Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-27-09, 12:43 PM   #1
dbakl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
Posts: 5,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow, nice Paramount

Restored frame:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...STRK:MESELX:IT
dbakl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 01:41 PM   #2
EjustE
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That's from a Tourist bike, which complete was (as per the person's pictured brochure) a full 43 lbs. That's about 2 bikes worth of weight and the price is probably missing a decimal point (painting and all)...
EjustE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 02:29 PM   #3
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,222
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
That's from a Tourist bike, which complete was (as per the person's pictured brochure) a full 43 lbs. That's about 2 bikes worth of weight and the price is probably missing a decimal point (painting and all)...
That's the shipping weight. The actual weight of the '55 Tourist Paramount should be around 25 pounds (packing material was more substantial in the fifties).

Also, bear in mind that there are fenders and a chainguard.

EDIT - It's quite possible that's an Oscar Wastyn built Paramount, and if so it's probably worth more than the $1,000 starting price to many collectors. Frank W. Schwinn's 1956 Paramount was built by Oscar, so he was still building them as late as the mid-fifties.
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.

Last edited by Scooper; 10-27-09 at 02:44 PM.
Scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 03:19 PM   #4
XR2
Senior Member
 
XR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back in the hills again
Bikes: 88 Bridgestone T700
Posts: 1,004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Georgeous.
XR2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 03:31 PM   #5
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,222
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Too bad it's a 21" frame.

If it were a 24", I'd consider bidding.
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.
Scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 03:53 PM   #6
EjustE
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
That's the shipping weight. The actual weight of the '55 Tourist Paramount should be around 25 pounds (packing material was more substantial in the fifties).

Also, bear in mind that there are fenders and a chainguard.
In the same source, the racer is listed as shipping weight of 35 lbs. If the tourist was around 25, the racer would be 25-8 = 17 lbs. Impossible for 1955. If the racer in 1955 was closer to a more realistic, but still probably outrageous for the era, 25 lbs, the tourist would be more like 33 pounds. Still a heavy bike but much lighter than the 50+ lbs competition.
EjustE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 04:49 PM   #7
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,222
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
I don't really want to argue with you, but in 1899 the Schwinn World track racer weighed less than 20 pounds:



I raced my dad's mid-fifties 22-inch frame P-12 Paramount track racer (Reynolds 531) in the late fifties when I was in high school, and it weighed 20 pounds.



If the P-11 Tourist weighed more than 25 pounds, it wasn't by much. It certainly wasn't 33 pounds.
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.
Scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 06:07 PM   #8
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 16,689
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
With steel fenders, chainguard, seatpost, bars and a Sturmey Archer 3 speed hub, my guess would be closer to 33 than to 25 pounds. My Reynolds 531 Carlton with aluminum fenders, no chainguard, lightweight components and an aluminum-shelled SA 3 speed weighs over 25 pounds.

I'll bet that Waterford charged close to $1000 just for the paint, decals and striping.

I assume that EjustE is just trying to give us a laugh with his appraisals.
Grand Bois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 06:28 PM   #9
EjustE
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop View Post
I'll bet that Waterford charged close to $1000 just for the paint, decals and striping.

I assume that EjustE is just trying to give us a laugh with his appraisals.
Not necessarily... and it was not an "appraisal", just my opinion of its "value" (to me who I don't see that bicycle as practical today) but I am sure that someone might be willing to pay $1000 for this frame to have it sit behind glass and look at it. Who knows? Value is relative and in the eye of the beholder. In my eye its crazily-priced

This particular frame is not Waterford-painted (it is "restored") and in 2009 $1000 can buy about 10 frames (instead of this one) each more appropriate for use than this one. It does have collective value, but not much use value. Take the "Paramount" sticky off and it changes a whole bunch of things.
EjustE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 06:34 PM   #10
mkeller234
Rustbelt Rider
 
mkeller234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Posts: 8,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So because Waterford "restored" it, you're saying that means that Waterford did not paint it??
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
mkeller234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 06:41 PM   #11
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,222
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop View Post
With steel fenders, chainguard, seatpost, bars and a Sturmey Archer 3 speed hub, my guess would be closer to 33 than to 25 pounds. My Reynolds 531 Carlton with aluminum fenders, no chainguard, lightweight components and an aluminum-shelled SA 3 speed weighs over 25 pounds.

I'll bet that Waterford charged close to $1000 just for the paint, decals and striping.

I assume that EjustE is just trying to give us a laugh with his appraisals.
Well, we won't know unless we have one to weigh. However, I know the 22" P12 weighed 20 pounds ready to ride, and the shipping weight was 35 pounds (shipping crate and packing = 15 pounds). Assuming the P11 shipping materials weighed the same (15 pounds) and the stated shipping weight was 43 pounds, the bike would weigh 28 pounds. That, I'll buy into.

