Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Spec'ing A Frame

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Spec'ing A Frame

Old 06-18-10, 01:26 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Spec'ing A Frame

I wish that people would give the fundamental measurements of a bike frame when they offer it for sale.

Wheelbase - a 39" wheelbase is a "responsive" bike, some would say "twitchy". A 42" is going to be a bit more "relaxed". Fork rake and trail would also help, but I understand these are more esoteric concepts. :-)

Stand-over Height - seat tube length is meaningless unless it is tied to a bottom bracket height and wheel diameter. What is critically important (to the family jewels) is stand over height. To some extent, I could care less about top tube length (within reason), as I can fit the bike with whatever stem length is required.

Frame's wheel size - absolutely essential to know so one can understand if they have the proper set of brakes to put on the frame. If a frame was designed for 27" wheel but you have 700c, the brakes you're planning/hoping to use may not work. You'll never know until you get your hands on the frame.

Last edited by Mike Mills; 06-18-10 at 01:44 AM.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 03:00 AM
  #2  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,246
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
You can always ask. If the seller doesn't know, move on!
khatfull is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:44 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,851

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
There's a lot of difference of opinion on what measurements are in fact the most important, and I think the reasons for most of them are at least as good as yours are. It boils down to personal preference. I think the best you can do is to ask for the numbers you want, AND for pictures, at least a side elevation that lets you see the proportions. Over time I've learned to guesstimate most of what I want to know based on that picture, combined with a few facts.

Also consider that many sellers don't know anywhere near what we on-line bike freaks know (yes, even us!), and will never give you the numbers you need. However, this doesn't diminish the desirability of what they're selling.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 06:31 AM
  #4  
Bianchi Goddess
 
Bianchigirll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 29,682

Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.

Mentioned: 190 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2896 Post(s)
Liked 2,784 Times in 1,441 Posts
if 39 is 'twitchy' what would you call a 37.5 wheelbase?

I have to admit *blushing* I am guilty of this. I have a frame on ebay and I put the size but forgot to put any TT, WB, CS info on it.

even worse I listed a pair of hubs and never put the drilling
__________________
One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"

Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Bianchigirll is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 08:52 AM
  #5  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,536

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
i agree with Road Fan, the 'important' measurements are different for different folks. Personally I'm not terribly concerned with standover height, I'm much more concerned with Top Tube length.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 09:27 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
bobbycorno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
For me, seat tube and top tube. Wheelbase doesn't tell me much: the most stable, rock solid bike I've ever ridden has a 38.5" wheelbase (on a 63cm frame!).

SP
Bend, OR
bobbycorno is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 09:35 AM
  #7  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,561

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 948 Times in 620 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Mills
I wish that people would give the fundamental measurements of a bike frame when they offer it for sale.
I actually prefer to buy from sellers that can't seem to work a tape measure, can't take a good picture, can't read the model name off the frame, and are really slow to return emails. Why? Because those are often the best deals, sometimes incredible deals. One great deal I got was on a nice road bike, where the seller couldn't figure out how to put air in the tires (he thought they were defective, the bike had Presta valves).

A really sophisticated seller will likely know their values well too, and the price is almost always higher.

The bicycle market is very inefficient, the person with the most knowledge usually wins. I would rather be that person.

Last edited by wrk101; 06-18-10 at 09:38 AM.
wrk101 is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 09:38 AM
  #8  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,581
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
how about head and seat angles, as well ? Or seat post diameter

Realistically, I do not trust most sellers (on ebay or CL) to know how to measure a bike. Most (non-flipper) sellers (and a good amount of flippers) see a bike like something that needs to be sold, like a used window airconditioner or something that takes space. Unless they are enthusiasts. And in that case, expect higher prices.

