3 speed Dana bottom bracket on a Western Flyer
#1
Hello
Thread Starter
3 speed Dana bottom bracket on a Western Flyer
My neighbor bought this bike from a retired guy at a local trailer park for $20. I told him I would post it hear to see if we could find out anything about it. Can you tell me any background on the bike or it's unique gear box and the potential value?
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 442
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
29 Posts
I believe the Dana 3 speed was added to the bike.The Dana units are unusual,uncommon but certainly not rare,in used condition i believe they are worth perhaps $25.00 - $50.00.
#3
Hello
Thread Starter
Thanks Schwinnderella, FWIW the rear fender has two "factory bends or crimps" one for a normal chain height from a chain ring and a lower one for the low chain for the small front chainring hidden behind the unit and not shown in the photos. Therefore I beleive that Western Flyer may have offered the Dana unit as an option. The model number underneath the bottom bracket starts off with G60. Would you think this bike is from 1960?
#4
Senior Member
As posted above, the Dana transmission was sold separately. My Dad installed one on his Schwinn Varsity, which made it weigh probably close to 50 pounds. It worked very well. I remember the low gear being ridiculously low and the same with the high gear. Came and went very quickly, though.
#5
Elitest Murray Owner
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657
Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
The bike is probably much older than 1960. I say this because the dropouts for the rear wheel face backwards - most companies discontinued this practice shortly after WWII. Also, the bent seatpost is another thing that dissapeared shortly after the war. I would hazard a guess that bike is probably from the early 50s or older.
Got any more pictures of it?
Got any more pictures of it?
#6
Hello
Thread Starter
#7
Elitest Murray Owner
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657
Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
The bends in the fender were for the chain-guard.
The red band bendix dates from at least 1961. But is probably a later addition.
Edit: Looks like the frame was made by Cleveland Welding, this example dates from 49/50:
Yours is probably of similiar vintage,
The red band bendix dates from at least 1961. But is probably a later addition.
Edit: Looks like the frame was made by Cleveland Welding, this example dates from 49/50:
Yours is probably of similiar vintage,
Last edited by Mos6502; 10-22-09 at 04:02 PM.
#9
Bicyclerider4life
They were an after market item. I put one on my 1950's Western Flier back in '75. Bike weighed almost 58 pounds BEFORE I put it on, (what can I say? it had all the "goodies" - tank, lights, springer front end, rear rack, fenders) and prob. close to 70 pounds after, that 3 speed conversion weighs about 10 pounds by itself. BUT, I was able to RIDE up the steepest hill in town (1.3 miles @ 15% grade) after it went on! Riding is better than pushing.
__________________
"Whenever I see an adult riding a bicycle, I know there is hope for mankind." (H. G. Wells)
"Whenever I see an adult riding a bicycle, I know there is hope for mankind." (H. G. Wells)
#10
Elitest Murray Owner
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657
Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I dunno, I've seen them come on ebay every now and then. I wouldn't call them rare either.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: Too many Bicycles to list
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times
in
45 Posts
I picked up a complete one with a bunch of other parts cheap,still haven't decided what to do with it. I was thinking about using it in combo with a three speed rear hub.
#12
Senior Member
#13
Senator from Secret
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Secret
Posts: 688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a couple of the Dana transmissions... interesting stuff but I wouldn't put one on my vintage road bike!
I have used them on my crazy HPV creations and they work great... but they weigh a million ounces.
They are not rare if you are really searching for them. Few people remember them so you can sometimes get them cheap. I got a nos set in the box once.
Gosh... I have to sell some of my stuff... I can't see the walls anymore.
I have used them on my crazy HPV creations and they work great... but they weigh a million ounces.
They are not rare if you are really searching for them. Few people remember them so you can sometimes get them cheap. I got a nos set in the box once.
Gosh... I have to sell some of my stuff... I can't see the walls anymore.
#15
Senator from Secret
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Secret
Posts: 688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't see why not... they work with any rear hub.
The action is internal to the Dana Transmission, so the chain does not move like with a derailleur.
But why would you want to have a 3 speed fixie? That's just crazy talk. (I like it)
The action is internal to the Dana Transmission, so the chain does not move like with a derailleur.
But why would you want to have a 3 speed fixie? That's just crazy talk. (I like it)
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
It's just that I have this drum brake rear hub that would make an easy skiptooth fixy conversion. (-:><:-)
Last edited by sailorbenjamin; 10-25-09 at 09:28 PM.
#17
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
If you have to ask why, you don't understand! But combined with an ASC hub, you could have a 9-speed fixie.
#19
Senator from Secret
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Secret
Posts: 688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#21
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
837 Posts
A good multispeed fixed gear is a great idea, which is why Sturmey-Archer is finally reintroducing one, but a 3x3 setup with 9 properly-spaced ratios would be really cool! Another option is the 3-speed sliding gear bottom bracket transmission found on some German Adler bikes from the 1930s -- that is one rare bird (literally, since "Adler" = "eagle").
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#22
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
Could you tell us more about the ratios? So far all we have is memories of
Maybe it would work in conjunction with an ASC or the modern version thereof!
#24
Senator from Secret
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Secret
Posts: 688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did some poking around in my special {bike} place... It appears that I have 3 Dana Transmissions.
Two seem to be missing the sprocket and of those one is missing the crank assembly.
I would say that they made them for more than a couple of years only because there are some differences between each of the ones I have seen. The photo above shows a decal that seems newer than mine which is without a decal. I have a patent pending example and one with two patent numbers
I have also located the original installation instructions that came with one of them. Exiting, yes.
It has what I take to be a date code on it reading 5/73. I will assume that is the month and year.
There is no gear ratio information, however, the final instruction is that "The range of the transmission can be modified by changing the size of the rear sprocket. A larger rear sprocket will result in easier pedaling and better hill climbing ability. While a smaller rear sprocket will result in more speed." Apparently physics in 1973 have changed little when compared to today. Maybe global warming isn't as bad as we have been told.
All in all: it is a pretty heavy and impractical gearbox... more of a novelty, even though it is well made. The fact that it moves your drive side pedaling leg over another 4-5 inches has got to have some drawbacks.
I will leave you with this final tidbit taken from the instructions:
"WARNING For reasons of safety the cranks and pedals must be on tightly or they will gradually work loose and come off."
Amazing we ever made it out of the cold war.
Two seem to be missing the sprocket and of those one is missing the crank assembly.
I would say that they made them for more than a couple of years only because there are some differences between each of the ones I have seen. The photo above shows a decal that seems newer than mine which is without a decal. I have a patent pending example and one with two patent numbers
I have also located the original installation instructions that came with one of them. Exiting, yes.
It has what I take to be a date code on it reading 5/73. I will assume that is the month and year.
There is no gear ratio information, however, the final instruction is that "The range of the transmission can be modified by changing the size of the rear sprocket. A larger rear sprocket will result in easier pedaling and better hill climbing ability. While a smaller rear sprocket will result in more speed." Apparently physics in 1973 have changed little when compared to today. Maybe global warming isn't as bad as we have been told.
All in all: it is a pretty heavy and impractical gearbox... more of a novelty, even though it is well made. The fact that it moves your drive side pedaling leg over another 4-5 inches has got to have some drawbacks.
I will leave you with this final tidbit taken from the instructions:
"WARNING For reasons of safety the cranks and pedals must be on tightly or they will gradually work loose and come off."
Amazing we ever made it out of the cold war.