Heck, my 24" 1973 Super Sport with straight gauge 4130 CrMo frame, triple chainring, 10-speed cassette, derailleurs, seatpost, Brooks saddle, stem, handlbars, shifters, and pedals only weighs a hair over 26 pounds.
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.
Scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 06:49 PM   #12
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,222
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkeller234 View Post
So because Waterford "restored" it, you're saying that means that Waterford did not paint it??
I had that question too; a Waterford restoration includes historically accurate paint and decals.
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.
Scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 07:01 PM   #13
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 16,689
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
Not necessarily... and it was not an "appraisal", just my opinion of its "value" (to me who I don't see that bicycle as practical today) but I am sure that someone might be willing to pay $1000 for this frame to have it sit behind glass and look at it. Who knows? Value is relative and in the eye of the beholder. In my eye its crazily-priced

This particular frame is not Waterford-painted (it is "restored") and in 2009 $1000 can buy about 10 frames (instead of this one) each more appropriate for use than this one. It does have collective value, but not much use value. Take the "Paramount" sticky off and it changes a whole bunch of things.
Some of us consider a bike like that one to be much more practical for everyday use than an obsolete racing bike.
Grand Bois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 09:02 PM   #14
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,744
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
I had that question too; a Waterford restoration includes historically accurate paint and decals.
I've seen at least one that wasn't entirely correct.

-Kurt
__________________
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 09:47 PM   #15
oldbobcat
Senior Member
 
oldbobcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Bikes: '79 Gios, '80 Masi, '06 Felt, early '60s Frejus
Posts: 2,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
. . .in 2009 $1000 can buy about 10 frames (instead of this one) each more appropriate for use than this one. It does have collective value, but not much use value. Take the "Paramount" sticky off and it changes a whole bunch of things.
Tourist bikes with 3-speed hubs may not be popular but they sure would be practical for bridging the market gap between impractical cruisers and derailleur-equipped "fitness" bikes. I've met so many potential customers who want practical bikes but are scared of derailleurs, unguarded chains, and unfendered wheels.

I guess you had to grow up before the 1970s to see firsthand how useful this kind of bike can be.
oldbobcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 11:04 PM   #16
krems81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Bikes: Vintage Miele
Posts: 714
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
Not necessarily... and it was not an "appraisal", just my opinion of its "value" (to me who I don't see that bicycle as practical today) but I am sure that someone might be willing to pay $1000 for this frame to have it sit behind glass and look at it. Who knows? Value is relative and in the eye of the beholder. In my eye its crazily-priced

This particular frame is not Waterford-painted (it is "restored") and in 2009 $1000 can buy about 10 frames (instead of this one) each more appropriate for use than this one. It does have collective value, but not much use value. Take the "Paramount" sticky off and it changes a whole bunch of things.
You're assuming value only in terms of utility, and not in terms of history. This bike, like many others discussed on these forums, is part of cycling history.

In this case value is more in history and rarity than utility. Thank goodness people treasure these items so, and value them so highly. Otherwise, they'd be treated more carelessly, and probably not preserved as well.

Edit: not saying they're not useful, but it is true that a bike can be had for much less that would be usable in all the same ways.
krems81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 10:49 AM   #17
DARTHVADER
the darkness
 
DARTHVADER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i think that frame was actually painted at elliot bay cycles. excellent painter there, excellent.
DARTHVADER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 01:22 PM   #18
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 16,689
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARTHVADER View Post
i think that frame was actually painted at elliot bay cycles. excellent painter there, excellent.
What makes you think so? The seller says it was painted by Waterford.
Grand Bois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 02:05 PM   #19
EjustE
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This description has so many inconsistencies that makes a potential buyer worry. For starters:

a. at the Waterford Restoration web page
http://waterfordbikes.com/now/home.p...e=randrCollect the company itself stated about painting frames:

If it is historically important and in decent condition, then new paint may actually reduce its value..

(the seller claims that it was restored by Waterford - with no receipt, btw - so I would assume that either a. Waterford did not paint that bike or b. the frame was not in "decent condition" or c. someones is making a story)

b. the seller claims this: Waterford Cycles, who made the last real Paramounts for Schwinn as the Paramount Design Group in the early 80s . Here is the connection between Paramount and Waterford per the Waterford web site and who produced those last "real" Paramounts. Website:

http://www.waterfordbikes.com/2005/d...ory/pdgnew.php

When Ed Schwinn took over the company in 1979, one of the first things he did was to shut down Paramount production. [...] By 1981, enough demand had built up to justify bigger plans. Marc got the go-ahead to build a factory which, after a considerable search, landed in Waterford, Wisconsin [...] When Schwinn was sold in 1993, a group of Schwinn employees bought the factory and started Waterford Precision Cycles (that's, of course, another story). Waterford continued to build Paramounts pretty much as before the sale though the end of the 1993 model year. In 1994, Schwinn contracted with Waterford to build Paramounts - both for stock and on a custom basis.