Here is what I do: If I am to buy a bike for personal use from a CL ad, I always bring a measuring tape, and take it from there. If it is an ebay bike (and I bought just one bike and one frameset on ebay for personal use) I figure out the size and then I look up the charts, or base it on personal experience by eyeballing it. If it is a bike I do not intend to keep, I assume that it will not fit me and if it does, it is a bonus.
EjustE is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 09:41 AM
  #9  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by wrk101
I actually prefer to buy from sellers that can't seem to work a tape measure, can't take a good picture, can't read the model name off the frame, and are really slow to return emails. Why? Because those are often the best deals, sometimes incredible deals. One great deal I got was on a nice road bike, where the seller couldn't figure out how to put air in the tires (he thought they were defective, the bike had Presta valves).

A really sophisticated seller will likely know their values well too, and the price is almost always higher.

The bicycle market is very inefficient, the person with the most knowledge usually wins. I would rather be that person.
As usual, you offer excellent insights. That's exactly how I got great deals on the Team Miyata and Trek 660.
RFC is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 12:46 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
When I was preparing the list above, I was trying to get to the very fundamental measurements that all sellers should be able to make.

Simple things such as wheel base and how high off the ground the top tube is can be directly measured. Wheel size can be determined by reading the sidewall of the tire. Anyone of average intelligence can do these things.

1. Spin the crank to get the pedals out of the way, point the front wheel straight ahead and measure the wheelbase using a tape measure.

2. Measure the vertical height from the top of the top tube to the ground with that same tape measure.

3. Read the sidewall of the tire and report the tire size.


Tube lengths, frame angles, stay lengths, etc are more esoteric and did not make my list. Some of you know enough to report these but I do not expect the average Joe to do so.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 01:43 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,755

Bikes: Miele Azsora, Kuwahara Cascade

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It is probably because 98% of buyers don't give a crap about any of those measurements.

Just go look at the damn bike!
jtgotsjets is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 03:11 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jtgotsjets
It is probably because 98% of buyers don't give a crap about any of those measurements.

Just go look at the damn bike!

I think we are on totally different wavelengths in regards to this, jt. Are you suggesting I drive across town to look at any/every frame I'm interested in? Most are in a completely different part of the country (i.e., New Hampshire versus California), sometimes in different nations (Canada, UK).
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,671

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
When offering a bicycle for sale on Ebay, I always list the frame specs. Perhaps not every person would be interested, but many are. This thread is, perhaps, some evidence to support my opinion on this. I don't know about anyone else, for sure, but I would want to know those numbers before I buy a bike I cannot sit on and/or test ride.
randyjawa is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 03:34 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,755

Bikes: Miele Azsora, Kuwahara Cascade

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Mills
I think we are on totally different wavelengths in regards to this, jt. Are you suggesting I drive across town to look at any/every frame I'm interested in? Most are in a completely different part of the country (i.e., New Hampshire versus California), sometimes in different nations (Canada, UK).
Sorry, for some reason I thought we were primarily discussing local craigslist bikes.

Although uneducated sellers is not something I would really complain about anyway.
jtgotsjets is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 04:04 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
No apologies needed, this whole topic is just a rant, anyway. It's okay to rant in a rant thread.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 04:15 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
i agree with Road Fan, the 'important' measurements are different for different folks. Personally I'm not terribly concerned with standover height, I'm much more concerned with Top Tube length.
Zaphod, there's probably something here I need to learn or remember:

Why are you more concerned about top tube length when stem length is so easily changed?

How do you avoid being concerned about stand over height?
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 04:46 PM
  #17  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,536

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mike, I might be alone on this one and I don't pretend to have any scientific methods or anything backing me up....but here's my reasoning:

I feel like there's a difference in the ride of a smaller frame bike with a long stem versus a bike thats larger with a shorter stem. I like to stretch my upper body out when I ride, and I prefer the feel of a larger frame over a smaller one...so I prefer a long top tube.

You're right that I could take a 58cm frame and with a longer stem make the saddle to bar distance equal to that of a 61cm with a shorter stem. To me the larger frame would feel better, will have a little more give to it, and ya know everything on the frame is a little bigger too so I feel like it changes the ride...at least enough for me to prefer a larger frame.

