happen for much under $2-3k for the frame and fork.
As Deuce Bigalow once said "Its a Custom, Hand, Job"
Get a handful of Nervex Lugs and locate a set of Reynolds Tubes and find a good framebuilder...you could make it happen but it ain't gonna be cheap.
Personally I'd rather spend that kind of money on 3 original Paramounts.
As Deuce Bigalow once said "Its a Custom, Hand, Job"
Get a handful of Nervex Lugs and locate a set of Reynolds Tubes and find a good framebuilder...you could make it happen but it ain't gonna be cheap.
Personally I'd rather spend that kind of money on 3 original Paramounts.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Crown Point,Indiana
Posts: 607
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Local Trek shop had a Waterford with Nervex lugs and the frame was polished out to look like chrome.It was a special order.Cost=$15,000
#7
Decrepit Member
I had Waterford build an RS-22 in polished Reynolds 953 with Sachs Newvex stainless lugs to the same dimensions and angles as my chrome P15-9 Paramount. The Waterford is six pounds lighter than the Paramount.
Here are the two bikes together:
Details of the Waterford:
Here are the two bikes together:
Details of the Waterford:
#8
Decrepit Member
Waterford road Paramounts were lugged. Here's my '87 Standard which used a mix of Columbus SL and SP tubes.
Details:
Details:
#10
Larger Chainring
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Corvallis, Oregon
Posts: 1,037
Bikes: 1988 Schwinn Circuit. Bike-Boom-Puegeot. First "real bike" Trek 720 Hybrid in gross disrepair.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Holy mother, but doesn't surprise me I guess...when I looked at the pricing sheet on the Waterford site I thought, "oh, a frame only costs this?" before seeing what adding everything else to it cost. Let alone the components and everything else...
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 62
Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Paramount Ti, 1994 LeMond/Bilatto, 1985 Colnago Super
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Six pounds difference? 953 is pretty light. I imagine a lugged 953 Waterford built to the specs of my Ti would also be lighter.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
14 Posts
note also the differences in components. I'm sure the frame accounts for less than half the difference.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 62
Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Paramount Ti, 1994 LeMond/Bilatto, 1985 Colnago Super
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
True. I didn't think of that at first.
#15
Decrepit Member
Thanks guys.
The 61cm 953 frame weighs 1670 grams (~3.7 pounds) and the chromed 531 fork weighs ~815 grams (~1.8 pounds). A carbon threadless fork would save about a pound, but just wouldn't look right.
I rode the Waterford from San Francisco to Los Angeles in June for the AIDS/LifeCycle fundraising ride, and it's a very fast, comfortable, long range bike.
It cost nowhere near $10k.
The 61cm 953 frame weighs 1670 grams (~3.7 pounds) and the chromed 531 fork weighs ~815 grams (~1.8 pounds). A carbon threadless fork would save about a pound, but just wouldn't look right.
I rode the Waterford from San Francisco to Los Angeles in June for the AIDS/LifeCycle fundraising ride, and it's a very fast, comfortable, long range bike.
It cost nowhere near $10k.
#16
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
My wife and I were just past there on Monday... did some biking at Lapham Peak... wondering if we should have dropped by...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#17
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531
Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
The lugwork on that 953 frame is incredibly clean