Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

How big is too big of a frame?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

How big is too big of a frame?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-10, 11:35 PM
  #26  
Bottecchia fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520

Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
I'm 5' 10" with short legs and long torso. I have a 32" inseam measured Rivendell style). My favorite bike is my Bottecchia Grand Turismo. It's a 23" (58.5 cm) with a 73.5 degree seat tube angle. It's "square" so it also has a 58.5 cm top tube. I use a 105mm stem. I can just straddle it with shoes on and the top tube in contact with my pubic bone. My several other bikes are all slightly smaller, about 22" and are quite comfortable as well but not as much as the Gran Turismo. My Bianchi's are both much smaller (55cm for the Veloce and 53cm for the Pista though it has a high bottom bracket) but they both have proportionally longer top tubes so essentially they fit the same as the others but with more seat post showing. I don't find it bothers anything that I don't have clearance at the top tube. If I do crash I'll be falling off the saddle and landing on the top tube so I doubt an inch of clearance is going to help. And I've already had a vasectomy so no problem there
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Kommisar89 is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 12:38 AM
  #27  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by auchencrow
There is a flip side to the Top Tube terror that inexperienced male riders experience - and that is, on a smaller bike, one has further to fall.
My apologies. Pure BS.
RFC is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 12:39 AM
  #28  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by EjustE
Use of a bike is a huge factor in both sizing and adjusting (ie. determining stem size and seatpost position) a bike to "fit". For road bikes, TT length (or more accurately saddle to handlebar length) is more important that ST length. I am riding 4 road bikes that vary in size from 51 to 57 cm (ST C-C) but their TT+stem are within one or two cms. My do it all mule and long distance bike (not included in the above count), has a longer TT

As far as stand-over height goes... I suspect that a lot of men really want to avoid the possibility of an involuntary vasectomy without anesthesia in a hard stop, thus the recommendation for straddling over the TT. And, frankly, it all depends on how experienced a rider is (so he can avoid such an unfortunate close encounter with the top tube.) If you think you are good enough to deal with a close encounter, more power to you, but if you try to size a novice cyclist...
+1 Best advice in this thread.
RFC is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 01:37 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Your feet won't be the only sore thing if you're riding a bike that big. Sooner or later, probably at the worst possible time,...
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 05:32 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
A frame that is so tall that your crotch is smashed into the top bar is too big, and DANGEROUS. Your frame should be at least one inch (25.4 mm) shorter than your crotch height. You will usually find that a little smaller than your normal size will work better than slightly larger. A ROUGH estimate of proper size would be something like: your leg length minus 10 inches. So a 33 in. inseam = about 23 inch frame, or 58 cm. One cm smaller would be about right as well. Anything much larger would be too large.
bikerosity57 is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 05:34 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
32inch inseam should = about 56 cm. 55 wouldn't be too small. 60, or 62 would be WAY too large
bikerosity57 is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 05:36 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
It's probably the quality frame materials and angles etc... that make the frame so nice.
bikerosity57 is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 06:04 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Bikedued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,963
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 60 Posts
[QUOTE=BigPolishJimmy;10596465]
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll
try these to give you a bit more clearance.
...QUOTE]





...and then I suppose you have to make sure your bicycles bags match?
At least the wrap would be easy to match up, hehe.,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
Bikedued is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 09:51 AM
  #34  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bikerosity57
32inch inseam should = about 56 cm. 55 wouldn't be too small. 60, or 62 would be WAY too large
Its really about body proportions more than straight numbers. I'm 5'10 with a 32" Inseam and my ideal frame size is somewhere around 59cm because it gives me top tube length I desire.

Different Manufacturers and Models have different Top Tube to Seat Tube relationships in terms of length...that makes it hard to pin down a size based on seat tube length....Knowing both the Seat tube and Top Tube length gives you a much better picture of how things are gonna fit.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 10:05 AM
  #35  
low end rider
 
riva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 780

Bikes: 80's. hoarder.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 37 Posts
When you have to place your torso under the top tube in order to pedal, the frame is too big.
riva is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 10:24 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Walfredo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 101

Bikes: 83 Trek 620

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Problem solved. Buy said bike and give to me. I'm 6' 3" and it sounds perfect for me.
Walfredo is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 12:28 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Bottom bracket height can also affect frame sizing. A high BB will have a shorter C-C distance to the top tube.

Rim size and tire OD can alsoaffect frame sizing - large diameter rims and high profile tires dictate a smaller frame is needed.

The real key is stand-over height. You have to be able to straddle the bike without hitting your crotch on the top tube. It's as simple as that. If you cannot do that, the frame is too big. It doesn't matter how much you might like the frame, it is just too big for you.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 04:44 PM
  #38  
Elitest Murray Owner
 
Mos6502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657

Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Stand over height. It is important.

But it is of relative importance. I would never ride a bike I could not stand over for commuting -because I'm going to have to stand over the bike at red lights, waiting for turns, and sometimes just when I'm stuck in traffic and there are no apparent escape routes....

On the other hand if I was say going for a long ride out away from the city, then having a slightly oversize bike wouldn't be much of a hassle or safety concern.

In any event, the stand over height is the only fixed measurement of the bike (that pertains to rider fit), unlike handle bars and seat which can be adjusted to different positions, or stems that can be replaced to alter reach. So it IS important in that once you've chosen it, you have to stick with it.

And of course if you just collect bikes and hang them on the wall, then any size you like is right.
Mos6502 is offline  
Old 03-30-10, 06:17 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I understand your point but I disagree entirely. The safety concern exists at all times. Accidents happen. Things break. Stuff goes wrong. It happens. If you get dumped down off the seat it is going to hurt - maybe more, maybe less but it WILL get your attention.

When you are riding casually, as you suggest, it is no problem to slide off the seat and over to one side and let your thigh straddle the top tube. That's easy to do and you have plenty of time to effect the maneuver. But when the stuff hits the rotary air circulation device,...

Well, they are your future children at risk, not mine. :-)
Mike Mills is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jcl1988
General Cycling Discussion
14
09-23-15 11:54 AM
rms13
Fitting Your Bike
6
06-16-15 02:37 PM
hamster
Road Cycling
22
07-09-12 11:33 PM
ruskiantonov
Road Cycling
3
10-02-11 11:54 PM
bus_ter
Road Cycling
11
06-08-11 02:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.