I don't get concerned over standover height unless my feet don't reach the pedals when the seat is all the way down. I never stand flat footed on the ground with the bike straight up and down underneath me and I have yet to run into an emergency stop situation where I was required to come to a stop and stand in that position. I love my nads as much as any other dude...If I thought riding a big frame was endangering 'em I'd probably ride smaller frames.

like I said though... this is my preference. I don't expect anybody else to feel the same way.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 04:54 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
ftwelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Posts: 3,091

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Mills
Zaphod, there's probably something here I need to learn or remember:

Why are you more concerned about top tube length when stem length is so easily changed?

How do you avoid being concerned about stand over height?
I can't answer for him but I really am not comfortable on a TT shorter than 570. To me the stem sort of goes with the head angle fork combo, not as a top tube fixer. Just my opinion.
ftwelder is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:08 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Zaphod,

I wonder if the "feel" of the longer top tube derives from what must be a longer wheelbase that goes with that longer top tube. Long tube/short stem or short tube/long stem, either would let you stretch out your torso. One, however, would have the fronbt wheel a lot closer to the rear wheel than the other (all other things being equal).

On top of that, it may be that frames with long top tubes are generically designed with shallower angles, longer stays, etc, hence, they have a certain "feel" to them.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:39 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,315
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3447 Post(s)
Liked 2,786 Times in 1,967 Posts
Originally Posted by Bianchigirll
if 39 is 'twitchy' what would you call a 37.5 wheelbase?
I had a bike with a 37.25" wheelbase. Can you say toe clip overlap? Actually for what is was intended for, it was great, but not my only bike at the time. Short rear triangle, if the builder had not filed a bit off the lower portion of the horizontal dropouts... I would have had to deflate a tire to change a rear wheel. As it was no Del Mundo's for that bike. High bottom bracket, this was when Campagnolo pedals reigned supreme, a high bottom bracket (11") was needed to get pedaling through a corner. Not needed today. While it was a great criterium weapon, I did not keep it. They had their place, their time has past.

Last edited by repechage; 06-18-10 at 05:40 PM. Reason: missing word
repechage is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:42 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,315
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3447 Post(s)
Liked 2,786 Times in 1,967 Posts
Wheel base falls where it will after the other things are in place. To get a better handle on a bikes nature the front center dimension and top tube length tell me more.
repechage is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:49 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,315
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3447 Post(s)
Liked 2,786 Times in 1,967 Posts
Originally Posted by ftwelder
I can't answer for him but I really am not comfortable on a TT shorter than 570. To me the stem sort of goes with the head angle fork combo, not as a top tube fixer. Just my opinion.
There has been an evolution on what is the "correct" stem extension. Gios was one of the promoters of the short top tube, torsos did not suddenly become shorter, so they were pushing longer extensions. This places more weight over the front wheel, it changes the basic handling and envelope that one lives in between the wheels. Pinarello followed suit, even Colnago moved that way. DeRosa much later, and Merckx even later, and not for the full line. Better? Well, it is different, I tend to like normal angle bikes where my stem is 110mm and the seat in the correct position. Indeed everyone will be different.
repechage is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:50 PM
  #23  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,536

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mike I wish I knew more about frame design and could say for certain what it is, but I'd say any combination of the things you listed could be the reason. Wheelbase makes alot of sense to me.

I also agree completely with ftwelder on this point
to me the stem sort of goes with the head angle fork combo, not as a top tube fixer.
also I think really short and really long stems look silly.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 05:56 PM
  #24  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,536

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
This places more weight over the front wheel, it changes the basic handling and envelope that one lives in between the wheels.
that also makes a lot of sense as to why it would affect the handling.

I do recognize the flip side of the coin for racers...smaller frame, less material...lighter.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 06-18-10, 06:56 PM
  #25  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,407 Times in 908 Posts
I follow Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yosemite Sam
Fitting Your Bike
16
09-16-13 11:43 AM
Alfred31
Framebuilders
7
05-20-13 09:11 AM
hurricane_dave
Commuting
5
06-22-10 07:21 AM
DisplayERROR
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
10
06-13-10 08:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.