So if the real paramounts (including the one for sale) were stopped being made in Chicago in 1980, the Paramounts that Waterford made were not "real" also some Schwinn employees (who actually had nothing to do with Paramount ) bought the factory and started Waterford that as Waterford made Paramounts for one single year... Connection overstated by the seller. And actually I doubt that there are any bodies left in the Waterford factory who made bikes of the second (or third -waterford-made paramounts) generation (PDG) of Paramounts. Of course, very few people who work on that bike restoration were probably even born when that bike was made in Chicago...



c.
This is a good one. Seller says: "Buyer to pay actual shipping plus $25 for professional packing. I wrap frames in pipe insulation to prevent damage"


Still a good deal at $1000?

edit: through the listing and the link to the seller's flickr site, it is apparent that the seller works at Elliott Bay.
Draw your own conclusions. Here is the link:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/8379107...7606377598435/

(some great looking bikes, btw, including at least 8 Paramounts )




Last edited by EjustE; 10-28-09 at 02:18 PM.
EjustE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 02:27 PM   #20
DARTHVADER
the darkness
 
DARTHVADER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop View Post
What makes you think so? The seller says it was painted by Waterford.
oh nvm. seems it was restored before bob got it. i saw it on the flickr page of the half owner of elliot bay plus the ebay seller location is seattle...
elliot bay does lots of restoration work though.
DARTHVADER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 02:29 PM   #21
Hydrated
Reeks of aged cotton duck
 
Hydrated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle Georgia, USA
Bikes: 2008 Kogswell PR mkII, 1976 Raleigh Professional, 1996 Serotta Atlanta, 1984 Trek 520, 1979 Raleigh Comp GS, 1995 Trek 950, 1979 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist
Posts: 1,175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
*sigh*
Hydrated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 03:01 PM   #22
DARTHVADER
the darkness
 
DARTHVADER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
c. [/color][/i]This is a good one. Seller says: "Buyer to pay actual shipping plus $25 for professional packing. I wrap frames in pipe insulation to prevent damage"


Still a good deal at $1000?

edit: through the listing and the link to the seller's flickr site, it is apparent that the seller works at Elliott Bay.
Draw your own conclusions. Here is the link:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/8379107...7606377598435/

(some great looking bikes, btw, including at least 8 Paramounts )



he doesn't just work at elliot bay, he's part owner.
they do pack well.
DARTHVADER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 03:02 PM   #23
Migraine_boy
obnoxious
 
Migraine_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 527
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
This description has so many inconsistencies that makes a potential buyer worry. For starters:

blah blah blah
[/I]
why are you even here? this is a forum about classic bikes, it seems to me you have no interest
in classic & vintage bikes other than to criticize them.
__________________
I'd rather catch Pneumonia and Die
Migraine_boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 04:30 PM   #24
EjustE
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migraine_boy View Post
why are you even here? this is a forum about classic bikes, it seems to me you have no interest
in classic & vintage bikes other than to criticize them.
Criticizing one particular ebay sale and the price of a particular frame is waaaaay different than criticizing a particular bike. I am sure that there are a lot of people drooling about this bike. We'll find out whether their money is where their mouth is....

As far as my "criticism" about this bike being a heavy and impractical frame for the price, is just my opinion. Feel free to disagree. Opining that a 50s heavy frame that can do less than a 70s lighter frame in the 21st century, does not make someone less interested in vintage and classic bikes. I am sure a Model T is highly collectible, I just think that a '65 Mustang is more practical today. That does not make it less "classic".
EjustE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 04:38 PM   #25
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com
Posts: 22,744
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EjustE View Post
[/COLOR][/I]So if the real paramounts (including the one for sale) were stopped being made in Chicago in 1980, the Paramounts that Waterford made were not "real" also some Schwinn employees (who actually had nothing to do with Paramount ) bought the factory and started Waterford that as Waterford made Paramounts for one single year... Connection overstated by the seller. And actually I doubt that there are any bodies left in the Waterford factory who made bikes of the second (or third -waterford-made paramounts) generation (PDG) of Paramounts. Of course, very few people who work on that bike restoration were probably even born when that bike was made in Chicago...
[I][COLOR=#000000]
Huh? You sound as if you're the cousin of DonQuixote1954.

-Kurt
__________________
cudak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.