Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Saw an interesting Trek today.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Saw an interesting Trek today.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-10, 06:15 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Saw an interesting Trek today.

It was a mid 80's 620 frameset with a dual position rear brake bridge. Lower hole for 700's upper for 27's.
miamijim is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 06:26 PM
  #2  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
No pictures? Shame.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 06:56 PM
  #3  
Ellensburg, WA
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 458 Times in 160 Posts
Did it look like a factory thing or something done later by a framebuilder?
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 07:04 PM
  #4  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by scozim
Did it look like a factory thing or something done later by a framebuilder?
If the former, JohnDThompson might know something of it.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 07:25 PM
  #5  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
I am pretty sure that it is not a factory feature. The 620 was made only 3 years (1983-85) and all 3 years used 27 inch wheels. Maybe the owner added that later to use with 700c wheels, for convenience and better tire selection. On second thought, it has to be an '83 because the other 2 years it used canti brakes.
EjustE is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 08:27 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
My bad.... Trek 610 and it looked very factory to me. The big is actually decent, Brooks saddle, Campy NR seatpost, Specialized sealed bearing hubs, Stronglight roller bearing headset, everything else is 600EX and minimal rust speckling.


Last edited by miamijim; 02-20-10 at 08:31 PM.
miamijim is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 08:46 PM
  #7  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Looks like the point of using 27's is lost with your clearance being taken up by that lower bolt.

Is there anything that didn't get spraybombed on that thing?

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 08:51 PM
  #8  
Wherever I may roam....
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Topton Pa
Posts: 1,853

Bikes: A few bikes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmmm.... Interesting bike Jim, very interesting
RobE30 is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 08:53 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Looks like the point of using 27's is lost with your clearance being taken up by that lower bolt.

Is there anything that didn't get spraybombed on that thing?

-Kurt
I hear 'ya on the 27's but it appeared to have adequete clearance. 15 minutes w/ a can of paint stripper and it'll look good. Honestly, it looks much better in person.
miamijim is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 09:23 PM
  #10  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by miamijim
My bad.... Trek 610 and it looked very factory to me. The big is actually decent, Brooks saddle, Campy NR seatpost, Specialized sealed bearing hubs, Stronglight roller bearing headset, everything else is 600EX and minimal rust speckling.


the 610 is a totally different beast from the 620 (other than the 531 frame). I am 99% sure that this is an '84. Factory spec'd with 27 inch rims. Again, I suspect that this is a later user modification. 6207 was spec'd with this bike, so that is correct, as was spec'd with the Maillard Helicomatic freewheel (be glad that this one does not have it) ... That is a 6207 brake, but the quick release lever is gone. To show you what I mean this is a pair of 6207 brakes (not the extra special gios blue variety) :



(also looks like the shoes were replaced at some point)
EjustE is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 09:46 PM
  #11  
Dropped
 
JunkYardBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwestern NJ
Posts: 6,080
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
He made a visit to our valuations subforum recently: https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...a-home-for-her

Last edited by JunkYardBike; 02-20-10 at 09:59 PM.
JunkYardBike is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 10:18 PM
  #12  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by JunkYardBike
He made a visit to our valuations subforum recently: https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...a-home-for-her
Darn, I couldn't put one plus one together on this one

miamijim, do you have any plans for those handlebars? I'd trade you a pair of 410mm alloy anatomical Sakae CT if you are interested...
EjustE is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 10:50 PM
  #13  
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Is there anything that didn't get spraybombed on that thing?
Mebbe it was part of a Blue Man Group performance.

Why would one need to go back and forth between 27“ and 700C wheels? Choose one and ride on!
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 11:32 PM
  #14  
juneeaa memba!
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: boogled up in...Idaho!
Posts: 5,632

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I rode with a guy that rode that bike, for several years. I know the back end of that blue 610 as well as anything, and it didn't have a dual position brake mount. Cool idea, though.
luker is offline  
Old 02-20-10, 11:54 PM
  #15  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
Why would one need to go back and forth between 27“ and 700C wheels? Choose one and ride on!
I'm figuring someone brazed on the extension in order to use 700C's permenantly, leaving the second hole purely out of laziness or sloppiness.

Granted, it looks as if very little damage was done (or this fellow did a heck of a job matching the paint). The whole spraybomb job is a disaster though.

I'd probably give it a shot myself if he was selling it for $50, but I know I'd regret it later. I dislike Treks in the first place; I'd end up flipping it. If I wanted one, there's a fellow selling a nice semi-complete 410 and an equally sharp 670 frameset locally for the same price this fellow wants for his rattlecan handiwork.

-Kurt
__________________













Last edited by cudak888; 02-20-10 at 11:58 PM.
cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 12:34 AM
  #16  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Kurt - Why don't you like Treks ?

Those early handbuilt frames are a nice as any frame out there and the workmanship tends to be far better and more consistent on lets say... vintage Raleighs.



I have had quite a few of these pass through my hands and it was only because they were all the wrong size... the folks I gave them to were really happy and say these are the nicest bikes they have ever owned.

One was so happy he brought me a 1954 Raleigh Sports which is going on it's maiden voyage tomorrow.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 12:48 AM
  #17  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
Kurt - Why don't you like Treks ?

Those early handbuilt frames are a nice as any frame out there and the workmanship tends to be far better and more consistent on lets say... vintage Raleighs.
Treks look great, and ride like crap.
Raleighs look like crap, and ride great.

I know I'm being a bit over-general (face it, I did the above more for laughs than anything else), but a few forum searches should bring up my full opinion of Treks, based on my 1981 610 and 1982 720/728. I'd have a bit more to say if it wasn't 1:41 AM over here. Dull and dead pretty much sum up the ride characteristics of each.

I will, however, say that I'd give anything to have the opportunity to run 10 to 20 pre-'85 Trek frames (with full Wisconsin frames, not the Japanese rear triangles) through an X-ray machine. I'll bet that a lot of those nice shorelines are as a result of insufficient brass penetration, especially on the brake bridges, which I've noted are prone to failure.

No offense to JohnDThompson intended.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 01:10 AM
  #18  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by luker
I rode with a guy that rode that bike, for several years. I know the back end of that blue 610 as well as anything, and it didn't have a dual position brake mount. Cool idea, though.
and it made it way from Idaho to South Florida? Pretty amazing
EjustE is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 06:06 AM
  #19  
afraid of whales
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles Wahl
...Why would one need to go back and forth between 27“ and 700C wheels? Choose one and ride on!
Back in the day, people rode wire-ons and sew-ups on the same bike. 700C wasn't universal for wire-ons (in fact, rare until the early 80s), if your bike came with nice 27" wheels you might just have ridden them weekdays and your sew-up wheels on weekends. Just so ya know how things worked before brake cables where hidden
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 06:12 AM
  #20  
afraid of whales
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
...I will, however, say that I'd give anything to have the opportunity to run 10 to 20 pre-'85 Trek frames (with full Wisconsin frames, not the Japanese rear triangles) through an X-ray machine. I'll bet that a lot of those nice shorelines are as a result of insufficient brass penetration, especially on the brake bridges, which I've noted are prone to failure....
No worse than the 70's Paramounts...I saw the 8 year warrenty backlog in 80-82 up close, there was some ugly brazing and mis-matched tubeset coming from the UAW workers, that's why they shut it down and moved out of state...it was beyond hope.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 09:01 AM
  #21  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr IGH
No worse than the 70's Paramounts...I saw the 8 year warrenty backlog in 80-82 up close,
Chicago or Don Mainland frames? I'd bet the former. My '61 is unquestionably a Chicago machine (Mainland hadn't been contracted yet at that time), while my Superior is equally known to be a Don Mainland frame. If the craftsmanship between Chicago and Mainland remained on par with my two reference points, one can quickly tell a Mainland frameset from the Chicago work. If look squarely at the Chicago frames, the off-and-on sloppiness is apparent.

Originally Posted by Mr IGH
there was some ugly brazing and mis-matched tubeset coming from the UAW workers, that's why they shut it down and moved out of state...it was beyond hope.
Anyone mention that some Columbus bits worked their way onto the supposedly all-531 Superiors?

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 09:08 AM
  #22  
afraid of whales
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Chicago or Don Mainland frames?
Whatever was in the backlog, Schwinn didn't do any warrenty work for several years through the early eighties. I worked at the shop that cleared all the warrenty backlog while Schwinn moved production the Waterford.

Most 70's era frames have their bad examples, Masi, Colango, Bob Jackson, Raleigh, etc. I remember when Raleigh released 753 tubing and wouldn't sell it until they trained the builder in a brand new brazing technique...silver It's very difficult to have complete brazing penetration when brass is used, esp in the BB.

Last edited by Mr IGH; 02-21-10 at 09:11 AM.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 02-21-10, 09:54 PM
  #23  
juneeaa memba!
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: boogled up in...Idaho!
Posts: 5,632

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by EjustE
and it made it way from Idaho to South Florida? Pretty amazing
sorry for the lax grammer: "I rode with a guy that rode that model of bike..." Would have been clearer.

I did buy one from Florida a few years ago, though.
luker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
leftthread
Classic & Vintage
7
08-07-18 07:55 AM
cs1
General Cycling Discussion
85
02-08-17 09:18 AM
DropDeadFred
Road Cycling
59
02-10-12 09:27 PM
tsegu
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
0
08-19-10 03:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.